NLR 주가 전망 및 ETF 분석 - 배당·운용보수·보유종목·NAV·RSI·MACD

NLR

VanEck Uranium Nuclear Energy ETF

7월 28일 2:29 PM ET (한국 7/29 03:29)

$109.76

+1.66 ▲ +1.54%

NLR ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

Total Expense Ratio

0.52%

Annual operating cost

Net Assets (AUM)

$3.9B

약 5조원

Holdings

26 items

Dividend Yield

2.88%

Management Style

Passive

Category ⓘ	Global or ExUS Equities - Factor & Thematic	Asset Type ⓘ	Equities (Stocks)	Return% 1Y ⓘ	-5.99%	Total Holdings ⓘ	26	Perf Week ⓘ	4.46%
ETF Type ⓘ	Global Equities	Active/Passive ⓘ	Passive	Return% 3Y ⓘ	24.34%	AUM ⓘ	$3.9B	Perf Month ⓘ	-6.5%
Expense ⓘ	0.52%	NAV ⓘ	$108.35	Return% 5Y ⓘ	18.26%	52W High ⓘ	-34.71%	Perf Quarter ⓘ	-23.66%
Dividend TTM ⓘ	$3.17 (2.88%)	Div Gr. 3/5Y ⓘ	41.86% 23.63%	Return% 10Y ⓘ	11.07%	52W Low ⓘ	7.69%	Perf Half Y ⓘ	-28.16%
Flows% 1M ⓘ	-2.52%	Flows% YTD ⓘ	33.74%	Return% SI ⓘ	3.12%	Volatility(W/M) ⓘ	2.6% 3.04%	Perf YTD ⓘ	-11.63%
SMA20 ⓘ	-1.23%	SMA50 ⓘ	-8.85%	SMA200 ⓘ	-18.9%	RSI (14) ⓘ	43.1	Beta ⓘ	0.85
IPO ⓘ	2007/8/15	Prev Close ⓘ	$108.1	Perf Year ⓘ	-9.25%	Avg Volume ⓘ	0.49M	Price ⓘ	$109.76

📊 VanEck Uranium Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

VanEck Uranium Nuclear Energy ETF · Global or ExUS Equities - Factor & Thematic

원자재형 — 금·원유·농산물 등 실물 자산 노출

2007년 상장, 19년 운영 중.

VanEck Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF는 운용 수수료 및 비용 차감 전 기준으로 MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index의 가격 및 수익률 성과를 최대한 가깝게 복제하는 것을 목표로 합니다. 통상적으로 총자산의 최소 80%를 벤치마크 지수 구성 증권에 투자합니다. 이 지수는 우라늄 및 원자력 에너지에 관여하는 기업이 발행한 주식 증권 및 예탁증서를 포함합니다. 비분산 펀드입니다.

📘 NLR ETF 자세히 알아보기 →

Globalequityenergymaterials

규모: $3.9B 약 5조원
운용사: VanEck
운용 방식: 패시브 (지수 추종)
상장일: 2007년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Average expense ratio — 0.52% annually

Mid-range within the Global or ExUS Equities - Factor & Thematic category.

Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)

평균권

0.52%

My positionMid-range

Low range Average High range

Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount

$100.0M

Annual Expense Ratio

$520K

Save $30K per year vs. category average

Category Median Annual Cost

$550K

Based on expense ratio of 0.55%

10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)

$9.4M

9.7% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees

💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Cheaper alternatives in the same category

KLMN

Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF

0.09%

-0.43%p annually

FINA

Fidelity MSCI North American Subset Index ETF

0.09%

-0.43%p annually

VSGX

Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF

0.10%

-0.42%p annually

* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Top-tier returns in its category

상위 5% vs. Global or ExUS Equities - Factor & Thematic.-23.8%p vs. benchmark (SPY) over 1Y.

ℹ️ The "1Y·3Y·5Y·10Y" periods below represent annualized returns (CAGR) measured backward from today. Example: "3Y +12%" means the investment grew at a compounded 12% per year over the past three years.

🪙 Commodity ETFs — Price moves, not dividends

These products are exposed to spot (or futures) commodity prices, pay no dividends, and returns come purely from price changes. Benchmarking against the commodity itself (rather than an index like SPY) may be more meaningful.

If you had invested 10 year(s) ago

$100.0M

Today's value

$285.7M

→

Total gain

+$185.7M

Annualized +11.1%

1 Year

2025.07 ~ 2026.07

Annualized -5.99%

하위 5%

Trailed the benchmark by 23.8%p annually

My positionBottom 5%

Low range Average High range

3 Years

2023.07 ~ 2026.07

Annualized +24.34% Cumulative +92.2%

상위 25%

Outperformed the benchmark by 5.3%p annually

My positionTop 25%

Low range Average High range

5 Years

2021.07 ~ 2026.07

Annualized +18.26% Cumulative +131.3%

상위 5%

Outperformed the benchmark by 5.4%p annually

My positionTop 5%

Low range Average High range

10Y

2016.07 ~ 2026.07

Annualized +11.07% Cumulative +185.7%

평균권

Trailed the benchmark by 3.8%p annually

My positionMid-range

Low range Average High range

10Y Cumulative Total Return Curve

2016-07-28 start, based on a 100M KRW base — read the curve values directly as units of 100M KRW (e.g., 308 → 3.08억 / 308M KRW). Both this ETF and the benchmark are rebased to 100 on the same start date for comparison.

NLR · Price Only NLR · Price + Cumulative Dividends NLR · Dividend Reinvested S&P 500 (SPY)

150

250

350

450

ℹ️ Price Only: Excludes dividends and tracks pure stock price only. Covered-call and high-dividend ETFs often show a flat or declining line on this view, which is meaningful from a "principal preservation" standpoint. Price + Cumulative Dividend: Share count stays the same and received dividends are accumulated as cash. Closely matches your actual account total assets. Reinvested: Dividends are immediately used to buy additional shares (adjClose-based, the industry standard for total return). The wider the gap between the three lines, the easier it is to gauge the effectiveness of the dividend strategy.

Annual Return Comparison

ETF returns vs S&P 500 (SPY) by calendar year

NLR S&P 500 (SPY)

+60%

−60%

+9%

2017

+5%

2018

+1%

2019

+3%

2020

+15%

2021

+2%

2022

+37%

2023

+15%

2024

+51%

2025

-17%

2026 YTD

💡 SPY is an equity benchmark, so direct comparison with different asset classes is for reference only.

ℹ️ Returns from January 1 to December 31 of each year. The current year (2026) column is dimmed to indicate YTD (incomplete). If blue is higher than gray, the ETF outperformed the benchmark in that year.

Win rate vs S&P 500 (SPY)

4 / 9Y

Roughly even with benchmark (44%)

+ 2026 YTD: Behind (-17.5% vs 8.5%)

2017 ✗

2018 ✓

2019 ✗

2020 ✗

2021 ✗

2022 ✓

2023 ✓

2024 ✗

2025 ✓

2026 ✗ YTD

💡 Win rates against SPY are for reference only, since the asset class differs.

ℹ️ Number of winning years versus S&P 500 (SPY) within a completed calendar year (1/1–12/31). The current year (YTD) is reported separately.

Downside Capture

⚠️ 144%

Falls more than the benchmark — vulnerable in drawdowns

<85% (Defend) 85~110% (Track) >110% (Lag)

ℹ️ Average % drop of this ETF when S&P 500 (SPY) is −1%. Based on daily returns over the past 3 years (only days where the benchmark is negative).

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade

Commodity Benchmark

Commodities move on a different rhythm than the stock market, and volatility varies widely by type — gold tends to be stable while crude oil can swing sharply.

🪙 Commodity ETFs — Independent volatility patterns

Commodities move on a different cycle than equities. Beta (vs. stocks) carries little meaning, and volatility varies widely by asset (low for gold, high for crude oil).

Beta (market sensitivity)

평균권

0.85

If the market rises +10% +8.5%

If the market falls -10% -8.5%

My positionMid-range

Low range Average High range

ℹ️ A beta of 1.0 moves in line with the market. Above 1 means it moves more than the market; below 1 means less.

Average daily range (last 1 month)

하위 25%

±3.04%

S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more

Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)

ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.

Max Drawdown · Past 10 years

-36.6%

Drawdown duration: 6 months

2026-01-28 → 2026-07-17

Still recovering

2015-07-31 Worst -30% 2026-07-01

ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.

Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)

0.32

Weak — Low risk-adjusted returns

ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.

Estimated Monthly Maximum Loss (VaR 95%)

-8.6%

Historically, monthly losses exceeding this figure occurred only5%of the time.

ℹ️ A statistical estimate meaning "with 95% probability, monthly losses will not exceed this amount." The remaining 5% corresponds to crisis-level events such as financial crises or pandemics.

Dividend Analysis

Yield · Dividend history · After-tax income calculator

Dividend-paying ETF — 2.88% annually

An ETF that provides consistent dividend income.5-year dividend growth rate: +23.6%.

배당수익률

2.88%

주당 배당

$3.17

연간 기준

5년 성장률

23.6%

지급 주기

연배당

12월

📊 총 이력 2007~2025 (18건)

연도별 배당 총액 추이

주당 배당금을 연 단위로 합산한 금액입니다. 막대가 우상향이면 매년 배당이 늘어나고 있다는 뜻입니다.

$1.72 +15.7%

2016

$2.38 +38.6%

2017

$1.94 -18.7%

2018

$1.18 -39.1%

2019

$1.10 -7.0%

2020

$1.09 -0.5%

2021

$1.11 +1.6%

2022

$3.26 +193.8%

2023

$0.61 -81.2%

2024

$3.17 +415.6%

2025

$X.XX 그 해 총 배당금 +X% 전년 대비 증가 -X% 감소

최근 배당 이력 총 18건

아래로 스크롤하면 과거 배당 이력을 볼 수 있습니다.

배당락일

주당 금액

지급일

당시 수익률

2025-12-22

$3.17

—

2.95%

2024-12-23

$0.614

—

0.74%

2023-12-18

$3.26

—

6.11%

2022-12-19

$1.11

—

4.13%

2021-12-20

$1.09

—

4.11%

2020-12-21

$1.10

—

4.73%

2019-12-23

$1.18

—

2.43%

2018-12-20

$1.94

—

3.84%

2017-12-18

$2.38

—

8.11%

2016-12-19

$1.72

—

6.71%

2015-12-21

$1.49

—

6.22%

2014-12-22

$1.27

—

3.11%

2013-12-23

$0.333

—

4.72%

2012-12-24

$1.90

—

4.65%

2011-12-23

$5.80

—

20.20%

2010-12-23

$3.19

—

5.90%

2009-12-23

$1.25

—

1.85%

2007-12-24

$5.83

—

5.37%

* "배당락일"은 배당받으려면 이 날 이전에 주식을 보유해야 하는 기준일입니다. 지급일·당시 수익률은 일부 종목에서 데이터가 없을 수 있습니다.

💰 내가 $100K 투자한다면

연간 배당금 (세후) $2K

5년 누적 (세후) $20K

* 환율 1 가정, 배당소득세 15% 반영. 5년 누적은 배당 성장률 연 23.63% 가정.

* Qualified dividend middle-bracket approximation. Actual rate varies by total income.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

Overall attractive Key metrics look solid, and the strengths outweigh the weak spots.

🎯 목적별 적합도

내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.

🌳

장기 보유

수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때

낮음

💵

배당 인컴

매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때

매우 낮음

⚡

단기 트레이딩

며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매

낮음

🧩

포트폴리오 보조

자산 배분·헤지 용도

매우 적합

👤

이런 분에게 어울려요

Investors seeking asset diversification

✅ 강점

📈Top 5% long-term returns in Global or ExUS Equities - Factor & Thematic
🎯Outperforms benchmark by +5.4%p annually

⚠️ 약점·주의사항

⚠️Volatility is above average

Portfolio Composition

What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings

26개 종목으로 구성

상위 섹터는 Energy (26%)

ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?

ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.

🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기

총 보유종목

26개

상위 10개 비중

57.9%

최대 단일 종목

7.97%

집중도(HHI)

513

보통

⚠️ 소수 종목·섹터에 집중되어 있어, 해당 종목/섹터가 흔들리면 ETF 전체가 크게 영향을 받아요.

🥧 섹터 비중

Energy

25.7%

Utilities

23.4%

Industrials

11.7%

📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 57.9% 차지

티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)

#1 CCJ Cameco Corp

7.97%

#2 CEG Constellation Energy Corp

7.90%

BWXT BWX Technologies Inc

6.66%

#4 PEG Public Service Enterprise Group Inc

6.10%

#5 PCG PG&E Corp

5.58%

#6 - Fortum Oyj

5.25%

#7 - CGN Power Co Ltd

4.84%

#8 - NAC Kazatomprom JSC

4.58%

UEC Uranium Energy Corp

4.55%

#10 - CEZ AS

4.43%

Category Peers

Category: Global or ExUS Equities - Factor & Thematic

같은 카테고리 4종 중 AUM 1/4위 · 보수율 2/4위

카테고리: Global or ExUS Equities - Factor & Thematic

ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?

같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 NLR보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 NLR보다 불리를 뜻해요.

티커	ETF명	보수율	AUM	보유종목	배당률	YTD	1년
NLR	VanEck Uranium Nuclear Energy ETF	0.52%	$3.9B	26	2.88%	-11.63%	-9.25%
VEGI	iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF	0.39% ▲	$152M ▼	166	1.88% ▼	-	+11.30% ▲
EMET	VanEck Copper and Electrification Metals ETF	0.62% ▼	$33M ▼	64	1.79% ▼	-	+47.51% ▲
FTAG	First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF	0.7% ▼	$15M ▼	61	1.29% ▼	-	+8.72% ▲

AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ NLR보다 유리 · ▼ NLR보다 불리

Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme

ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy

15 ETFs tracking the same theme as NLR using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 7 · Inverse 5 · Covered Call 3)

Not direct derivatives of NLR, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.

ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?

Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with NLR, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.

⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding

Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.

📈 Leverage 7 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)