TOAO
Twin Oak Active Opportunities III ETF
5월 14일 10:13 AM ET (한국 5/14 23:13)
$26.30
+0.10 ▲ +0.39%
TOAO ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.
Total Expense Ratio
0.95%
Annual operating cost
Net Assets (AUM)
$426M
약 5834억원
Holdings
49 items
Dividend Yield
-
Management Style
Active
| Category | Target Date / Multi-Asset - Other | Asset Type | Multi-Asset - Tactical / Active | Return% 1Y | - | Total Holdings | 49 | Perf Week | -0.63% |
| ETF Type | US Diversified | Active/Passive | Active | Return% 3Y | - | AUM | $426M | Perf Month | 1.85% |
| Expense | 0.95% | NAV | $26.13 | Return% 5Y | - | 52W High | -2.7% | Perf Quarter | 3.89% |
| Dividend TTM | - | Div Gr. 3/5Y | - | Return% 10Y | - | 52W Low | 4.98% | Perf Half Y | - |
| Flows% 1M | - | Flows% YTD | 0.03% | Return% SI | 14.74% | Volatility(W/M) | - | Perf YTD | 3.89% |
| SMA20 | -1.11% | SMA50 | 0.87% | SMA200 | 0.87% | RSI (14) | 49.92 | Beta | - |
| IPO | 2026/4/24 | Prev Close | $26.2 | Perf Year | - | Avg Volume | 0.00M | Price | $26.3 |
Twin Oak Active Opportunities III ETF (TOAO) Investment Analysis
ETF Overview
Twin Oak Active Opportunities III ETF · Target Date / Multi-Asset - Other
액티브 운용 — 펀드매니저가 종목을 선별해 초과수익 추구
Globalequityfixed-incomeETFs
- 규모
- $426M 약 5834억원
- 운용사
- -
- 운용 방식
- 액티브 (운용사 재량)
- 상장일
- 2026년
Cost Efficiency
Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact
Average expense ratio — 0.95% annually
Mid-range within the Target Date / Multi-Asset - Other category.
Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)
평균권0.95%
My positionMid-range
Low range Average High range
Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount
$100.0M
Annual Expense Ratio
$950K
Pay $130K more per year vs. category average
Category Median Annual Cost
$820K
Based on expense ratio of 0.82%
10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)
$16.8M
17.4% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees
Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.
Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.
Cheaper alternatives in the same category
CTAP
Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF
0.10%
-0.85%p annually
ITDC
iShares LifePath Target Date 2035 ETF
0.10%
-0.85%p annually
ITDD
iShares LifePath Target Date 2040 ETF
0.11%
-0.84%p annually
* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.
Long-Term Performance
1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense
Insufficient return data
Insufficient return data
This ETF is either too recently listed or does not yet have enough disclosed return data. Please refer to ETFs that have been operating for more than one year.
Risk Profile
Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History
Overall Risk Grade
Low Risk
Less volatile than the market average, making it relatively easy to hold over time.
Average daily range (last 1 month)
±0.00%
S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more
Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)
ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.
Max Drawdown · Past 10 years
-4.1%
2026-04-24 Worst -5% 2026-07-01
ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.
Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)
1.02
Good — Solid risk-adjusted returns
ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.
Overall investment appeal
What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile
An average ETF No standout strengths or weaknesses — pretty run-of-the-mill.
🎯 목적별 적합도
내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.
보통
낮음
낮음
낮음
이런 분에게 어울려요
Investors who believe in active strategies
✅ 강점
뚜렷한 강점이 드러나지 않아요.
⚠️ 약점·주의사항
특별한 약점이 보이지 않아요.
Portfolio Composition
What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings
43개 종목에 넓게 분산
개별 종목 리스크가 분산되어 있어요.
ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?
ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.
🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기
총 보유종목
43개
상위 10개 비중
16.1%
최대 단일 종목
5.93%
집중도(HHI)
65
낮음 (분산)
📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 16.1% 차지
티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)
#1 - Invesco Treasury Portfolio 5.93%
#3 - LendingClub Structured Loan Certificate Issuer Trust Series 2025-P10 0.82%
#4 - LendingClub Structured Loan Certificate Issuer Trust Series 2025-P12 0.75%
#5 - PAR 2026-1 Issuer Trust 0.70%
#6 - SLCLC 2025-P13 R 0.69%
#7 - Upgrade Master Pass-Thru Trust Series 2025-ST7 0.61%
#8 - LendingClub Structured Loan Certificate Issuer Trust Series 2025-P15 0.60%
#9 - LendingClub Structured Loan Certificate Issuer Trust Series 2025-P8 0.58%
#10 - BEAST 2025-E CERT 0.58%
Category Peers
Category: Target Date / Multi-Asset - Other
같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 5/6위
카테고리: Target Date / Multi-Asset - Other
ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?
같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 TOAO보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 TOAO보다 불리를 뜻해요.
| 티커 | ETF명 | 보수율 | AUM | 보유종목 | 배당률 | YTD | 1년 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOAO | Twin Oak Active Opportunities III ETF | 0.95% | $426M | 49 | - | +3.89% | - |
| Capital Group Core Balanced ETF | 0.33% ▲ | $7.1B ▲ | 82 | 1.88% | - | +9.66% | |
| iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF | 0.99% ▼ | $5.2B ▲ | 2418 | 0.27% | - | - | |
| iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF | 0.15% ▲ | $3.6B ▲ | 9 | 2.59% | - | +9.88% | |
| iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF | 0.15% ▲ | $3.2B ▲ | 12 | 2.15% | - | +13.50% | |
| First Trust Institutional Preferred Securities and Income ETF | 0.85% ▲ | $1.9B ▲ | 176 | 5.81% | - | +0.53% |
AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ TOAO보다 유리 · ▼ TOAO보다 불리
Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme
ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy
9 ETFs tracking the same theme as TOAO using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 2 · Inverse 3 · Covered Call 4)
Not direct derivatives of TOAO, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.
ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?
Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with TOAO, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.
⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding
Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.
Leverage 2 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)
Inverse 3 ETFs that bet on declines in the same theme
Covered Call & Options 4 ETFs that add a monthly dividend via covered calls on the same theme
FAQ
What kind of ETF is TOAO?
TOAO is an ETF in the Target Date / Multi-Asset - Other category.
How many holdings does TOAO have?
TOAO holds a total of 49 securities, with an AUM of approximately $426M.
What is the 52-week high and low for TOAO?
TOAO has recorded a 52-week high of $27.03 and a low of $25.06.
면책조항: 본 콘텐츠는 참고 자료이며 투자 권유가 아닙니다. 모든 투자의 책임은 투자자 본인에게 있습니다.