ARKT 주가 전망 및 ETF 분석 - 배당·운용보수·보유종목·NAV·RSI·MACD

ARKT

ARK DIET Q4 Buffer ETF

7월 24일 3:27 PM ET (한국 7/25 04:27)

$18.25

+0.02 ▲ +0.11%

🌙 7월 28일 5:05 PM ET (한국 7/29 06:05)

$18.25

+0.00 +0.00%

ARKT ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

Total Expense Ratio

0.89%

Annual operating cost

Net Assets (AUM)

$2M

약 25억원

Holdings

5 items

Dividend Yield

0.25%

Management Style

Passive

Category ⓘ	US Equities - Quant Strat	Asset Type ⓘ	Equities (Stocks)	Return% 1Y ⓘ	-	Total Holdings ⓘ	5	Perf Week ⓘ	-3%
ETF Type ⓘ	US Equities	Active/Passive ⓘ	Passive	Return% 3Y ⓘ	-	AUM ⓘ	$2M	Perf Month ⓘ	-3.54%
Expense ⓘ	0.89%	NAV ⓘ	$18.29	Return% 5Y ⓘ	-	52W High ⓘ	-14.84%	Perf Quarter ⓘ	-2.54%
Dividend TTM ⓘ	$0.05 (0.25%)	Div Gr. 3/5Y ⓘ	-	Return% 10Y ⓘ	-	52W Low ⓘ	6.54%	Perf Half Y ⓘ	-4.88%
Flows% 1M ⓘ	-	Flows% YTD ⓘ	-43.94%	Return% SI ⓘ	-13.43%	Volatility(W/M) ⓘ	0.08% 0.26%	Perf YTD ⓘ	-2.61%
SMA20 ⓘ	-3.34%	SMA50 ⓘ	-3.2%	SMA200 ⓘ	-3.56%	RSI (14) ⓘ	36.97	Beta ⓘ	-
IPO ⓘ	2025/10/1	Prev Close ⓘ	$18.23	Perf Year ⓘ	-	Avg Volume ⓘ	0.00M	Price ⓘ	$18.25

📊 ARK DIET Q4 Buffer ETF (ARKT) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

ARK DIET Q4 Buffer ETF · US Equities - Quant Strat

버퍼/구조화형 — 옵션으로 하락 일부 방어 · 상승도 제한

2025년 상장, 1년 운영 중.

The Ark Diet Q4 Buffer ETF seeks to provide a degree of downside protection along with capital appreciation. This ETF is actively managed and aims to deliver a predefined risk/return profile, before fees, over a rolling 12-month Outcome Period running from October 1 through September 30 each year. The targeted outcome is only achieved if shares are purchased on the first day of the Outcome Period and held through the last day. It is a non-diversified fund.

U.S.optionsbufferupside-cap

규모: $2M 약 25억원
운용사: ARK Invest
운용 방식: 패시브 (지수 추종)
상장일: 2025년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Above-average cost — 0.89% annually

Expense ratio is higher than the US Equities - Quant Strat median. Compare against similar ETFs.

Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)

하위 25%

0.89%

My positionBottom 25%

Low range Average High range

Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount

$100.0M

Annual Expense Ratio

$890K

Pay $100K more per year vs. category average

Category Median Annual Cost

$790K

Based on expense ratio of 0.79%

10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)

$15.8M

16.3% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees

💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Cheaper alternatives in the same category

CBOX

Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF

0.14%

-0.75%p annually

XBOX

Roundhill Ultra Short Duration No Dividend Target ETF

0.14%

-0.75%p annually

SELV

SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Low Volatility Active ETF

0.15%

-0.74%p annually

* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Insufficient return data

🛡️ Buffered / Structured ETF — designed for a defined outcome period

These use options to buffer a portion of downside losses while also capping upside gains. They typically have a 1-year outcome period; buying or selling outside this window means the buffer and cap may apply differently. Total return and win-rate versus the benchmark are inherently limited by the structure.

Insufficient return data

This ETF is either too recently listed or does not yet have enough disclosed return data. Please refer to ETFs that have been operating for more than one year.

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade

Low Risk

Less volatile than the market average, making it relatively easy to hold over time.

Average daily range (last 1 month)

평균권

±0.26%

S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more

Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)

ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.

Max Drawdown · Past 10 years

-18.8%

Drawdown duration: 6 months

2025-10-09 → 2026-03-30

Still recovering

2025-10-01 Worst -16% 2026-07-01

ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.

Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)

-0.88

Poor — Underperforms the risk-free rate

ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.

Dividend Analysis

Yield · Dividend history · After-tax income calculator

Pays dividends, but at a relatively low rate — 0.25% annually

Closer to a blend of growth and dividends.

배당수익률

0.25%

주당 배당

$0.05

연간 기준

5년 성장률

지급 주기

연배당

12월

📊 총 이력 2025~2025 (1건)

연도별 배당 총액 추이

주당 배당금을 연 단위로 합산한 금액입니다. 막대가 우상향이면 매년 배당이 늘어나고 있다는 뜻입니다.

—

2021

—

2022

—

2023

—

2024

$0.05

2025

$X.XX 그 해 총 배당금 +X% 전년 대비 증가 -X% 감소

최근 배당 이력 총 1건

아래로 스크롤하면 과거 배당 이력을 볼 수 있습니다.

배당락일

주당 금액

지급일

당시 수익률

2025-12-26

$0.046

—

0.24%

* "배당락일"은 배당받으려면 이 날 이전에 주식을 보유해야 하는 기준일입니다. 지급일·당시 수익률은 일부 종목에서 데이터가 없을 수 있습니다.

💰 내가 $100K 투자한다면

연간 배당금 (세후) $233

5년 누적 (세후) $1K

* 환율 1 가정, 배당소득세 15% 반영. 5년 누적은 배당 성장률 연 0% 가정.

* Qualified dividend middle-bracket approximation. Actual rate varies by total income.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

Strengths and weaknesses both present Check the fit below to see whether it matches your investing goal.

🎯 목적별 적합도

내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.

🌳

장기 보유

수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때

보통

💵

배당 인컴

매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때

부적합

⚡

단기 트레이딩

며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매

매우 낮음

🧩

포트폴리오 보조

자산 배분·헤지 용도

낮음

👤

이런 분에게 어울려요

Long-term and recurring investors

✅ 강점

뚜렷한 강점이 드러나지 않아요.

⚠️ 약점·주의사항

💸Expense ratio is somewhat high — 0.89% annually

Portfolio Composition

What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings

상위 10종목이 105% 차지

소수 종목에 집중돼 개별 종목 변동에 크게 영향을 받을 수 있어요.

ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?

ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.

🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기

총 보유종목

5개

상위 10개 비중

104.8%

최대 단일 종목

92.98%

집중도(HHI)

8728

높음 (집중)

⚠️ 소수 종목·섹터에 집중되어 있어, 해당 종목/섹터가 흔들리면 ETF 전체가 크게 영향을 받아요.

🥧 섹터 비중

Financial

93.8%

📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 100.0% 차지

티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)

ARKK ARK ETF Trust

92.98%

#2 - WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC

8.75%

#3 - WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC

2.27%

GTOP Goldman Sachs Financial Square Treasury Obligations Fund

0.84%

#5 - WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC

-4.85%

Category Peers

Category: US Equities - Quant Strat

같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 2/6위

카테고리: US Equities - Quant Strat

ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?

같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 ARKT보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 ARKT보다 불리를 뜻해요.

티커	ETF명	보수율	AUM	보유종목	배당률	YTD	1년
ARKT	ARK DIET Q4 Buffer ETF	0.89%	$2M	5	0.25%	-2.61%	-
BUFR	FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF	0.95% ▼	$10.1B ▲	13	-	-	+12.67%
SFLR	Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF	0.89%	$2.1B ▲	196	0.28% ▲	-	+10.40%
BUFD	FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF	0.95% ▼	$2.0B ▲	13	-	-	+10.50%
BUFQ	FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF	1% ▼	$1.5B ▲	5	-	-	+12.97%
PJAN	Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January	0.79% ▲	$1.4B ▲	5	-	-	+10.99%

AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ ARKT보다 유리 · ▼ ARKT보다 불리

Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme

ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy

21 ETFs tracking the same theme as ARKT using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 8 · Inverse 5 · Covered Call 8)

Not direct derivatives of ARKT, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.

ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?

Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with ARKT, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.

⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding

Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.

📈 Leverage 8 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)