ATTR 주가 전망 및 ETF 분석 - 배당·운용보수·보유종목·NAV·RSI·MACD

ATTR

Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF

7월 27일 12:17 PM ET (한국 7/28 01:17)

$94.33

+0.09 ▲ +0.09%

🌙 7월 28일 5:05 PM ET (한국 7/29 06:05)

$94.33

+0.00 +0.00%

ATTR ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

Total Expense Ratio

0.63%

Annual operating cost

Net Assets (AUM)

$94M

약 1290억원

Holdings

20 items

Dividend Yield

Management Style

Active

Category ⓘ	US Equities - Quant Strat	Asset Type ⓘ	Equities (Stocks)	Return% 1Y ⓘ	-	Total Holdings ⓘ	20	Perf Week ⓘ	-0.35%
ETF Type ⓘ	US Equities	Active/Passive ⓘ	Active	Return% 3Y ⓘ	-	AUM ⓘ	$94M	Perf Month ⓘ	0.96%
Expense ⓘ	0.63%	NAV ⓘ	$94.27	Return% 5Y ⓘ	-	52W High ⓘ	-0.47%	Perf Quarter ⓘ	0.97%
Dividend TTM ⓘ	-	Div Gr. 3/5Y ⓘ	-	Return% 10Y ⓘ	-	52W Low ⓘ	6.33%	Perf Half Y ⓘ	3.68%
Flows% 1M ⓘ	-0.99%	Flows% YTD ⓘ	2.01%	Return% SI ⓘ	6.48%	Volatility(W/M) ⓘ	0.05% 0.05%	Perf YTD ⓘ	4.29%
SMA20 ⓘ	-0.07%	SMA50 ⓘ	0.2%	SMA200 ⓘ	2.45%	RSI (14) ⓘ	51.61	Beta ⓘ	-
IPO ⓘ	2025/10/28	Prev Close ⓘ	$94.24	Perf Year ⓘ	-	Avg Volume ⓘ	0.00M	Price ⓘ	$94.33

📊 Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF (ATTR) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF · US Equities - Quant Strat

액티브 운용 — 펀드매니저가 종목을 선별해 초과수익 추구

2025년 상장, 1년 운영 중.

The Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF seeks to maximize total returns through a combination of capital appreciation and current income. Under normal circumstances, it primarily invests in option contracts on U.S. large-cap stocks or stock market indices, such as the S&P 500 Index, and may also invest in individual stocks or ETFs that provide exposure to such indices or other U.S. large-cap stock indices.

📘 ATTR ETF 자세히 알아보기 →

U.S.equityoptionslarge-cap

규모: $94M 약 1290억원
운용사: -
운용 방식: 액티브 (운용사 재량)
상장일: 2025년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Average expense ratio — 0.63% annually

Mid-range within the US Equities - Quant Strat category.

Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)

평균권

0.63%

My positionMid-range

Low range Average High range

Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount

$100.0M

Annual Expense Ratio

$630K

Save $160K per year vs. category average

Category Median Annual Cost

$790K

Based on expense ratio of 0.79%

10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)

$11.3M

11.7% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees

💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Cheaper alternatives in the same category

CBOX

Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF

0.14%

-0.49%p annually

XBOX

Roundhill Ultra Short Duration No Dividend Target ETF

0.14%

-0.49%p annually

SELV

SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Low Volatility Active ETF

0.15%

-0.48%p annually

* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Insufficient return data

This ETF is either too recently listed or does not yet have enough disclosed return data. Please refer to ETFs that have been operating for more than one year.

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade

Low Risk

Less volatile than the market average, making it relatively easy to hold over time.

Average daily range (last 1 month)

상위 25%

±0.05%

S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more

Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)

ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.

Max Drawdown · Past 10 years

-1.8%

Drawdown duration: 1 months

2026-03-02 → 2026-03-30

Recovered in about 9 days

2025-10-28 Worst -5% 2026-07-01

ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.

Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)

1.12

Good — Solid risk-adjusted returns

ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

Strengths and weaknesses both present Check the fit below to see whether it matches your investing goal.

🎯 목적별 적합도

내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.

🌳

장기 보유

수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때

보통

💵

배당 인컴

매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때

낮음

⚡

단기 트레이딩

며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매

낮음

🧩

포트폴리오 보조

자산 배분·헤지 용도

낮음

👤

이런 분에게 어울려요

Investors who believe in active strategies

✅ 강점

🛡️Below-average volatility

⚠️ 약점·주의사항

특별한 약점이 보이지 않아요.

Portfolio Composition

What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings

상위 10종목이 127% 차지

소수 종목에 집중돼 개별 종목 변동에 크게 영향을 받을 수 있어요.

ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?

ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.

🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기

총 보유종목

18개

상위 10개 비중

126.5%

최대 단일 종목

60.28%

집중도(HHI)

5522

높음 (집중)

⚠️ 소수 종목·섹터에 집중되어 있어, 해당 종목/섹터가 흔들리면 ETF 전체가 크게 영향을 받아요.

🥧 섹터 비중

Financial

60.3%

📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 126.3% 차지

티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)

CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk Etf

60.28%

#2 - SPY 06/18/2026 10010.01 P

33.00%

#3 - SPX US 06/18/26 P12000

28.13%

#4 - SPY 06/18/2026 10.01 C

2.27%

FAF First American Government Obligations Fund

1.45%

#6 - SPXW US 05/15/26 P6600

1.06%

#7 - SPXW US 04/17/26 P6600

0.25%

#8 - SPX US 06/18/26 P2500

0.05%

#9 - SPX US 05/15/26 P2500

0.02%

#10 - SPXW US 04/17/26 P6500

-0.18%

Category Peers

Category: US Equities - Quant Strat

같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 5/6위

카테고리: US Equities - Quant Strat

ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?

같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 ATTR보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 ATTR보다 불리를 뜻해요.

티커	ETF명	보수율	AUM	보유종목	배당률	YTD	1년
ATTR	Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF	0.63%	$94M	20	-	+4.29%	-
HELO	JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	0.5% ▲	$4.5B ▲	163	0.63%	-	+6.76%
CBOX	Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF	0.14% ▲	$1.2B ▲	4	-	-	-
FHEQ	Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF	0.48% ▲	$914M ▲	189	0.55%	-	+13.12%
INFO	Harbor PanAgora Dynamic Large Cap Core ETF	0.35% ▲	$830M ▲	146	0.31%	-	+21.45%
CAOS	Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF	0.63%	$719M ▲	11	-	-	+1.90%

AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ ATTR보다 유리 · ▼ ATTR보다 불리

Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme

ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy

21 ETFs tracking the same theme as ATTR using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 8 · Inverse 5 · Covered Call 8)

Not direct derivatives of ATTR, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.

ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?

Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with ATTR, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.

⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding

Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.

📈 Leverage 8 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)