YMAR
FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March
7월 29일 3:34 PM ET (한국 7/30 04:34)
$28.75
-0.04 ▼ -0.14%
🌙 7월 29일 4:10 PM ET (한국 7/30 05:10)
$28.75
+0.00 +0.00%
YMAR ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.
Total Expense Ratio
0.9%
Annual operating cost
Net Assets (AUM)
$161M
약 2204억원
Holdings
6 items
Dividend Yield
-
Management Style
Passive
| Category | Global or ExUS Equities - Quant Strat | Asset Type | Equities (Stocks) | Return% 1Y | 11.86% | Total Holdings | 6 | Perf Week | -0.17% |
| ETF Type | Global Ex. US Equities | Active/Passive | Passive | Return% 3Y | 10.19% | AUM | $161M | Perf Month | 0.52% |
| Expense | 0.9% | NAV | $28.73 | Return% 5Y | 7% | 52W High | -1.3% | Perf Quarter | 2.68% |
| Dividend TTM | - | Div Gr. 3/5Y | - | Return% 10Y | - | 52W Low | 14.18% | Perf Half Y | 4.53% |
| Flows% 1M | 1.81% | Flows% YTD | 28.95% | Return% SI | 6.94% | Volatility(W/M) | 0.37% 0.38% | Perf YTD | 6.41% |
| SMA20 | 0.1% | SMA50 | 0.61% | SMA200 | 4.3% | RSI (14) | 53.66 | Beta | 0.52 |
| IPO | 2021/3/22 | Prev Close | $28.79 | Perf Year | 12.56% | Avg Volume | 0.02M | Price | $28.75 |
FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (YMAR) Investment Analysis
ETF Overview
FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March · Global or ExUS Equities - Quant Strat
버퍼/구조화형 — 옵션으로 하락 일부 방어 · 상승도 제한
2021년 상장, 5년 운영 중.
FT Cboe Vest International Equity Buffer ETF - March는 iShares MSCI EAFE ETF(기초 ETF)의 가격 수익률과 일치하는 수익을 투자자에게 제공하고자 합니다. 정상적인 시장 여건에서 이 ETF는 자산의 대부분을 iShares MSCI EAFE ETF(기초 ETF)의 가격 성과를 기준으로 하는 FLEX 옵션(FLexible EXchange Options)에 투자합니다. FLEX 옵션은 거래소에서 거래되는 맞춤형 주식·지수 옵션 계약으로, 행사가격·스타일·만기 등 주요 조건을 맞춤 설정할 수 있습니다. 비분산형입니다.
📘 YMAR ETF 자세히 알아보기 →Internationaloptionsbufferupside-cap
- 규모
- $161M 약 2204억원
- 운용사
- First Trust
- 운용 방식
- 패시브 (지수 추종)
- 상장일
- 2021년
Cost Efficiency
Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact
Above-average cost — 0.9% annually
Expense ratio is higher than the Global or ExUS Equities - Quant Strat median. Compare against similar ETFs.
Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)
하위 25%0.9%
My positionBottom 25%
Low range Average High range
Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount
$100.0M
Annual Expense Ratio
$900K
Pay $100K more per year vs. category average
Category Median Annual Cost
$800K
Based on expense ratio of 0.80%
10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)
$15.9M
16.5% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees
Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.
Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.
Cheaper alternatives in the same category
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
0.29%
-0.61%p annually
QQA
Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF
0.29%
-0.61%p annually
BRIE
MFS Blended Research International Equity ETF
0.34%
-0.56%p annually
* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.
Long-Term Performance
1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense
Average long-term returns
Near the Global or ExUS Equities - Quant Strat median.-5.7%p vs. benchmark (SPY) over 1Y.
ℹ️ The "1Y·3Y·5Y·10Y" periods below represent annualized returns (CAGR) measured backward from today. Example: "3Y +12%" means the investment grew at a compounded 12% per year over the past three years.
🛡️ Buffered / Structured ETF — designed for a defined outcome period
These use options to buffer a portion of downside losses while also capping upside gains. They typically have a 1-year outcome period; buying or selling outside this window means the buffer and cap may apply differently. Total return and win-rate versus the benchmark are inherently limited by the structure.
If you had invested 5 year(s) ago
$100.0M
Today's value
$140.3M
→
Total gain
+$40.3M
Annualized +7.0%
1 Year
2025.07 ~ 2026.07
Annualized +11.86%
평균권Trailed the benchmark by 5.7%p annually
My positionMid-range
Low range Average High range
3 Years
2023.07 ~ 2026.07
Annualized +10.19% Cumulative +33.8%
평균권Trailed the benchmark by 9.2%p annually
My positionMid-range
Low range Average High range
5 Years
2021.07 ~ 2026.07
Annualized +7.00% Cumulative +40.3%
평균권Trailed the benchmark by 6.0%p annually
My positionMid-range
Low range Average High range
10Y
2016.07 ~ 2026.07
Listed 2021/3 — under 10 years
5Y Cumulative Total Return Curve
2021-03-22 start, based on a 100M KRW base — read the curve values directly as units of 100M KRW (e.g., 308 → 3.08억 / 308M KRW). Both this ETF and the benchmark are rebased to 100 on the same start date for comparison.
YMAR · Price Only YMAR · Price + Cumulative Dividends YMAR · Dividend Reinvested S&P 500 (SPY)
50
100
150
200
250
ℹ️ Price Only: Excludes dividends and tracks pure stock price only. Covered-call and high-dividend ETFs often show a flat or declining line on this view, which is meaningful from a "principal preservation" standpoint. Price + Cumulative Dividend: Share count stays the same and received dividends are accumulated as cash. Closely matches your actual account total assets. Reinvested: Dividends are immediately used to buy additional shares (adjClose-based, the industry standard for total return). The wider the gap between the three lines, the easier it is to gauge the effectiveness of the dividend strategy.
Annual Return Comparison
ETF returns vs S&P 500 (SPY) by calendar year
YMAR S&P 500 (SPY)
+40%
0%
−40%
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026 YTD
ℹ️ Returns from January 1 to December 31 of each year. The current year (2026) column is dimmed to indicate YTD (incomplete). If blue is higher than gray, the ETF outperformed the benchmark in that year.
Win rate vs S&P 500 (SPY)
2 / 5Y
Roughly even with benchmark (40%)
+ 2026 YTD: Behind (6.1% vs 7.1%)
2021 ✗
2022 ✓
2023 ✗
2024 ✗
2025 ✓
2026 ✗ YTD
ℹ️ Number of winning years versus S&P 500 (SPY) within a completed calendar year (1/1–12/31). The current year (YTD) is reported separately.
Downside Capture
47%
Falls less than the benchmark in drawdowns — strong downside protection
<85% (Defend) 85~110% (Track) >110% (Lag)
ℹ️ Average % drop of this ETF when S&P 500 (SPY) is −1%. Based on daily returns over the past 3 years (only days where the benchmark is negative).
Risk Profile
Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History
Overall Risk Grade
Low Risk
Less volatile than the market average, making it relatively easy to hold over time.
Beta (market sensitivity)
평균권0.52
If the market rises +10% +5.2%
If the market falls -10% -5.2%
My positionMid-range
Low range Average High range
ℹ️ A beta of 1.0 moves in line with the market. Above 1 means it moves more than the market; below 1 means less.
Average daily range (last 1 month)
평균권±0.38%
S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more
Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)
ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.
Max Drawdown · Past 10 years
-22.6%
2021-03-22 Worst -21% 2026-07-01
ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.
Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)
0.35
Weak — Low risk-adjusted returns
ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.
Estimated Monthly Maximum Loss (VaR 95%)
-4.7%
Historically, monthly losses exceeding this figure occurred only5%of the time.
ℹ️ A statistical estimate meaning "with 95% probability, monthly losses will not exceed this amount." The remaining 5% corresponds to crisis-level events such as financial crises or pandemics.
Overall investment appeal
What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile
Strengths and weaknesses both present Check the fit below to see whether it matches your investing goal.
🎯 목적별 적합도
내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.
보통
매우 낮음
매우 낮음
낮음
이런 분에게 어울려요
Long-term and recurring investors
✅ 강점
뚜렷한 강점이 드러나지 않아요.
⚠️ 약점·주의사항
- 💸Expense ratio is somewhat high — 0.9% annually
- 🎯Trails benchmark by -6.0%p annually
Portfolio Composition
What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings
상위 10종목이 216% 차지
소수 종목에 집중돼 개별 종목 변동에 크게 영향을 받을 수 있어요.
ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?
ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.
🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기
총 보유종목
25개
상위 10개 비중
216.0%
최대 단일 종목
85.38%
집중도(HHI)
14220
높음 (집중)
⚠️ 소수 종목·섹터에 집중되어 있어, 해당 종목/섹터가 흔들리면 ETF 전체가 크게 영향을 받아요.
🥧 섹터 비중
Financial 198.8%
📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 216.0% 차지
티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)
#8 - DREYFUS GOVERNMENT CASH MANAGEMENT FUNDS 0.99%
#10 - Dreyfus Government Cash Management Funds 0.33%
Category Peers
Category: Global or ExUS Equities - Quant Strat
같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 6/6위
카테고리: Global or ExUS Equities - Quant Strat
ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?
같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 YMAR보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 YMAR보다 불리를 뜻해요.
| 티커 | ETF명 | 보수율 | AUM | 보유종목 | 배당률 | YTD | 1년 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YMAR | FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March | 0.9% | $161M | 6 | - | +6.41% | +12.56% |
| AB International Buffer ETF | 0.69% ▲ | $271M ▲ | 7 | - | - | +12.84% ▲ | |
| Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF January | 0.85% ▲ | $258M ▲ | 5 | - | - | +11.37% ▼ | |
| Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF July | 0.85% ▲ | $244M ▲ | 5 | - | - | +13.07% ▲ | |
| Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF April | 0.85% ▲ | $198M ▲ | 5 | - | - | +13.65% ▲ | |
| Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF July | 0.89% ▲ | $178M ▲ | 5 | - | - | +5.43% ▼ |
AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ YMAR보다 유리 · ▼ YMAR보다 불리
Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme
ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy
6 ETFs tracking the same theme as YMAR using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 5 · Inverse 1)
Not direct derivatives of YMAR, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.
ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?
Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with YMAR, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.
⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding
Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.
Leverage 5 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)
Inverse 1 ETFs that bet on declines in the same theme
FAQ
What kind of ETF is YMAR?
YMAR is an ETF in the Global or ExUS Equities - Quant Strat category, managed by First Trust.
How many holdings does YMAR have?
YMAR holds a total of 6 securities, with an AUM of approximately $161M.
What is the 52-week high and low for YMAR?
YMAR has recorded a 52-week high of $29.13 and a low of $25.18.
면책조항: 본 콘텐츠는 참고 자료이며 투자 권유가 아닙니다. 모든 투자의 책임은 투자자 본인에게 있습니다.