WAMA 주가 전망 및 ETF 분석 - 배당·운용보수·보유종목·NAV·RSI·MACD

WAMA

WisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average Fund

7월 27일 4:00 PM ET (한국 7/28 05:00)

$25.83

-0.03 ▼ -0.13%

WAMA ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

Total Expense Ratio

0.32%

Annual operating cost

Net Assets (AUM)

$186M

약 2553억원

Holdings

505 items

Dividend Yield

0.43%

Management Style

Passive

Category ⓘ	US Equities - Quant Strat	Asset Type ⓘ	Equities (Stocks)	Return% 1Y ⓘ	-	Total Holdings ⓘ	505	Perf Week ⓘ	-0.76%
ETF Type ⓘ	US Equities	Active/Passive ⓘ	Passive	Return% 3Y ⓘ	-	AUM ⓘ	$186M	Perf Month ⓘ	0.88%
Expense ⓘ	0.32%	NAV ⓘ	$25.88	Return% 5Y ⓘ	-	52W High ⓘ	-3.44%	Perf Quarter ⓘ	3%
Dividend TTM ⓘ	$0.11 (0.43%)	Div Gr. 3/5Y ⓘ	-	Return% 10Y ⓘ	-	52W Low ⓘ	10.67%	Perf Half Y ⓘ	-
Flows% 1M ⓘ	1.13%	Flows% YTD ⓘ	1168.04%	Return% SI ⓘ	15.91%	Volatility(W/M) ⓘ	0.45% 0.52%	Perf YTD ⓘ	4.98%
SMA20 ⓘ	-1.36%	SMA50 ⓘ	-1.24%	SMA200 ⓘ	1.42%	RSI (14) ⓘ	42.71	Beta ⓘ	-
IPO ⓘ	2026/3/12	Prev Close ⓘ	$25.86	Perf Year ⓘ	-	Avg Volume ⓘ	0.01M	Price ⓘ	$25.83

📊 WisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

WisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average Fund · US Equities - Quant Strat

일반 ETF — 카테고리 기반 분석만 제공됩니다

정상적인 상황에서 이 ETF는 순자산(투자 목적 차입금 포함)의 최소 80%를 지수 구성 요소 및/또는 이와 실질적으로 유사한 경제적 특성을 가진 투자자산에 투자합니다. 지수는 WisdomTree 500 Index 주식 구성 요소, 미국 T-bill, 이 증권들과 유사하거나 동등한 경제적 특성을 가진 기타 상품으로 구성됩니다. 비분산형입니다.

📘 WAMA ETF 자세히 알아보기 →

U.S.equitytreasuriestactical

규모: $186M 약 2553억원
운용사: WisdomTree
운용 방식: 패시브 (지수 추종)
상장일: 2026년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Low-cost ETF — 0.32% annually

상위 25% within US Equities - Quant Strat. For a ₩100M investment, roughly ₩320,000/year.

Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)

상위 25%

0.32%

My positionTop 25%

Low range Average High range

Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount

$100.0M

Annual Expense Ratio

$320K

Save $470K per year vs. category average

Category Median Annual Cost

$790K

Based on expense ratio of 0.79%

10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)

$5.8M

6.0% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees

💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Cheaper alternatives in the same category

CBOX

Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF

0.14%

-0.18%p annually

XBOX

Roundhill Ultra Short Duration No Dividend Target ETF

0.14%

-0.18%p annually

SELV

SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Low Volatility Active ETF

0.15%

-0.17%p annually

* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Insufficient return data

This ETF is either too recently listed or does not yet have enough disclosed return data. Please refer to ETFs that have been operating for more than one year.

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade

Low Risk

Less volatile than the market average, making it relatively easy to hold over time.

Average daily range (last 1 month)

평균권

±0.52%

S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more

Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)

ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.

Max Drawdown · Past 10 years

-5.8%

Drawdown duration: 0 months

2026-03-17 → 2026-03-30

Recovered in about 18 days

2026-03-12 Worst -5% 2026-07-01

ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.

Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)

0.81

Average — Moderate risk-adjusted returns

ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.

Dividend Analysis

Yield · Dividend history · After-tax income calculator

Pays dividends, but at a relatively low rate — 0.43% annually

Closer to a blend of growth and dividends.

배당수익률

0.43%

주당 배당

$0.11

연간 기준

5년 성장률

지급 주기

—

최근 12개월 기준

💰 내가 $100K 투자한다면

연간 배당금 (세후) $362

5년 누적 (세후) $2K

* 환율 1 가정, 배당소득세 15% 반영. 5년 누적은 배당 성장률 연 0% 가정.

* Qualified dividend middle-bracket approximation. Actual rate varies by total income.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

Strengths and weaknesses both present Check the fit below to see whether it matches your investing goal.

🎯 목적별 적합도

내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.

🌳

장기 보유

수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때

보통

💵

배당 인컴

매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때

부적합

⚡

단기 트레이딩

며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매

매우 낮음

🧩

포트폴리오 보조

자산 배분·헤지 용도

낮음

👤

이런 분에게 어울려요

Long-term and recurring investors

✅ 강점

💸Low cost — 0.32% annually

⚠️ 약점·주의사항

특별한 약점이 보이지 않아요.

Portfolio Composition

What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings

502개 종목에 넓게 분산

개별 종목 리스크가 분산되어 있어요.

ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?

ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.

🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기

총 보유종목

502개

상위 10개 비중

39.1%

최대 단일 종목

7.58%

집중도(HHI)

220

낮음 (분산)

🥧 섹터 비중

Technology

32.8%

Communication Services

11.2%

Financial

10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%

Healthcare

7.5%

Industrials

7.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%

Utilities

2.2%

Energy

2.2%

Real Estate

1.6%

Basic Materials

1.4%

📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 39.1% 차지

티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)

#1 NVDA NVIDIA Corp.

7.58%

#2 AAPL Apple Inc.

6.71%

#3 GOOGL Alphabet Inc.

6.06%

#4 MSFT Microsoft Corp.

4.77%

#5 AMZN Amazon.com, Inc.

3.73%

#6 META Meta Platforms Inc

2.46%

#7 AVGO Broadcom Inc

2.38%

#8 TSLA Tesla Inc

1.90%

#9 BRK-A Berkshire Hathaway Inc.

1.79%

#10 WMT Walmart Inc

1.69%

Category Peers

Category: US Equities - Quant Strat

같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 1/6위

카테고리: US Equities - Quant Strat

ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?

같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 WAMA보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 WAMA보다 불리를 뜻해요.

티커	ETF명	보수율	AUM	보유종목	배당률	YTD	1년
WAMA	WisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average Fund	0.32%	$186M	505	0.43%	+4.98%	-
MOAT	VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF	0.46% ▼	$11.5B ▲	56	1.32% ▲	-	+7.10%
PTLC	Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF	0.6% ▼	$3.2B ▲	505	1.03% ▲	-	+10.28%
BALT	Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF	0.69% ▼	$2.7B ▲	5	-	-	+6.10%
ACIO	Aptus Collared Investment Opportunity ETF	0.79% ▼	$2.3B ▲	207	0.38% ▼	-	+8.56%
PKW	Invesco BuyBack Achievers ETF	0.62% ▼	$1.7B ▲	228	0.77% ▲	-	+14.87%

AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ WAMA보다 유리 · ▼ WAMA보다 불리

Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme

ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy

17 ETFs tracking the same theme as WAMA using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 6 · Inverse 7 · Covered Call 4)

Not direct derivatives of WAMA, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.

ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?

Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with WAMA, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.

⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding

Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.

📈 Leverage 6 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)