ACEI 주가 전망 및 ETF 분석 - 배당·운용보수·보유종목·NAV·RSI·MACD

ACEI

Innovator Equity Autocallable Income Strategy ETF

7월 28일 3:51 PM ET (한국 7/29 04:51)

$22.47

-0.12 ▼ -0.54%

🌙 7월 28일 5:05 PM ET (한국 7/29 06:05)

$22.47

+0.00 +0.00%

ACEI ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

Total Expense Ratio

0.79%

Annual operating cost

Net Assets (AUM)

$42M

약 578억원

Holdings

12 items

Dividend Yield

8.94%

Management Style

Active

Category ⓘ	US Equities - Quant Strat	Asset Type ⓘ	Equities (Stocks)	Return% 1Y ⓘ	-	Total Holdings ⓘ	12	Perf Week ⓘ	-3.42%
ETF Type ⓘ	US Equities	Active/Passive ⓘ	Active	Return% 3Y ⓘ	-	AUM ⓘ	$42M	Perf Month ⓘ	-3.4%
Expense ⓘ	0.79%	NAV ⓘ	$22.51	Return% 5Y ⓘ	-	52W High ⓘ	-17.74%	Perf Quarter ⓘ	-8.66%
Dividend TTM ⓘ	$2.01 (8.94%)	Div Gr. 3/5Y ⓘ	-	Return% 10Y ⓘ	-	52W Low ⓘ	-0.25%	Perf Half Y ⓘ	-8.72%
Flows% 1M ⓘ	10.43%	Flows% YTD ⓘ	254.14%	Return% SI ⓘ	-1.92%	Volatility(W/M) ⓘ	1.1% 1.02%	Perf YTD ⓘ	-8.78%
SMA20 ⓘ	-2.93%	SMA50 ⓘ	-5.33%	SMA200 ⓘ	-7.28%	RSI (14) ⓘ	29.19	Beta ⓘ	-
IPO ⓘ	2025/9/25	Prev Close ⓘ	$22.59	Perf Year ⓘ	-	Avg Volume ⓘ	0.02M	Price ⓘ	$22.47

📊 Innovator Equity Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACEI) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

Innovator Equity Autocallable Income Strategy ETF · US Equities - Quant Strat

커버드콜형 — 콜옵션 매도로 월배당 현금흐름 추구 (상승 제한)

2025년 상장, 1년 운영 중.

The Innovator Equity Autocallable Income Strategy ETF aims to provide investors with the potential for a high level of income and the ability to limit downside losses. This ETF is actively managed and seeks to achieve its investment objective through income distributions and downside exposure linked to the performance of a large-cap equity basket selected from a broad range of large-cap U.S. equity indices on a market-capitalization basis. It is a non-diversified fund.

U.S.equitylarge-capautocallable

규모: $42M 약 578억원
운용사: Innovator
운용 방식: 액티브 (운용사 재량)
상장일: 2025년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Average expense ratio — 0.79% annually

Mid-range within the US Equities - Quant Strat category.

Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)

평균권

0.79%

My positionMid-range

Low range Average High range

Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount

$100.0M

Annual Expense Ratio

$790K

Same as category average

Category Median Annual Cost

$790K

Based on expense ratio of 0.79%

10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)

$14.1M

14.5% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees

💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Cheaper alternatives in the same category

CBOX

Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF

0.14%

-0.65%p annually

XBOX

Roundhill Ultra Short Duration No Dividend Target ETF

0.14%

-0.65%p annually

SELV

SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Low Volatility Active ETF

0.15%

-0.64%p annually

* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Insufficient return data

🎴 Covered Call ETF — total-return comparisons are for reference only

This ETF generates monthly cash distributions by selling call options, but in doing so gives up some of the upside potential of the underlying index. As a result, the total return and win-rate metrics versus the benchmark below will naturally appear unfavorable. The product's primary purpose is stable dividend cash flow, so we recommend reviewing it alongside the dividend analysis section.

Insufficient return data

This ETF is either too recently listed or does not yet have enough disclosed return data. Please refer to ETFs that have been operating for more than one year.

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade

Moderate Risk

The price swings may look small, but the options structure can gradually reduce your principal. Part of the dividends you receive may effectively be a return of your own invested capital.

🎴 Covered-call ETFs — Options absorb volatility

By selling call options to give up upside in exchange for premium, these ETFs show lower volatility than typical equity funds. This is an intended risk mitigation — not evidence of a "better ETF."

Average daily range (last 1 month)

하위 25%

±1.02%

S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more

Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)

ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.

Max Drawdown · Past 10 years

-9.8%

Drawdown duration: 2 months

2026-05-28 → 2026-07-28

Still recovering

2025-09-25 Worst -7% 2026-07-01

ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.

Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)

-0.61

Poor — Underperforms the risk-free rate

ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.

Dividend Analysis

Yield · Dividend history · After-tax income calculator

Covered call distribution — 8.94% annually

The stated distribution yield is high, but it combines option premiums and return of capital, so it differs from a "pure dividend."

ℹ️ Covered call ETF distributions combine option premiums with return of capital (ROC), so distributions may decline when the share price falls; even a high stated yield may be partly paid from principal.

배당수익률

8.94%

주당 배당

$2.01

연간 기준

5년 성장률

지급 주기

분기배당

1월 · 2월 · 3월 · 11월 · 12월

📊 총 이력 2025~2026 (5건)

연도별 배당 총액 추이

주당 배당금을 연 단위로 합산한 금액입니다. 막대가 우상향이면 매년 배당이 늘어나고 있다는 뜻입니다. 커버드콜은 기초자산·옵션 시장 변동에 따라 연도별 변동이 일반 배당주보다 크게 나타날 수 있습니다.

—

2021

—

2022

—

2023

—

2024

$0.52

2025

$X.XX 그 해 총 배당금 +X% 전년 대비 증가 -X% 감소

최근 배당 이력 총 5건

아래로 스크롤하면 과거 배당 이력을 볼 수 있습니다.

배당락일

주당 금액

지급일

당시 수익률

2026-03-31

$0.238

—

5.33%

2026-02-27

$0.238

—

4.19%

2026-01-30

$0.238

—

3.15%

2025-12-31

$0.238

—

2.11%

2025-11-28

$0.282

—

1.16%

* "배당락일"은 배당받으려면 이 날 이전에 주식을 보유해야 하는 기준일입니다. 지급일·당시 수익률은 일부 종목에서 데이터가 없을 수 있습니다.

💰 내가 $100K 투자한다면

연간 배당금 (세후) $8K

5년 누적 (세후) $38K

* 환율 1 가정, 배당소득세 15% 반영. 5년 누적은 배당 성장률 연 0% 가정.

* Qualified dividend middle-bracket approximation. Actual rate varies by total income.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

Income-focused ETF monthly distributions matter more to you than long-term capital growth.

💡 Dividend income-focused product. Capital appreciation is limited, and some distributions may be a return of principal.

🎯 목적별 적합도

내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.

🌳

장기 보유

수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때

매우 낮음

💵

배당 인컴

매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때

매우 적합

⚡

단기 트레이딩

며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매

낮음

🧩

포트폴리오 보조

자산 배분·헤지 용도

낮음

👤

이런 분에게 어울려요

Dividend-focused income investors (accepting limited capital growth)

✅ 강점

뚜렷한 강점이 드러나지 않아요.

⚠️ 약점·주의사항

⚠️Volatility is above average
🧪Option structure can slowly erode principal (NAV erosion)

Category Peers

Category: US Equities - Quant Strat

같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 6/6위

카테고리: US Equities - Quant Strat

ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?

같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 ACEI보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 ACEI보다 불리를 뜻해요.

티커	ETF명	보수율	AUM	보유종목	배당률	YTD	1년
ACEI	Innovator Equity Autocallable Income Strategy ETF	0.79%	$42M	12	8.94%	-8.78%	-
JEPI	JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF	0.35% ▲	$45.6B ▲	128	7.95% ▼	-	+0.54%
JEPQ	JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF	0.35% ▲	$39.1B ▲	111	10.95% ▲	-	+3.49%
QYLD	Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	0.6% ▲	$8.1B ▲	107	12.07% ▲	-	+4.23%
GPIQ	Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF	0.29% ▲	$5.0B ▲	109	10.30% ▲	-	+7.60%
GPIX	Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF	0.29% ▲	$4.9B ▲	500	8.17% ▼	-	+8.27%

AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ ACEI보다 유리 · ▼ ACEI보다 불리

Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme

ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy

16 ETFs tracking the same theme as ACEI using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 8 · Inverse 3 · Covered Call 5)

Not direct derivatives of ACEI, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.

ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?

Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with ACEI, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.

⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding

Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.

📈 Leverage 8 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)