OAEM ETF: What Is It? A Complete Guide to Returns, Expense Ratio, Holdings, and Alternative ETFs
The One Ascent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM) is an actively managed emerging-market equity ETF that benchmarks against the MSCI EM and combines value-based selection with bottom-up stock analysis. Compared with similar emerging-market ETFs such as FNDE and VWO, the key selection factors are the expense burden, dividends, and differences in management approach.
What Is the One Ascent Emerging Markets ETF?
It is an active ETF that uses the MSCI EM Index as its comparison benchmark and invests most of its assets in stocks of companies in emerging markets outside the US. The management team selects stocks through a bottom-up approach that combines fundamental and quantitative analysis.
It suits long-term investors who want exposure to emerging-market growth and prefer active management based on value-oriented selection.
It is an ETF run by One Ascent using an active (actively managed) approach.
How Does the One Ascent Emerging Markets ETF Invest?
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Comparison Index | MSCI EM |
| Management Style | Active (stock selection) |
| Rebalancing Frequency | At the management team's discretion |
| Dividend Frequency | Annual dividend |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25% |
| Manager | One Ascent |
Under normal market conditions, the fund invests most of its assets in stocks of emerging-market companies and builds its portfolio through bottom-up stock selection that combines fundamental and quantitative analysis. Rather than simply tracking an index, it reflects the discretionary judgment of the management team in pursuit of long-term capital growth.
- Active management reflecting a value-based selection philosophy
- A portfolio composition differentiated from the MSCI EM
One Ascent Emerging Markets ETF Size and Costs (AUM and Management Fees)
Assets under management (AUM) are $127.9M, and the total expense ratio is 1.25% per year.
Compared with passive emerging-market ETFs, it reflects the management team's discretion, and because of its active management, the expense burden is somewhat higher.
One Ascent Emerging Markets ETF Performance and Trends
Emerging-market stocks are affected by economic conditions outside the US, exchange rates, and commodity prices, so they tend to be highly volatile. Depending on the results of active stock selection, performance can differ from the comparison index. Short-term movements depend on global risk appetite.
Demand for emerging-market exposure fluctuates with the global asset allocation environment and the strength of the dollar, and money tends to flow in when risk appetite rises. As a small-to-mid-sized ETF in its category, it sees relatively large swings in fund flows.
One Ascent Emerging Markets ETF Pros and Cons
Its strengths are value-based active management and diversified emerging-market exposure, while its weaknesses are the expense burden and the volatility inherent in emerging markets.
💪 Key Strengths
⚠️ Points to Watch
One Ascent Emerging Markets ETF Alternatives and Related Products
Comparable products in the same emerging-market category shown in the table include FNDE, XSOE, and EMGF, which are index-based, lower-cost passive emerging-market ETFs. If you want broad emerging-market exposure at an even lower expense ratio, you can consider the leading passive ETFs VWO and IEMG as direct substitutes, and if you want different country weightings, you can also look at variants such as XSOE in the table.
| Ticker | Name | Price | Change | AUM | Total Expense Ratio | Dividend Yield | 1Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF | $40.86 | -2.0% | $10.2B | 0.39% | 3.64% | +10.7% | |
| Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF | $63.19 | -0.7% | $3.3B | 0.49% | 1.86% | +34.0% | |
| Invesco RAFI Emerging Markets ETF | $28.26 | -1.7% | $2.0B | 0.47% | 4.11% | +8.9% | |
| WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund | $43.41 | -0.2% | $1.9B | 0.32% | 1.79% | +10.9% | |
| iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF | $66.48 | -0.1% | $1.8B | 0.26% | 2.17% | +13.8% |
| Ticker | Name | Weight | Price | Change | Market Cap | P/E | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing ADR | 0.28% | $424.37 | +1.4% | $2.20T | 27.3 | 0.97% |
| SKHY | SK Hynix Inc ADR | 0.07% | $142.66 | +4.1% | $1.04T | 9.3 | 0.36% |
| Ultrapar Participacoes SA ADR | 0.03% | $6.56 | -15.3% | $7.0B | 10.8 | 6.11% | |
| BAP | Credicorp Ltd | 0.01% | $374.02 | +1.0% | $29.7B | 13.8 | 4.16% |
| NU | Nu Holdings Ltd | 0.01% | $12.59 | -16.9% | $60.8B | 17.1 | - |
One Ascent Emerging Markets ETF Investor Checkpoints
Here are the points to review before investing in OAEM. Because it is an active ETF with emerging-market exposure, it is advisable to check the expense burden, the management approach, and the risks specific to emerging markets in advance.
| Checkpoint | What to Check | Current Status |
|---|---|---|
| 💵 Expense Ratio | Check the long-term cumulative effect of active management fees | Annual fee applies |
| 🌏 Emerging-Market Exposure | Investment regions and degree of country diversification | Needs verification |
| 📊 Management Style | Stock selection rather than index tracking | Active management |
| 💱 Exchange Rate | Impact of emerging-market currencies and the dollar exchange rate | Not currency hedged |
Political, currency, and liquidity volatility in emerging markets, together with exchange-rate movements, are the main drivers of short-term volatility. Because of its active management, you should also consider the possibility that performance diverges significantly from the comparison index.
It is a suitable choice for long-term investors who want active emerging-market exposure through value-based selection. To lower the expense burden, VWO and IEMG, which are passive emerging-market ETFs, are options, while OAEM is the one to consider if active selection matters more.
Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. All investment responsibility lies with the investor.
This article reflects information as of June 26, 2026.