YNOT 주가 전망 및 ETF 분석 - 배당·운용보수·보유종목·NAV·RSI·MACD

YNOT

Horizon Digital Frontier ETF

7월 28일 4:00 PM ET (한국 7/29 05:00)

$29.74

-0.48 ▼ -1.58%

🌙 7월 28일 4:38 PM ET (한국 7/29 05:38)

$29.75

+0.02 ▲ +0.08%

YNOT ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

Total Expense Ratio

0.75%

Annual operating cost

Net Assets (AUM)

$130M

약 1779억원

Holdings

104 items

Dividend Yield

Management Style

Active

Category ⓘ	Global or ExUS Equities - Factor & Thematic	Asset Type ⓘ	Equities (Stocks)	Return% 1Y ⓘ	16.16%	Total Holdings ⓘ	104	Perf Week ⓘ	-5.86%
ETF Type ⓘ	Global Equities	Active/Passive ⓘ	Active	Return% 3Y ⓘ	-	AUM ⓘ	$130M	Perf Month ⓘ	-5.89%
Expense ⓘ	0.75%	NAV ⓘ	$30.19	Return% 5Y ⓘ	-	52W High ⓘ	-15.07%	Perf Quarter ⓘ	-5.52%
Dividend TTM ⓘ	-	Div Gr. 3/5Y ⓘ	-	Return% 10Y ⓘ	-	52W Low ⓘ	18.08%	Perf Half Y ⓘ	0.5%
Flows% 1M ⓘ	15.77%	Flows% YTD ⓘ	111.24%	Return% SI ⓘ	18.86%	Volatility(W/M) ⓘ	3.03% 2.25%	Perf YTD ⓘ	5.45%
SMA20 ⓘ	-5.59%	SMA50 ⓘ	-7.87%	SMA200 ⓘ	-0.23%	RSI (14) ⓘ	35.52	Beta ⓘ	1.83
IPO ⓘ	2025/7/10	Prev Close ⓘ	$30.22	Perf Year ⓘ	16.14%	Avg Volume ⓘ	0.03M	Price ⓘ	$29.74

📊 Horizon Digital Frontier ETF (YNOT) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

Horizon Digital Frontier ETF · Global or ExUS Equities - Factor & Thematic

액티브 운용 — 펀드매니저가 종목을 선별해 초과수익 추구

2025년 상장, 1년 운영 중.

Horizon Digital Frontier ETF는 자본 증식을 목표로 합니다. 다양한 개발 단계에 있는 혁신 기술에 대한 노출을 제공하는 미국 및 해외 기업의 주식에 주로 투자하는 액티브 운용 ETF입니다. 보통주뿐만 아니라 예탁증서(ADR) 및 다른 ETF 등도 투자 대상에 포함되는 비분산형(Non-diversified) 펀드입니다.

📘 YNOT ETF 자세히 알아보기 →

Globalequitytechnologyinnovation

규모: $130M 약 1779억원
운용사: Horizon Kinetics
운용 방식: 액티브 (운용사 재량)
상장일: 2025년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Above-average cost — 0.75% annually

Expense ratio is higher than the Global or ExUS Equities - Factor & Thematic median. Compare against similar ETFs.

Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)

하위 25%

0.75%

My positionBottom 25%

Low range Average High range

Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount

$100.0M

Annual Expense Ratio

$750K

Pay $200K more per year vs. category average

Category Median Annual Cost

$550K

Based on expense ratio of 0.55%

10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)

$13.4M

13.8% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees

💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Cheaper alternatives in the same category

KLMN

Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF

0.09%

-0.66%p annually

FINA

Fidelity MSCI North American Subset Index ETF

0.09%

-0.66%p annually

VSGX

Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF

0.10%

-0.65%p annually

* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Insufficient return data

-1.6%p vs. benchmark (SPY) over 1Y.

ℹ️ The "1Y·3Y·5Y·10Y" periods below represent annualized returns (CAGR) measured backward from today. Example: "3Y +12%" means the investment grew at a compounded 12% per year over the past three years.

If you had invested 1 year(s) ago

$100.0M

Today's value

$116.2M

→

Total gain

+$16.2M

Annualized +16.2%

1 Year

2025.07 ~ 2026.07

Annualized +16.16%

평균권

Trailed the benchmark by 1.6%p annually

My positionMid-range

Low range Average High range

3 Years

2023.07 ~ 2026.07

Listed 2025/7 — under 3 years

5 Years

2021.07 ~ 2026.07

Listed 2025/7 — under 5 years

10Y

2016.07 ~ 2026.07

Listed 2025/7 — under 10 years

1Y Cumulative Total Return Curve

2025-07-10 start, based on a 100M KRW base — read the curve values directly as units of 100M KRW (e.g., 308 → 3.08억 / 308M KRW). Both this ETF and the benchmark are rebased to 100 on the same start date for comparison.

YNOT · Price Only YNOT · Price + Cumulative Dividends YNOT · Dividend Reinvested S&P 500 (SPY)

100

150

ℹ️ Price Only: Excludes dividends and tracks pure stock price only. Covered-call and high-dividend ETFs often show a flat or declining line on this view, which is meaningful from a "principal preservation" standpoint. Price + Cumulative Dividend: Share count stays the same and received dividends are accumulated as cash. Closely matches your actual account total assets. Reinvested: Dividends are immediately used to buy additional shares (adjClose-based, the industry standard for total return). The wider the gap between the three lines, the easier it is to gauge the effectiveness of the dividend strategy.

Annual Return Comparison

ETF returns vs S&P 500 (SPY) by calendar year

YNOT S&P 500 (SPY)

+40%

−40%

+12%

2025

+4%

2026 YTD

ℹ️ Returns from January 1 to December 31 of each year. The current year (2026) column is dimmed to indicate YTD (incomplete). If blue is higher than gray, the ETF outperformed the benchmark in that year.

Win rate vs S&P 500 (SPY)

—

Completed years: 1 — 3+ years of data are needed for a win rate to be shown.

2025 ✗

2026 ✗ YTD

ℹ️ Number of winning years versus S&P 500 (SPY) within a completed calendar year (1/1–12/31). The current year (YTD) is reported separately.

Downside Capture

⚠️ 190%

Falls more than the benchmark — vulnerable in drawdowns

<85% (Defend) 85~110% (Track) >110% (Lag)

ℹ️ Average % drop of this ETF when S&P 500 (SPY) is −1%. Based on daily returns over the past 3 years (only days where the benchmark is negative).

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade

Moderate Risk

Volatility is around market average. Be prepared for losses of roughly -30% to -40% in major downturns.

Beta (market sensitivity)

하위 25%

1.83

If the market rises +10% +18.3%

If the market falls -10% -18.3%

My positionBottom 25%

Low range Average High range

ℹ️ A beta of 1.0 moves in line with the market. Above 1 means it moves more than the market; below 1 means less.

Average daily range (last 1 month)

하위 25%

±2.25%

S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more

Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)

ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.

Max Drawdown · Past 10 years

-16.7%

Drawdown duration: 5 months

2025-10-29 → 2026-03-30

Recovered in about 18 days

2025-07-10 Worst -11% 2026-07-01

ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.

Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)

0.57

Average — Moderate risk-adjusted returns

ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

Strengths and weaknesses both present Check the fit below to see whether it matches your investing goal.

🎯 목적별 적합도

내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.

🌳

장기 보유

수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때

낮음

💵

배당 인컴

매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때

낮음

⚡

단기 트레이딩

며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매

낮음

🧩

포트폴리오 보조

자산 배분·헤지 용도

낮음

👤

이런 분에게 어울려요

Investors who believe in active strategies

✅ 강점

뚜렷한 강점이 드러나지 않아요.

⚠️ 약점·주의사항

💸Expense ratio is somewhat high — 0.75% annually
⚠️Volatility is above average

Portfolio Composition

What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings

214개 종목으로 구성

상위 섹터는 Technology (88%)

ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?

ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.

🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기

총 보유종목

214개

상위 10개 비중

64.8%

최대 단일 종목

10.26%

집중도(HHI)

615

보통

⚠️ 소수 종목·섹터에 집중되어 있어, 해당 종목/섹터가 흔들리면 ETF 전체가 크게 영향을 받아요.

🥧 섹터 비중

Technology

88.2%

Communication Services

22.0%

Consumer Cyclical

18.0%

Industrials

17.9%

Basic Materials

5.7%

Financial

5.3%

Utilities

3.0%

Healthcare

1.5%

Energy

0.9%

📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 64.8% 차지

티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)

#1 GOOGL Alphabet Inc

10.26%

#2 NVDA NVIDIA Corp

8.28%

#3 AMZN Amazon.com Inc

7.31%

#4 GOOGL Alphabet Inc

7.24%

#5 NVDA NVIDIA Corp

6.77%

#6 MSFT Microsoft Corp

5.84%

#7 MSFT Microsoft Corp

5.78%

#8 AMZN Amazon.com Inc

5.38%

#9 AVGO Broadcom Inc

4.69%

#10 MU Micron Technology Inc

3.29%

Category Peers

Category: Global or ExUS Equities - Factor & Thematic

같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 4/6위

카테고리: Global or ExUS Equities - Factor & Thematic

ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?

같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 YNOT보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 YNOT보다 불리를 뜻해요.

티커	ETF명	보수율	AUM	보유종목	배당률	YTD	1년
YNOT	Horizon Digital Frontier ETF	0.75%	$130M	104	-	+5.45%	+16.14%
FWD	AB Disruptors ETF	0.65% ▲	$3.0B ▲	124	0.10%	-	+32.38% ▲
FEOE	First Eagle Overseas Equity ETF	0.5% ▲	$1.6B ▲	77	1.35%	-	+28.17% ▲
INFL	Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF	0.85% ▼	$1.5B ▲	49	0.82%	-	+21.34% ▲
MGNR	American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF	0.75%	$841M ▲	46	0.86%	-	+41.81% ▲
CCNR	ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF	0.39% ▲	$424M ▲	311	3.04%	-	+36.82% ▲

AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ YNOT보다 유리 · ▼ YNOT보다 불리

Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme

ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy

24 ETFs tracking the same theme as YNOT using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 8 · Inverse 8 · Covered Call 8)

Not direct derivatives of YNOT, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.

ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?

Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with YNOT, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.

⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding

Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.

📈 Leverage 8 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)