BNDP 주가 전망 및 ETF 분석 - 배당·운용보수·보유종목·NAV·RSI·MACD

BNDP

Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF

7월 28일 4:00 PM ET (한국 7/29 05:00)

$73.49

+0.14 ▲ +0.19%

🌙 7월 28일 4:10 PM ET (한국 7/29 05:10)

$73.49

+0.00 +0.00%

BNDP ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

Total Expense Ratio

0.05%

Annual operating cost

Net Assets (AUM)

$132M

약 1807억원

Holdings

6184 items

Dividend Yield

2.46%

Management Style

Passive

Category ⓘ	Bonds - Broad Market	Asset Type ⓘ	Bonds	Return% 1Y ⓘ	-	Total Holdings ⓘ	6184	Perf Week ⓘ	0.12%
ETF Type ⓘ	US Bonds	Active/Passive ⓘ	Passive	Return% 3Y ⓘ	-	AUM ⓘ	$132M	Perf Month ⓘ	-1.36%
Expense ⓘ	0.05%	NAV ⓘ	$73.27	Return% 5Y ⓘ	-	52W High ⓘ	-3.42%	Perf Quarter ⓘ	-1.49%
Dividend TTM ⓘ	$1.81 (2.46%)	Div Gr. 3/5Y ⓘ	-	Return% 10Y ⓘ	-	52W Low ⓘ	0.6%	Perf Half Y ⓘ	-2.38%
Flows% 1M ⓘ	4.37%	Flows% YTD ⓘ	34.04%	Return% SI ⓘ	-0.07%	Volatility(W/M) ⓘ	0.27% 0.2%	Perf YTD ⓘ	-2.1%
SMA20 ⓘ	-0.14%	SMA50 ⓘ	-0.47%	SMA200 ⓘ	-1.44%	RSI (14) ⓘ	45.55	Beta ⓘ	-
IPO ⓘ	2025/12/4	Prev Close ⓘ	$73.35	Perf Year ⓘ	-	Avg Volume ⓘ	0.01M	Price ⓘ	$73.49

📊 Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF · Bonds - Broad Market

채권형 — 채권 ETF (만기 미상)

2025년 상장, 1년 운영 중.

The Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF seeks to track the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Float Adjusted Index. It uses an indexing investment approach designed to deliver performance that matches the index, which measures the performance of U.S. dollar-denominated, taxable bonds rated investment grade or high yield as determined by the index provider. The fund invests using a sampling strategy, meaning it holds securities that are broadly similar to the overall index in terms of key risk factors and other characteristics. It also seeks to maintain a dollar-weighted average maturity that aligns with the index.

📘 BNDP ETF 자세히 알아보기 →

U.S.fixed-incomebondstreasuries

규모: $132M 약 1807억원
운용사: Vanguard
운용 방식: 패시브 (지수 추종)
상장일: 2025년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Top-tier low cost — 0.05% annually

상위 5% within the Bonds - Broad Market category. For a ₩100M investment, the annual cost is roughly ₩50,000.

Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)

상위 5%

0.05%

My positionTop 5%

Low range Average High range

Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount

$100.0M

Annual Expense Ratio

$50K

Save $310K per year vs. category average

Category Median Annual Cost

$360K

Based on expense ratio of 0.36%

10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)

$917K

0.9% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees

💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Cheaper alternatives in the same category

BND

Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF

0.03%

-0.02%p annually

AGG

iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF

0.03%

-0.02%p annually

BSV

Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF

0.03%

-0.02%p annually

* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Insufficient return data

This ETF is either too recently listed or does not yet have enough disclosed return data. Please refer to ETFs that have been operating for more than one year.

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade

Bond Benchmark

Bond ETFs are naturally less volatile than stocks, so it only makes sense to compare them with other bond ETFs. You should also factor in the inverse relationship between interest rates and bond prices.

🏦 Bond ETFs — Low volatility and low Beta are the norm

Bonds have far lower volatility than stocks, and a lower Beta versus equity benchmarks. An "stable" rating is the natural result; meaningful comparison should be made against bond indices (e.g., AGG/TLT).

Average daily range (last 1 month)

평균권

±0.20%

S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more

Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)

ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.

Max Drawdown · Past 10 years

-2.8%

Drawdown duration: 5 months

2026-02-27 → 2026-07-23

Still recovering

2025-12-04 Worst -5% 2026-07-01

ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.

Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)

-1.05

Poor — Underperforms the risk-free rate

ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.

Dividend Analysis

Yield · Dividend history · After-tax income calculator

Bond distribution — 2.46% annually

Coupon interest is the primary source.

ℹ️ Bond ETF distributions are mostly coupon income. Distributions may rise when interest rates increase, but this should be considered alongside the resulting price decline.

배당수익률

2.46%

주당 배당

$1.81

연간 기준

5년 성장률

지급 주기

분기배당

2월 · 3월 · 4월 · 12월

📊 총 이력 2025~2026 (4건)

연도별 배당 총액 추이

주당 배당금을 연 단위로 합산한 금액입니다. 막대가 우상향이면 매년 배당이 늘어나고 있다는 뜻입니다.

—

2021

—

2022

—

2023

—

2024

$0.18

2025

$X.XX 그 해 총 배당금 +X% 전년 대비 증가 -X% 감소

최근 배당 이력 총 4건

아래로 스크롤하면 과거 배당 이력을 볼 수 있습니다.

배당락일

주당 금액

지급일

당시 수익률

2026-04-01

$0.277

—

1.32%

2026-03-02

$0.254

—

0.93%

2026-02-02

$0.267

—

0.60%

2025-12-23

$0.184

—

0.25%

* "배당락일"은 배당받으려면 이 날 이전에 주식을 보유해야 하는 기준일입니다. 지급일·당시 수익률은 일부 종목에서 데이터가 없을 수 있습니다.

💰 내가 $100K 투자한다면

연간 배당금 (세후) $2K

5년 누적 (세후) $10K

* 환율 1 가정, 배당소득세 15% 반영. 5년 누적은 배당 성장률 연 0% 가정.

* Qualified dividend middle-bracket approximation. Actual rate varies by total income.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

Strengths and weaknesses both present Check the fit below to see whether it matches your investing goal.

🎯 목적별 적합도

내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.

🌳

장기 보유

수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때

보통

💵

배당 인컴

매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때

적합

⚡

단기 트레이딩

며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매

매우 낮음

🧩

포트폴리오 보조

자산 배분·헤지 용도

매우 적합

👤

이런 분에게 어울려요

Investors seeking portfolio stability

✅ 강점

💸Top 5% lowest expense ratio in Bonds - Broad Market — 0.05% annually

⚠️ 약점·주의사항

특별한 약점이 보이지 않아요.

Portfolio Composition

What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings

채권 포트폴리오

주식과 달리 "섹터 = 만기·신용등급"으로 해석해야 해요.

ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?

ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.

🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기

총 보유종목

5595개

상위 10개 비중

6.4%

최대 단일 종목

2.51%

집중도(HHI)

낮음 (분산)

🥧 섹터 비중

Financial

2.8%

Healthcare

1.5%

Communication Services

1.2%

Technology

1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

0.8%

Industrials

0.5%

Energy

0.5%

Consumer Defensive

0.5%

Utilities

0.3%

Real Estate

0.1%

Basic Materials

0.1%

📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 6.4% 차지

티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)

#1 - Vanguard Cmt Funds-Vanguard Market Liquidity Fund

2.51%

ESGD iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF

0.96%

#3 - Fannie Mae Pool

0.41%

#4 - Freddie Mac Pool

0.41%

#5 - Freddie Mac Pool

0.41%

#6 - Freddie Mac Pool

0.37%

BNO United States Treasury Note/Bond

0.35%

BNO United States Treasury Note/Bond

0.34%

BNO United States Treasury Note/Bond

0.34%

#10

BNO United States Treasury Note/Bond

0.33%

Category Peers

Category: Bonds - Broad Market

같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 1/6위

카테고리: Bonds - Broad Market

ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?

같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 BNDP보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 BNDP보다 불리를 뜻해요.

티커	ETF명	보수율	AUM	보유종목	배당률	YTD	1년
BNDP	Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF	0.05%	$132M	6184	2.46%	-2.10%	-
BNDX	Vanguard Total International Bond ETF	0.07% ▼	$82.7B ▲	6833	4.51% ▲	-	-2.68%
IUSB	iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF	0.06% ▼	$43.1B ▲	18034	4.27% ▲	-	-0.50%
BINC	iShares Flexible Income Active ETF	0.4% ▼	$16.1B ▲	4747	5.59% ▲	-	-1.19%
PYLD	PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF	0.64% ▼	$15.0B ▲	2426	5.93% ▲	-	-0.34%
JCPB	JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF	0.38% ▼	$14.0B ▲	2743	4.93% ▲	-	-0.55%

AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ BNDP보다 유리 · ▼ BNDP보다 불리

Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme

ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy

9 ETFs tracking the same theme as BNDP using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 2 · Inverse 3 · Covered Call 4)

Not direct derivatives of BNDP, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.

ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?

Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with BNDP, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.

⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding

Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.

📈 Leverage 2 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)