AIUP 주가 전망 및 ETF 분석 - 배당·운용보수·보유종목·NAV·RSI·MACD

AIUP

FINQ FIRST U.S. Large Cap AI-Managed Equity ETF

7월 28일 12:57 PM ET (한국 7/29 01:57)

$26.52

+0.12 ▲ +0.47%

🌙 7월 28일 5:05 PM ET (한국 7/29 06:05)

$26.52

+0.00 +0.00%

AIUP ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

Total Expense Ratio

0.7%

Annual operating cost

Net Assets (AUM)

$4M

약 54억원

Holdings

16 items

Dividend Yield

Management Style

Active

Category ⓘ	US Equities - Quant Strat	Asset Type ⓘ	Equities (Stocks)	Return% 1Y ⓘ	-	Total Holdings ⓘ	16	Perf Week ⓘ	-3.53%
ETF Type ⓘ	US Equities	Active/Passive ⓘ	Active	Return% 3Y ⓘ	-	AUM ⓘ	$4M	Perf Month ⓘ	0.64%
Expense ⓘ	0.7%	NAV ⓘ	$26.43	Return% 5Y ⓘ	-	52W High ⓘ	-7.34%	Perf Quarter ⓘ	-2.46%
Dividend TTM ⓘ	-	Div Gr. 3/5Y ⓘ	-	Return% 10Y ⓘ	-	52W Low ⓘ	17.58%	Perf Half Y ⓘ	-
Flows% 1M ⓘ	-	Flows% YTD ⓘ	405.78%	Return% SI ⓘ	16.86%	Volatility(W/M) ⓘ	0.83% 0.5%	Perf YTD ⓘ	8.08%
SMA20 ⓘ	-3.28%	SMA50 ⓘ	-2.65%	SMA200 ⓘ	1.72%	RSI (14) ⓘ	41.95	Beta ⓘ	-
IPO ⓘ	2026/2/6	Prev Close ⓘ	$26.4	Perf Year ⓘ	-	Avg Volume ⓘ	0.00M	Price ⓘ	$26.52

📊 FINQ FIRST U.S. Large Cap AI-Managed Equity ETF (AIUP) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

FINQ FIRST U.S. Large Cap AI-Managed Equity ETF · US Equities - Quant Strat

액티브 운용 — 펀드매니저가 종목을 선별해 초과수익 추구

The FINQ FIRST U.S. Large Cap AI-Managed Equity ETF is an actively managed, non-diversified fund that seeks long-term capital appreciation by taking long positions in a concentrated portfolio of U.S. large-cap stocks. Its investment process is run through a proprietary, fully autonomous adaptive AI framework that combines fundamental, sentiment, and market data to generate daily relative rankings of S&P 500 constituents and select the most attractive stocks.

U.S.equitylarge-capSP500

규모: $4M 약 54억원
운용사: FINQ
운용 방식: 액티브 (운용사 재량)
상장일: 2026년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Average expense ratio — 0.7% annually

Mid-range within the US Equities - Quant Strat category.

Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)

평균권

0.7%

My positionMid-range

Low range Average High range

Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount

$100.0M

Annual Expense Ratio

$700K

Save $90K per year vs. category average

Category Median Annual Cost

$790K

Based on expense ratio of 0.79%

10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)

$12.5M

12.9% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees

💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Cheaper alternatives in the same category

CBOX

Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF

0.14%

-0.56%p annually

XBOX

Roundhill Ultra Short Duration No Dividend Target ETF

0.14%

-0.56%p annually

SELV

SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Low Volatility Active ETF

0.15%

-0.55%p annually

* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Insufficient return data

This ETF is either too recently listed or does not yet have enough disclosed return data. Please refer to ETFs that have been operating for more than one year.

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade

Low Risk

Less volatile than the market average, making it relatively easy to hold over time.

Average daily range (last 1 month)

평균권

±0.50%

S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more

Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)

ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.

Max Drawdown · Past 10 years

-11.3%

Drawdown duration: 1 months

2026-03-05 → 2026-03-27

Recovered in about 18 days

2026-02-06 Worst -6% 2026-07-01

ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.

Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)

0.63

Average — Moderate risk-adjusted returns

ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

An average ETF No standout strengths or weaknesses — pretty run-of-the-mill.

🎯 목적별 적합도

내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.

🌳

장기 보유

수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때

보통

💵

배당 인컴

매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때

낮음

⚡

단기 트레이딩

며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매

낮음

🧩

포트폴리오 보조

자산 배분·헤지 용도

낮음

👤

이런 분에게 어울려요

Investors who believe in active strategies

✅ 강점

뚜렷한 강점이 드러나지 않아요.

⚠️ 약점·주의사항

특별한 약점이 보이지 않아요.

Portfolio Composition

What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings

15개 종목으로 구성

상위 섹터는 Technology (51%)

ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?

ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.

🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기

총 보유종목

15개

상위 10개 비중

78.0%

최대 단일 종목

15.54%

집중도(HHI)

943

보통

⚠️ 소수 종목·섹터에 집중되어 있어, 해당 종목/섹터가 흔들리면 ETF 전체가 크게 영향을 받아요.

🥧 섹터 비중

Technology

51.4%

Communication Services

20.1%

Consumer Cyclical

19.4%

Healthcare

4.4%

📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 78.0% 차지

티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)

#1 META Meta Platforms Inc

15.54%

#2 NVDA NVIDIA Corp

15.22%

#3 AMZN Amazon.com Inc

14.96%

FAF First American Government Obli

4.83%

#5 ORCL Oracle Corp

4.64%

#6 AVGO Broadcom Inc

4.63%

#7 XYZ Block Inc

4.60%

#8 UBER Uber Technologies Inc

4.52%

#9 NFLX Netflix Inc

4.52%

#10 MSFT Microsoft Corp

4.50%

Category Peers

Category: US Equities - Quant Strat

같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 6/6위

카테고리: US Equities - Quant Strat

ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?

같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 AIUP보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 AIUP보다 불리를 뜻해요.

티커	ETF명	보수율	AUM	보유종목	배당률	YTD	1년
AIUP	FINQ FIRST U.S. Large Cap AI-Managed Equity ETF	0.7%	$4M	16	-	+8.08%	-
HELO	JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	0.5% ▲	$4.5B ▲	163	0.63%	-	+6.76%
CBOX	Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF	0.14% ▲	$1.2B ▲	4	-	-	-
FHEQ	Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF	0.48% ▲	$914M ▲	189	0.55%	-	+13.12%
INFO	Harbor PanAgora Dynamic Large Cap Core ETF	0.35% ▲	$830M ▲	146	0.31%	-	+21.45%
CAOS	Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF	0.63% ▲	$719M ▲	11	-	-	+1.90%

AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ AIUP보다 유리 · ▼ AIUP보다 불리

Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme

ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy

16 ETFs tracking the same theme as AIUP using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 8 · Inverse 3 · Covered Call 5)

Not direct derivatives of AIUP, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.

ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?

Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with AIUP, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.

⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding

Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.

📈 Leverage 8 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)