XBOX 주가 전망 및 ETF 분석 - 배당·운용보수·보유종목·NAV·RSI·MACD

XBOX

Roundhill Ultra Short Duration No Dividend Target ETF

7월 28일 3:01 PM ET (한국 7/29 04:01)

$100.39

+0.02 ▲ +0.02%

XBOX ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

Total Expense Ratio

0.14%

Annual operating cost

Net Assets (AUM)

$351M

약 4813억원

Holdings

5 items

Dividend Yield

Management Style

Active

Category ⓘ	US Equities - Quant Strat	Asset Type ⓘ	Equities (Stocks)	Return% 1Y ⓘ	-	Total Holdings ⓘ	5	Perf Week ⓘ	0.13%
ETF Type ⓘ	US Equity Income	Active/Passive ⓘ	Active	Return% 3Y ⓘ	-	AUM ⓘ	$351M	Perf Month ⓘ	0.51%
Expense ⓘ	0.14%	NAV ⓘ	$100.37	Return% 5Y ⓘ	-	52W High ⓘ	-0.24%	Perf Quarter ⓘ	1.08%
Dividend TTM ⓘ	-	Div Gr. 3/5Y ⓘ	-	Return% 10Y ⓘ	-	52W Low ⓘ	1.91%	Perf Half Y ⓘ	-
Flows% 1M ⓘ	24.48%	Flows% YTD ⓘ	5909.78%	Return% SI ⓘ	4.24%	Volatility(W/M) ⓘ	0.08% 0.16%	Perf YTD ⓘ	1.42%
SMA20 ⓘ	0.18%	SMA50 ⓘ	0.49%	SMA200 ⓘ	0.81%	RSI (14) ⓘ	74.87	Beta ⓘ	-
IPO ⓘ	2026/3/18	Prev Close ⓘ	$100.37	Perf Year ⓘ	-	Avg Volume ⓘ	0.07M	Price ⓘ	$100.39

📊 Roundhill Ultra Short Duration No Dividend Target ETF (XBOX) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

Roundhill Ultra Short Duration No Dividend Target ETF · US Equities - Quant Strat

레버리지형 — 지수의 2~3배 방향으로 추종 (단기 투자용 · 고위험)

Roundhill Ultra Short Duration No Dividend Target ETF는 시장 중립적인 '박스 스프레드(Box Spreads)' 옵션 전략을 활용하여 단기 채권 수준의 수익을 창출하고자 하는 액티브 운용 ETF입니다. 세금 효율성을 중시하는 투자자를 위해 설계되었으며, 분배금을 최소화하고 수익을 자본 증식으로 간주하여 안정적인 현금성 수익을 제공하고자 합니다.

📘 XBOX ETF 자세히 알아보기 →

U.S.equityoptionsfixed-income

규모: $351M 약 4813억원
운용사: Roundhill
운용 방식: 액티브 (운용사 재량)
상장일: 2026년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Top-tier low cost — 0.14% annually

상위 5% within the US Equities - Quant Strat category. For a ₩100M investment, the annual cost is roughly ₩140,000.

Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)

상위 5%

0.14%

My positionTop 5%

Low range Average High range

Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount

$100.0M

Annual Expense Ratio

$140K

Save $650K per year vs. category average

Category Median Annual Cost

$790K

Based on expense ratio of 0.79%

10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)

$2.6M

2.6% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees

💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Insufficient return data

⚡ Leveraged ETF — beware of compounding decay over long holding periods

These ETFs aim to deliver 2–3× the daily return of the underlying index, but during sideways or volatile markets, compounding effects can cause long-term cumulative returns to diverge significantly from 2–3× the index. They are suited for short-term trading and are not appropriate as core holdings for long-term portfolios.

Insufficient return data

This ETF is either too recently listed or does not yet have enough disclosed return data. Please refer to ETFs that have been operating for more than one year.

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade

High Risk

These 2-3x leveraged products are structurally very volatile. Holding them long-term can erode your principal in ways that don't match expectations, so they're better suited for short-term trading.

⚡ Leveraged ETF — High Beta & Volatility Are by Design

A Beta of 2 or higher and volatility 2–3× the underlying index is by design. The "high volatility" reading below is a feature of the product, not a problem. However, long-term holding can lead to compounding decay and results that differ from expectations.

Average daily range (last 1 month)

상위 25%

±0.16%

S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more

Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)

ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.

Max Drawdown · Past 10 years

-0.8%

Drawdown duration: 0 months

2026-03-25 → 2026-03-31

Recovered in about 27 days

2026-03-19 Worst -5% 2026-07-01

ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.

Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)

0.67

Average — Moderate risk-adjusted returns

ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

Designed for short-term trading Not recommended for long-term investing, but suitable for short-term trading and hedging.

⚠️ 2–3x leveraged product; not suitable for long-term holding. Use as a short-term trading tool only.

🎯 목적별 적합도

내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.

🌳

장기 보유

수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때

부적합

💵

배당 인컴

매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때

부적합

⚡

단기 트레이딩

며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매

매우 적합

🧩

포트폴리오 보조

자산 배분·헤지 용도

매우 낮음

👤

이런 분에게 어울려요

Short-term traders only

✅ 강점

💸Top 5% lowest expense ratio in US Equities - Quant Strat — 0.14% annually
🛡️Below-average volatility

⚠️ 약점·주의사항

🎢Leveraged — compounding decay can produce results that differ from expectations over long holds

Portfolio Composition

What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings

파생상품 기반 ETF

실제 보유 종목이 일반 ETF와 다르게 스왑·선물 중심이에요.

ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?

ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.

🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기

총 보유종목

5개

상위 10개 비중

100.0%

최대 단일 종목

93.39%

집중도(HHI)

8764

높음 (집중)

⚠️ 소수 종목·섹터에 집중되어 있어, 해당 종목/섹터가 흔들리면 ETF 전체가 크게 영향을 받아요.

📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 100.0% 차지

티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)

#1 - N/A

93.39%

#2 - N/A

6.54%

FAF First American Government Obli

0.07%

#4 - N/A

0.00%

#5 - N/A

Category Peers

Category: US Equities - Quant Strat

같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 2/6위 · 보수율 1/6위

카테고리: US Equities - Quant Strat

ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?

같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 XBOX보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 XBOX보다 불리를 뜻해요.

티커	ETF명	보수율	AUM	보유종목	배당률	YTD	1년
XBOX	Roundhill Ultra Short Duration No Dividend Target ETF	0.14%	$351M	5	-	+1.42%	-
ULTY	YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF	1.3% ▼	$773M ▲	99	110.57%	-	-57.51%
UJUL	Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - July	0.79% ▼	$288M ▼	7	-	-	+8.79%
UJAN	Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - January	0.79% ▼	$268M ▼	5	-	-	+10.44%
UDEC	Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - December	0.79% ▼	$247M ▼	5	-	-	+12.43%
UFEB	Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - February	0.79% ▼	$237M ▼	5	-	-	+10.88%

AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ XBOX보다 유리 · ▼ XBOX보다 불리

Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme

ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy

21 ETFs tracking the same theme as XBOX using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 8 · Inverse 5 · Covered Call 8)

Not direct derivatives of XBOX, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.

ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?

Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with XBOX, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.

⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding

Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.

📈 Leverage 8 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)