장마감
Log in Sign up
GLNK
GLNK
Grayscale Investments LLC
7월 28일 4:00 PM ET (한국 7/29 05:00)
$7.43
-0.23 ▼ -3.00%
🌙 7월 28일 7:59 PM ET (한국 7/29 08:59)
$7.36
-0.07 ▼ -0.93%

GLNK ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

시황 · 실적발표 · 매수매도 신호, 가장 먼저 받아보세요 🔔 구독
Total Expense Ratio
0%
Annual operating cost
Net Assets (AUM)
$90M
약 1234억원
Holdings
1 items
Dividend Yield
-
Management Style
Passive
Category Other Asset Types - Multi-Asset / OtherAsset Type CryptoCurrencyReturn% 1Y -Total Holdings 1Perf Week -3%
ETF Type Global CryptocurrencyActive/Passive PassiveReturn% 3Y -AUM $90MPerf Month 13.96%
Expense -NAV $7.65Return% 5Y -52W High -89.38%Perf Quarter -9.17%
Dividend TTM -Div Gr. 3/5Y -Return% 10Y -52W Low 18.88%Perf Half Y -29.71%
Flows% 1M 3.9%Flows% YTD 90.72%Return% SI -49.19%Volatility(W/M) 1.94% 2.64%Perf YTD -31.8%
SMA20 2.98%SMA50 0.86%SMA200 -34.43%RSI (14) 52.45Beta 4.1
IPO 2022/5/19Prev Close $7.66Perf Year -78.15%Avg Volume 0.24MPrice $7.43

📊 Grayscale Investments LLC (GLNK) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

Grayscale Investments LLC · Other Asset Types - Multi-Asset / Other

일반 ETF — 카테고리 기반 분석만 제공됩니다
2022년 상장, 4년 운영 중.

Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF는 체인링크(LINK) 토큰을 보유하는 패시브 운용 단일 자산 암호화폐 ETP이며, 펀드가 보유한 LINK 가치에서 비용과 부채를 차감한 금액을 반영하는 것을 투자 목표로 합니다. 1940년 투자회사법에 따라 등록되지 않은 비(非)40 Act 상장 거래상품으로, 높은 변동성과 단일 산업 집중 리스크가 있습니다.

📘 GLNK ETF 자세히 알아보기 →
Globalcrypto-spotcryptoLINK
규모
$90M 약 1234억원
운용사
Grayscale
운용 방식
패시브 (지수 추종)
상장일
2022년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Average expense ratio — 0% annually
Limited category sample — assessed against all ETFs.
Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)
0%
Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount
$100.0M
Annual Expense Ratio
$0
Category Median Annual Cost
-
No category distribution data available
10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)
$0
0.0% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees
💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Cheaper alternatives in the same category

* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Insufficient return data
-95.9%p vs. benchmark (SPY) over 1Y.
ℹ️ The "1Y·3Y·5Y·10Y" periods below represent annualized returns (CAGR) measured backward from today. Example: "3Y +12%" means the investment grew at a compounded 12% per year over the past three years.
If you had invested 1 year(s) ago
$100.0M
Today's value
$21.9M
Total loss
$-78,150,000
Annualized -78.2%
1 Year
2025.07 ~ 2026.07
Annualized -78.15%
하위 5%
Trailed the benchmark by 95.9%p annually
My positionBottom 5%
Low range Average High range
3 Years
2023.07 ~ 2026.07
Insufficient data
5 Years
2021.07 ~ 2026.07
Listed 2022/5 — under 5 years
10Y
2016.07 ~ 2026.07
Listed 2022/5 — under 10 years
2Y Cumulative Total Return Curve
2024-07-09 start, based on a 100M KRW base — read the curve values directly as units of 100M KRW (e.g., 308 → 3.08억 / 308M KRW). Both this ETF and the benchmark are rebased to 100 on the same start date for comparison.
GLNK · Price Only GLNK · Price + Cumulative Dividends GLNK · Dividend Reinvested S&P 500 (SPY)
0
50
100
150
ℹ️ Price Only: Excludes dividends and tracks pure stock price only. Covered-call and high-dividend ETFs often show a flat or declining line on this view, which is meaningful from a "principal preservation" standpoint. Price + Cumulative Dividend: Share count stays the same and received dividends are accumulated as cash. Closely matches your actual account total assets. Reinvested: Dividends are immediately used to buy additional shares (adjClose-based, the industry standard for total return). The wider the gap between the three lines, the easier it is to gauge the effectiveness of the dividend strategy.
Annual Return Comparison
ETF returns vs S&P 500 (SPY) by calendar year
GLNK S&P 500 (SPY)
+90%
0%
−90%
-8%
2024
-88%
2025
-37%
2026 YTD
ℹ️ Returns from January 1 to December 31 of each year. The current year (2026) column is dimmed to indicate YTD (incomplete). If blue is higher than gray, the ETF outperformed the benchmark in that year.
Win rate vs S&P 500 (SPY)
Completed years: 2 — 3+ years of data are needed for a win rate to be shown.
2024
2025
2026 YTD
ℹ️ Number of winning years versus S&P 500 (SPY) within a completed calendar year (1/1–12/31). The current year (YTD) is reported separately.
Downside Capture
⚠️ 349%
Falls more than the benchmark — vulnerable in drawdowns
<85% (Defend) 85~110% (Track) >110% (Lag)
ℹ️ Average % drop of this ETF when S&P 500 (SPY) is −1%. Based on daily returns over the past 3 years (only days where the benchmark is negative).

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade
High Risk
Significantly more volatile than the market average. Invest only with money you can afford to keep invested for the long haul.
Beta (market sensitivity)
하위 5%
4.10
If the market rises +10% +41.0%
If the market falls -10% -41.0%
My positionBottom 5%
Low range Average High range
ℹ️ A beta of 1.0 moves in line with the market. Above 1 means it moves more than the market; below 1 means less.
Average daily range (last 1 month)
하위 25%
±2.64%
S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more
Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)
ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.
Max Drawdown · Past 10 years
-95.8%
Drawdown duration: 19 months
2024-12-16 → 2026-06-25
Still recovering
2024-07-09 Worst -96% 2026-07-01
ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.
Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)
-0.50
Poor — Underperforms the risk-free rate
ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.
Estimated Monthly Maximum Loss (VaR 95%)
-49.2%
Historically, monthly losses exceeding this figure occurred only5%of the time.
ℹ️ A statistical estimate meaning "with 95% probability, monthly losses will not exceed this amount." The remaining 5% corresponds to crisis-level events such as financial crises or pandemics.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

Strengths and weaknesses both present Check the fit below to see whether it matches your investing goal.
🎯 목적별 적합도
내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.
🌳
장기 보유
수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때
낮음
💵
배당 인컴
매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때
매우 낮음
단기 트레이딩
며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매
매우 낮음
🧩
포트폴리오 보조
자산 배분·헤지 용도
낮음
👤
이런 분에게 어울려요
Long-term and recurring investors
✅ 강점
뚜렷한 강점이 드러나지 않아요.
⚠️ 약점·주의사항
  • ⚠️Volatility is above average
  • 🎯Trails benchmark by -95.9%p annually

Category Peers

Category: Other Asset Types - Multi-Asset / Other

같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 1/6위
카테고리: Other Asset Types - Multi-Asset / Other
ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?
같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시GLNK보다 유리, ▼ 표시GLNK보다 불리를 뜻해요.
티커ETF명보수율AUM보유종목배당률YTD1년
GLNK GLNK
Grayscale Investments LLC0% $90M 1- -31.80% -78.15%
Alerian MLP ETF1.01% $12.7B 157.34% - +11.61%
Invesco Preferred ETF0.5% $3.8B 2706.39% - -4.11%
Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF0.5% $3.0B 3516.18% - -1.15%
VanEck Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF0.4% $2.4B 1216.58% - +0.34%
Global X MLP ETF0.77% $2.2B 227.00% - +11.66%
AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ GLNK보다 유리 · ▼ GLNK보다 불리
📊
See the market at a glance with a real-time dashboard Track premarket, regular, and after-hours quotes, screeners, and heatmaps on a single screen

Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme

ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy

3 ETFs tracking the same theme as GLNK using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 3)
Not direct derivatives of GLNK, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.
ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?
Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with GLNK, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.
⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding
Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.
🧺
Deeper Analysis at the ETF Center ETF overlap, sector exposure, and X-Ray analysis tools

FAQ

What kind of ETF is GLNK?

GLNK is an ETF in the Other Asset Types - Multi-Asset / Other category, managed by Grayscale.

How many holdings does GLNK have?

GLNK holds a total of 1 securities, with an AUM of approximately $90M.

What is the 52-week high and low for GLNK?

GLNK has recorded a 52-week high of $69.99 and a low of $6.25.

시황 · 실적발표 · 매수매도 신호, 가장 먼저 받아보세요 🔔 구독

면책조항: 본 콘텐츠는 참고 자료이며 투자 권유가 아닙니다. 모든 투자의 책임은 투자자 본인에게 있습니다.