BKFI 주가 전망 및 ETF 분석 - 배당·운용보수·보유종목·NAV·RSI·MACD

BKFI

BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF

7월 27일 3:59 PM ET (한국 7/28 04:59)

$23.64

+0.07 ▲ +0.28%

🌙 7월 28일 4:05 PM ET (한국 7/29 05:05)

$23.57

-0.07 ▼ -0.28%

BKFI ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

Total Expense Ratio

0.4%

Annual operating cost

Net Assets (AUM)

$250M

약 3424억원

Holdings

284 items

Dividend Yield

2.15%

Management Style

Active

Category ⓘ	Bonds - Broad Market	Asset Type ⓘ	Bonds	Return% 1Y ⓘ	-	Total Holdings ⓘ	284	Perf Week ⓘ	0.19%
ETF Type ⓘ	Global Bonds	Active/Passive ⓘ	Active	Return% 3Y ⓘ	-	AUM ⓘ	$250M	Perf Month ⓘ	-1.48%
Expense ⓘ	0.4%	NAV ⓘ	$23.62	Return% 5Y ⓘ	-	52W High ⓘ	-3.81%	Perf Quarter ⓘ	-1.73%
Dividend TTM ⓘ	$0.51 (2.15%)	Div Gr. 3/5Y ⓘ	-	Return% 10Y ⓘ	-	52W Low ⓘ	3.57%	Perf Half Y ⓘ	-2.64%
Flows% 1M ⓘ	-3.67%	Flows% YTD ⓘ	-34.34%	Return% SI ⓘ	-1.35%	Volatility(W/M) ⓘ	1.36% 0.59%	Perf YTD ⓘ	-2.66%
SMA20 ⓘ	-0.2%	SMA50 ⓘ	-0.55%	SMA200 ⓘ	-1.51%	RSI (14) ⓘ	45.4	Beta ⓘ	-
IPO ⓘ	2026/1/12	Prev Close ⓘ	$23.57	Perf Year ⓘ	-	Avg Volume ⓘ	0.05M	Price ⓘ	$23.64

📊 BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF (BKFI) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF · Bonds - Broad Market

채권형 — 채권 ETF (만기 미상)

The BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF is an actively managed fund that seeks total returns through a diversified portfolio of investment-grade fixed income securities. The strategy employs fundamental credit research and sector analysis to take advantage of pricing inefficiencies across government, corporate, and structured bond markets while maintaining a moderate duration profile.

📘 BKFI ETF 자세히 알아보기 →

U.S.fixed-incomebondsgovernment-bonds

규모: $250M 약 3424억원
운용사: BNY Mellon
운용 방식: 액티브 (운용사 재량)
상장일: 2026년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Average expense ratio — 0.4% annually

Mid-range within the Bonds - Broad Market category.

Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)

평균권

0.4%

My positionMid-range

Low range Average High range

Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount

$100.0M

Annual Expense Ratio

$400K

Pay $40K more per year vs. category average

Category Median Annual Cost

$360K

Based on expense ratio of 0.36%

10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)

$7.2M

7.5% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees

💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Cheaper alternatives in the same category

BND

Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF

0.03%

-0.37%p annually

AGG

iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF

0.03%

-0.37%p annually

BSV

Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF

0.03%

-0.37%p annually

* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Insufficient return data

This ETF is either too recently listed or does not yet have enough disclosed return data. Please refer to ETFs that have been operating for more than one year.

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade

Bond Benchmark

Bond ETFs are naturally less volatile than stocks, so it only makes sense to compare them with other bond ETFs. You should also factor in the inverse relationship between interest rates and bond prices.

🏦 Bond ETFs — Low volatility and low Beta are the norm

Bonds have far lower volatility than stocks, and a lower Beta versus equity benchmarks. An "stable" rating is the natural result; meaningful comparison should be made against bond indices (e.g., AGG/TLT).

Average daily range (last 1 month)

하위 5%

±0.59%

S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more

Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)

ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.

Max Drawdown · Past 10 years

-3.3%

Drawdown duration: 5 months

2026-02-27 → 2026-07-23

Still recovering

2026-01-12 Worst -5% 2026-07-01

ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.

Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)

-1.19

Poor — Underperforms the risk-free rate

ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.

Dividend Analysis

Yield · Dividend history · After-tax income calculator

Bond distribution — 2.15% annually

Coupon interest is the primary source.

ℹ️ Bond ETF distributions are mostly coupon income. Distributions may rise when interest rates increase, but this should be considered alongside the resulting price decline.

배당수익률

2.15%

주당 배당

$0.51

연간 기준

5년 성장률

지급 주기

분기배당

2월 · 3월 · 4월

💰 내가 $100K 투자한다면

연간 배당금 (세후) $2K

5년 누적 (세후) $9K

* 환율 1 가정, 배당소득세 15% 반영. 5년 누적은 배당 성장률 연 0% 가정.

* Qualified dividend middle-bracket approximation. Actual rate varies by total income.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

Strengths and weaknesses both present Check the fit below to see whether it matches your investing goal.

🎯 목적별 적합도

내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.

🌳

장기 보유

수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때

낮음

💵

배당 인컴

매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때

적합

⚡

단기 트레이딩

며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매

매우 낮음

🧩

포트폴리오 보조

자산 배분·헤지 용도

매우 적합

👤

이런 분에게 어울려요

Investors seeking portfolio stability

✅ 강점

뚜렷한 강점이 드러나지 않아요.

⚠️ 약점·주의사항

⚠️Very high volatility — invest only with capital you can hold for the long term

Category Peers

Category: Bonds - Broad Market

같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 6/6위

카테고리: Bonds - Broad Market

ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?

같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 BKFI보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 BKFI보다 불리를 뜻해요.

티커	ETF명	보수율	AUM	보유종목	배당률	YTD	1년
BKFI	BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF	0.4%	$250M	284	2.15%	-2.66%	-
BND	Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF	0.03% ▲	$160.9B ▲	17416	4.00% ▲	-	-0.49%
AGG	iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF	0.03% ▲	$137.8B ▲	13305	4.02% ▲	-	-0.41%
FBND	Fidelity Total Bond ETF	0.36% ▲	$27.2B ▲	4716	4.72% ▲	-	-0.88%
IAGG	iShares International Aggregate Bond Fund	0.07% ▲	$10.9B ▲	8185	4.51% ▲	-	-2.06%
SCHZ	Schwab US Aggregate Bond ETF	0.03% ▲	$10.5B ▲	12389	4.16% ▲	-	-0.61%

AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ BKFI보다 유리 · ▼ BKFI보다 불리

Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme

ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy

9 ETFs tracking the same theme as BKFI using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 2 · Inverse 3 · Covered Call 4)

Not direct derivatives of BKFI, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.

ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?

Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with BKFI, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.

⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding

Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.

📈 Leverage 2 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)