QNDX 주가 전망 및 ETF 분석 - 배당·운용보수·보유종목·NAV·RSI·MACD

QNDX

State Street SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF

7월 28일 12:13 PM ET (한국 7/29 01:13)

$23.10

-0.08 ▼ -0.35%

QNDX ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

Total Expense Ratio

0.1%

Annual operating cost

Net Assets (AUM)

$139M

약 1905억원

Holdings

106 items

Dividend Yield

Management Style

Passive

Category ⓘ	US Equities - Broad Market & Size	Asset Type ⓘ	Equities (Stocks)	Return% 1Y ⓘ	-	Total Holdings ⓘ	106	Perf Week ⓘ	-1.99%
ETF Type ⓘ	US Equities	Active/Passive ⓘ	Passive	Return% 3Y ⓘ	-	AUM ⓘ	$139M	Perf Month ⓘ	-4.59%
Expense ⓘ	0.1%	NAV ⓘ	$23.17	Return% 5Y ⓘ	-	52W High ⓘ	-7.53%	Perf Quarter ⓘ	-
Dividend TTM ⓘ	-	Div Gr. 3/5Y ⓘ	-	Return% 10Y ⓘ	-	52W Low ⓘ	-0.09%	Perf Half Y ⓘ	-
Flows% 1M ⓘ	25878.4%	Flows% YTD ⓘ	25878.4%	Return% SI ⓘ	-35.65%	Volatility(W/M) ⓘ	1.25% 1.62%	Perf YTD ⓘ	-4.55%
SMA20 ⓘ	-4.01%	SMA50 ⓘ	-4.02%	SMA200 ⓘ	-4.02%	RSI (14) ⓘ	40.12	Beta ⓘ	-
IPO ⓘ	2026/6/24	Prev Close ⓘ	$23.18	Perf Year ⓘ	-	Avg Volume ⓘ	0.56M	Price ⓘ	$23.1

📊 State Street SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF (QNDX) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

State Street SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF · US Equities - Broad Market & Size

광범위 지수형 — 시총 버킷 미상의 광범위 지수 추종

📘 QNDX ETF 자세히 알아보기 →

U.S.equitytechnologyconsumer-discretionary

규모: $139M 약 1905억원
운용사: -
운용 방식: 패시브 (지수 추종)
상장일: 2026년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Average expense ratio — 0.1% annually

Mid-range within the US Equities - Broad Market & Size category.

Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)

평균권

0.1%

My positionMid-range

Low range Average High range

Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount

$100.0M

Annual Expense Ratio

$100K

Save $130K per year vs. category average

Category Median Annual Cost

$230K

Based on expense ratio of 0.23%

10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)

$1.8M

1.9% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees

💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Cheaper alternatives in the same category

SPYM

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF

0.02%

-0.08%p annually

BBUS

JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF

* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Insufficient return data

This ETF is either too recently listed or does not yet have enough disclosed return data. Please refer to ETFs that have been operating for more than one year.

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade

Low Risk

Less volatile than the market average, making it relatively easy to hold over time.

Average daily range (last 1 month)

하위 5%

±1.62%

S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more

ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

Strengths and weaknesses both present Check the fit below to see whether it matches your investing goal.

🎯 목적별 적합도

내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.

🌳

장기 보유

수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때

적합

💵

배당 인컴

매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때

낮음

⚡

단기 트레이딩

며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매

매우 낮음

🧩

포트폴리오 보조

자산 배분·헤지 용도

보통

👤

이런 분에게 어울려요

Long-term DCA and diversified investors

✅ 강점

뚜렷한 강점이 드러나지 않아요.

⚠️ 약점·주의사항

⚠️Very high volatility — invest only with capital you can hold for the long term

Category Peers

Category: US Equities - Broad Market & Size

같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 5/6위

카테고리: US Equities - Broad Market & Size

ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?

같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 QNDX보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 QNDX보다 불리를 뜻해요.

티커	ETF명	보수율	AUM	보유종목	배당률	YTD	1년
QNDX	State Street SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF	0.1%	$139M	106	-	-4.55%	-
VOO	Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	0.03% ▲	$980.9B ▲	519	1.08%	-	+16.01%
IVV	iShares Core S&P 500 ETF	0.03% ▲	$866.8B ▲	509	1.10%	-	+16.01%
SPY	SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust	0.09% ▲	$783.4B ▲	505	1.02%	-	+16.01%
VTI	Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF	0.03% ▲	$657.4B ▲	3544	1.07%	-	+16.41%
QQQ	Invesco QQQ Trust Series 1	0.18% ▼	$452.3B ▲	108	0.44%	-	+20.44%

AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ QNDX보다 유리 · ▼ QNDX보다 불리

Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme

ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy

24 ETFs tracking the same theme as QNDX using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 8 · Inverse 8 · Covered Call 8)

Not direct derivatives of QNDX, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.

ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?

Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with QNDX, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.

⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding

Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.

📈 Leverage 8 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)