CNBS
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF
7월 28일 3:59 PM ET (한국 7/29 04:59)
$24.22
-0.64 ▼ -2.59%
🌙 7월 28일 7:34 PM ET (한국 7/29 08:34)
$24.22
+0.00 +0.00%
CNBS ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.
Total Expense Ratio
0.76%
Annual operating cost
Net Assets (AUM)
$71M
약 972억원
Holdings
37 items
Dividend Yield
-
Management Style
Active
| Category | Global or ExUS Equities - Factor & Thematic | Asset Type | Equities (Stocks) | Return% 1Y | 39.76% | Total Holdings | 37 | Perf Week | -7.17% |
| ETF Type | Global Equities | Active/Passive | Active | Return% 3Y | -7.5% | AUM | $71M | Perf Month | -12.29% |
| Expense | 0.76% | NAV | $25.00 | Return% 5Y | -32.84% | 52W High | -44.88% | Perf Quarter | -20.01% |
| Dividend TTM | - | Div Gr. 3/5Y | - | Return% 10Y | - | 52W Low | 38.24% | Perf Half Y | -12.18% |
| Flows% 1M | - | Flows% YTD | -23.32% | Return% SI | -25.5% | Volatility(W/M) | 1.97% 2.61% | Perf YTD | -14.63% |
| SMA20 | -8.57% | SMA50 | -12.29% | SMA200 | -8.11% | RSI (14) | 35.08 | Beta | 1.23 |
| IPO | 2019/7/23 | Prev Close | $24.86 | Perf Year | 25.2% | Avg Volume | 0.01M | Price | $24.22 |
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) Investment Analysis
ETF Overview
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF · Global or ExUS Equities - Factor & Thematic
테마형 — AI·로봇·블록체인 등 비-GICS 테마 ETF
2019년 상장, 7년 운영 중.
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF는 투자자에게 자본 증식을 제공하는 것을 목표로 합니다. 순자산의 80% 이상을 매출의 50% 이상을 대마·헴프 생태계에서 창출하는 기업 증권과, 이와 유사한 경제적 특성을 가진 파생상품에 투자합니다. 이 ETF는 액티브 운용 방식으로, 3가지 분류 중 하나에 주로 참여하는 글로벌 대마·헴프 생태계 기업에 투자 익스포저를 제공합니다. 비분산 투자 펀드입니다.
📘 CNBS ETF 자세히 알아보기 →Globalequitycannabis
- 규모
- $71M 약 972억원
- 운용사
- Amplify
- 운용 방식
- 액티브 (운용사 재량)
- 상장일
- 2019년
Cost Efficiency
Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact
Above-average cost — 0.76% annually
Expense ratio is higher than the Global or ExUS Equities - Factor & Thematic median. Compare against similar ETFs.
Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)
하위 25%0.76%
My positionBottom 25%
Low range Average High range
Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount
$100.0M
Annual Expense Ratio
$760K
Pay $210K more per year vs. category average
Category Median Annual Cost
$550K
Based on expense ratio of 0.55%
10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)
$13.5M
14.0% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees
Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.
Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.
Cheaper alternatives in the same category
KLMN
Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF
0.09%
-0.67%p annually
FINA
Fidelity MSCI North American Subset Index ETF
0.09%
-0.67%p annually
VSGX
Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF
0.10%
-0.66%p annually
* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.
Long-Term Performance
1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense
Lower-tier returns in its category
Long-term returns trail the category average by a wide margin.+22.0%p vs. benchmark (SPY) over 1Y.
ℹ️ The "1Y·3Y·5Y·10Y" periods below represent annualized returns (CAGR) measured backward from today. Example: "3Y +12%" means the investment grew at a compounded 12% per year over the past three years.
If you had invested 5 year(s) ago
$100.0M
Today's value
$13.7M
→
Total loss
$-86,336,768
Annualized -32.8%
1 Year
2025.07 ~ 2026.07
Annualized +39.76%
상위 25%Outperformed the benchmark by 22.0%p annually
My positionTop 25%
Low range Average High range
3 Years
2023.07 ~ 2026.07
Annualized -7.50% Cumulative -20.9%
하위 5%Trailed the benchmark by 26.8%p annually
My positionBottom 5%
Low range Average High range
5 Years
2021.07 ~ 2026.07
Annualized -32.84% Cumulative -86.3%
하위 5%Trailed the benchmark by 46.1%p annually
My positionBottom 5%
Low range Average High range
10Y
2016.07 ~ 2026.07
Listed 2019/7 — under 10 years
7Y Cumulative Total Return Curve
2019-07-23 start, based on a 100M KRW base — read the curve values directly as units of 100M KRW (e.g., 308 → 3.08억 / 308M KRW). Both this ETF and the benchmark are rebased to 100 on the same start date for comparison.
CNBS · Price Only CNBS · Price + Cumulative Dividends CNBS · Dividend Reinvested S&P 500 (SPY)
0
100
200
300
ℹ️ Price Only: Excludes dividends and tracks pure stock price only. Covered-call and high-dividend ETFs often show a flat or declining line on this view, which is meaningful from a "principal preservation" standpoint. Price + Cumulative Dividend: Share count stays the same and received dividends are accumulated as cash. Closely matches your actual account total assets. Reinvested: Dividends are immediately used to buy additional shares (adjClose-based, the industry standard for total return). The wider the gap between the three lines, the easier it is to gauge the effectiveness of the dividend strategy.
Annual Return Comparison
ETF returns vs S&P 500 (SPY) by calendar year
CNBS S&P 500 (SPY)
+70%
0%
−70%
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026 YTD
ℹ️ Returns from January 1 to December 31 of each year. The current year (2026) column is dimmed to indicate YTD (incomplete). If blue is higher than gray, the ETF outperformed the benchmark in that year.
Win rate vs S&P 500 (SPY)
1 / 7Y
Lags behind benchmark (14%)
+ 2026 YTD: Behind (-16.3% vs 8.7%)
2019 ✗
2020 ✓
2021 ✗
2022 ✗
2023 ✗
2024 ✗
2025 ✗
2026 ✗ YTD
ℹ️ Number of winning years versus S&P 500 (SPY) within a completed calendar year (1/1–12/31). The current year (YTD) is reported separately.
Downside Capture
95%
Falls in line with the benchmark — high correlation
<85% (Defend) 85~110% (Track) >110% (Lag)
ℹ️ Average % drop of this ETF when S&P 500 (SPY) is −1%. Based on daily returns over the past 3 years (only days where the benchmark is negative).
Risk Profile
Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History
Overall Risk Grade
Moderate Risk
Volatility is around market average. Be prepared for losses of roughly -30% to -40% in major downturns.
Beta (market sensitivity)
하위 25%1.23
If the market rises +10% +12.3%
If the market falls -10% -12.3%
My positionBottom 25%
Low range Average High range
ℹ️ A beta of 1.0 moves in line with the market. Above 1 means it moves more than the market; below 1 means less.
Average daily range (last 1 month)
하위 25%±2.61%
S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more
Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)
ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.
Max Drawdown · Past 10 years
-95.7%
2019-07-23 Worst -95% 2026-07-01
ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.
Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)
-0.47
Poor — Underperforms the risk-free rate
ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.
Estimated Monthly Maximum Loss (VaR 95%)
-24.0%
Historically, monthly losses exceeding this figure occurred only5%of the time.
ℹ️ A statistical estimate meaning "with 95% probability, monthly losses will not exceed this amount." The remaining 5% corresponds to crisis-level events such as financial crises or pandemics.
Overall investment appeal
What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile
Warrants a closer look Several metrics show warning signs. Compare it with similar ETFs before deciding.
🎯 목적별 적합도
내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.
낮음
매우 낮음
보통
보통
이런 분에게 어울려요
Investors with conviction in a specific sector or theme
✅ 강점
뚜렷한 강점이 드러나지 않아요.
⚠️ 약점·주의사항
- 💸Expense ratio is somewhat high — 0.76% annually
- 📈Long-term returns are well below peers
- ⚠️Volatility is above average
- 🎯Trails benchmark by -46.1%p annually
Portfolio Composition
What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings
Real Estate 집중 테마 ETF
한 섹터에 집중된 게 이 상품의 설계 자체예요. 해당 섹터 전망을 확신할 때 유용해요.
ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?
ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.
🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기
총 보유종목
40개
상위 10개 비중
98.9%
최대 단일 종목
51.79%
집중도(HHI)
3491
높음 (집중)
🥧 섹터 비중
Real Estate 3.8%
Consumer Cyclical 1.0%
Healthcare 0.8%
Consumer Defensive 0.7%
Financial 0.5%
📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 98.9% 차지
티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)
#3 - Curaleaf Holdings Inc 12.68%
#10 - N/A 0.56%
Category Peers
Category: Global or ExUS Equities - Factor & Thematic
같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 6/6위
카테고리: Global or ExUS Equities - Factor & Thematic
ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?
같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 CNBS보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 CNBS보다 불리를 뜻해요.
| 티커 | ETF명 | 보수율 | AUM | 보유종목 | 배당률 | YTD | 1년 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNBS | Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF | 0.76% | $71M | 37 | - | -14.63% | +25.20% |
| First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund | 0.56% ▲ | $11.4B ▲ | 127 | 0.83% | - | +19.68% ▼ | |
| Global X Funds Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF | 0.68% ▲ | $3.2B ▲ | 67 | 0.52% | - | -0.82% ▼ | |
| Invesco Solar ETF | 0.7% ▲ | $1.5B ▲ | 43 | - | - | +26.94% ▲ | |
| Tema Space Innovators ETF | 0.75% ▲ | $1.1B ▲ | 37 | - | - | - | |
| VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF | 0.75% ▲ | $834M ▲ | 62 | - | - | +108.87% ▲ |
AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ CNBS보다 유리 · ▼ CNBS보다 불리
Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme
ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy
1 ETFs tracking the same theme as CNBS using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 1)
Not direct derivatives of CNBS, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.
ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?
Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with CNBS, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.
⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding
Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.
Leverage 1 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)
FAQ
What kind of ETF is CNBS?
CNBS is an ETF in the Global or ExUS Equities - Factor & Thematic category, managed by Amplify.
How many holdings does CNBS have?
CNBS holds a total of 37 securities, with an AUM of approximately $71M.
What is the 52-week high and low for CNBS?
CNBS has recorded a 52-week high of $43.94 and a low of $17.52.
면책조항: 본 콘텐츠는 참고 자료이며 투자 권유가 아닙니다. 모든 투자의 책임은 투자자 본인에게 있습니다.