XRPZ 주가 전망 및 ETF 분석 - 배당·운용보수·보유종목·NAV·RSI·MACD

XRPZ

Franklin XRP Trust

7월 28일 4:00 PM ET (한국 7/29 05:00)

$11.50

-0.35 ▼ -2.99%

🌙 7월 28일 5:44 PM ET (한국 7/29 06:44)

$11.63

+0.13 ▲ +1.13%

XRPZ ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

Total Expense Ratio

Annual operating cost

Net Assets (AUM)

$257M

약 3515억원

Holdings

2 items

Dividend Yield

Management Style

Passive

Category ⓘ	Other Asset Types - Multi-Asset / Other	Asset Type ⓘ	CryptoCurrency	Return% 1Y ⓘ	-	Total Holdings ⓘ	2	Perf Week ⓘ	-8.44%
ETF Type ⓘ	Global Cryptocurrency	Active/Passive ⓘ	Passive	Return% 3Y ⓘ	-	AUM ⓘ	$257M	Perf Month ⓘ	1.05%
Expense ⓘ	-	NAV ⓘ	$11.85	Return% 5Y ⓘ	-	52W High ⓘ	-55.92%	Perf Quarter ⓘ	-23.94%
Dividend TTM ⓘ	-	Div Gr. 3/5Y ⓘ	-	Return% 10Y ⓘ	-	52W Low ⓘ	4.55%	Perf Half Y ⓘ	-44.09%
Flows% 1M ⓘ	6.18%	Flows% YTD ⓘ	246.51%	Return% SI ⓘ	-66.31%	Volatility(W/M) ⓘ	1.83% 2.43%	Perf YTD ⓘ	-42.24%
SMA20 ⓘ	-3.67%	SMA50 ⓘ	-9.5%	SMA200 ⓘ	-29.55%	RSI (14) ⓘ	41.01	Beta ⓘ	-
IPO ⓘ	2025/11/24	Prev Close ⓘ	$11.85	Perf Year ⓘ	-	Avg Volume ⓘ	0.26M	Price ⓘ	$11.5

📊 Franklin XRP Trust (XRPZ) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

Franklin XRP Trust · Other Asset Types - Multi-Asset / Other

일반 ETF — 카테고리 기반 분석만 제공됩니다

2025년 상장, 1년 운영 중.

Franklin XRP Trust는 XRP의 가격 성과를 반영하고자 하는 현물 가상자산 ETF입니다. 신탁 비용을 차감한 후의 투자 결과를 제공하기 위해 직접 XRP를 보유하며, 파생 상품이나 레버리지를 사용하지 않는 패시브 운용 방식의 신탁형 상품입니다.

📘 XRPZ ETF 자세히 알아보기 →

Globalcryptocrypto-spotripple

규모: $257M 약 3515억원
운용사: Franklin Templeton
운용 방식: 패시브 (지수 추종)
상장일: 2025년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Average expense ratio — 0% annually

Limited category sample — assessed against all ETFs.

Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)

Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount

$100.0M

Annual Expense Ratio

Category Median Annual Cost

No category distribution data available

10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)

0.0% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees

💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Cheaper alternatives in the same category

MSBT

Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust

0.14%

--0.14%p annually

BTC

Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF

0.15%

--0.15%p annually

ETH

Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF

0.15%

--0.15%p annually

* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Insufficient return data

This ETF is either too recently listed or does not yet have enough disclosed return data. Please refer to ETFs that have been operating for more than one year.

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade

Moderate Risk

Volatility is around market average. Be prepared for losses of roughly -30% to -40% in major downturns.

Average daily range (last 1 month)

하위 25%

±2.43%

S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more

Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)

ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.

Max Drawdown · Past 10 years

-55.4%

Drawdown duration: 6 months

2026-01-05 → 2026-06-25

Still recovering

2025-11-24 Worst -54% 2026-07-01

ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.

Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)

-1.02

Poor — Underperforms the risk-free rate

ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

Strengths and weaknesses both present Check the fit below to see whether it matches your investing goal.

🎯 목적별 적합도

내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.

🌳

장기 보유

수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때

낮음

💵

배당 인컴

매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때

매우 낮음

⚡

단기 트레이딩

며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매

매우 낮음

🧩

포트폴리오 보조

자산 배분·헤지 용도

낮음

👤

이런 분에게 어울려요

Long-term and recurring investors

✅ 강점

뚜렷한 강점이 드러나지 않아요.

⚠️ 약점·주의사항

⚠️Volatility is above average

Category Peers

Category: Other Asset Types - Multi-Asset / Other

같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 1/6위

카테고리: Other Asset Types - Multi-Asset / Other

ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?

같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 XRPZ보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 XRPZ보다 불리를 뜻해요.

티커	ETF명	보수율	AUM	보유종목	배당률	YTD	1년
XRPZ	Franklin XRP Trust	0%	$257M	2	-	-42.24%	-
AMLP	Alerian MLP ETF	1.01% ▼	$12.7B ▲	15	7.34%	-	+11.61%
PGX	Invesco Preferred ETF	0.5% ▼	$3.8B ▲	270	6.39%	-	-4.11%
VRP	Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF	0.5% ▼	$3.0B ▲	351	6.18%	-	-1.15%
PFXF	VanEck Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF	0.4% ▼	$2.4B ▲	121	6.58%	-	+0.34%
MLPA	Global X MLP ETF	0.77% ▼	$2.2B ▲	22	7.00%	-	+11.66%

AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ XRPZ보다 유리 · ▼ XRPZ보다 불리

Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme

ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy

20 ETFs tracking the same theme as XRPZ using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 8 · Inverse 4 · Covered Call 8)

Not direct derivatives of XRPZ, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.

ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?

Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with XRPZ, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.

⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding

Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.

📈 Leverage 8 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)