CSEN 주가 전망 및 ETF 분석 - 배당·운용보수·보유종목·NAV·RSI·MACD

CSEN

Cohen& Steers Future of Energy Active ETF

7월 28일 4:00 PM ET (한국 7/29 05:00)

$24.01

-0.39 ▼ -1.61%

🌙 7월 28일 4:10 PM ET (한국 7/29 05:10)

$24.00

+0.00 +0.00%

CSEN ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

Total Expense Ratio

0.8%

Annual operating cost

Net Assets (AUM)

$181M

약 2483억원

Holdings

40 items

Dividend Yield

0.33%

Management Style

Active

Category ⓘ	Global or ExUS Equities - Industry Sector	Asset Type ⓘ	Equities (Stocks)	Return% 1Y ⓘ	-	Total Holdings ⓘ	40	Perf Week ⓘ	-2.38%
ETF Type ⓘ	Global Equities	Active/Passive ⓘ	Active	Return% 3Y ⓘ	-	AUM ⓘ	$181M	Perf Month ⓘ	0.88%
Expense ⓘ	0.8%	NAV ⓘ	$24.40	Return% 5Y ⓘ	-	52W High ⓘ	-4.95%	Perf Quarter ⓘ	-
Dividend TTM ⓘ	$0.08 (0.33%)	Div Gr. 3/5Y ⓘ	-	Return% 10Y ⓘ	-	52W Low ⓘ	3.31%	Perf Half Y ⓘ	-
Flows% 1M ⓘ	-1.94%	Flows% YTD ⓘ	-1.94%	Return% SI ⓘ	-5.97%	Volatility(W/M) ⓘ	1.03% 1.03%	Perf YTD ⓘ	-2%
SMA20 ⓘ	-0.37%	SMA50 ⓘ	-0.31%	SMA200 ⓘ	-0.31%	RSI (14) ⓘ	43.61	Beta ⓘ	-
IPO ⓘ	2026/6/16	Prev Close ⓘ	$24.4	Perf Year ⓘ	-	Avg Volume ⓘ	0.03M	Price ⓘ	$24.01

📊 Cohen& Steers Future of Energy Active ETF (CSEN) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

Cohen& Steers Future of Energy Active ETF · Global or ExUS Equities - Industry Sector

액티브 운용 — 펀드매니저가 종목을 선별해 초과수익 추구

📘 CSEN ETF 자세히 알아보기 →

GlobalequityMLPenergy

규모: $181M 약 2483억원
운용사: -
운용 방식: 액티브 (운용사 재량)
상장일: 2026년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Above-average cost — 0.8% annually

Expense ratio is higher than the Global or ExUS Equities - Industry Sector median. Compare against similar ETFs.

Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)

하위 25%

0.8%

My positionBottom 25%

Low range Average High range

Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount

$100.0M

Annual Expense Ratio

$800K

Pay $220K more per year vs. category average

Category Median Annual Cost

$580K

Based on expense ratio of 0.58%

10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)

$14.2M

14.7% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees

💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Cheaper alternatives in the same category

HAUZ

Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF

0.10%

-0.70%p annually

VNQI

Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF

0.12%

-0.68%p annually

PBPH

Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF

0.13%

-0.67%p annually

* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Insufficient return data

This ETF is either too recently listed or does not yet have enough disclosed return data. Please refer to ETFs that have been operating for more than one year.

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade

Low Risk

Less volatile than the market average, making it relatively easy to hold over time.

Average daily range (last 1 month)

평균권

±1.03%

S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more

ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.

Dividend Analysis

Yield · Dividend history · After-tax income calculator

Pays dividends, but at a relatively low rate — 0.33% annually

Closer to a blend of growth and dividends.

배당수익률

0.33%

주당 배당

$0.08

연간 기준

5년 성장률

지급 주기

—

최근 12개월 기준

💰 내가 $100K 투자한다면

연간 배당금 (세후) $283

5년 누적 (세후) $1K

* 환율 1 가정, 배당소득세 15% 반영. 5년 누적은 배당 성장률 연 0% 가정.

* Qualified dividend middle-bracket approximation. Actual rate varies by total income.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

Strengths and weaknesses both present Check the fit below to see whether it matches your investing goal.

🎯 목적별 적합도

내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.

🌳

장기 보유

수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때

보통

💵

배당 인컴

매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때

매우 낮음

⚡

단기 트레이딩

며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매

낮음

🧩

포트폴리오 보조

자산 배분·헤지 용도

낮음

👤

이런 분에게 어울려요

Investors who believe in active strategies

✅ 강점

뚜렷한 강점이 드러나지 않아요.

⚠️ 약점·주의사항

💸Expense ratio is somewhat high — 0.8% annually

Category Peers

Category: Global or ExUS Equities - Industry Sector

같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 6/6위

카테고리: Global or ExUS Equities - Industry Sector

ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?

같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 CSEN보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 CSEN보다 불리를 뜻해요.

티커	ETF명	보수율	AUM	보유종목	배당률	YTD	1년
CSEN	Cohen& Steers Future of Energy Active ETF	0.8%	$181M	40	0.33%	-2.00%	-
SMH	VanEck Semiconductor ETF	0.35% ▲	$63.6B ▲	26	0.21% ▼	-	+81.43%
DRAM	Roundhill Memory ETF	0.65% ▲	$25.0B ▲	21	-	-	-
GDX	VanEck Gold Miners ETF	0.51% ▲	$23.1B ▲	61	0.85% ▲	-	+41.11%
CIBR	First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	0.58% ▲	$14.0B ▲	44	0.44% ▲	-	+20.15%
IXN	iShares Global Tech ETF	0.39% ▲	$8.3B ▲	144	0.27% ▼	-	+35.42%

AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ CSEN보다 유리 · ▼ CSEN보다 불리

Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme

ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy

1 ETFs tracking the same theme as CSEN using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 1)

Not direct derivatives of CSEN, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.

ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?

Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with CSEN, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.

⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding

Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.

📈 Leverage 1 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)