MLPI
NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF
7월 28일 12:31 PM ET (한국 7/29 01:31)
$54.49
-1.06 ▼ -1.91%
MLPI ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.
Total Expense Ratio
0.68%
Annual operating cost
Net Assets (AUM)
$834M
약 1조원
Holdings
27 items
Dividend Yield
9.87%
Management Style
Active
| Category | Other Asset Types - Multi-Asset / Other | Asset Type | MLP | Return% 1Y | - | Total Holdings | 27 | Perf Week | -3.2% |
| ETF Type | US MLPs | Active/Passive | Active | Return% 3Y | - | AUM | $834M | Perf Month | -2.44% |
| Expense | 0.68% | NAV | $55.68 | Return% 5Y | - | 52W High | -6.81% | Perf Quarter | -0.53% |
| Dividend TTM | $5.38 (9.87%) | Div Gr. 3/5Y | - | Return% 10Y | - | 52W Low | 10.86% | Perf Half Y | 5.9% |
| Flows% 1M | 22.51% | Flows% YTD | 1847.61% | Return% SI | 41.47% | Volatility(W/M) | 1.18% 1.27% | Perf YTD | 8.74% |
| SMA20 | -2.07% | SMA50 | -2.42% | SMA200 | -0.38% | RSI (14) | 39.5 | Beta | - |
| IPO | 2025/12/18 | Prev Close | $55.55 | Perf Year | - | Avg Volume | 0.33M | Price | $54.49 |
NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI) Investment Analysis
ETF Overview
NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF · Other Asset Types - Multi-Asset / Other
에너지 섹터 — 에너지 섹터 ETF (석유·가스·에너지 서비스)
2025년 상장, 1년 운영 중.
NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF는 세금 효율적인 방식으로 높은 월간 수익을 창출하면서 자본 증식 잠재력을 유지하고자 합니다. 정상적인 상황에서 순자산의 최소 80%(차입금 포함)를 에너지 인프라 MLP 및 관련 기업의 주식에 배분하며, 비분산형(Non-diversified) 펀드입니다.
📘 MLPI ETF 자세히 알아보기 →U.S.equityoptionsenergy
- 규모
- $834M 약 1조원
- 운용사
- NEOS
- 운용 방식
- 액티브 (운용사 재량)
- 상장일
- 2025년
Cost Efficiency
Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact
Average expense ratio — 0.68% annually
Mid-range within the Other Asset Types - Multi-Asset / Other category.
Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)
평균권0.68%
My positionMid-range
Low range Average High range
Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount
$100.0M
Annual Expense Ratio
$680K
Save $10K per year vs. category average
Category Median Annual Cost
$690K
Based on expense ratio of 0.69%
10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)
$12.1M
12.6% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees
Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.
Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.
Cheaper alternatives in the same category
MSBT
Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust
0.14%
-0.54%p annually
BTC
Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF
0.15%
-0.53%p annually
ETH
Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF
0.15%
-0.53%p annually
* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.
Long-Term Performance
1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense
Insufficient return data
Insufficient return data
This ETF is either too recently listed or does not yet have enough disclosed return data. Please refer to ETFs that have been operating for more than one year.
Risk Profile
Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History
Overall Risk Grade
Low Risk
Less volatile than the market average, making it relatively easy to hold over time.
Average daily range (last 1 month)
평균권±1.27%
S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more
Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)
ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.
Max Drawdown · Past 10 years
-6.9%
2025-12-18 Worst -7% 2026-07-01
ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.
Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)
1.86
Excellent — Strong risk-adjusted returns
ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.
Dividend Analysis
Yield · Dividend history · After-tax income calculator
Dividend-paying ETF — 9.87% annually
An ETF that provides consistent dividend income.
배당수익률
9.87%
주당 배당
$5.38
연간 기준
5년 성장률
-
지급 주기
분기배당
1월 · 2월 · 3월 · 4월 · 12월
연도별 배당 총액 추이
주당 배당금을 연 단위로 합산한 금액입니다. 막대가 우상향이면 매년 배당이 늘어나고 있다는 뜻입니다.
—
2021
—
2022
—
2023
—
2024
$0.65
2025
$X.XX 그 해 총 배당금 +X% 전년 대비 증가 -X% 감소
최근 배당 이력 총 5건
아래로 스크롤하면 과거 배당 이력을 볼 수 있습니다.
배당락일
주당 금액
지급일
당시 수익률
2026-04-22
$0.667
—
6.06%
2026-03-18
$0.680
—
4.77%
2026-02-18
$0.638
—
3.58%
2026-01-21
$0.661
—
2.59%
2025-12-24
$0.652
—
1.30%
* "배당락일"은 배당받으려면 이 날 이전에 주식을 보유해야 하는 기준일입니다. 지급일·당시 수익률은 일부 종목에서 데이터가 없을 수 있습니다.
💰 내가 $100K 투자한다면
연간 배당금 (세후) $8K
5년 누적 (세후) $42K
* 환율 1 가정, 배당소득세 15% 반영. 5년 누적은 배당 성장률 연 0% 가정.
* Qualified dividend middle-bracket approximation. Actual rate varies by total income.
Overall investment appeal
What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile
An average ETF No standout strengths or weaknesses — pretty run-of-the-mill.
🎯 목적별 적합도
내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.
보통
낮음
매우 낮음
낮음
이런 분에게 어울려요
Long-term and recurring investors
✅ 강점
뚜렷한 강점이 드러나지 않아요.
⚠️ 약점·주의사항
특별한 약점이 보이지 않아요.
Portfolio Composition
What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings
28개 종목으로 구성
상위 섹터는 Energy (76%)
ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?
ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.
🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기
총 보유종목
28개
상위 10개 비중
59.7%
최대 단일 종목
9.42%
집중도(HHI)
513
보통
⚠️ 소수 종목·섹터에 집중되어 있어, 해당 종목/섹터가 흔들리면 ETF 전체가 크게 영향을 받아요.
🥧 섹터 비중
Energy 75.8%
Utilities 2.8%
📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 59.7% 차지
티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)
Category Peers
Category: Other Asset Types - Multi-Asset / Other
같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 3/6위 · 보수율 3/6위
카테고리: Other Asset Types - Multi-Asset / Other
ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?
같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 MLPI보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 MLPI보다 불리를 뜻해요.
| 티커 | ETF명 | 보수율 | AUM | 보유종목 | 배당률 | YTD | 1년 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLPI | NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF | 0.68% | $834M | 27 | 9.87% | +8.74% | - |
| First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.95% ▼ | $4.2B ▲ | 58 | 2.75% ▼ | - | +16.83% | |
| Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 0.45% ▲ | $3.7B ▲ | 31 | 4.06% ▼ | - | +23.44% | |
| USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF | 0.69% ▼ | $519M ▼ | 25 | 3.79% ▼ | - | +24.43% | |
| VanEck Energy Income ETF | 0.46% ▲ | $80M ▼ | 31 | 2.64% ▼ | - | +27.79% | |
| Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 0.75% ▼ | $67M ▼ | 29 | 3.75% ▼ | - | +27.54% |
AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ MLPI보다 유리 · ▼ MLPI보다 불리
Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme
ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy
21 ETFs tracking the same theme as MLPI using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 8 · Inverse 5 · Covered Call 8)
Not direct derivatives of MLPI, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.
ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?
Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with MLPI, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.
⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding
Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.
Leverage 8 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)
XQQI
NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
-0.26%
$245M
XBAP
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April
+0.13%
$131M
XBCI
NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF
+1.38%
$104M
XBJA
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - January
+0.16%
$88M
XSPI
NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF
+0.23%
$79M
SEMY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST Semiconductor ETF
-0.49%
$78M
XBJL
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July
+0.13%
$74M
XDSQ
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF - Quarterly
+0.09%
$69M
Inverse 5 ETFs that bet on declines in the same theme
WNTR
YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF
-5.13%
$80M
FIAT
YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
-4.69%
$36M
CRSH
YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF
+0.99%
$18M
YQQQ
YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF
+0.34%
$15M
DIPS
YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF
+3.69%
$8M
Covered Call & Options 8 ETFs that add a monthly dividend via covered calls on the same theme
JEPI
JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF
+0.51%
$45.3B
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
-0.38%
$39.2B
SPYI
NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF
+0.04%
$10.8B
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
-0.06%
$8.0B
DIVO
Amplify CPW Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
+0.19%
$7.5B
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
+0.07%
$3.2B
FTHI
First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF
-0.21%
$2.4B
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
+0.49%
$1.9B
FAQ
What kind of ETF is MLPI?
MLPI is an ETF in the Other Asset Types - Multi-Asset / Other category, managed by NEOS.
How many holdings does MLPI have?
MLPI holds a total of 27 securities, with an AUM of approximately $834M.
Does MLPI pay dividends (distributions)?
MLPI's distribution yield is approximately 9.87%.
What is the 52-week high and low for MLPI?
MLPI has recorded a 52-week high of $58.47 and a low of $49.15.
면책조항: 본 콘텐츠는 참고 자료이며 투자 권유가 아닙니다. 모든 투자의 책임은 투자자 본인에게 있습니다.