GUSE 주가 전망 및 ETF 분석 - 배당·운용보수·보유종목·NAV·RSI·MACD

GUSE

Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

7월 28일 1:49 PM ET (한국 7/29 02:49)

$44.63

-0.01 ▼ -0.01%

GUSE ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

Total Expense Ratio

0.3%

Annual operating cost

Net Assets (AUM)

$351M

약 4808억원

Holdings

122 items

Dividend Yield

0.66%

Management Style

Active

Category ⓘ	US Equities - Quant Strat	Asset Type ⓘ	Equities (Stocks)	Return% 1Y ⓘ	-	Total Holdings ⓘ	122	Perf Week ⓘ	-0.28%
ETF Type ⓘ	US Equities	Active/Passive ⓘ	Active	Return% 3Y ⓘ	-	AUM ⓘ	$351M	Perf Month ⓘ	1.27%
Expense ⓘ	0.3%	NAV ⓘ	$44.66	Return% 5Y ⓘ	-	52W High ⓘ	-2.01%	Perf Quarter ⓘ	4.16%
Dividend TTM ⓘ	$0.29 (0.66%)	Div Gr. 3/5Y ⓘ	-	Return% 10Y ⓘ	-	52W Low ⓘ	17.6%	Perf Half Y ⓘ	8.8%
Flows% 1M ⓘ	1.27%	Flows% YTD ⓘ	-4.73%	Return% SI ⓘ	20.43%	Volatility(W/M) ⓘ	0.66% 0.67%	Perf YTD ⓘ	10.3%
SMA20 ⓘ	-0.87%	SMA50 ⓘ	-0.17%	SMA200 ⓘ	6.16%	RSI (14) ⓘ	46.86	Beta ⓘ	-
IPO ⓘ	2025/11/17	Prev Close ⓘ	$44.64	Perf Year ⓘ	-	Avg Volume ⓘ	0.01M	Price ⓘ	$44.63

📊 Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF (GUSE) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · US Equities - Quant Strat

액티브 운용 — 펀드매니저가 종목을 선별해 초과수익 추구

2025년 상장, 1년 운영 중.

Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF는 장기적인 자본 성장을 목표로 합니다. 정상적인 상황에서 순자산의 최소 80%(투자 목적의 차입금 포함)를 미국의 대형, 중형 및 소형 기업들이 발행한 주식 증권에 투자하는 액티브 운용 ETF입니다.

📘 GUSE ETF 자세히 알아보기 →

U.S.equitylarge-capfundamental

규모: $351M 약 4808억원
운용사: Goldman Sachs
운용 방식: 액티브 (운용사 재량)
상장일: 2025년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Low-cost ETF — 0.3% annually

상위 25% within US Equities - Quant Strat. For a ₩100M investment, roughly ₩300,000/year.

Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)

상위 25%

0.3%

My positionTop 25%

Low range Average High range

Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount

$100.0M

Annual Expense Ratio

$300K

Save $490K per year vs. category average

Category Median Annual Cost

$790K

Based on expense ratio of 0.79%

10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)

$5.4M

5.6% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees

💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Cheaper alternatives in the same category

CBOX

Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF

0.14%

-0.16%p annually

XBOX

Roundhill Ultra Short Duration No Dividend Target ETF

0.14%

-0.16%p annually

SELV

SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Low Volatility Active ETF

0.15%

-0.15%p annually

* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Insufficient return data

This ETF is either too recently listed or does not yet have enough disclosed return data. Please refer to ETFs that have been operating for more than one year.

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade

Low Risk

Less volatile than the market average, making it relatively easy to hold over time.

Average daily range (last 1 month)

하위 25%

±0.67%

S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more

Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)

ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.

Max Drawdown · Past 10 years

-8.5%

Drawdown duration: 1 months

2026-02-25 → 2026-03-30

Recovered in about 15 days

2025-11-17 Worst -5% 2026-07-01

ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.

Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)

1.26

Good — Solid risk-adjusted returns

ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.

Dividend Analysis

Yield · Dividend history · After-tax income calculator

Pays dividends, but at a relatively low rate — 0.66% annually

Closer to a blend of growth and dividends.

배당수익률

0.66%

주당 배당

$0.29

연간 기준

5년 성장률

지급 주기

연배당

12월

📊 총 이력 2025~2025 (1건)

연도별 배당 총액 추이

주당 배당금을 연 단위로 합산한 금액입니다. 막대가 우상향이면 매년 배당이 늘어나고 있다는 뜻입니다.

—

2021

—

2022

—

2023

—

2024

$0.29

2025

$X.XX 그 해 총 배당금 +X% 전년 대비 증가 -X% 감소

최근 배당 이력 총 1건

아래로 스크롤하면 과거 배당 이력을 볼 수 있습니다.

배당락일

주당 금액

지급일

당시 수익률

2025-12-23

$0.295

—

0.72%

* "배당락일"은 배당받으려면 이 날 이전에 주식을 보유해야 하는 기준일입니다. 지급일·당시 수익률은 일부 종목에서 데이터가 없을 수 있습니다.

💰 내가 $100K 투자한다면

연간 배당금 (세후) $552

5년 누적 (세후) $3K

* 환율 1 가정, 배당소득세 15% 반영. 5년 누적은 배당 성장률 연 0% 가정.

* Qualified dividend middle-bracket approximation. Actual rate varies by total income.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

Strengths and weaknesses both present Check the fit below to see whether it matches your investing goal.

🎯 목적별 적합도

내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.

🌳

장기 보유

수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때

낮음

💵

배당 인컴

매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때

매우 낮음

⚡

단기 트레이딩

며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매

낮음

🧩

포트폴리오 보조

자산 배분·헤지 용도

낮음

👤

이런 분에게 어울려요

Investors who believe in active strategies

✅ 강점

💸Low cost — 0.3% annually

⚠️ 약점·주의사항

⚠️Volatility is above average

Portfolio Composition

What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings

244개 종목에 넓게 분산

개별 종목 리스크가 분산되어 있어요.

ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?

ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.

🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기

총 보유종목

244개

상위 10개 비중

52.1%

최대 단일 종목

7.91%

집중도(HHI)

442

낮음 (분산)

⚠️ 소수 종목·섹터에 집중되어 있어, 해당 종목/섹터가 흔들리면 ETF 전체가 크게 영향을 받아요.

🥧 섹터 비중

Technology

66.7%

Communication Services

20.3%

Financial

18.6%

Consumer Cyclical

18.6%

Industrials

15.5%

Healthcare

12.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%

Real Estate

4.6%

Utilities

3.9%

Energy

3.0%

Basic Materials

2.3%

📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 52.1% 차지

티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)

#1 NVDA NVIDIA CORP

7.91%

#2 NVDA NVIDIA Corp.

7.31%

#3 AAPL APPLE INC

6.63%

#4 AAPL Apple Inc.

5.72%

#5 MSFT MICROSOFT CORP

5.20%

#6 MSFT Microsoft Corp.

4.42%

#7 AMZN AMAZON.COM INC

4.37%

#8 AMZN Amazon.com, Inc.

3.73%

#9 GOOG ALPHABET INC

3.66%

#10 AVGO BROADCOM INC

3.19%

Category Peers

Category: US Equities - Quant Strat

같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 2/6위

카테고리: US Equities - Quant Strat

ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?

같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 GUSE보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 GUSE보다 불리를 뜻해요.

티커	ETF명	보수율	AUM	보유종목	배당률	YTD	1년
GUSE	Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF	0.3%	$351M	122	0.66%	+10.30%	-
HELO	JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	0.5% ▼	$4.5B ▲	163	0.64% ▼	-	+6.61%
CBOX	Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF	0.14% ▲	$1.2B ▲	4	-	-	-
FHEQ	Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF	0.48% ▼	$912M ▲	192	0.55% ▼	-	+12.66%
INFO	Harbor PanAgora Dynamic Large Cap Core ETF	0.35% ▼	$829M ▲	146	0.32% ▼	-	+20.94%
CAOS	Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF	0.63% ▼	$719M ▲	11	-	-	+1.96%

AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ GUSE보다 유리 · ▼ GUSE보다 불리

Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme

ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy

16 ETFs tracking the same theme as GUSE using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 8 · Inverse 3 · Covered Call 5)

Not direct derivatives of GUSE, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.

ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?

Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with GUSE, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.

⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding

Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.

📈 Leverage 8 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)