PQUS 주가 전망 및 ETF 분석 - 배당·운용보수·보유종목·NAV·RSI·MACD

PQUS

Pictet AI Enhanced US Equity ETF

7월 28일 1:48 PM ET (한국 7/29 02:48)

$27.59

+0.08 ▲ +0.27%

🌙 7월 28일 4:04 PM ET (한국 7/29 05:04)

$27.59

+0.00 +0.00%

PQUS ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

Total Expense Ratio

0.22%

Annual operating cost

Net Assets (AUM)

$76M

약 1037억원

Holdings

162 items

Dividend Yield

Management Style

Active

Category ⓘ	US Equities - Quant Strat	Asset Type ⓘ	Equities (Stocks)	Return% 1Y ⓘ	-	Total Holdings ⓘ	162	Perf Week ⓘ	-0.74%
ETF Type ⓘ	US Equities	Active/Passive ⓘ	Active	Return% 3Y ⓘ	-	AUM ⓘ	$76M	Perf Month ⓘ	1.45%
Expense ⓘ	0.22%	NAV ⓘ	$27.52	Return% 5Y ⓘ	-	52W High ⓘ	-2.25%	Perf Quarter ⓘ	4.88%
Dividend TTM ⓘ	-	Div Gr. 3/5Y ⓘ	-	Return% 10Y ⓘ	-	52W Low ⓘ	17.64%	Perf Half Y ⓘ	-
Flows% 1M ⓘ	-16.29%	Flows% YTD ⓘ	462.52%	Return% SI ⓘ	22.85%	Volatility(W/M) ⓘ	0.23% 0.52%	Perf YTD ⓘ	9.18%
SMA20 ⓘ	-0.45%	SMA50 ⓘ	-0.11%	SMA200 ⓘ	4.21%	RSI (14) ⓘ	49.26	Beta ⓘ	-
IPO ⓘ	2026/2/26	Prev Close ⓘ	$27.51	Perf Year ⓘ	-	Avg Volume ⓘ	0.02M	Price ⓘ	$27.59

📊 Pictet AI Enhanced US Equity ETF (PQUS) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

Pictet AI Enhanced US Equity ETF · US Equities - Quant Strat

액티브 운용 — 펀드매니저가 종목을 선별해 초과수익 추구

Pictet AI Enhanced US Equity ETF는 독자적인 인공지능(AI) 및 머신러닝 모델을 활용하여 미국 대형주 포트폴리오를 구성하는 액티브 운용 ETF입니다. 전통적인 분석이나 인간이 놓치기 쉬운 주가 변동 요인을 파악하여 시장 벤치마크 대비 안정적인 초과 수익(Alpha)을 내는 것을 목표로 합니다.

📘 PQUS ETF 자세히 알아보기 →

U.S.equitylarge-capSP500

규모: $76M 약 1037억원
운용사: Pictet
운용 방식: 액티브 (운용사 재량)
상장일: 2026년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Top-tier low cost — 0.22% annually

상위 5% within the US Equities - Quant Strat category. For a ₩100M investment, the annual cost is roughly ₩220,000.

Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)

상위 5%

0.22%

My positionTop 5%

Low range Average High range

Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount

$100.0M

Annual Expense Ratio

$220K

Save $570K per year vs. category average

Category Median Annual Cost

$790K

Based on expense ratio of 0.79%

10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)

$4.0M

4.1% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees

💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Cheaper alternatives in the same category

CBOX

Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF

0.14%

-0.08%p annually

XBOX

Roundhill Ultra Short Duration No Dividend Target ETF

0.14%

-0.08%p annually

SELV

SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Low Volatility Active ETF

0.15%

-0.07%p annually

* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Insufficient return data

This ETF is either too recently listed or does not yet have enough disclosed return data. Please refer to ETFs that have been operating for more than one year.

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade

Low Risk

Less volatile than the market average, making it relatively easy to hold over time.

Average daily range (last 1 month)

평균권

±0.52%

S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more

Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)

ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.

Max Drawdown · Past 10 years

-7.2%

Drawdown duration: 1 months

2026-02-26 → 2026-03-30

Recovered in about 14 days

2026-02-26 Worst -5% 2026-07-01

ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.

Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)

1.44

Good — Solid risk-adjusted returns

ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

Strengths and weaknesses both present Check the fit below to see whether it matches your investing goal.

🎯 목적별 적합도

내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.

🌳

장기 보유

수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때

보통

💵

배당 인컴

매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때

낮음

⚡

단기 트레이딩

며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매

낮음

🧩

포트폴리오 보조

자산 배분·헤지 용도

낮음

👤

이런 분에게 어울려요

Investors who believe in active strategies

✅ 강점

💸Top 5% lowest expense ratio in US Equities - Quant Strat — 0.22% annually

⚠️ 약점·주의사항

특별한 약점이 보이지 않아요.

Portfolio Composition

What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings

173개 종목에 넓게 분산

개별 종목 리스크가 분산되어 있어요.

ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?

ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.

🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기

총 보유종목

173개

상위 10개 비중

38.8%

최대 단일 종목

7.68%

집중도(HHI)

232

낮음 (분산)

🥧 섹터 비중

Technology

34.4%

Financial

13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%

Communication Services

9.3%

Healthcare

8.6%

Industrials

6.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%

Utilities

2.8%

Energy

1.9%

Basic Materials

0.9%

Real Estate

0.6%

📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 38.8% 차지

티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)

#1 AAPL APPLE INC

7.68%

#2 NVDA NVIDIA CORP

7.11%

#3 MSFT MICROSOFT CORP

5.57%

#4 AVGO BROADCOM INC

3.26%

#5 GOOGL ALPHABET INC-CL A

3.16%

#6 AMZN AMAZON.COM INC

2.64%

#7 BRK-A BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC-CL B

2.51%

#8 GOOGL ALPHABET INC-CL C

2.41%

#9 LLY ELI LILLY & CO

2.35%

#10 TSLA TESLA INC

2.11%

Category Peers

Category: US Equities - Quant Strat

같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 2/6위

카테고리: US Equities - Quant Strat

ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?

같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 PQUS보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 PQUS보다 불리를 뜻해요.

티커	ETF명	보수율	AUM	보유종목	배당률	YTD	1년
PQUS	Pictet AI Enhanced US Equity ETF	0.22%	$76M	162	-	+9.18%	-
HELO	JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	0.5% ▼	$4.5B ▲	163	0.63%	-	+6.76%
CBOX	Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF	0.14% ▲	$1.2B ▲	4	-	-	-
FHEQ	Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF	0.48% ▼	$914M ▲	189	0.55%	-	+13.12%
INFO	Harbor PanAgora Dynamic Large Cap Core ETF	0.35% ▼	$830M ▲	146	0.31%	-	+21.45%
CAOS	Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF	0.63% ▼	$719M ▲	11	-	-	+1.90%

AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ PQUS보다 유리 · ▼ PQUS보다 불리

Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme

ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy

16 ETFs tracking the same theme as PQUS using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 8 · Inverse 3 · Covered Call 5)

Not direct derivatives of PQUS, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.

ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?

Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with PQUS, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.

⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding

Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.

📈 Leverage 8 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)