USSTOCK.TODAY
Weekend. Closed
Log in Sign up
ETF Profiles

FLRG ETF: What Is It? — A Complete Guide to Returns, Expense Ratio, Holdings, and Alternative ETFs

Updated June 11, 2026 · First published June 11, 2026

FLRG, the Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF, applies a smart-beta strategy that combines value, quality, momentum, and low volatility across U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks, with sector-neutral rebalancing, a low expense ratio, and quarterly distributions as its key selection criteria. Comparing its exposure differences with fundamental-weighted ETFs is recommended.

Briefs · earnings · signals, first Subscribe
🏷️

What Is the Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF?

It is a multifactor ETF that tracks the Fidelity U.S. Multifactor Index, using a rules-based methodology to select U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks with attractive value, quality, momentum, and low-volatility characteristics. Unlike market-cap-weighted core ETFs, it diversifies factor exposure.

It is well suited for U.S. large-cap core investors who want factor-based diversification beyond a simple market-cap-weighted approach.

The ETF is passively managed (index-tracking) by Fidelity.

💰

How Does the Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF Work?

ItemDetails
Tracking IndexFidelity U.S. Multifactor Index
Management StylePassive (rules-based index tracking)
Rebalancing FrequencyPeriodic rebalancing
Distribution FrequencyQuarterly distributions
ManagerFidelity
Total Expense Ratio0.15%

It selects U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks with attractive scores across the value, quality, momentum, and low-volatility factors based on predefined rules. During rebalancing, sector weights are adjusted to a neutral stance to limit unintended industry concentration, while combining multiple factors reduces reliance on any single factor.

  • Combining multiple factors helps smooth volatility from any single factor
  • Sector-neutral adjustments help curb unintended industry concentration
📐

Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF Size and Cost (AUM & Expense Ratio)

Assets under management (AUM) stand at $294.9M, with a total expense ratio of 0.15% per year.

Fee levels differ from comparable fundamental-weighted and multifactor peers such as FNDX and PRF, although the rules-based core exposure approach is similar.

📈

Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF Performance and Flows

1-Year Price Performance
Dividend & Yield
Dividend Yield 1.41%
Annual Dividend (TTM) $0.59
1Y Return +9.5%
Next Ex-Dividend Date 9/18/2026
52-Week Price Range
$42
Low $36 High $43
vs. low +15.98% vs. high -3.16%

Because it tracks the U.S. large- and mid-cap market through factor screens, it tends to follow a similar broad direction to core ETFs, though the inclusion of a low-volatility factor can produce trend differences during sharp market swings.

Fund flows into the smart-beta and multifactor category are driven by demand for differentiated exposure relative to market-cap-weighted core strategies. Flow direction can shift with the market environment and changes in factor preferences.

⚔️

Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF: Strengths and Weaknesses

The combination of multiple factors and sector-neutral rebalancing is a strength, while the potential for tracking behavior to diverge from a market-cap-weighted core is a weakness.

💪 Key Strengths

Multifactor Diversification
Combines value, quality, momentum, and low volatility to reduce reliance on any single factor.
Sector Neutrality
Adjusts sector weights to a neutral stance at rebalancing, limiting industry concentration.
Low Fee Level
A fee level below the multifactor category average is a strength.

⚠️ Points to Watch

Tracking Differences vs. Core
Factor screens can cause performance to diverge from market-cap-weighted core ETFs.
Factor Headwind Periods
When specific factors underperform, relative returns may weaken.
Currency Exposure
Won-based investors are also exposed to USD/KRW exchange-rate fluctuations.
🔄

Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF: Alternative and Related Products

FNDX, PRF, and FNDA shown in the table are rules-based ETFs that use fundamental weighting and share a similar exposure approach to multifactor strategies, while RECS is a research-enhanced core ETF. Other alternatives outside the table include the multifactor peer LRGF, single-factor quality QUAL, value factor VLUE, and momentum factor MTUM, which together allow for comparison of factor-by-factor exposure differences.

Peer Comparison ETFs
TickerNamePriceChangeAUMTotal Expense RatioDividend Yield1Y
FNDXFNDXSchwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF$32.71-0.6%$28.6B0.25%1.44%+23.3%
PRFPRFInvesco RAFI US 1000 ETF$56.13-0.8%$10.2B0.34%1.32%+23.1%
FNDAFNDASchwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF$35.98-1.3%$9.0B0.25%1.23%+17.6%
RECSRECSColumbia Research Enhanced Core ETF$44.93-1.5%$6.2B0.15%0.72%+10.0%
JHMMJHMMJohn Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF$73.57-1.3%$6.1B0.41%0.89%+14.8%
Top Holdings
TickerNameWeightPriceChangeMarket CapP/EDividend Yield
NVDANVIDIA Corp0.15%$204.64-4.2%$4.93T25.90.38%
AAPLApple Inc0.13%$344.63-1.2%$5.03T39.50.32%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc0.06%$279.84-1.4%$3.41T14.60.31%
GOOGAlphabet Inc0.05%$278.22-1.4%$3.41T14.50.31%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp0.10%$521.91-1.6%$3.88T27.30.74%
AVGOBroadcom Inc0.06%$326.08-5.5%$1.56T41.60.8%
✅

Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF Investor Checklist

These are the points to review before investing in FLRG. Because multifactor smart-beta ETFs differ in exposure from market-cap-weighted core products, it is advisable to examine factor characteristics, fees, and tracking behavior in advance.

Checklist ItemWhat to ConfirmCurrent Status
💵 Expense RatioCheck cumulative impact over long-term holdingLow level
📊 Factor ExposureConfirm combination of value, quality, momentum, and low volatilityMultifactor
🔄 Sector NeutralityCheck how industry concentration is limitedNeutral adjustment
💱 CurrencyImpact on won-converted returnsUnhedged

Because of the factor screens, performance can diverge from a market-cap-weighted core, and relative returns may weaken when specific factors underperform. Exchange-rate movements also act as an additional variable for won-based investors.

For those seeking factor-based core diversification beyond a simple market-cap-weighted approach, this is a reasonable choice. Investors who prefer fundamental-weighted exposure may compare FNDX and PRF, while those seeking single-factor concentration may also review QUAL, VLUE, and MTUM.

Briefs · earnings · signals, first Subscribe

Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. All investment responsibility lies with the investor.

This article reflects information as of June 11, 2026.

Today's 5 AI picks, all free
Nothing hidden: past picks and how they did against the S&P 500.
See today's picks →