XQQI 주가 전망 및 ETF 분석 - 배당·운용보수·보유종목·NAV·RSI·MACD

XQQI

NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF

7월 28일 4:00 PM ET (한국 7/29 05:00)

$46.12

-0.68 ▼ -1.45%

🌙 7월 28일 7:43 PM ET (한국 7/29 08:43)

$46.86

+0.73 ▲ +1.59%

XQQI ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

Total Expense Ratio

0.98%

Annual operating cost

Net Assets (AUM)

$244M

약 3343억원

Holdings

108 items

Dividend Yield

11.03%

Management Style

Active

Category ⓘ	Equity - Leveraged / Inverse	Asset Type ⓘ	Equities (Stocks)	Return% 1Y ⓘ	-	Total Holdings ⓘ	108	Perf Week ⓘ	-6.88%
ETF Type ⓘ	US Equity Income	Active/Passive ⓘ	Active	Return% 3Y ⓘ	-	AUM ⓘ	$244M	Perf Month ⓘ	-8.8%
Expense ⓘ	0.98%	NAV ⓘ	$46.74	Return% 5Y ⓘ	-	52W High ⓘ	-15.68%	Perf Quarter ⓘ	-7.09%
Dividend TTM ⓘ	$5.09 (11.03%)	Div Gr. 3/5Y ⓘ	-	Return% 10Y ⓘ	-	52W Low ⓘ	10.65%	Perf Half Y ⓘ	-
Flows% 1M ⓘ	16.33%	Flows% YTD ⓘ	-	Return% SI ⓘ	11.51%	Volatility(W/M) ⓘ	2.35% 2.24%	Perf YTD ⓘ	-8.13%
SMA20 ⓘ	-7.02%	SMA50 ⓘ	-9.88%	SMA200 ⓘ	-6.13%	RSI (14) ⓘ	34.01	Beta ⓘ	-
IPO ⓘ	2026/2/3	Prev Close ⓘ	$46.8	Perf Year ⓘ	-	Avg Volume ⓘ	0.28M	Price ⓘ	$46.12

📊 NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF · Equity - Leveraged / Inverse

배당 인컴형 — 꾸준한 배당 수익 목적의 배당주 바구니

NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF는 세금 효율적인 방식으로 높은 월간 수익을 창출하는 동시에 주가 상승 참여를 목표로 합니다. 나스닥 100 지수 구성 종목 포트폴리오를 운영하면서 추가적으로 합성 옵션 전략을 통해 노출도를 약 150% 수준으로 높이고, 커버드콜 전략을 병행하여 인컴 수익을 추구합니다.

📘 XQQI ETF 자세히 알아보기 →

U.S.equityNasdaq100options

규모: $244M 약 3343억원
운용사: NEOS
운용 방식: 액티브 (운용사 재량)
상장일: 2026년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Average expense ratio — 0.98% annually

Mid-range within the Equity - Leveraged / Inverse category.

Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)

평균권

0.98%

My positionMid-range

Low range Average High range

Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount

$100.0M

Annual Expense Ratio

$980K

Pay $10K more per year vs. category average

Category Median Annual Cost

$970K

Based on expense ratio of 0.97%

10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)

$17.3M

17.9% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees

💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Cheaper alternatives in the same category

TOPW

Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF

0.32%

-0.66%p annually

FNGU

MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs

0.35%

-0.63%p annually

SPDN

Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1X ETF

0.48%

-0.50%p annually

* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Insufficient return data

This ETF is either too recently listed or does not yet have enough disclosed return data. Please refer to ETFs that have been operating for more than one year.

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade

Low Risk

Less volatile than the market average, making it relatively easy to hold over time.

Average daily range (last 1 month)

상위 25%

±2.24%

S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more

Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)

ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.

Max Drawdown · Past 10 years

-14.2%

Drawdown duration: 2 months

2026-06-02 → 2026-07-28

Still recovering

2026-02-03 Worst -6% 2026-07-01

ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.

Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)

0.04

Weak — Low risk-adjusted returns

ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.

Dividend Analysis

Yield · Dividend history · After-tax income calculator

Dividend-paying ETF — 11.03% annually

An ETF that provides consistent dividend income.

ℹ️ This ETF is designed for dividend income. Distributions mainly come from dividends paid by its holdings, plus a small amount of interest, making them relatively stable.

배당수익률

11.03%

주당 배당

$5.09

연간 기준

5년 성장률

지급 주기

분기배당

2월 · 3월 · 4월

💰 내가 $100K 투자한다면

연간 배당금 (세후) $9K

5년 누적 (세후) $47K

* 환율 1 가정, 배당소득세 15% 반영. 5년 누적은 배당 성장률 연 0% 가정.

* Qualified dividend middle-bracket approximation. Actual rate varies by total income.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

Strengths and weaknesses both present Check the fit below to see whether it matches your investing goal.

🎯 목적별 적합도

내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.

🌳

장기 보유

수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때

적합

💵

배당 인컴

매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때

매우 적합

⚡

단기 트레이딩

며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매

매우 낮음

🧩

포트폴리오 보조

자산 배분·헤지 용도

보통

👤

이런 분에게 어울려요

Investors who want consistent dividend income

✅ 강점

🛡️Below-average volatility

⚠️ 약점·주의사항

특별한 약점이 보이지 않아요.

Portfolio Composition

What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings

배당주 중심 포트폴리오

주로 배당을 꾸준히 지급하는 기업들로 구성되어 있어요.

ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?

ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.

🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기

총 보유종목

107개

상위 10개 비중

48.3%

최대 단일 종목

8.96%

집중도(HHI)

330

낮음 (분산)

🥧 섹터 비중

Technology

51.1% +21%p

Communication Services

16.2% +7%p

Consumer Cyclical

12.5%

Consumer Defensive

8.5%

Healthcare

5.0% -6%p

Industrials

3.3% -5%p

Utilities

1.5%

Basic Materials

1.3%

Energy

0.6% -3%p

Financial

0.3% -13%p

Real Estate

0.1%

S&P 500보다 많이 투자 (+3%p 이상) S&P 500보다 적게 투자 (-3%p 이상)

📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 48.3% 차지

티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)

#1 NVDA NVIDIA Corp

8.96%

#2 AAPL Apple Inc

7.85%

#3 MSFT Microsoft Corp

6.01%

#4 AMZN Amazon.com Inc

4.68%

#5 TSLA Tesla Inc

3.88%

#6 GOOG Alphabet Inc

3.55%

#7 META Meta Platforms Inc

3.49%

#8 WMT Walmart Inc

3.49%

#9 GOOGL Alphabet Inc

3.28%

#10 AVGO Broadcom Inc

3.12%

Category Peers

Category: Equity - Leveraged / Inverse

같은 카테고리 3종 중 AUM 1/3위 · 보수율 1/3위

카테고리: Equity - Leveraged / Inverse

ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?

같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 XQQI보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 XQQI보다 불리를 뜻해요.

티커	ETF명	보수율	AUM	보유종목	배당률	YTD	1년
XQQI	NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	0.98%	$244M	108	11.03%	-8.13%	-
XSPI	NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF	0.98%	$79M ▼	509	8.46% ▼	-	-
MST	Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF	1.31% ▼	$14M ▼	11	985.89% ▲	-	-98.24%

AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ XQQI보다 유리 · ▼ XQQI보다 불리

Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme

ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy

21 ETFs tracking the same theme as XQQI using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 8 · Inverse 5 · Covered Call 8)

Not direct derivatives of XQQI, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.

ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?

Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with XQQI, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.

⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding

Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.

📈 Leverage 8 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)