RDIV 주가 전망 및 ETF 분석 - 배당·운용보수·보유종목·NAV·RSI·MACD

RDIV

Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF

7월 28일 9:46 AM ET (한국 7/28 22:46)

$62.62

+0.52 ▲ +0.84%

RDIV ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

Total Expense Ratio

0.39%

Annual operating cost

Net Assets (AUM)

$1.4B

약 2조원

Holdings

63 items

Dividend Yield

3.45%

Management Style

Passive

Category ⓘ	US Equities - Dividend & Fundamental	Asset Type ⓘ	Equities (Stocks)	Return% 1Y ⓘ	29.87%	Total Holdings ⓘ	63	Perf Week ⓘ	2.4%
ETF Type ⓘ	US Equities	Active/Passive ⓘ	Passive	Return% 3Y ⓘ	19.49%	AUM ⓘ	$1.4B	Perf Month ⓘ	6.3%
Expense ⓘ	0.39%	NAV ⓘ	$62.08	Return% 5Y ⓘ	13.95%	52W High ⓘ	0.16%	Perf Quarter ⓘ	12.71%
Dividend TTM ⓘ	$2.16 (3.45%)	Div Gr. 3/5Y ⓘ	11.03% 4.23%	Return% 10Y ⓘ	11.16%	52W Low ⓘ	32.45%	Perf Half Y ⓘ	16.11%
Flows% 1M ⓘ	1.07%	Flows% YTD ⓘ	29.48%	Return% SI ⓘ	11.79%	Volatility(W/M) ⓘ	0.98% 1.03%	Perf YTD ⓘ	20.33%
SMA20 ⓘ	4.06%	SMA50 ⓘ	6.24%	SMA200 ⓘ	13.12%	RSI (14) ⓘ	69.49	Beta ⓘ	0.78
IPO ⓘ	2013/10/1	Prev Close ⓘ	$62.1	Perf Year ⓘ	26%	Avg Volume ⓘ	0.07M	Price ⓘ	$62.62

📊 Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF · US Equities - Dividend & Fundamental

레버리지형 — 지수의 2~3배 방향으로 추종 (단기 투자용 · 고위험)

2013년 상장, 13년 운영 중.

Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF는 수수료 및 비용 차감 전 기준으로 S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted 지수의 투자 결과를 추종하고자 합니다. S&P 900 지수 구성 종목 중 매출 실적이 양호하고 배당 수익률이 높은 기업들을 선별하여 매출 비중으로 가중치를 부여하며, 자산의 최소 90%를 해당 지수 종목에 투자하는 비분산형(Non-diversified) 펀드입니다.

📘 RDIV ETF 자세히 알아보기 →

U.S.equitydividendrevenue

규모: $1.4B 약 2조원
운용사: Invesco
운용 방식: 패시브 (지수 추종)
상장일: 2013년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Average expense ratio — 0.39% annually

Mid-range within the US Equities - Dividend & Fundamental category.

Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)

평균권

0.39%

My positionMid-range

Low range Average High range

Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount

$100.0M

Annual Expense Ratio

$390K

Save $60K per year vs. category average

Category Median Annual Cost

$450K

Based on expense ratio of 0.45%

10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)

$7.1M

7.3% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees

💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Cheaper alternatives in the same category

VIG

Vanguard Dividend Appreciation FTF

0.04%

-0.35%p annually

VYM

Vanguard High Dividend Yield Indx ETF

0.04%

-0.35%p annually

DIVB

iShares Core Dividend ETF

0.05%

-0.34%p annually

* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Upper-tier returns in its category

상위 25% within US Equities - Dividend & Fundamental.+12.1%p vs. benchmark (SPY) over 1Y.

ℹ️ The "1Y·3Y·5Y·10Y" periods below represent annualized returns (CAGR) measured backward from today. Example: "3Y +12%" means the investment grew at a compounded 12% per year over the past three years.

⚡ Leveraged ETF — beware of compounding decay over long holding periods

These ETFs aim to deliver 2–3× the daily return of the underlying index, but during sideways or volatile markets, compounding effects can cause long-term cumulative returns to diverge significantly from 2–3× the index. They are suited for short-term trading and are not appropriate as core holdings for long-term portfolios.

If you had invested 10 year(s) ago

$100.0M

Today's value

$288.1M

→

Total gain

+$188.1M

Annualized +11.2%

ℹ️ How to read the return breakdown bar

Each period bar shows the share of this ETF's returns by source.

Price gains Price decline Dividends received

Mostly blue (80%+): Growth-style — price gains drive most returns
Mostly orange (70%+): Income-style — dividends drive most returns (watch out for after-tax drag)
Red + orange: Stagnant or declining price — dividends offset losses (common in covered-call and high-dividend funds)

1 Year

2025.07 ~ 2026.07

Annualized +29.87%

상위 5%

Price +26.00% + Dividend +3.87% = Total +29.87%/yr

Outperformed the benchmark by 12.1%p annually

My positionTop 5%

Low range Average High range

3 Years

2023.07 ~ 2026.07

Annualized +19.49% Cumulative +70.6%

상위 25%

Price +14.85% + Dividend +4.64% = Total +19.49%/yr

Similar to benchmark

My positionTop 25%

Low range Average High range

5 Years

2021.07 ~ 2026.07

Annualized +13.95% Cumulative +92.1%

상위 25%

Price +9.36% + Dividend +4.59% = Total +13.95%/yr

Outperformed the benchmark by 1.1%p annually

My positionTop 25%

Low range Average High range

10Y

2016.07 ~ 2026.07

Annualized +11.16% Cumulative +188.1%

평균권

Price +6.55% + Dividend +4.61% = Total +11.16%/yr

Trailed the benchmark by 3.8%p annually

My positionMid-range

Low range Average High range

10Y Cumulative Total Return Curve

2016-07-28 start, based on a 100M KRW base — read the curve values directly as units of 100M KRW (e.g., 308 → 3.08억 / 308M KRW). Both this ETF and the benchmark are rebased to 100 on the same start date for comparison.

RDIV · Price Only RDIV · Price + Cumulative Dividends RDIV · Dividend Reinvested S&P 500 (SPY)

150

250

350

450

ℹ️ Price Only: Excludes dividends and tracks pure stock price only. Covered-call and high-dividend ETFs often show a flat or declining line on this view, which is meaningful from a "principal preservation" standpoint. Price + Cumulative Dividend: Share count stays the same and received dividends are accumulated as cash. Closely matches your actual account total assets. Reinvested: Dividends are immediately used to buy additional shares (adjClose-based, the industry standard for total return). The wider the gap between the three lines, the easier it is to gauge the effectiveness of the dividend strategy.

Annual Return Comparison

ETF returns vs S&P 500 (SPY) by calendar year

RDIV S&P 500 (SPY)

+40%

−40%

+10%

2017

-6%

2018

+22%

2019

-10%

2020

+30%

2021

+7%

2022

+5%

2023

+14%

2024

+12%

2025

+20%

2026 YTD

💡 Leveraged ETFs have an asymmetric structure: big wins in up markets, big losses in down markets.

ℹ️ Returns from January 1 to December 31 of each year. The current year (2026) column is dimmed to indicate YTD (incomplete). If blue is higher than gray, the ETF outperformed the benchmark in that year.

Win rate vs S&P 500 (SPY)

1 / 9Y

Lags behind benchmark (11%)

+ 2026 YTD: Ahead (20.0% vs 8.5%)

2017 ✗

2018 ✗

2019 ✗

2020 ✗

2021 ✗

2022 ✓

2023 ✗

2024 ✗

2025 ✗

2026 ✓ YTD

💡 Leveraged wins in up markets, loses big in down markets — annual return dispersion matters more than win rate.

ℹ️ Number of winning years versus S&P 500 (SPY) within a completed calendar year (1/1–12/31). The current year (YTD) is reported separately.

Downside Capture

🛡️ 56%

Falls less than the benchmark in drawdowns — strong downside protection

<85% (Defend) 85~110% (Track) >110% (Lag)

💡 Leveraged ETFs are designed to fall 2–3x the benchmark — values above 200% are normal. Short-term risk must be considered.

ℹ️ Average % drop of this ETF when S&P 500 (SPY) is −1%. Based on daily returns over the past 3 years (only days where the benchmark is negative).

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade

High Risk

These 2-3x leveraged products are structurally very volatile. Holding them long-term can erode your principal in ways that don't match expectations, so they're better suited for short-term trading.

⚡ Leveraged ETF — High Beta & Volatility Are by Design

A Beta of 2 or higher and volatility 2–3× the underlying index is by design. The "high volatility" reading below is a feature of the product, not a problem. However, long-term holding can lead to compounding decay and results that differ from expectations.

Beta (market sensitivity)

평균권

0.78

If the market rises +10% +7.8%

If the market falls -10% -7.8%

My positionMid-range

Low range Average High range

ℹ️ A beta of 1.0 moves in line with the market. Above 1 means it moves more than the market; below 1 means less.

Average daily range (last 1 month)

평균권

±1.03%

S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more

Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)

ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.

Max Drawdown · Past 10 years

-50.0%

Drawdown duration: 2 months

2020-01-16 → 2020-03-23

Recovered in about 11 months

2015-07-31 Worst -45% 2026-07-01

ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.

Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)

0.39

Weak — Low risk-adjusted returns

ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.

Estimated Monthly Maximum Loss (VaR 95%)

-7.2%

Historically, monthly losses exceeding this figure occurred only5%of the time.

ℹ️ A statistical estimate meaning "with 95% probability, monthly losses will not exceed this amount." The remaining 5% corresponds to crisis-level events such as financial crises or pandemics.

Dividend Analysis

Yield · Dividend history · After-tax income calculator

Leveraged ETF distribution — 3.45% annually

Its leveraged structure makes it unsuitable for long-term dividend investing.5-year dividend growth rate: +4.2%.

ℹ️ Leveraged ETFs are not designed for dividend income. Even if they temporarily show a high yield, their structure makes them unsuitable for long-term dividend investing.

배당수익률

3.45%

주당 배당

$2.16

연간 기준

5년 성장률

4.2%

지급 주기

분기배당

3월 · 9월 · 12월

🏆 4년 연속 배당 증가

📊 총 이력 2013~2026 (48건)

연도별 배당 총액 추이

주당 배당금을 연 단위로 합산한 금액입니다. 막대가 우상향이면 매년 배당이 늘어나고 있다는 뜻입니다.

$1.07 -13.9%

2016

$1.56 +45.8%

2017

$1.45 -7.3%

2018

$1.52 +5.0%

2019

$1.30 -14.6%

2020

$1.04 -20.1%

2021

$1.50 +44.7%

2022

$1.72 +14.5%

2023

$1.97 +14.6%

2024

$2.05 +4.4%

2025

$X.XX 그 해 총 배당금 +X% 전년 대비 증가 -X% 감소

최근 배당 이력 총 48건

아래로 스크롤하면 과거 배당 이력을 볼 수 있습니다.

배당락일

주당 금액

지급일

당시 수익률

2026-03-23

$0.556

—

4.79%

2025-12-22

$0.529

—

4.91%

2025-09-22

$0.552

—

4.93%

2025-06-23

$0.473

—

5.19%

2025-03-24

$0.498

—

4.00%

2024-12-23

$0.516

—

4.06%

2024-09-23

$0.501

—

3.74%

2024-06-24

$0.448

—

4.08%

2024-03-18

$0.501

—

5.10%

2023-12-18

$0.403

—

4.95%

2023-09-18

$0.491

—

5.47%

2023-06-20

$0.390

—

5.02%

2023-03-20

$0.432

—

4.91%

2022-12-19

$0.429

—

4.28%

2022-09-19

$0.370

—

3.42%

2022-06-21

$0.350

—

3.42%

2022-03-21

$0.350

—

3.23%

2021-12-20

$0.334

—

4.63%

2021-06-21

$0.329

—

4.18%

2021-03-22

$0.373

—

4.22%

2020-12-21

$0.850

—

5.36%

2020-06-22

$0.162

—

6.02%

2020-03-23

$0.284

—

7.81%

2019-12-23

$0.488

—

4.68%

2019-09-23

$0.422

—

4.70%

2019-06-24

$0.336

—

3.60%

2019-03-19

$0.271

—

3.69%

2018-12-26

$0.331

—

5.70%

2018-09-25

$0.406

—

5.13%

2018-06-19

$0.379

—

5.00%

2018-03-16

$0.329

—

5.31%

2017-12-28

$0.446

—

5.17%

2017-10-03

$0.417

—

4.97%

2017-07-05

$0.351

—

4.52%

2017-04-04

$0.345

—

4.14%

2016-12-28

$0.333

—

4.20%

2016-10-04

$0.271

—

4.37%

2016-07-05

$0.212

—

4.42%

2016-04-04

$0.253

—

3.92%

2015-12-29

$0.368

—

5.41%

2015-10-05

$0.296

—

3.99%

2015-07-06

$0.244

—

4.01%

2015-04-02

$0.333

—

4.56%

2014-12-29

$0.272

—

3.27%

2014-10-03

$0.310

—

3.52%

2014-07-03

$0.226

—

2.41%

2014-04-02

$0.212

—

1.66%

2013-12-27

$0.237

—

0.92%

* "배당락일"은 배당받으려면 이 날 이전에 주식을 보유해야 하는 기준일입니다. 지급일·당시 수익률은 일부 종목에서 데이터가 없을 수 있습니다.

💰 내가 $100K 투자한다면

연간 배당금 (세후) $3K

5년 누적 (세후) $16K

* 환율 1 가정, 배당소득세 15% 반영. 5년 누적은 배당 성장률 연 4.23% 가정.

* Qualified dividend middle-bracket approximation. Actual rate varies by total income.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

Designed for short-term trading Not recommended for long-term investing, but suitable for short-term trading and hedging.

⚠️ 2–3x leveraged product; not suitable for long-term holding. Use as a short-term trading tool only.

🎯 목적별 적합도

내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.

🌳

장기 보유

수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때

매우 낮음

💵

배당 인컴

매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때

부적합

⚡

단기 트레이딩

며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매

매우 적합

🧩

포트폴리오 보조

자산 배분·헤지 용도

매우 낮음

👤

이런 분에게 어울려요

Short-term traders only

✅ 강점

📈Top-tier long-term returns

⚠️ 약점·주의사항

🎢Leveraged — compounding decay can produce results that differ from expectations over long holds

Portfolio Composition

What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings

파생상품 기반 ETF

실제 보유 종목이 일반 ETF와 다르게 스왑·선물 중심이에요.

ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?

ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.

🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기

총 보유종목

61개

상위 10개 비중

50.2%

최대 단일 종목

5.52%

집중도(HHI)

381

낮음 (분산)

⚠️ 소수 종목·섹터에 집중되어 있어, 해당 종목/섹터가 흔들리면 ETF 전체가 크게 영향을 받아요.

🥧 섹터 비중

Energy

23.4%

Financial

17.6%

Consumer Defensive

14.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%

Healthcare

8.7%

Real Estate

7.5%

Utilities

6.8%

Technology

4.7%

📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 50.2% 차지

티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)

#1 BMY Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.

5.52%

#2 CVX Chevron Corp.

5.40%

#3 OKE ONEOK, Inc.

5.27%

#4 TGT Target Corp.

5.18%

PBF PBF Energy Inc.

4.95%

#6 F Ford Motor Co.

4.94%

#7 - Invesco Private Prime Fund

4.80%

#8 USB U.S. Bancorp

4.76%

HPQ HP Inc.

4.69%

#10 TFC Truist Financial Corp.

4.67%

Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme

ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy

10 ETFs tracking the same theme as RDIV using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 3 · Covered Call 7)

Not direct derivatives of RDIV, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.

ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?

Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with RDIV, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.

⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding

Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.

📈 Leverage 3 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)