POWA ETF: What Is It? A Complete Guide to Returns, Expense Ratio, Holdings, and Alternative ETFs
The Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) invests in high-quality US companies with strong pricing power that maintain stable gross margins. The key selection criteria are the differences in fees and stock selection strategy compared with dividend ETFs such as VIG and SCHD.
What Is the Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF?
This is a core-oriented ETF that tracks the Bloomberg Pricing Power Index and invests in US large- and mid-cap companies whose gross margins have fluctuated little over the past several years. It selects stocks with strong pricing power, focusing on the ability to defend margins when costs are rising.
It suits long-term investors who want to diversify across high-quality companies that maintain stable profitability even in inflationary and rising-cost environments.
It is a passive (index-tracking) ETF managed by Invesco.
How Does the Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF Invest?
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Tracked Index | Bloomberg Pricing Power Index |
| Management Style | Passive (index-tracking) |
| Rebalancing Frequency | Regular rebalancing |
| Dividend Frequency | Quarterly |
| Issuer | Invesco |
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% |
Following the index rules, the fund selects and holds stocks whose gross margins have varied little over the past several years, in other words, companies with stable pricing power. By concentrating on high-quality stocks that maintain margins regardless of economic cycles and price swings, it provides exposure to business models that can pass costs on to customers.
- Rule-based stock selection based on gross margin stability
- A relatively concentrated portfolio focused on the pricing power theme
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF Size and Costs (AUM and Management Fee)
Assets under management (AUM) stand at $169.3M, and the expense ratio is 0.40% per year.
Compared with broad core ETFs, its selection criteria are more distinct, so exposure is concentrated in a single factor: margin stability.
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF Performance and Trends
Because it is built around high-quality stocks with strong pricing power, it tends to follow a trend similar to that of US large caps overall in the long run. Short-term performance is affected by interest rates, the inflation environment, and margin-related earnings seasons.
Fund flows vary with interest in the margin-defense theme, and when inflation concerns come to the fore, demand for stocks able to pass on prices can stand out by comparison.
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF Pros and Cons
Its strength is a clear selection criterion of margin stability, while its weaknesses are single-factor concentration and a somewhat higher fee than the category average.
💪 Key Strengths
⚠️ Points to Watch
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF Alternative ETFs and Related Products
VIG, SCHD, and VYM shown in the table are comparison targets focused on dividend growth and high dividends. They overlap in offering exposure to quality stocks, but their selection criteria are geared toward dividends. Meanwhile, QUAL is a quality-themed option that, much like gross margin stability, selects stocks with strong profitability, and VOO can also be considered as a broad, low-cost core holding.
| Ticker | Name | Price | Change | AUM | Total Expense Ratio | Dividend Yield | 1Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF | $35.78 | +0.5% | $120.5B | 0.06% | 2.94% | +34.1% | |
| Vanguard Dividend Appreciation FTF | $247.76 | -0.6% | $116.5B | 0.04% | 1.47% | +13.8% | |
| Vanguard High Dividend Yield Indx ETF | $163.74 | -0.7% | $83.8B | 0.04% | 2.25% | +16.3% | |
| U.S. Core Equity 2 Portfolio-ETF Class Shares | $44.89 | -1.3% | $49.9B | 0.18% | 0.88% | +15.4% | |
| First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | $79.17 | -1.0% | $25.7B | 0.47% | 0.86% | +17.2% |
| Ticker | Name | Weight | Price | Change | Market Cap | P/E | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JBL | Jabil Inc | 0.05% | $272.72 | -5.2% | $28.1B | 27.9 | 0.12% |
| PWR | Quanta Services Inc | 0.03% | $620.73 | -2.3% | $93.3B | 56.2 | 0.07% |
| KLAC | KLA Corp | 0.03% | $157.91 | -5.7% | $206.1B | 39.5 | 0.59% |
| Neurocrine Biosciences Inc | 0.03% | $146.10 | -0.2% | $14.9B | 21.4 | - | |
| US Foods Holding Corp | 0.03% | $103.61 | +0.8% | $22.4B | 31.9 | - | |
| AMAT | Applied Materials Inc | 0.03% | $390.09 | -7.5% | $309.6B | 33.6 | 0.5% |
| ROP | Roper Technologies Inc | 0.03% | $466.60 | +3.8% | $46.1B | 18.4 | 0.8% |
| Best Buy Co Inc | 0.03% | $95.65 | -4.7% | $20.1B | 15.9 | 4.06% | |
| MTD | Mettler-Toledo International Inc | 0.03% | $1674.81 | -2.5% | $33.6B | 37.7 | - |
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF Investor Checkpoints
These are the points to review before investing in POWA. Checking in advance the nature of the pricing power theme, the fee level, the degree of single-factor concentration, and the currency exposure can help you judge whether it fits your investment objectives.
| Checkpoint | What to Check | Current Status |
|---|---|---|
| 💵 Expense Ratio | Check the cumulative cost impact over a long holding period | Somewhat higher than the category average |
| 🎯 Selection Criteria | Understand exposure to the margin stability factor | Concentrated in a single theme |
| 📊 Holdings | Degree of diversification across large- and mid-cap quality stocks | Relatively concentrated |
| 💱 Currency | Impact on returns converted into Korean won | No currency hedge |
Because it is concentrated in the single factor of margin stability, it may lag broad indexes when that theme loses its market leadership. A tilt toward large caps and exchange rate movements are also sources of short-term volatility.
It suits long-term investors who want to diversify, through a thematic approach, across high-quality companies able to pass costs on. If you want a dividend focus, VIG and SCHD can be alternatives, and if you prefer a low-cost broad core holding, VOO can serve that role.
Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. All investment responsibility lies with the investor.
This article reflects information as of June 23, 2026.