* Q4 figures are derived from the annual filing (10-K) · loss-making quarters are underlined in red
📊 Reddit Inc (RDDT) Investment Analysis
📐
What kind of company is Reddit Inc?
레딧(RDDT) 초고성장주
Communication Services·Internet Content & Information
📊
Top 440 by Market Cap — Large-Cap
💬 This is a global community- and discussion-based internet content platform. Founded in the United States in 2005 and headquartered in San Francisco, it operates a user-generated content and community discussion business centered around topic-based subreddits.
Bollinger Bands are upper and lower channels showing the closing price range (20 days · 2σ). Touching the upper band = overheated; touching the lower band = oversold. Ichimoku Cloud shows trend direction and strength through colored areas. Prices above the cloud indicate an uptrend; prices below indicate a downtrend. About Bollinger Bands →
🔴
Current diagnosis · 2026-07-24
Downtrend zone
Current price $168.73 below the midline ($187.13). Normal downward flow. Below the Ichimoku cloud (bearish).
MACD (12 · 26 · 9)Expand ▼
An indicator that uses the difference between the short-term EMA (12) and long-term EMA (26) to identify trend reversals. When MACD rises above the Signal line, it is a buy signal (golden cross); when it falls below, it is a sell signal (death cross). About MACD →
🔴
Current diagnosis · 2026-07-24
Bearish momentum holding
MACD -0.052 < Signal 3.899 in negative zone + Hist negative (-3.951). Weakness in progress.
RSI(14) · Stochastics %K(14)Expand ▼
RSI measures short-term buying and selling pressure on a scale of 0–100. 30 or below = oversold (a rebound may be possible); 70 or above = overbought (a pullback may be possible). Stoch %K similarly measures short-term momentum strength. RSI · Learn more about Stochastics →
🔴
Current diagnosis · 2026-07-24
Bearish zone
RSI 41.8 (below the neutral level of 50). Selling pressure leads, indicating a weak trend. Stoch %K is also 7.5.
※ "Current diagnosis" is an automated interpretation based on standard thresholds and is for reference only. Make your own comprehensive judgment before trading.
🎯
Is it attractive at this price?
⚠️
Pricier than peers in its industry
Pricey on Vs. Earnings·Vs. Assets·Vs. Sales·Vs. Cash Flow
💡 How to read this — Compare against peers in the same industry to see what the price is cheap or expensive relative to. Example: cheap vs. earnings = stock price is low relative to what the company earns; expensive vs. assets = stock price is high relative to assets on the balance sheet.
💵Vs. EarningsPricey
🏢Vs. AssetsPricey
🧾Vs. SalesPricey
💧Vs. Cash FlowPricey
💵 Vs. Earnings
PER Price-to-Earnings Ratio
How expensive the price is vs. earnings — lower is cheaper
47.84x
✓ Very pricey
My positionBottom 5%
Low rangeAverageHigh range
Internet Content & Information median 15.63x · Bottom 1% — expensive within the industry
💡 PER 15 이하 저평가, 25 이상이면 성장성 검증 필요 (적자 기업은 의미 없음)
💵 Vs. Earnings
Forward PER Forward Price-to-Earnings Ratio
PER using next year's estimated earnings — reflects growth
25.79x
✓ Pricey
My positionBottom 25%
Low rangeAverageHigh range
Internet Content & Information median 11.69x · Bottom 17% — expensive within the industry
💡 향후 12개월 예상 EPS 기준 PER. 현재 PER보다 낮으면 이익 성장 중
🏢 Vs. Assets
PBR Price-to-Book Ratio
Price vs. the company's asset value — below 1 trades cheaper than assets
10.21x
✓ Very pricey
My positionBottom 5%
Low rangeAverageHigh range
Internet Content & Information median 1.50x · Bottom 1% — expensive within the industry
💡 PBR 1 미만이면 청산가치 이하 (금융·제조업에서 특히 의미, IT는 낮은 비중)
🧾 Vs. Sales
PSR Price-to-Sales Ratio
Market cap vs. revenue — lower is cheaper relative to sales
13.13x
✓ Very pricey
My positionBottom 5%
Low rangeAverageHigh range
Internet Content & Information median 0.94x · Bottom 1% — expensive within the industry
💡 PSR 2 이하 저평가, 10 초과면 고평가 (고성장 기업일 때만 정당화)
💧 Vs. Cash Flow
EV/EBITDA Enterprise Value Multiple
Total enterprise value ÷ operating cash earnings — a benchmark for M&A
46.66x
✓ Very pricey
My positionBottom 5%
Low rangeAverageHigh range
Internet Content & Information median 10.16x · Bottom 1% — expensive within the industry
💡 EV/EBITDA 10 이하 저평가, 20 이상이면 고평가 (M&A 밸류 기준)
💧 Vs. Cash Flow
P/FCF Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Ratio
Price vs. actual cash generation — lower means more efficient
37.39x
✓ Pricey
My positionBottom 25%
Low rangeAverageHigh range
Internet Content & Information median 11.81x · Bottom 22% — expensive within the industry
💡 P/FCF 20 이하면 현금창출 대비 저평가 (실질 수익성 기준)
Analyst target price (reference)
$230.23 vs. current price +36.4%
* Valuation is the stock's relative position within the industry peer group (same sector and market-cap range). Even when valuation looks attractive, check the 'Profitability' and 'Growth' sections too.
As of: Recent snapshot · Peer group: Internet Content & Information
👥
Who owns it?
🔴
Ownership backdrop is unfavorable
Insider modest net selling -0.8% · Institutional net selling -3.9% · Short interest elevated 12.4% · Short interest fell -1.3%p over the last 90 days
📈 Recent trading flow (6 months)
🧑💼 Insiders (executives & directors)
-0.8%
Insiders net selling
🏦 Institutions (funds & investors)
-3.9%
Institutions net selling
💡 Net change over the past 6 months. Shows how much insiders and institutions increased or reduced their holdings, in %.
👥 Holdings composition
🏦 Institutions65.9%
Adequate institutional weight
Communication Services 대형주 Median 58.1%
🧑💼 Insiders28.8%
Founder/management large holders (strong skin-in-the-game)
Communication Services 대형주 Median 11.6%
👤 Retail investors (estimated)5.3%
Everyone excluding institutions and insiders
InstitutionsInsidersRetail (est.)
📉 Short-selling metrics
Short ratio
12.4%
Somewhat high
Communication Services 대형주 Median 4.3%
Past 90 days 📉 -1.3%p decrease
Short interest days to cover
3.4 days
Days needed to close short positions using average trading volume
🧮 Share count
Total shares outstanding141.9M주
Float (tradable shares)137.1M주
* Insider/institutional flows are based on net changes over the past 6 months. Trend is cumulative over the past 90 days.
Leveraged, inverse, and covered call ETFs based on the underlying asset
2 derivative ETFs based on RDDT (Leverage 1 · Covered Call 1)
These are based on the same underlying asset but carry a completely different risk and return profile. Please review the warning below first.
ℹ️ What is a Derivative ETF?
These are special ETFs that amplify, reverse, or monetize the price movement of an underlying ETF or security. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs target opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.
⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding
Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.
📈Leverage1ETFs that move 2-3x with RDDT (high volatility)