RWL ETF Explained: Returns, Expense Ratio, Holdings, and Alternative ETFs
The Invesco S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted ETF (RWL) reweights stocks by revenue rather than market capitalization, offering value-oriented exposure and reduced concentration. Differences in portfolio composition and fees versus market-cap-weighted core ETFs are the key selection criteria.
SubscribeWhat Is the Invesco S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted ETF?
The fund tracks the S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted index, which reweights S&P 500 constituents by each company's reported revenue instead of market capitalization. A cap on each stock's weight keeps the portfolio diversified.
It suits investors who want to invest in the large-cap universe but seek value-oriented exposure that differs from market-cap weighting.
It is a passive (index-tracking) ETF managed by Invesco.
How Does the Invesco S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted ETF Invest?
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Tracked Index | S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted Index |
| Management Style | Passive (rules-based index tracking) |
| Rebalancing Frequency | Quarterly |
| Dividend Frequency | Quarterly |
| Issuer | Invesco |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39% |
The fund reweights S&P 500 stocks in proportion to their reported revenue and limits any single stock's weight so that it does not exceed a set cap. This approach has a value-oriented character: it lowers the weight of stocks with high valuations relative to revenue and raises the weight of stocks with large revenue.
- Reweighting by revenue rather than market cap
- Per-stock weight caps to ease concentration
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted ETF Size and Costs (AUM and Expense Ratio)
Assets under management (AUM) stand at $10.4B, and the total expense ratio (Expense Ratio) is 0.39% per year.
Fees are somewhat higher than those of market-cap-weighted core ETFs that use the same S&P 500 universe, and the portfolio weightings differ.
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted ETF Performance and Trends
1-Year Price Performance
Dividend & Yield
52-Week Price RangeThe fund broadly follows the large-cap market, but because of its revenue-weighting, its performance can diverge from market-cap-weighted indexes in periods when value stocks carry more weight. Short-term performance is affected by sector rotation and earnings season.
Within the smart beta category, the clear concept of revenue weighting has secured steady demand, and the fund has maintained a broad asset base. Preferences between value and growth styles shift with market conditions, and fund flows can change accordingly.
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted ETF Pros and Cons
Its strengths are value-oriented exposure and reduced concentration through revenue-based reweighting, while its weakness is a somewhat higher fee than market-cap-weighted core ETFs.
💪 Key Strengths
⚠️ Points to Watch
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted ETF Alternatives and Related Products
Alternatives that rebuild the same large-cap universe under different rules include the multi-factor OMFL and QVML shown in the table, as well as the screened SNPE and SPYX, which differ in weighting method and fee level. You can also consider style variations such as RSP, which holds every stock at equal weight, SPYV, which focuses on value stocks, and SPYG, which focuses on growth stocks.
Peer Comparison ETFs| Ticker | Name | Price | Change | AUM | Total Expense Ratio | Dividend Yield | 1Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 OMFL | Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | $70.64 | -1.1% | $4.8B | 0.29% | 0.83% | +17.5% |
 SPUS | SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | $58.42 | -2.3% | $3.4B | 0.45% | 0.52% | +13.1% |
 SNPE | Xtrackers S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF | $68.70 | -1.8% | $2.9B | 0.10% | 0.99% | +11.1% |
 SPYX | State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF | $61.78 | -1.9% | $2.8B | 0.20% | 0.86% | +10.2% |
 QVML | Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF | $44.99 | -1.6% | $1.7B | 0.11% | 1% | +12.5% |
Top Holdings| Ticker | Name | Weight | Price | Change | Market Cap | P/E | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 TPG | TPG Inc | - | $46.68 | -2.6% | $17.9B | 53.7 | 5.03% |
| AMZN | Amazon.com Inc | 0.12% | $240.35 | -1.4% | $2.59T | 19.4 | - |
| WMT | Walmart Inc | 0.10% | $123.51 | +1.9% | $979.9B | 44.8 | 0.81% |
| UNH | Unitedhealth Group Inc | 0.03% | $406.97 | -1.0% | $365.3B | 23.2 | 2.21% |
| AAPL | Apple Inc | 0.03% | $344.63 | -1.2% | $5.03T | 39.5 | 0.32% |
Investor Checkpoints for the Invesco S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted ETF
Here are the points to review before investing in RWL. It is wise to check in advance how its structural feature of revenue weighting differs from market-cap-weighted core ETFs, as well as its costs and style deviation.
| Checkpoint | What to Check | Current Status |
|---|---|---|
| 💵 Expense Ratio | Check the cumulative impact over a long holding period | Somewhat higher than core ETFs |
| 📊 Weighting Method | Differences in composition between revenue weighting and market-cap weighting | Reweighted by revenue |
| 🎯 Style | Review value and growth exposure tendencies | Value-oriented |
| 💱 Exchange Rate | Impact on returns converted into Korean won | Not currency hedged |
Because of its value orientation, the fund may underperform market-cap-weighted indexes in growth-led markets, and its fee burden is also larger than that of core ETFs. Revenue weighting does not always guarantee superior results.
It is a suitable choice for investors who want large-cap exposure with a revenue-based approach that differs from market-cap weighting. If cost is the priority, a low-fee core ETF is the better fit, while RWL is worth considering if the goal is value-oriented factor exposure.
SubscribeDisclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. All investment responsibility lies with the investor.
This article reflects information as of June 21, 2026.
Today's 5 AI picks, all free