AMUB
UBS ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN
7월 20일 12:45 PM ET (한국 7/21 01:45)
$22.92
+0.26 ▲ +1.13%
AMUB ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.
Total Expense Ratio
0.8%
Annual operating cost
Net Assets (AUM)
$39M
약 528억원
Holdings
-
Dividend Yield
5.54%
Management Style
Passive
| Category | Other Asset Types - Multi-Asset / Other | Asset Type | MLP | Return% 1Y | 25.27% | Total Holdings | - | Perf Week | 0.51% |
| ETF Type | US MLPs | Active/Passive | Passive | Return% 3Y | 22.34% | AUM | $39M | Perf Month | 6.69% |
| Expense | 0.8% | NAV | $22.68 | Return% 5Y | 23.31% | 52W High | -2.67% | Perf Quarter | 6.07% |
| Dividend TTM | $1.27 (5.54%) | Div Gr. 3/5Y | 12.36% 5.28% | Return% 10Y | 10.79% | 52W Low | 29.82% | Perf Half Y | 14.56% |
| Flows% 1M | - | Flows% YTD | - | Return% SI | 7.61% | Volatility(W/M) | - 0.15% | Perf YTD | 21.31% |
| SMA20 | 2.29% | SMA50 | 3.12% | SMA200 | 11.05% | RSI (14) | 60.03 | Beta | 0.49 |
| IPO | 2015/10/9 | Prev Close | $22.66 | Perf Year | 19.3% | Avg Volume | 0.00M | Price | $22.92 |
UBS ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMUB) Investment Analysis
ETF Overview
UBS ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN · Other Asset Types - Multi-Asset / Other
배당 인컴형 — 꾸준한 배당 수익 목적의 배당주 바구니
2015년 상장, 11년 운영 중.
UBS ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Series B is designed to provide exposure to the price performance of the Alerian MLP Index. Series B ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN, which matures on July 18, 2042, is an unsecured senior obligation issued by UBS. The index measures the composite performance of energy MLPs and is calculated by S&P Dow Jones Indices using a float-adjusted market-capitalization-weighted methodology.
U.S.equityenergyinfrastructure
- 규모
- $39M 약 528억원
- 운용사
- UBS
- 운용 방식
- 패시브 (지수 추종)
- 상장일
- 2015년
Cost Efficiency
Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact
Average expense ratio — 0.8% annually
Mid-range within the Other Asset Types - Multi-Asset / Other category.
Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)
평균권0.8%
My positionMid-range
Low range Average High range
Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount
$100.0M
Annual Expense Ratio
$800K
Pay $110K more per year vs. category average
Category Median Annual Cost
$690K
Based on expense ratio of 0.69%
10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)
$14.2M
14.7% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees
Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.
Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.
Cheaper alternatives in the same category
MSBT
Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust
0.14%
-0.66%p annually
BTC
Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF
0.15%
-0.65%p annually
ETH
Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF
0.15%
-0.65%p annually
* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.
Long-Term Performance
1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense
Upper-tier returns in its category
상위 25% within Other Asset Types - Multi-Asset / Other.+7.5%p vs. benchmark (SPY) over 1Y.
ℹ️ The "1Y·3Y·5Y·10Y" periods below represent annualized returns (CAGR) measured backward from today. Example: "3Y +12%" means the investment grew at a compounded 12% per year over the past three years.
If you had invested 10 year(s) ago
$100.0M
Today's value
$278.6M
→
Total gain
+$178.6M
Annualized +10.8%
ℹ️ How to read the return breakdown bar
Each period bar shows the share of this ETF's returns by source.
Price gains Price decline Dividends received
Mostly blue (80%+): Growth-style — price gains drive most returns
Mostly orange (70%+): Income-style — dividends drive most returns (watch out for after-tax drag)
Red + orange: Stagnant or declining price — dividends offset losses (common in covered-call and high-dividend funds)
Mostly orange (70%+): Income-style — dividends drive most returns (watch out for after-tax drag)
Red + orange: Stagnant or declining price — dividends offset losses (common in covered-call and high-dividend funds)
1 Year
2025.07 ~ 2026.07
Annualized +25.27%
상위 25%Price +19.30% + Dividend +5.97% = Total +25.27%/yr
Outperformed the benchmark by 7.5%p annually
My positionTop 25%
Low range Average High range
3 Years
2023.07 ~ 2026.07
Annualized +22.34% Cumulative +83.1%
상위 25%Price +14.80% + Dividend +7.54% = Total +22.34%/yr
Outperformed the benchmark by 3.1%p annually
My positionTop 25%
Low range Average High range
5 Years
2021.07 ~ 2026.07
Annualized +23.31% Cumulative +185.1%
상위 25%Price +14.47% + Dividend +8.84% = Total +23.31%/yr
Outperformed the benchmark by 10.1%p annually
My positionTop 25%
Low range Average High range
10Y
2016.07 ~ 2026.07
Annualized +10.79% Cumulative +178.6%
상위 25%Price +3.43% + Dividend +7.36% = Total +10.79%/yr
Trailed the benchmark by 4.1%p annually
My positionTop 25%
Low range Average High range
10Y Cumulative Total Return Curve
2016-07-29 start, based on a 100M KRW base — read the curve values directly as units of 100M KRW (e.g., 308 → 3.08억 / 308M KRW). Both this ETF and the benchmark are rebased to 100 on the same start date for comparison.
AMUB · Price Only AMUB · Price + Cumulative Dividends AMUB · Dividend Reinvested S&P 500 (SPY)
0
150
300
450
ℹ️ Price Only: Excludes dividends and tracks pure stock price only. Covered-call and high-dividend ETFs often show a flat or declining line on this view, which is meaningful from a "principal preservation" standpoint. Price + Cumulative Dividend: Share count stays the same and received dividends are accumulated as cash. Closely matches your actual account total assets. Reinvested: Dividends are immediately used to buy additional shares (adjClose-based, the industry standard for total return). The wider the gap between the three lines, the easier it is to gauge the effectiveness of the dividend strategy.
Annual Return Comparison
ETF returns vs S&P 500 (SPY) by calendar year
AMUB S&P 500 (SPY)
+40%
0%
−40%
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026 YTD
ℹ️ Returns from January 1 to December 31 of each year. The current year (2026) column is dimmed to indicate YTD (incomplete). If blue is higher than gray, the ETF outperformed the benchmark in that year.
Win rate vs S&P 500 (SPY)
3 / 9Y
Lags behind benchmark (33%)
+ 2026 YTD: Ahead (22.2% vs 8.7%)
2017 ✗
2018 ✗
2019 ✗
2020 ✗
2021 ✓
2022 ✓
2023 ✓
2024 ✗
2025 ✗
2026 ✓ YTD
ℹ️ Number of winning years versus S&P 500 (SPY) within a completed calendar year (1/1–12/31). The current year (YTD) is reported separately.
Downside Capture
21%
Falls less than the benchmark in drawdowns — strong downside protection
<85% (Defend) 85~110% (Track) >110% (Lag)
ℹ️ Average % drop of this ETF when S&P 500 (SPY) is −1%. Based on daily returns over the past 3 years (only days where the benchmark is negative).
Risk Profile
Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History
Overall Risk Grade
Moderate Risk
Volatility is around market average. Be prepared for losses of roughly -30% to -40% in major downturns.
Beta (market sensitivity)
평균권0.49
If the market rises +10% +4.9%
If the market falls -10% -4.9%
My positionMid-range
Low range Average High range
ℹ️ A beta of 1.0 moves in line with the market. Above 1 means it moves more than the market; below 1 means less.
Average daily range (last 1 month)
상위 25%±0.15%
S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more
Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)
ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.
Max Drawdown · Past 10 years
-73.5%
2015-12-08 Worst -67% 2026-07-01
ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.
Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)
0.28
Weak — Low risk-adjusted returns
ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.
Estimated Monthly Maximum Loss (VaR 95%)
-10.1%
Historically, monthly losses exceeding this figure occurred only5%of the time.
ℹ️ A statistical estimate meaning "with 95% probability, monthly losses will not exceed this amount." The remaining 5% corresponds to crisis-level events such as financial crises or pandemics.
Dividend Analysis
Yield · Dividend history · After-tax income calculator
Dividend-paying ETF — 5.54% annually
An ETF that provides consistent dividend income.5-year dividend growth rate: +5.3%.
This ETF is designed for dividend income. Distributions mainly come from dividends paid by its holdings, plus a small amount of interest, making them relatively stable.
배당수익률
5.54%
주당 배당
$1.27
연간 기준
5년 성장률
5.3%
지급 주기
분기배당
3월 · 8월 · 12월
연도별 배당 총액 추이
주당 배당금을 연 단위로 합산한 금액입니다. 막대가 우상향이면 매년 배당이 늘어나고 있다는 뜻입니다.
$1.32
2016
$1.21 -7.9%
2017
$1.19 -2.2%
2018
$1.15 -3.2%
2019
$0.95 -16.8%
2020
$0.82 -13.6%
2021
$0.87 +5.6%
2022
$1.05 +20.3%
2023
$1.12 +6.5%
2024
$1.24 +10.8%
2025
$X.XX 그 해 총 배당금 +X% 전년 대비 증가 -X% 감소
최근 배당 이력 총 41건
아래로 스크롤하면 과거 배당 이력을 볼 수 있습니다.
배당락일
주당 금액
지급일
당시 수익률
2026-03-02
$0.320
—
7.13%
2025-12-01
$0.317
—
6.42%
2025-08-28
$0.309
—
7.72%
2025-05-29
$0.309
—
7.78%
2025-03-03
$0.300
—
5.67%
2024-11-29
$0.285
—
5.58%
2024-08-28
$0.279
—
6.29%
2024-05-29
$0.288
—
6.29%
2024-02-28
$0.263
—
7.70%
2023-11-28
$0.272
—
8.01%
2023-08-25
$0.260
—
8.20%
2023-05-25
$0.264
—
8.45%
2023-02-28
$0.251
—
7.93%
2022-11-28
$0.229
—
6.21%
2022-08-25
$0.220
—
7.42%
2022-05-26
$0.225
—
7.69%
2022-02-28
$0.196
—
6.39%
2021-11-26
$0.221
—
9.12%
2021-08-26
$0.199
—
9.66%
2021-05-27
$0.208
—
9.17%
2021-02-26
$0.196
—
11.79%
2020-11-27
$0.212
—
10.82%
2020-08-27
$0.240
—
13.21%
2020-05-28
$0.229
—
12.06%
2020-02-28
$0.273
—
13.22%
2019-11-27
$0.295
—
11.23%
2019-08-27
$0.299
—
10.34%
2019-05-28
$0.261
—
7.38%
2019-02-28
$0.292
—
9.26%
2018-11-28
$0.286
—
9.49%
2018-08-27
$0.314
—
6.44%
2018-05-25
$0.319
—
7.01%
2018-02-28
$0.266
—
6.90%
2017-11-28
$0.300
—
7.12%
2017-08-24
$0.306
—
8.96%
2017-05-24
$0.314
—
7.89%
2017-02-27
$0.292
—
5.94%
2016-11-25
$0.316
—
6.78%
2016-08-24
$0.320
—
6.11%
2016-05-25
$0.340
—
4.16%
2016-02-25
$0.340
—
2.25%
* "배당락일"은 배당받으려면 이 날 이전에 주식을 보유해야 하는 기준일입니다. 지급일·당시 수익률은 일부 종목에서 데이터가 없을 수 있습니다.
💰 내가 $100K 투자한다면
연간 배당금 (세후) $5K
5년 누적 (세후) $26K
* 환율 1 가정, 배당소득세 15% 반영. 5년 누적은 배당 성장률 연 5.28% 가정.
* Qualified dividend middle-bracket approximation. Actual rate varies by total income.
Overall investment appeal
What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile
A balanced, attractive ETF Holds up well across cost, performance, and stability.
🎯 목적별 적합도
내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.
매우 적합
매우 적합
매우 낮음
보통
이런 분에게 어울려요
Investors who want consistent dividend income
✅ 강점
- 📈Top-tier long-term returns
- 🛡️Below-average volatility
- 🎯Outperforms benchmark by +10.1%p annually
⚠️ 약점·주의사항
특별한 약점이 보이지 않아요.
Category Peers
Category: Other Asset Types - Multi-Asset / Other
같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 5/6위
카테고리: Other Asset Types - Multi-Asset / Other
ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?
같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 AMUB보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 AMUB보다 불리를 뜻해요.
| 티커 | ETF명 | 보수율 | AUM | 보유종목 | 배당률 | YTD | 1년 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMUB | UBS ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN | 0.8% | $39M | - | 5.54% | +21.31% | +19.30% |
| Alerian MLP ETF | 1.01% ▼ | $12.7B ▲ | 15 | 7.34% ▲ | - | +11.61% ▼ | |
| Invesco Preferred ETF | 0.5% ▲ | $3.8B ▲ | 270 | 6.39% ▲ | - | -4.11% ▼ | |
| Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF | 0.5% ▲ | $3.0B ▲ | 351 | 6.18% ▲ | - | -1.15% ▼ | |
| VanEck Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF | 0.4% ▲ | $2.4B ▲ | 121 | 6.58% ▲ | - | +0.34% ▼ | |
| Global X MLP ETF | 0.77% ▲ | $2.2B ▲ | 22 | 7.00% ▲ | - | +11.66% ▼ |
AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ AMUB보다 유리 · ▼ AMUB보다 불리
Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme
ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy
15 ETFs tracking the same theme as AMUB using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 7 · Inverse 5 · Covered Call 3)
Not direct derivatives of AMUB, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.
ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?
Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with AMUB, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.
⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding
Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.
Leverage 7 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)
GUSH
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exp. & Prod. Bull 2X ETF
-3.49%
$231M
ERX
Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X ETF
-2.66%
$229M
DIG
ProShares Ultra Energy
-2.74%
$80M
NRGU
MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil 3 Leveraged ETNs
-3.11%
$61M
WTIU
MicroSectorsTM Energy 3X Leveraged ETNs
-3.82%
$27M
TEXU
Direxion Daily Energy Top 5 Bull 2X ETF
-2.75%
$3M
XLEX
Corgi U.S. Energy 2x Daily ETF
-2.56%
Inverse 5 ETFs that bet on declines in the same theme
Covered Call & Options 3 ETFs that add a monthly dividend via covered calls on the same theme
FAQ
What kind of ETF is AMUB?
AMUB is an ETF in the Other Asset Types - Multi-Asset / Other category, managed by UBS.
How many holdings does AMUB have?
AMUB's AUM is approximately $39M.
Does AMUB pay dividends (distributions)?
AMUB's distribution yield is approximately 5.54%.
What is the 52-week high and low for AMUB?
AMUB has recorded a 52-week high of $23.55 and a low of $17.65.
면책조항: 본 콘텐츠는 참고 자료이며 투자 권유가 아닙니다. 모든 투자의 책임은 투자자 본인에게 있습니다.