* Q4 figures are derived from the annual filing (10-K) · loss-making quarters are underlined in red
📊 Trade Desk Inc (TTD) Investment Analysis
📐
What kind of company is Trade Desk Inc?
트레이드데스크(TTD) 성장주
Communication Services·Advertising Agencies
📈
#1053 by Market Cap — Mid-Cap
A US digital advertising company that operates a demand-side platform offering programmatic advertising solutions, enabling advertisers to automatically purchase and serve digital ads. It is positioned to benefit from the growth of digital and connected TV (CTV) advertising.
Bollinger Bands are upper and lower channels showing the closing price range (20 days · 2σ). Touching the upper band = overheated; touching the lower band = oversold. Ichimoku Cloud shows trend direction and strength through colored areas. Prices above the cloud indicate an uptrend; prices below indicate a downtrend. About Bollinger Bands →
🔴
Current diagnosis · 2026-07-27
Downtrend zone
Current price $17.88 below the midline ($18.70). Normal downward flow. Below the Ichimoku cloud (bearish).
MACD (12 · 26 · 9)Expand ▼
An indicator that uses the difference between the short-term EMA (12) and long-term EMA (26) to identify trend reversals. When MACD rises above the Signal line, it is a buy signal (golden cross); when it falls below, it is a sell signal (death cross). About MACD →
🔴
Current diagnosis · 2026-07-27
Bearish momentum holding
MACD -0.525 < Signal -0.413 in negative zone + Hist negative (-0.113). Weakness in progress.
RSI(14) · Stochastics %K(14)Expand ▼
RSI measures short-term buying and selling pressure on a scale of 0–100. 30 or below = oversold (a rebound may be possible); 70 or above = overbought (a pullback may be possible). Stoch %K similarly measures short-term momentum strength. RSI · Learn more about Stochastics →
🔴
Current diagnosis · 2026-07-27
Bearish zone
RSI 43.2 (below the neutral level of 50). Selling pressure leads, indicating a weak trend. Stoch %K is also 30.8.
※ "Current diagnosis" is an automated interpretation based on standard thresholds and is for reference only. Make your own comprehensive judgment before trading.
🎯
Is it attractive at this price?
⚖️
In line with the industry average
Cheap on Vs. Earnings·Vs. Cash Flow, Pricey on Vs. Assets·Vs. Sales
💡 How to read this — Compare against peers in the same industry to see what the price is cheap or expensive relative to. Example: cheap vs. earnings = stock price is low relative to what the company earns; expensive vs. assets = stock price is high relative to assets on the balance sheet.
💵Vs. EarningsCheap
🏢Vs. AssetsPricey
🧾Vs. SalesPricey
💧Vs. Cash FlowCheap
💵 Vs. Earnings
PER Price-to-Earnings Ratio
How expensive the price is vs. earnings — lower is cheaper
20.15x
✓ Cheap
My positionMid-range
Low rangeAverageHigh range
Advertising Agencies median 31.90x · Around the industry average
💡 PER 15 이하 저평가, 25 이상이면 성장성 검증 필요 (적자 기업은 의미 없음)
💵 Vs. Earnings
Forward PER Forward Price-to-Earnings Ratio
PER using next year's estimated earnings — reflects growth
14.98x
✓ Fair
My positionMid-range
Low rangeAverageHigh range
Advertising Agencies median 10.61x · Around the industry average
💡 향후 12개월 예상 EPS 기준 PER. 현재 PER보다 낮으면 이익 성장 중
🏢 Vs. Assets
PBR Price-to-Book Ratio
Price vs. the company's asset value — below 1 trades cheaper than assets
3.43x
✓ Pricey
My positionBottom 25%
Low rangeAverageHigh range
Advertising Agencies median 1.17x · Bottom 23% — expensive within the industry
💡 PBR 1 미만이면 청산가치 이하 (금융·제조업에서 특히 의미, IT는 낮은 비중)
🧾 Vs. Sales
PSR Price-to-Sales Ratio
Market cap vs. revenue — lower is cheaper relative to sales
2.83x
✓ Pricey
My positionBottom 25%
Low rangeAverageHigh range
Advertising Agencies median 0.77x · Bottom 16% — expensive within the industry
💡 PSR 2 이하 저평가, 10 초과면 고평가 (고성장 기업일 때만 정당화)
💧 Vs. Cash Flow
EV/EBITDA Enterprise Value Multiple
Total enterprise value ÷ operating cash earnings — a benchmark for M&A
10.24x
✓ Cheap
My positionMid-range
Low rangeAverageHigh range
Advertising Agencies median 10.41x · Around the industry average
💡 EV/EBITDA 10 이하 저평가, 20 이상이면 고평가 (M&A 밸류 기준)
💧 Vs. Cash Flow
P/FCF Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Ratio
Price vs. actual cash generation — lower means more efficient
9.98x
✓ Fair
My positionMid-range
Low rangeAverageHigh range
Advertising Agencies median 9.11x · Around the industry average
💡 P/FCF 20 이하면 현금창출 대비 저평가 (실질 수익성 기준)
Analyst target price (reference)
$25.31 vs. current price +41.6%
* Valuation is the stock's relative position within the industry peer group (same sector and market-cap range). Even when valuation looks attractive, check the 'Profitability' and 'Growth' sections too.
As of: Recent snapshot · Peer group: Advertising Agencies
👥
Who owns it?
🟢
Ownership flow is positive
Insider net buying +12.3% · Institutional net buying +2.2% · Short interest elevated 17.6% · Short interest up +6.9pp over last 90d
📈 Recent trading flow (6 months)
🧑💼 Insiders (executives & directors)
+12.3%
Insiders large net buying
🏦 Institutions (funds & investors)
+2.2%
Institutions net buying
💡 Net change over the past 6 months. Shows how much insiders and institutions increased or reduced their holdings, in %.
👥 Holdings composition
🏦 Institutions80.4%
Institution-led, stable structure
Communication Services 중형주 Median 63.8%
🧑💼 Insiders11.2%
Founder/management large holders (strong skin-in-the-game)
Communication Services 중형주 Median 18.7%
👤 Retail investors (estimated)8.4%
Everyone excluding institutions and insiders
InstitutionsInsidersRetail (est.)
📉 Short-selling metrics
Short ratio
17.6%
Somewhat high
Communication Services 중형주 Median 5.9%
Past 90 days 📈 +6.9%p increase
Short interest days to cover
3.9 days
Days needed to close short positions using average trading volume
🧮 Share count
Total shares outstanding427.9M주
Float (tradable shares)417.4M주
* Insider/institutional flows are based on net changes over the past 6 months. Trend is cumulative over the past 90 days.
Leveraged, inverse, and covered call ETFs based on the underlying asset
1 derivative ETFs based on TTD (Leverage 1)
These are based on the same underlying asset but carry a completely different risk and return profile. Please review the warning below first.
ℹ️ What is a Derivative ETF?
These are special ETFs that amplify, reverse, or monetize the price movement of an underlying ETF or security. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs target opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.
⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding
Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.
📈Leverage1ETFs that move 2-3x with TTD (high volatility)