* Q4 figures are derived from the annual filing (10-K) · loss-making quarters are underlined in red
📊 Hyatt Hotels Corp (H) Investment Analysis
📐
What kind of company is Hyatt Hotels Corp?
하얏트 호텔즈(H) 초고성장주
Consumer Cyclical·Lodging
📈
#654 by Market Cap — Mid-Cap
This company operates hotels and resorts worldwide with a focus on luxury and lifestyle hospitality. It manages and operates hotels and resorts around the world, centered on luxury and upscale brands, and is shifting toward an asset-light model that emphasizes management contracts and franchising over direct ownership. It is one of the leading companies in the global hotel industry.
Bollinger Bands are upper and lower channels showing the closing price range (20 days · 2σ). Touching the upper band = overheated; touching the lower band = oversold. Ichimoku Cloud shows trend direction and strength through colored areas. Prices above the cloud indicate an uptrend; prices below indicate a downtrend. About Bollinger Bands →
🔴
Current diagnosis · 2026-07-24
Downtrend zone
Current price $187.13 below the midline ($190.38). Normal downward flow. Inside the Ichimoku cloud (neutral).
MACD (12 · 26 · 9)Expand ▼
An indicator that uses the difference between the short-term EMA (12) and long-term EMA (26) to identify trend reversals. When MACD rises above the Signal line, it is a buy signal (golden cross); when it falls below, it is a sell signal (death cross). About MACD →
🔴
Current diagnosis · 2026-07-24
Bearish momentum holding
MACD -0.739 < Signal 0.195 in negative zone + Hist negative (-0.934). Weakness in progress.
RSI(14) · Stochastics %K(14)Expand ▼
RSI measures short-term buying and selling pressure on a scale of 0–100. 30 or below = oversold (a rebound may be possible); 70 or above = overbought (a pullback may be possible). Stoch %K similarly measures short-term momentum strength. RSI · Learn more about Stochastics →
🔴
Current diagnosis · 2026-07-24
Bearish zone
RSI 46.6 (below the neutral level of 50). Selling pressure leads, indicating a weak trend. Stoch %K is also 38.9.
※ "Current diagnosis" is an automated interpretation based on standard thresholds and is for reference only. Make your own comprehensive judgment before trading.
🎯
Is it attractive at this price?
⚠️
Pricier than peers in its industry
Pricey on Vs. Earnings·Vs. Cash Flow, In line with peers on Vs. Assets·Vs. Sales
💡 How to read this — Compare against peers in the same industry to see what the price is cheap or expensive relative to. Example: cheap vs. earnings = stock price is low relative to what the company earns; expensive vs. assets = stock price is high relative to assets on the balance sheet.
💵Vs. EarningsPricey
🏢Vs. AssetsMid-range
🧾Vs. SalesMid-range
💧Vs. Cash FlowPricey
💵 Vs. Earnings
Forward PER Forward Price-to-Earnings Ratio
PER using next year's estimated earnings — reflects growth
38.02x
✓ Very pricey
My positionBottom 5%
Low rangeAverageHigh range
Consumer Cyclical 대형주 median 16.10x · Bottom 1% — expensive within the industry
💡 향후 12개월 예상 EPS 기준 PER. 현재 PER보다 낮으면 이익 성장 중
🏢 Vs. Assets
PBR Price-to-Book Ratio
Price vs. the company's asset value — below 1 trades cheaper than assets
5.46x
✓ Fair
My positionMid-range
Low rangeAverageHigh range
Consumer Cyclical 대형주 median 5.14x · Around the industry average
💡 PBR 1 미만이면 청산가치 이하 (금융·제조업에서 특히 의미, IT는 낮은 비중)
🧾 Vs. Sales
PSR Price-to-Sales Ratio
Market cap vs. revenue — lower is cheaper relative to sales
2.45x
✓ Fair
My positionMid-range
Low rangeAverageHigh range
Consumer Cyclical 대형주 median 2.20x · Around the industry average
💡 PSR 2 이하 저평가, 10 초과면 고평가 (고성장 기업일 때만 정당화)
💧 Vs. Cash Flow
EV/EBITDA Enterprise Value Multiple
Total enterprise value ÷ operating cash earnings — a benchmark for M&A
28.74x
✓ Very pricey
My positionBottom 25%
Low rangeAverageHigh range
Consumer Cyclical 대형주 median 14.54x · Bottom 10% — expensive within the industry
💡 EV/EBITDA 10 이하 저평가, 20 이상이면 고평가 (M&A 밸류 기준)
💧 Vs. Cash Flow
P/FCF Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Ratio
Price vs. actual cash generation — lower means more efficient
155.93x
✓ Very pricey
My positionBottom 5%
Low rangeAverageHigh range
Consumer Cyclical 대형주 median 23.14x · Bottom 1% — expensive within the industry
💡 P/FCF 20 이하면 현금창출 대비 저평가 (실질 수익성 기준)
Analyst target price (reference)
$201.27 vs. current price +7.6%
* Valuation is the stock's relative position within the industry peer group (same sector and market-cap range). Even when valuation looks attractive, check the 'Profitability' and 'Growth' sections too.
As of: Recent snapshot · Peer group: Consumer Cyclical 대형주
👥
Who owns it?
🔴
Ownership backdrop is unfavorable
Insider modest net selling -0.8% · Institutional net selling -2.8% · Short interest elevated 11.5% · Short interest fell -3.2%p over the last 90 days
📈 Recent trading flow (6 months)
🧑💼 Insiders (executives & directors)
-0.8%
Insiders net selling
🏦 Institutions (funds & investors)
-2.8%
Institutions net selling
💡 Net change over the past 6 months. Shows how much insiders and institutions increased or reduced their holdings, in %.
👥 Holdings composition
🏦 Institutions52.8%
Adequate institutional weight
Consumer Cyclical 대형주 Median 85.8%
🧑💼 Insiders59.1%
Founder/management large holders (strong skin-in-the-game)
Consumer Cyclical 대형주 Median 2.2%
👤 Retail investors (estimated)0.0%
Everyone excluding institutions and insiders
InstitutionsInsidersRetail (est.)
📉 Short-selling metrics
Short ratio
11.5%
Somewhat high
Consumer Cyclical 대형주 Median 4.8%
Past 90 days 📉 -3.2%p decrease
Short interest days to cover
5.2 days
Days needed to close short positions using average trading volume
🧮 Share count
Total shares outstanding41.0M주
Float (tradable shares)38.5M주
* Insider/institutional flows are based on net changes over the past 6 months. Trend is cumulative over the past 90 days.
Leveraged, inverse, and covered call ETFs based on the underlying asset
24 derivative ETFs based on H (Leverage 8 · Inverse 8 · Covered Call 8)
These are based on the same underlying asset but carry a completely different risk and return profile. Please review the warning below first.
ℹ️ What is a Derivative ETF?
These are special ETFs that amplify, reverse, or monetize the price movement of an underlying ETF or security. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs target opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.
⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding
Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.
📈Leverage8ETFs that move 2-3x with H (high volatility)