GLTR 주가 전망 및 ETF 분석 - 배당·운용보수·보유종목·NAV·RSI·MACD

GLTR

Abrdn Precious Metals Basket ETF Trust

7월 28일 12:56 PM ET (한국 7/29 01:56)

$182.90

+1.63 ▲ +0.90%

GLTR ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

Total Expense Ratio

0.6%

Annual operating cost

Net Assets (AUM)

$2.5B

약 3조원

Holdings

1 items

Dividend Yield

Management Style

Passive

Category ⓘ	Commodities & Metals - Gold / Metals	Asset Type ⓘ	Commodities & Metals	Return% 1Y ⓘ	25.1%	Total Holdings ⓘ	1	Perf Week ⓘ	2.43%
ETF Type ⓘ	Global Commodities & Metals	Active/Passive ⓘ	Passive	Return% 3Y ⓘ	25.62%	AUM ⓘ	$2.5B	Perf Month ⓘ	1.5%
Expense ⓘ	0.6%	NAV ⓘ	$182.01	Return% 5Y ⓘ	13.49%	52W High ⓘ	-38.09%	Perf Quarter ⓘ	-17.04%
Dividend TTM ⓘ	-	Div Gr. 3/5Y ⓘ	-	Return% 10Y ⓘ	10.25%	52W Low ⓘ	32.56%	Perf Half Y ⓘ	-29.8%
Flows% 1M ⓘ	-0.74%	Flows% YTD ⓘ	11.06%	Return% SI ⓘ	5.7%	Volatility(W/M) ⓘ	1.02% 1.46%	Perf YTD ⓘ	-11.04%
SMA20 ⓘ	0.24%	SMA50 ⓘ	-6.18%	SMA200 ⓘ	-12.13%	RSI (14) ⓘ	45.61	Beta ⓘ	0.26
IPO ⓘ	2010/10/22	Prev Close ⓘ	$181.27	Perf Year ⓘ	28.89%	Avg Volume ⓘ	0.07M	Price ⓘ	$182.9

📊 Abrdn Precious Metals Basket ETF Trust (GLTR) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

Abrdn Precious Metals Basket ETF Trust · Commodities & Metals - Gold / Metals

일반 ETF — 카테고리 기반 분석만 제공됩니다

2010년 상장, 16년 운영 중.

abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF는 신탁이 보유한 물리적 금, 은, 백금, 팔라듐의 가격 성과(신탁 비용 차감 후)를 반영하고자 합니다. 투자자들이 신용 리스크가 적은 주식 형태로 4대 귀금속 실물 바스켓에 쉽고 비용 효율적으로 분산 투자할 수 있는 수단을 제공합니다.

📘 GLTR ETF 자세히 알아보기 →

commodityphysicalprecious-metals

규모: $2.5B 약 3조원
운용사: abrdn
운용 방식: 패시브 (지수 추종)
상장일: 2010년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Average expense ratio — 0.6% annually

Mid-range within the Commodities & Metals - Gold / Metals category.

Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)

평균권

0.6%

My positionMid-range

Low range Average High range

Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount

$100.0M

Annual Expense Ratio

$600K

Pay $10K more per year vs. category average

Category Median Annual Cost

$590K

Based on expense ratio of 0.59%

10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)

$10.8M

11.1% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees

💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Cheaper alternatives in the same category

IAUM

iShares Gold Trust Micro

0.09%

-0.51%p annually

GLDM

SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust

0.10%

-0.50%p annually

FGDL

Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF

0.15%

-0.45%p annually

* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Average long-term returns

Near the Commodities & Metals - Gold / Metals median.+7.3%p vs. benchmark (SPY) over 1Y.

ℹ️ The "1Y·3Y·5Y·10Y" periods below represent annualized returns (CAGR) measured backward from today. Example: "3Y +12%" means the investment grew at a compounded 12% per year over the past three years.

If you had invested 10 year(s) ago

$100.0M

Today's value

$265.3M

→

Total gain

+$165.3M

Annualized +10.3%

1 Year

2025.07 ~ 2026.07

Annualized +25.10%

상위 25%

Outperformed the benchmark by 7.3%p annually

My positionTop 25%

Low range Average High range

3 Years

2023.07 ~ 2026.07

Annualized +25.62% Cumulative +98.2%

평균권

Outperformed the benchmark by 6.6%p annually

My positionMid-range

Low range Average High range

5 Years

2021.07 ~ 2026.07

Annualized +13.49% Cumulative +88.3%

평균권

Outperformed the benchmark by 0.6%p annually

My positionMid-range

Low range Average High range

10Y

2016.07 ~ 2026.07

Annualized +10.25% Cumulative +165.3%

평균권

Trailed the benchmark by 4.7%p annually

My positionMid-range

Low range Average High range

10Y Cumulative Total Return Curve

2016-07-28 start, based on a 100M KRW base — read the curve values directly as units of 100M KRW (e.g., 308 → 3.08억 / 308M KRW). Both this ETF and the benchmark are rebased to 100 on the same start date for comparison.

GLTR · Price Only GLTR · Price + Cumulative Dividends GLTR · Dividend Reinvested S&P 500 (SPY)

150

250

350

450

ℹ️ Price Only: Excludes dividends and tracks pure stock price only. Covered-call and high-dividend ETFs often show a flat or declining line on this view, which is meaningful from a "principal preservation" standpoint. Price + Cumulative Dividend: Share count stays the same and received dividends are accumulated as cash. Closely matches your actual account total assets. Reinvested: Dividends are immediately used to buy additional shares (adjClose-based, the industry standard for total return). The wider the gap between the three lines, the easier it is to gauge the effectiveness of the dividend strategy.

Annual Return Comparison

ETF returns vs S&P 500 (SPY) by calendar year

GLTR S&P 500 (SPY)

+90%

−90%

+11%

2017

-4%

2018

+21%

2019

+29%

2020

-11%

2021

+1%

2022

+2%

2023

+21%

2024

+84%

2025

-12%

2026 YTD

ℹ️ Returns from January 1 to December 31 of each year. The current year (2026) column is dimmed to indicate YTD (incomplete). If blue is higher than gray, the ETF outperformed the benchmark in that year.

Win rate vs S&P 500 (SPY)

4 / 9Y

Roughly even with benchmark (44%)

+ 2026 YTD: Behind (-12.0% vs 8.5%)

2017 ✗

2018 ✓

2019 ✗

2020 ✓

2021 ✗

2022 ✓

2023 ✗

2024 ✗

2025 ✓

2026 ✗ YTD

ℹ️ Number of winning years versus S&P 500 (SPY) within a completed calendar year (1/1–12/31). The current year (YTD) is reported separately.

Downside Capture

🛡️ 50%

Falls less than the benchmark in drawdowns — strong downside protection

<85% (Defend) 85~110% (Track) >110% (Lag)

ℹ️ Average % drop of this ETF when S&P 500 (SPY) is −1%. Based on daily returns over the past 3 years (only days where the benchmark is negative).

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade

Low Risk

Less volatile than the market average, making it relatively easy to hold over time.

Beta (market sensitivity)

평균권

0.26

If the market rises +10% +2.6%

If the market falls -10% -2.6%

My positionMid-range

Low range Average High range

ℹ️ A beta of 1.0 moves in line with the market. Above 1 means it moves more than the market; below 1 means less.

Average daily range (last 1 month)

평균권

±1.46%

S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more

Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)

ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.

Max Drawdown · Past 10 years

-37.9%

Drawdown duration: 6 months

2026-01-28 → 2026-07-16

Still recovering

2015-07-31 Worst -36% 2026-07-01

ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.

Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)

0.42

Weak — Low risk-adjusted returns

ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.

Estimated Monthly Maximum Loss (VaR 95%)

-7.3%

Historically, monthly losses exceeding this figure occurred only5%of the time.

ℹ️ A statistical estimate meaning "with 95% probability, monthly losses will not exceed this amount." The remaining 5% corresponds to crisis-level events such as financial crises or pandemics.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

An average ETF No standout strengths or weaknesses — pretty run-of-the-mill.

🎯 목적별 적합도

내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.

🌳

장기 보유

수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때

보통

💵

배당 인컴

매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때

매우 낮음

⚡

단기 트레이딩

며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매

매우 낮음

🧩

포트폴리오 보조

자산 배분·헤지 용도

낮음

👤

이런 분에게 어울려요

Long-term and recurring investors

✅ 강점

뚜렷한 강점이 드러나지 않아요.

⚠️ 약점·주의사항

특별한 약점이 보이지 않아요.

Category Peers

Category: Commodities & Metals - Gold / Metals

같은 카테고리 4종 중 AUM 1/4위 · 보수율 2/4위

카테고리: Commodities & Metals - Gold / Metals

ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?

같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 GLTR보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 GLTR보다 불리를 뜻해요.

티커	ETF명	보수율	AUM	보유종목	배당률	YTD	1년
GLTR	Abrdn Precious Metals Basket ETF Trust	0.6%	$2.5B	1	-	-11.04%	+28.89%
DBB	Invesco DB Base Metals Fund	0.75% ▼	$364M ▼	9	-	-	+29.90% ▲
DBP	Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund	0.76% ▼	$205M ▼	8	-	-	+25.59% ▼
EVMT	Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	0.59% ▲	$7M ▼	14	11.32%	-	+12.76% ▼

AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ GLTR보다 유리 · ▼ GLTR보다 불리

Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme

ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy

21 ETFs tracking the same theme as GLTR using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 8 · Inverse 6 · Covered Call 7)

Not direct derivatives of GLTR, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.

ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?

Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with GLTR, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.

⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding

Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.

📈 Leverage 8 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)