OMFL 주가 전망 및 ETF 분석 - 배당·운용보수·보유종목·NAV·RSI·MACD

OMFL

Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF

7월 28일 1:11 PM ET (한국 7/29 02:11)

$68.62

+0.30 ▲ +0.44%

OMFL ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

Total Expense Ratio

0.29%

Annual operating cost

Net Assets (AUM)

$4.7B

약 6조원

Holdings

638 items

Dividend Yield

0.81%

Management Style

Passive

Category ⓘ	US Equities - Factor & Thematic	Asset Type ⓘ	Equities (Stocks)	Return% 1Y ⓘ	18.42%	Total Holdings ⓘ	638	Perf Week ⓘ	0.19%
ETF Type ⓘ	US Equities	Active/Passive ⓘ	Passive	Return% 3Y ⓘ	12%	AUM ⓘ	$4.7B	Perf Month ⓘ	1.64%
Expense ⓘ	0.29%	NAV ⓘ	$68.32	Return% 5Y ⓘ	9.96%	52W High ⓘ	-1.21%	Perf Quarter ⓘ	5.1%
Dividend TTM ⓘ	$0.56 (0.81%)	Div Gr. 3/5Y ⓘ	-9.85% -3.66%	Return% 10Y ⓘ	-	52W Low ⓘ	20.13%	Perf Half Y ⓘ	9.01%
Flows% 1M ⓘ	-0.28%	Flows% YTD ⓘ	-9.45%	Return% SI ⓘ	13.82%	Volatility(W/M) ⓘ	0.67% 0.71%	Perf YTD ⓘ	12.25%
SMA20 ⓘ	-0.13%	SMA50 ⓘ	0.54%	SMA200 ⓘ	7.96%	RSI (14) ⓘ	52.01	Beta ⓘ	0.94
IPO ⓘ	2017/11/10	Prev Close ⓘ	$68.32	Perf Year ⓘ	17.24%	Avg Volume ⓘ	0.14M	Price ⓘ	$68.62

📊 Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF · US Equities - Factor & Thematic

광범위 지수형 — 시총 버킷 미상의 광범위 지수 추종

2017년 상장, 9년 운영 중.

Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF는 수수료 및 비용 차감 전 기준으로 Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor 지수의 투자 결과를 추종하고자 합니다. 경제 주기에 따라 역사적으로 우수한 성과를 보였던 팩터 투자 전략을 동적으로 조합하여 미국 대형주 지수에 자산의 최소 80%를 투자합니다.

📘 OMFL ETF 자세히 알아보기 →

U.S.equityRussell-1000multi-factor

규모: $4.7B 약 6조원
운용사: Invesco
운용 방식: 패시브 (지수 추종)
상장일: 2017년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Average expense ratio — 0.29% annually

Mid-range within the US Equities - Factor & Thematic category.

Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)

평균권

0.29%

My positionMid-range

Low range Average High range

Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount

$100.0M

Annual Expense Ratio

$290K

Save $110K per year vs. category average

Category Median Annual Cost

$400K

Based on expense ratio of 0.40%

10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)

$5.3M

5.4% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees

💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Cheaper alternatives in the same category

VOTE

TCW Transform 500 ETF

0.05%

-0.24%p annually

USCA

Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF

0.07%

-0.22%p annually

LRGF

iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF

0.08%

-0.21%p annually

* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Average long-term returns

Near the US Equities - Factor & Thematic median.+0.6%p vs. benchmark (SPY) over 1Y.

ℹ️ The "1Y·3Y·5Y·10Y" periods below represent annualized returns (CAGR) measured backward from today. Example: "3Y +12%" means the investment grew at a compounded 12% per year over the past three years.

If you had invested 5 year(s) ago

$100.0M

Today's value

$160.8M

→

Total gain

+$60.8M

Annualized +10.0%

1 Year

2025.07 ~ 2026.07

Annualized +18.42%

평균권

Outperformed the benchmark by 0.6%p annually

My positionMid-range

Low range Average High range

3 Years

2023.07 ~ 2026.07

Annualized +12.00% Cumulative +40.5%

하위 25%

Trailed the benchmark by 7.0%p annually

My positionBottom 25%

Low range Average High range

5 Years

2021.07 ~ 2026.07

Annualized +9.96% Cumulative +60.8%

평균권

Trailed the benchmark by 2.9%p annually

My positionMid-range

Low range Average High range

10Y

2016.07 ~ 2026.07

Listed 2017/11 — under 10 years

9Y Cumulative Total Return Curve

2017-11-10 start, based on a 100M KRW base — read the curve values directly as units of 100M KRW (e.g., 308 → 3.08억 / 308M KRW). Both this ETF and the benchmark are rebased to 100 on the same start date for comparison.

OMFL · Price Only OMFL · Price + Cumulative Dividends OMFL · Dividend Reinvested S&P 500 (SPY)

150

250

350

ℹ️ Price Only: Excludes dividends and tracks pure stock price only. Covered-call and high-dividend ETFs often show a flat or declining line on this view, which is meaningful from a "principal preservation" standpoint. Price + Cumulative Dividend: Share count stays the same and received dividends are accumulated as cash. Closely matches your actual account total assets. Reinvested: Dividends are immediately used to buy additional shares (adjClose-based, the industry standard for total return). The wider the gap between the three lines, the easier it is to gauge the effectiveness of the dividend strategy.

Annual Return Comparison

ETF returns vs S&P 500 (SPY) by calendar year

OMFL S&P 500 (SPY)

+40%

−40%

+5%

2017

-3%

2018

+36%

2019

+21%

2020

+31%

2021

-14%

2022

+22%

2023

+8%

2024

+14%

2025

+12%

2026 YTD

ℹ️ Returns from January 1 to December 31 of each year. The current year (2026) column is dimmed to indicate YTD (incomplete). If blue is higher than gray, the ETF outperformed the benchmark in that year.

Win rate vs S&P 500 (SPY)

5 / 9Y

Roughly even with benchmark (56%)

+ 2026 YTD: Ahead (11.5% vs 8.5%)

2017 ✗

2018 ✓

2019 ✓

2020 ✓

2021 ✓

2022 ✓

2023 ✗

2024 ✗

2025 ✗

2026 ✓ YTD

ℹ️ Number of winning years versus S&P 500 (SPY) within a completed calendar year (1/1–12/31). The current year (YTD) is reported separately.

Downside Capture

⚖️ 95%

Falls in line with the benchmark — high correlation

<85% (Defend) 85~110% (Track) >110% (Lag)

ℹ️ Average % drop of this ETF when S&P 500 (SPY) is −1%. Based on daily returns over the past 3 years (only days where the benchmark is negative).

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade

Low Risk

Less volatile than the market average, making it relatively easy to hold over time.

Beta (market sensitivity)

평균권

0.94

If the market rises +10% +9.4%

If the market falls -10% -9.4%

My positionMid-range

Low range Average High range

ℹ️ A beta of 1.0 moves in line with the market. Above 1 means it moves more than the market; below 1 means less.

Average daily range (last 1 month)

평균권

±0.71%

S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more

Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)

ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.

Max Drawdown · Past 10 years

-33.2%

Drawdown duration: 2 months

2020-01-16 → 2020-03-23

Recovered in about 77 days

2017-11-10 Worst -26% 2026-07-01

ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.

Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)

0.54

Average — Moderate risk-adjusted returns

ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.

Estimated Monthly Maximum Loss (VaR 95%)

-5.6%

Historically, monthly losses exceeding this figure occurred only5%of the time.

ℹ️ A statistical estimate meaning "with 95% probability, monthly losses will not exceed this amount." The remaining 5% corresponds to crisis-level events such as financial crises or pandemics.

Dividend Analysis

Yield · Dividend history · After-tax income calculator

Pays dividends, but at a relatively low rate — 0.81% annually

Closer to a blend of growth and dividends.5-year dividend growth rate: -3.7%.

ℹ️ Dividends are a secondary source of performance; the main expected return comes from share-price appreciation.

배당수익률

0.81%

주당 배당

$0.56

연간 기준

5년 성장률

-3.7%

지급 주기

분기배당

3월 · 9월 · 12월

📊 총 이력 2018~2026 (33건)

연도별 배당 총액 추이

주당 배당금을 연 단위로 합산한 금액입니다. 막대가 우상향이면 매년 배당이 늘어나고 있다는 뜻입니다.

$0.35

2018

$0.51 +46.8%

2019

$0.59 +15.1%

2020

$0.48 -17.9%

2021

$0.67 +37.9%

2022

$0.70 +5.7%

2023

$0.66 -5.8%

2024

$0.49 -26.4%

2025

$X.XX 그 해 총 배당금 +X% 전년 대비 증가 -X% 감소

최근 배당 이력 총 33건

아래로 스크롤하면 과거 배당 이력을 볼 수 있습니다.

배당락일

주당 금액

지급일

당시 수익률

2026-03-23

$0.146

—

1.05%

2025-12-22

$0.156

—

0.92%

2025-09-22

$0.108

—

0.86%

2025-06-23

$0.107

—

1.14%

2025-03-24

$0.117

—

0.99%

2024-12-23

$0.077

—

1.20%

2024-09-23

$0.108

—

1.33%

2024-06-24

$0.232

—

1.51%

2024-03-18

$0.246

—

1.81%

2023-12-18

$0.118

—

1.77%

2023-09-18

$0.206

—

2.04%

2023-06-20

$0.168

—

1.93%

2023-03-20

$0.212

—

1.95%

2022-12-19

$0.200

—

1.80%

2022-09-19

$0.174

—

1.73%

2022-06-21

$0.171

—

1.59%

2022-03-21

$0.121

—

1.29%

2021-12-20

$0.094

—

1.38%

2021-09-20

$0.157

—

1.64%

2021-06-21

$0.107

—

1.55%

2021-03-22

$0.125

—

1.62%

2020-12-21

$0.190

—

1.99%

2020-09-21

$0.179

—

2.34%

2020-06-22

$0.115

—

2.22%

2020-03-23

$0.104

—

2.45%

2019-12-23

$0.187

—

1.94%

2019-09-23

$0.134

—

1.92%

2019-06-24

$0.128

—

1.55%

2019-03-19

$0.062

—

1.22%

2018-12-26

$0.139

—

1.40%

2018-09-25

$0.135

—

0.72%

2018-06-19

$0.012

—

0.27%

2018-03-16

$0.062

—

0.23%

* "배당락일"은 배당받으려면 이 날 이전에 주식을 보유해야 하는 기준일입니다. 지급일·당시 수익률은 일부 종목에서 데이터가 없을 수 있습니다.

💰 내가 $100K 투자한다면

연간 배당금 (세후) $694

5년 누적 (세후) $3K

* 환율 1 가정, 배당소득세 15% 반영. 5년 누적은 배당 성장률 연 -3.66% 가정.

* Qualified dividend middle-bracket approximation. Actual rate varies by total income.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

An average ETF No standout strengths or weaknesses — pretty run-of-the-mill.

🎯 목적별 적합도

내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.

🌳

장기 보유

수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때

매우 적합

💵

배당 인컴

매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때

매우 낮음

⚡

단기 트레이딩

며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매

매우 낮음

🧩

포트폴리오 보조

자산 배분·헤지 용도

보통

👤

이런 분에게 어울려요

Long-term DCA and diversified investors

✅ 강점

뚜렷한 강점이 드러나지 않아요.

⚠️ 약점·주의사항

특별한 약점이 보이지 않아요.

Portfolio Composition

What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings

광범위 시장 분산

931개 종목에 고루 분산되어 있어 안정적인 편이에요.

ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?

ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.

🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기

총 보유종목

931개

상위 10개 비중

29.6%

최대 단일 종목

5.69%

집중도(HHI)

124

낮음 (분산)

🥧 섹터 비중

Technology

29.9%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%

Industrials

10.3%

Communication Services

9.2%

Financial

8.3% -5%p

Healthcare

6.7% -4%p

Energy

5.8%

Basic Materials

3.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.4% -4%p

Utilities

2.3%

Real Estate

1.3%

S&P 500보다 많이 투자 (+3%p 이상) S&P 500보다 적게 투자 (-3%p 이상)

📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 29.6% 차지

티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)

#1 NVDA NVIDIA Corp.

5.69%

#2 AAPL Apple Inc.

4.15%

#3 - Invesco Private Prime Fund

3.69%

#4 META Meta Platforms, Inc.

3.32%

#5 MSFT Microsoft Corp.

2.91%

#6 AMZN Amazon.com, Inc.

2.51%

#7 MU Micron Technology, Inc.

2.38%

#8 - Invesco Private Government Fund

1.77%

#9 GOOGL Alphabet Inc.

1.76%

#10 GOOGL Alphabet Inc.

1.43%

Category Peers

Category: US Equities - Factor & Thematic

같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 2/6위 · 보수율 4/6위

카테고리: US Equities - Factor & Thematic

ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?

같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 OMFL보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 OMFL보다 불리를 뜻해요.

티커	ETF명	보수율	AUM	보유종목	배당률	YTD	1년
OMFL	Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF	0.29%	$4.7B	638	0.81%	+12.25%	+17.24%
RWL	Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF	0.39% ▼	$9.5B ▲	508	1.23% ▲	-	+24.02% ▲
SPUS	SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF	0.45% ▼	$2.9B ▼	219	0.55% ▼	-	+21.01% ▲
SPYX	State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF	0.2% ▲	$2.7B ▼	493	0.87% ▲	-	+15.74% ▼
SNPE	Xtrackers S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF	0.1% ▲	$2.6B ▼	330	0.97% ▲	-	+17.69% ▲
QVML	Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF	0.11% ▲	$1.5B ▼	453	1.02% ▲	-	+16.48% ▼

AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ OMFL보다 유리 · ▼ OMFL보다 불리

Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme

ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy

2 ETFs tracking the same theme as OMFL using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 2)

Not direct derivatives of OMFL, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.

ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?

Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with OMFL, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.

⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding

Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.

📈 Leverage 2 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)