AMZO 주가 전망 및 ETF 분석 - 배당·운용보수·보유종목·NAV·RSI·MACD

AMZO

Tradr 2X Short AMZN Daily ETF

7월 28일 1:49 PM ET (한국 7/29 02:49)

$19.12

+0.08 ▲ +0.39%

🌙 7월 28일 7:50 PM ET (한국 7/29 08:50)

$18.94

-0.18 ▼ -0.92%

AMZO ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

Total Expense Ratio

1.49%

Annual operating cost

Net Assets (AUM)

$1M

약 16억원

Holdings

4 items

Dividend Yield

Management Style

Active

Category ⓘ	Equity - Leveraged / Inverse	Asset Type ⓘ	Equities (Stocks)	Return% 1Y ⓘ	-	Total Holdings ⓘ	4	Perf Week ⓘ	14.19%
ETF Type ⓘ	US Equities	Active/Passive ⓘ	Active	Return% 3Y ⓘ	-	AUM ⓘ	$1M	Perf Month ⓘ	-1.01%
Expense ⓘ	1.49%	NAV ⓘ	$19.05	Return% 5Y ⓘ	-	52W High ⓘ	-30.69%	Perf Quarter ⓘ	21.91%
Dividend TTM ⓘ	-	Div Gr. 3/5Y ⓘ	-	Return% 10Y ⓘ	-	52W Low ⓘ	38.52%	Perf Half Y ⓘ	-
Flows% 1M ⓘ	36.97%	Flows% YTD ⓘ	452.73%	Return% SI ⓘ	-58.49%	Volatility(W/M) ⓘ	2.92% 4.03%	Perf YTD ⓘ	-25.07%
SMA20 ⓘ	10.07%	SMA50 ⓘ	11.91%	SMA200 ⓘ	7.46%	RSI (14) ⓘ	62.37	Beta ⓘ	-
IPO ⓘ	2026/3/24	Prev Close ⓘ	$19.04	Perf Year ⓘ	-	Avg Volume ⓘ	0.01M	Price ⓘ	$19.12

📊 Tradr 2X Short AMZN Daily ETF (AMZO) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

Tradr 2X Short AMZN Daily ETF · Equity - Leveraged / Inverse

인버스형 — 지수 하락에 베팅 (단기 헤지용 · 고위험)

Under normal market conditions, this ETF maintains more than 80% of its net assets in financial instruments that provide two-times inverse daily leveraged exposure to the performance of AMZN. It is a non-diversified investment fund.

U.S.single-assetAMZNleverage

규모: $1M 약 16억원
운용사: Tradr
운용 방식: 액티브 (운용사 재량)
상장일: 2026년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Above-average cost — 1.49% annually

Expense ratio is higher than the Equity - Leveraged / Inverse median. Compare against similar ETFs.

Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)

하위 25%

1.49%

My positionBottom 25%

Low range Average High range

Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount

$100.0M

Annual Expense Ratio

$1.5M

Pay $520K more per year vs. category average

Category Median Annual Cost

$970K

Based on expense ratio of 0.97%

10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)

$25.7M

26.6% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees

💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Cheaper alternatives in the same category

TOPW

Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF

0.32%

-1.17%p annually

FNGU

MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs

0.35%

-1.14%p annually

SPDN

Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1X ETF

0.48%

-1.01%p annually

* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Insufficient return data

↩️ Inverse ETF — for short-term hedging only

These products bet on declines in the underlying index. By construction, "if the index rises, the ETF falls," so it is not unusual to see a negative annualized return (−). The daily reset mechanism causes significant compounding decay over longer holding periods. Long-term holding is not recommended outside of hedging or short-term trading purposes.

Insufficient return data

This ETF is either too recently listed or does not yet have enough disclosed return data. Please refer to ETFs that have been operating for more than one year.

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade

High Risk

These products move opposite to the market. The longer you hold them, the more losses accumulate over time, making them suitable only for short-term hedging.

↩️ Inverse ETFs — Negative Beta is normal

Because they move opposite to the index, a negative Beta or one near −1 is expected. Volatility is similar to the underlying index. These are intended for short-term hedging and are unsuitable for long-term holding.

Average daily range (last 1 month)

평균권

±4.03%

S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more

Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)

ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.

Max Drawdown · Past 10 years

-48.8%

Drawdown duration: 1 months

2026-03-27 → 2026-05-06

Still recovering

2026-03-24 Worst -46% 2026-07-01

ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.

Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)

-0.98

Poor — Underperforms the risk-free rate

ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

Designed for short-term trading Not recommended for long-term investing, but suitable for short-term trading and hedging.

⚠️ Short-term hedge that moves opposite to the market. Time decay causes losses to accumulate on long holds.

🎯 목적별 적합도

내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.

🌳

장기 보유

수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때

부적합

💵

배당 인컴

매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때

부적합

⚡

단기 트레이딩

며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매

매우 적합

🧩

포트폴리오 보조

자산 배분·헤지 용도

매우 낮음

👤

이런 분에게 어울려요

For short-term hedging and downside bets

✅ 강점

뚜렷한 강점이 드러나지 않아요.

⚠️ 약점·주의사항

💸Expense ratio is somewhat high — 1.49% annually
🔄Inverse — time decay losses accumulate the longer you hold

Portfolio Composition

What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings

파생상품 기반 ETF

실제 보유 종목이 일반 ETF와 다르게 스왑·선물 중심이에요.

ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?

ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.

🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기

총 보유종목

1개

상위 10개 비중

0.8%

최대 단일 종목

0.82%

집중도(HHI)

낮음 (분산)

📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 0.8% 차지

티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)

#1 - CFD AMAZON.COM INC

0.82%

Category Peers

Category: Equity - Leveraged / Inverse

같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 6/6위

카테고리: Equity - Leveraged / Inverse

ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?

같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 AMZO보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 AMZO보다 불리를 뜻해요.

티커	ETF명	보수율	AUM	보유종목	배당률	YTD	1년
AMZO	Tradr 2X Short AMZN Daily ETF	1.49%	$1M	4	-	-25.07%	-
SQQQ	ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ -3x Shares	0.95% ▲	$2.1B ▲	22	8.59%	-	-48.55%
SOXS	Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X ETF	1% ▲	$1.6B ▲	13	36.06%	-	-95.65%
SH	ProShares Short S&P500 -1x Shares	0.89% ▲	$930M ▲	18	4.16%	-	-13.67%
PSQ	ProShares Short QQQ -1x Shares	0.95% ▲	$791M ▲	18	4.18%	-	-16.85%
SPXU	ProShares UltraPro Short S&P 500	0.9% ▲	$431M ▲	18	6.63%	-	-38.30%

AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ AMZO보다 유리 · ▼ AMZO보다 불리

Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme

ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy

24 ETFs tracking the same theme as AMZO using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 8 · Inverse 8 · Covered Call 8)

Not direct derivatives of AMZO, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.

ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?

Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with AMZO, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.

⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding

Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.

📈 Leverage 8 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)