NASA 주가 전망 및 ETF 분석 - 배당·운용보수·보유종목·NAV·RSI·MACD

NASA

Tema Space Innovators ETF

7월 28일 1:04 PM ET (한국 7/29 02:04)

$22.45

+0.31 ▲ +1.40%

NASA ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

Total Expense Ratio

0.75%

Annual operating cost

Net Assets (AUM)

$1.1B

약 1조원

Holdings

37 items

Dividend Yield

Management Style

Active

Category ⓘ	Global or ExUS Equities - Factor & Thematic	Asset Type ⓘ	Equities (Stocks)	Return% 1Y ⓘ	-	Total Holdings ⓘ	37	Perf Week ⓘ	-0.27%
ETF Type ⓘ	Global Equities	Active/Passive ⓘ	Active	Return% 3Y ⓘ	-	AUM ⓘ	$1.1B	Perf Month ⓘ	-15.03%
Expense ⓘ	0.75%	NAV ⓘ	$22.19	Return% 5Y ⓘ	-	52W High ⓘ	-47.4%	Perf Quarter ⓘ	-23.87%
Dividend TTM ⓘ	-	Div Gr. 3/5Y ⓘ	-	Return% 10Y ⓘ	-	52W Low ⓘ	1.95%	Perf Half Y ⓘ	-
Flows% 1M ⓘ	-24.31%	Flows% YTD ⓘ	-	Return% SI ⓘ	-33.48%	Volatility(W/M) ⓘ	4.29% 4.7%	Perf YTD ⓘ	-6.85%
SMA20 ⓘ	-12.27%	SMA50 ⓘ	-27.1%	SMA200 ⓘ	-26.04%	RSI (14) ⓘ	31.73	Beta ⓘ	-
IPO ⓘ	2026/3/31	Prev Close ⓘ	$22.14	Perf Year ⓘ	-	Avg Volume ⓘ	6.40M	Price ⓘ	$22.45

📊 Tema Space Innovators ETF (NASA) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

Tema Space Innovators ETF · Global or ExUS Equities - Factor & Thematic

테마형 — AI·로봇·블록체인 등 비-GICS 테마 ETF

NASA는 위성통신, 발사 시스템, 관련 기술에 종사하는 기업 등 상업 우주 경제 성장의 수혜를 받을 기업에 투자하는 액티브 운용 ETF입니다.

Globalequitytechnologyspace-exploration

규모: $1.1B 약 1조원
운용사: Tema
운용 방식: 액티브 (운용사 재량)
상장일: 2026년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Above-average cost — 0.75% annually

Expense ratio is higher than the Global or ExUS Equities - Factor & Thematic median. Compare against similar ETFs.

Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)

하위 25%

0.75%

My positionBottom 25%

Low range Average High range

Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount

$100.0M

Annual Expense Ratio

$750K

Pay $200K more per year vs. category average

Category Median Annual Cost

$550K

Based on expense ratio of 0.55%

10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)

$13.4M

13.8% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees

💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Cheaper alternatives in the same category

KLMN

Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF

0.09%

-0.66%p annually

FINA

Fidelity MSCI North American Subset Index ETF

0.09%

-0.66%p annually

VSGX

Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF

0.10%

-0.65%p annually

* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Insufficient return data

This ETF is either too recently listed or does not yet have enough disclosed return data. Please refer to ETFs that have been operating for more than one year.

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade

Low Risk

Less volatile than the market average, making it relatively easy to hold over time.

Average daily range (last 1 month)

하위 5%

±4.70%

S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more

Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)

ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.

Max Drawdown · Past 10 years

-47.1%

Drawdown duration: 2 months

2026-05-27 → 2026-07-24

Still recovering

2026-03-31 Worst -30% 2026-07-01

ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.

Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)

-0.50

Poor — Underperforms the risk-free rate

ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

Strengths and weaknesses both present Check the fit below to see whether it matches your investing goal.

🎯 목적별 적합도

내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.

🌳

장기 보유

수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때

낮음

💵

배당 인컴

매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때

매우 낮음

⚡

단기 트레이딩

며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매

보통

🧩

포트폴리오 보조

자산 배분·헤지 용도

보통

👤

이런 분에게 어울려요

Investors with conviction in a specific sector or theme

✅ 강점

뚜렷한 강점이 드러나지 않아요.

⚠️ 약점·주의사항

💸Expense ratio is somewhat high — 0.75% annually
⚠️Very high volatility — invest only with capital you can hold for the long term

Category Peers

Category: Global or ExUS Equities - Factor & Thematic

같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 4/6위 · 보수율 5/6위

카테고리: Global or ExUS Equities - Factor & Thematic

ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?

같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 NASA보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 NASA보다 불리를 뜻해요.

티커	ETF명	보수율	AUM	보유종목	배당률	YTD	1년
NASA	Tema Space Innovators ETF	0.75%	$1.1B	37	-	-6.85%	-
GRID	First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund	0.56% ▲	$11.5B ▲	128	0.81%	-	+21.87%
BOTZ	Global X Funds Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF	0.68% ▲	$3.2B ▲	67	0.51%	-	+0.03%
TAN	Invesco Solar ETF	0.7% ▲	$1.5B ▲	46	-	-	+31.83%
AIS	VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	0.75%	$851M ▼	62	-	-	+125.89%
ROBT	First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence and Robotics ETF	0.65% ▲	$693M ▼	121	0.02%	-	+5.16%

AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ NASA보다 유리 · ▼ NASA보다 불리

Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme

ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy

24 ETFs tracking the same theme as NASA using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 8 · Inverse 8 · Covered Call 8)

Not direct derivatives of NASA, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.

ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?

Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with NASA, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.

⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding

Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.

📈 Leverage 8 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)