APRB 주가 전망 및 ETF 분석 - 배당·운용보수·보유종목·NAV·RSI·MACD

APRB

Aptus April Buffer ETF

7월 28일 12:45 PM ET (한국 7/29 01:45)

$26.95

+0.03 ▲ +0.13%

APRB ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

Total Expense Ratio

0.25%

Annual operating cost

Net Assets (AUM)

$25M

약 336억원

Holdings

5 items

Dividend Yield

Management Style

Passive

Category ⓘ	US Equities - Quant Strat	Asset Type ⓘ	Equities (Stocks)	Return% 1Y ⓘ	-	Total Holdings ⓘ	5	Perf Week ⓘ	-0.09%
ETF Type ⓘ	US Equities	Active/Passive ⓘ	Passive	Return% 3Y ⓘ	-	AUM ⓘ	$25M	Perf Month ⓘ	0.75%
Expense ⓘ	0.25%	NAV ⓘ	$26.92	Return% 5Y ⓘ	-	52W High ⓘ	-0.35%	Perf Quarter ⓘ	2.35%
Dividend TTM ⓘ	-	Div Gr. 3/5Y ⓘ	-	Return% 10Y ⓘ	-	52W Low ⓘ	8.5%	Perf Half Y ⓘ	4.33%
Flows% 1M ⓘ	8.35%	Flows% YTD ⓘ	61.21%	Return% SI ⓘ	10.07%	Volatility(W/M) ⓘ	0.09% 0.14%	Perf YTD ⓘ	5.33%
SMA20 ⓘ	0.06%	SMA50 ⓘ	0.57%	SMA200 ⓘ	3.96%	RSI (14) ⓘ	55.79	Beta ⓘ	-
IPO ⓘ	2025/10/14	Prev Close ⓘ	$26.92	Perf Year ⓘ	-	Avg Volume ⓘ	0.00M	Price ⓘ	$26.95

📊 Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

Aptus April Buffer ETF · US Equities - Quant Strat

버퍼/구조화형 — 옵션으로 하락 일부 방어 · 상승도 제한

2025년 상장, 1년 운영 중.

The Aptus April Buffer ETF seeks to deliver returns that match those of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (the underlying ETF). This ETF is actively managed and, under normal market conditions, invests the majority of its assets in FLEX options whose underlying asset is the market price of the underlying ETF. It employs a "structured outcome" strategy using FLEX options, which seeks to provide pre-defined target investment outcomes based on the performance of the underlying security or index. It is a non-diversified fund.

U.S.optionsbufferupside-cap

규모: $25M 약 336억원
운용사: Aptus
운용 방식: 패시브 (지수 추종)
상장일: 2025년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Top-tier low cost — 0.25% annually

상위 5% within the US Equities - Quant Strat category. For a ₩100M investment, the annual cost is roughly ₩250,000.

Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)

상위 5%

0.25%

My positionTop 5%

Low range Average High range

Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount

$100.0M

Annual Expense Ratio

$250K

Save $540K per year vs. category average

Category Median Annual Cost

$790K

Based on expense ratio of 0.79%

10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)

$4.5M

4.7% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees

💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Cheaper alternatives in the same category

CBOX

Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF

0.14%

-0.11%p annually

XBOX

Roundhill Ultra Short Duration No Dividend Target ETF

0.14%

-0.11%p annually

SELV

SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Low Volatility Active ETF

0.15%

-0.10%p annually

* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Insufficient return data

🛡️ Buffered / Structured ETF — designed for a defined outcome period

These use options to buffer a portion of downside losses while also capping upside gains. They typically have a 1-year outcome period; buying or selling outside this window means the buffer and cap may apply differently. Total return and win-rate versus the benchmark are inherently limited by the structure.

Insufficient return data

This ETF is either too recently listed or does not yet have enough disclosed return data. Please refer to ETFs that have been operating for more than one year.

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade

Low Risk

Less volatile than the market average, making it relatively easy to hold over time.

Average daily range (last 1 month)

상위 25%

±0.14%

S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more

Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)

ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.

Max Drawdown · Past 10 years

-4.6%

Drawdown duration: 2 months

2026-01-28 → 2026-03-27

Recovered in about 18 days

2025-10-14 Worst -5% 2026-07-01

ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.

Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)

1.26

Good — Solid risk-adjusted returns

ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

Overall attractive Key metrics look solid, and the strengths outweigh the weak spots.

🎯 목적별 적합도

내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.

🌳

장기 보유

수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때

보통

💵

배당 인컴

매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때

매우 낮음

⚡

단기 트레이딩

며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매

매우 낮음

🧩

포트폴리오 보조

자산 배분·헤지 용도

낮음

👤

이런 분에게 어울려요

Long-term and recurring investors

✅ 강점

💸Top 5% lowest expense ratio in US Equities - Quant Strat — 0.25% annually
🛡️Below-average volatility

⚠️ 약점·주의사항

특별한 약점이 보이지 않아요.

Portfolio Composition

What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings

상위 10종목이 109% 차지

소수 종목에 집중돼 개별 종목 변동에 크게 영향을 받을 수 있어요.

ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?

ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.

🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기

총 보유종목

5개

상위 10개 비중

108.6%

최대 단일 종목

105.44%

집중도(HHI)

11127

높음 (집중)

⚠️ 소수 종목·섹터에 집중되어 있어, 해당 종목/섹터가 흔들리면 ETF 전체가 크게 영향을 받아요.

📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 100.0% 차지

티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)

#1 - N/A

105.44%

#2 - N/A

3.02%

FAF First American Treasury Obliga

0.15%

#4 - N/A

-1.40%

#5 - N/A

-7.25%

Category Peers

Category: US Equities - Quant Strat

같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 1/6위

카테고리: US Equities - Quant Strat

ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?

같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 APRB보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 APRB보다 불리를 뜻해요.

티커	ETF명	보수율	AUM	보유종목	배당률	YTD	1년
APRB	Aptus April Buffer ETF	0.25%	$25M	5	-	+5.33%	-
BUFR	FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF	0.95% ▼	$10.1B ▲	13	-	-	+12.67%
SFLR	Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF	0.89% ▼	$2.1B ▲	196	0.28%	-	+10.40%
BUFD	FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF	0.95% ▼	$2.0B ▲	13	-	-	+10.50%
BUFQ	FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF	1% ▼	$1.5B ▲	5	-	-	+12.97%
PJAN	Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January	0.79% ▼	$1.4B ▲	5	-	-	+10.99%

AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ APRB보다 유리 · ▼ APRB보다 불리

Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme

ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy

21 ETFs tracking the same theme as APRB using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 8 · Inverse 5 · Covered Call 8)

Not direct derivatives of APRB, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.

ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?

Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with APRB, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.

⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding

Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.

📈 Leverage 8 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)