SMHC 주가 전망 및 ETF 분석 - 배당·운용보수·보유종목·NAV·RSI·MACD

SMHC

VanEck China Semiconductor ETF

7월 28일 4:00 PM ET (한국 7/29 05:00)

$46.74

-5.34 ▼ -10.24%

🌙 7월 28일 7:34 PM ET (한국 7/29 08:34)

$46.74

+0.00 +0.00%

SMHC ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

Total Expense Ratio

0.65%

Annual operating cost

Net Assets (AUM)

$168M

약 2302억원

Holdings

28 items

Dividend Yield

Management Style

Passive

Category ⓘ	Global or ExUS Equities - Industry Sector	Asset Type ⓘ	Equities (Stocks)	Return% 1Y ⓘ	-	Total Holdings ⓘ	28	Perf Week ⓘ	-14.65%
ETF Type ⓘ	Global Ex. US Equities	Active/Passive ⓘ	Passive	Return% 3Y ⓘ	-	AUM ⓘ	$168M	Perf Month ⓘ	-26.44%
Expense ⓘ	0.65%	NAV ⓘ	$51.71	Return% 5Y ⓘ	-	52W High ⓘ	-31.96%	Perf Quarter ⓘ	-
Dividend TTM ⓘ	-	Div Gr. 3/5Y ⓘ	-	Return% 10Y ⓘ	-	52W Low ⓘ	-4.83%	Perf Half Y ⓘ	-
Flows% 1M ⓘ	-	Flows% YTD ⓘ	-	Return% SI ⓘ	-82.15%	Volatility(W/M) ⓘ	1.28% 2.08%	Perf YTD ⓘ	-22.71%
SMA20 ⓘ	-17.8%	SMA50 ⓘ	-19.44%	SMA200 ⓘ	-19.44%	RSI (14) ⓘ	36.46	Beta ⓘ	-
IPO ⓘ	2026/6/24	Prev Close ⓘ	$52.08	Perf Year ⓘ	-	Avg Volume ⓘ	0.18M	Price ⓘ	$46.74

📊 VanEck China Semiconductor ETF (SMHC) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

VanEck China Semiconductor ETF · Global or ExUS Equities - Industry Sector

일반 ETF — 카테고리 기반 분석만 제공됩니다

📘 SMHC ETF 자세히 알아보기 →

규모: $168M 약 2302억원
운용사: -
운용 방식: 패시브 (지수 추종)
상장일: 2026년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Average expense ratio — 0.65% annually

Mid-range within the Global or ExUS Equities - Industry Sector category.

Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)

평균권

0.65%

My positionMid-range

Low range Average High range

Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount

$100.0M

Annual Expense Ratio

$650K

Pay $70K more per year vs. category average

Category Median Annual Cost

$580K

Based on expense ratio of 0.58%

10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)

$11.6M

12.0% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees

💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Cheaper alternatives in the same category

HAUZ

Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF

0.10%

-0.55%p annually

VNQI

Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF

0.12%

-0.53%p annually

PBPH

Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF

0.13%

-0.52%p annually

* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Insufficient return data

This ETF is either too recently listed or does not yet have enough disclosed return data. Please refer to ETFs that have been operating for more than one year.

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade

Low Risk

Less volatile than the market average, making it relatively easy to hold over time.

Average daily range (last 1 month)

평균권

±2.08%

S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more

ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

An average ETF No standout strengths or weaknesses — pretty run-of-the-mill.

🎯 목적별 적합도

내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.

🌳

장기 보유

수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때

보통

💵

배당 인컴

매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때

매우 낮음

⚡

단기 트레이딩

며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매

매우 낮음

🧩

포트폴리오 보조

자산 배분·헤지 용도

낮음

👤

이런 분에게 어울려요

Long-term and recurring investors

✅ 강점

뚜렷한 강점이 드러나지 않아요.

⚠️ 약점·주의사항

특별한 약점이 보이지 않아요.

Portfolio Composition

What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings

95개 종목에 넓게 분산

개별 종목 리스크가 분산되어 있어요.

ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?

ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.

🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기

총 보유종목

95개

상위 10개 비중

22.3%

최대 단일 종목

3.10%

집중도(HHI)

123

낮음 (분산)

🥧 섹터 비중

Industrials

16.3%

Utilities

14.2%

Consumer Defensive

11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

6.8%

Financial

6.5%

Basic Materials

6.5%

Technology

5.6%

Real Estate

5.3%

Healthcare

3.7%

Communication Services

3.1%

Energy

2.9%

📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 22.3% 차지

티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)

#1 VZ Verizon Communications Inc.

3.10%

#2 EIX Edison International

2.59%

RHI Robert Half Inc.

2.56%

#4 O Realty Income Corporation

2.23%

BEN Franklin Resources Inc.

2.06%

SON Sonoco Products Company

2.04%

CLX The Clorox Company

2.03%

#8 KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation

1.99%

BBY Best Buy Co Inc.

1.89%

#10

HRL Hormel Foods Corp

1.85%

Category Peers

Category: Global or ExUS Equities - Industry Sector

같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 5/6위

카테고리: Global or ExUS Equities - Industry Sector

ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?

같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 SMHC보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 SMHC보다 불리를 뜻해요.

티커	ETF명	보수율	AUM	보유종목	배당률	YTD	1년
SMHC	VanEck China Semiconductor ETF	0.65%	$168M	28	-	-22.71%	-
SMH	VanEck Semiconductor ETF	0.35% ▲	$63.6B ▲	26	0.21%	-	+81.43%
DRAM	Roundhill Memory ETF	0.65%	$25.0B ▲	21	-	-	-
GDX	VanEck Gold Miners ETF	0.51% ▲	$23.1B ▲	61	0.85%	-	+41.11%
CIBR	First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	0.58% ▲	$14.0B ▲	44	0.44%	-	+20.15%
IXN	iShares Global Tech ETF	0.39% ▲	$8.3B ▲	144	0.27%	-	+35.42%