암페놀(APH) is a Technology sector company, analyzed across 14 metrics on this page including P/E, EPS, dividends, RSI, and MACD.
시황 · 실적발표 · 매수매도 신호, 가장 먼저 받아보세요🔔 구독
시가총액
$187.8B
미드캡
P/E
43.9
적정 수준
배당수익률
0.65%
52주 위치
66%
저점 +49% · 고점 -14%
애널리스트
매수
B+
Fundamental health
vs. Electronic Components
수익성 ⓘ
Top 18%
성장 ⓘ
Top 11%
밸류에이션 ⓘ
Top 33%
재무 안정 ⓘ
Top 40%
💰 Is this stock pricier than usual right now? ⓘ
Compared to this company's own recent 5년 (not other companies).
Very cheap
Cheap
Typical
Pricey
🔥 Very pricey
Simply put — what you pay today to own $1 of this company's yearly earnings is 42원. Over the past 5년, it usually traded around 33원. One of the priciest stretches of the past 5년.
Pricy doesn't mean bad — it means expectations are already baked in.
* Q4 figures are derived from the annual filing (10-K) · loss-making quarters are underlined in red
📊 Amphenol Corp (APH) Investment Analysis
📐
What kind of company is Amphenol Corp?
암페놀(APH) 성장주
Technology·Electronic Components
⭐
Top 78 by Market Cap — Global Large-Cap
🔌 A leading global electronic components company supplying electronic connectors, cable assemblies, sensors, and interconnect systems. Founded in the United States in 1932, it provides a broad product portfolio across diverse end markets including telecommunications, data centers, automotive, industrial, aerospace, and defense, and is characterized by a diversified revenue structure and steady growth momentum.
Bollinger Bands are upper and lower channels showing the closing price range (20 days · 2σ). Touching the upper band = overheated; touching the lower band = oversold. Ichimoku Cloud shows trend direction and strength through colored areas. Prices above the cloud indicate an uptrend; prices below indicate a downtrend. About Bollinger Bands →
🔴
Current diagnosis · 2026-07-24
Downtrend zone
Current price $152.67 below the midline ($159.99). Normal downward flow. Inside the Ichimoku cloud (neutral).
MACD (12 · 26 · 9)Expand ▼
An indicator that uses the difference between the short-term EMA (12) and long-term EMA (26) to identify trend reversals. When MACD rises above the Signal line, it is a buy signal (golden cross); when it falls below, it is a sell signal (death cross). About MACD →
🔴
Current diagnosis · 2026-07-24
Bearish momentum holding
MACD -0.158 < Signal 1.040 in negative zone + Hist negative (-1.197). Weakness in progress.
RSI(14) · Stochastics %K(14)Expand ▼
RSI measures short-term buying and selling pressure on a scale of 0–100. 30 or below = oversold (a rebound may be possible); 70 or above = overbought (a pullback may be possible). Stoch %K similarly measures short-term momentum strength. RSI · Learn more about Stochastics →
🔴
Current diagnosis · 2026-07-24
Bearish zone
RSI 45.5 (below the neutral level of 50). Selling pressure leads, indicating a weak trend. Stoch %K is also 35.2.
※ "Current diagnosis" is an automated interpretation based on standard thresholds and is for reference only. Make your own comprehensive judgment before trading.
🎯
Is it attractive at this price?
⚖️
In line with the industry average
Pricey on Vs. Assets·Vs. Sales, In line with peers on Vs. Earnings·Vs. Cash Flow
💡 How to read this — Compare against peers in the same industry to see what the price is cheap or expensive relative to. Example: cheap vs. earnings = stock price is low relative to what the company earns; expensive vs. assets = stock price is high relative to assets on the balance sheet.
💵Vs. EarningsMid-range
🏢Vs. AssetsPricey
🧾Vs. SalesPricey
💧Vs. Cash FlowMid-range
💵 Vs. Earnings
PER Price-to-Earnings Ratio
How expensive the price is vs. earnings — lower is cheaper
43.87x
✓ Fair
My positionMid-range
Low rangeAverageHigh range
Electronic Components median 40.84x · Around the industry average
💡 PER 15 이하 저평가, 25 이상이면 성장성 검증 필요 (적자 기업은 의미 없음)
💵 Vs. Earnings
Forward PER Forward Price-to-Earnings Ratio
PER using next year's estimated earnings — reflects growth
26.39x
✓ Fair
My positionMid-range
Low rangeAverageHigh range
Electronic Components median 24.45x · Around the industry average
💡 향후 12개월 예상 EPS 기준 PER. 현재 PER보다 낮으면 이익 성장 중
🏢 Vs. Assets
PBR Price-to-Book Ratio
Price vs. the company's asset value — below 1 trades cheaper than assets
13.43x
✓ Very pricey
My positionBottom 25%
Low rangeAverageHigh range
Electronic Components median 4.44x · Bottom 8% — expensive within the industry
💡 PBR 1 미만이면 청산가치 이하 (금융·제조업에서 특히 의미, IT는 낮은 비중)
🧾 Vs. Sales
PSR Price-to-Sales Ratio
Market cap vs. revenue — lower is cheaper relative to sales
7.25x
✓ Pricey
My positionBottom 25%
Low rangeAverageHigh range
Electronic Components median 3.08x · Bottom 22% — expensive within the industry
💡 PSR 2 이하 저평가, 10 초과면 고평가 (고성장 기업일 때만 정당화)
💧 Vs. Cash Flow
EV/EBITDA Enterprise Value Multiple
Total enterprise value ÷ operating cash earnings — a benchmark for M&A
24.78x
✓ Fair
My positionMid-range
Low rangeAverageHigh range
Electronic Components median 22.87x · Around the industry average
💡 EV/EBITDA 10 이하 저평가, 20 이상이면 고평가 (M&A 밸류 기준)
💧 Vs. Cash Flow
P/FCF Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Ratio
Price vs. actual cash generation — lower means more efficient
40.55x
✓ Fair
My positionMid-range
Low rangeAverageHigh range
Electronic Components median 36.13x · Around the industry average
💡 P/FCF 20 이하면 현금창출 대비 저평가 (실질 수익성 기준)
Analyst target price (reference)
$190.00 vs. current price +24.5%
* Valuation is the stock's relative position within the industry peer group (same sector and market-cap range). Even when valuation looks attractive, check the 'Profitability' and 'Growth' sections too.
As of: Recent snapshot · Peer group: Electronic Components
👥
Who owns it?
🟢
Ownership flow is positive
Insider net selling -13.0% · Institutional net buying +1.1% · Short interest light 1.3%
📈 Recent trading flow (6 months)
🧑💼 Insiders (executives & directors)
-13.0%
Insiders large net selling
🏦 Institutions (funds & investors)
+1.1%
Institutions net buying
💡 Net change over the past 6 months. Shows how much insiders and institutions increased or reduced their holdings, in %.
👥 Holdings composition
🏦 Institutions97.6%
Institution-led, stable structure
Technology 대형주 Median 87.7%
🧑💼 Insiders0.5%
Low, common among large-caps
Technology 대형주 Median 2.2%
👤 Retail investors (estimated)1.9%
Everyone excluding institutions and insiders
InstitutionsInsidersRetail (est.)
📉 Short-selling metrics
Short ratio
1.3%
Low — limited short-side pressure
Technology 대형주 Median 4.9%
Past 90 days Little change
Short interest days to cover
1.7 days
Days needed to close short positions using average trading volume
🧮 Share count
Total shares outstanding1.23B주
Float (tradable shares)1.22B주
* Insider/institutional flows are based on net changes over the past 6 months. Trend is cumulative over the past 90 days.
Leveraged, inverse, and covered call ETFs based on the underlying asset
2 derivative ETFs based on APH (Leverage 2)
These are based on the same underlying asset but carry a completely different risk and return profile. Please review the warning below first.
ℹ️ What is a Derivative ETF?
These are special ETFs that amplify, reverse, or monetize the price movement of an underlying ETF or security. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs target opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.
⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding
Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.
📈Leverage2ETFs that move 2-3x with APH (high volatility)