SLWS
Wisdom Short Duration Income ETF
7월 28일 10:30 AM ET (한국 7/28 23:30)
$101.22
+0.10 ▲ +0.10%
SLWS ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.
Total Expense Ratio
0.42%
Annual operating cost
Net Assets (AUM)
$385M
약 5278억원
Holdings
200 items
Dividend Yield
3.09%
Management Style
Active
| Category | Bonds - Broad Market | Asset Type | Bonds | Return% 1Y | - | Total Holdings | 200 | Perf Week | -0.05% |
| ETF Type | Global Bonds | Active/Passive | Active | Return% 3Y | - | AUM | $385M | Perf Month | -0.17% |
| Expense | 0.42% | NAV | $101.07 | Return% 5Y | - | 52W High | -1.04% | Perf Quarter | -0.07% |
| Dividend TTM | $3.12 (3.09%) | Div Gr. 3/5Y | - | Return% 10Y | - | 52W Low | 0.75% | Perf Half Y | -0.69% |
| Flows% 1M | 0.25% | Flows% YTD | 3.8% | Return% SI | 4.43% | Volatility(W/M) | - | Perf YTD | -0.26% |
| SMA20 | 0.07% | SMA50 | 0.05% | SMA200 | -0.03% | RSI (14) | 51.86 | Beta | - |
| IPO | 2025/11/6 | Prev Close | $101.12 | Perf Year | - | Avg Volume | 0.00M | Price | $101.22 |
Wisdom Short Duration Income ETF (SLWS) Investment Analysis
ETF Overview
Wisdom Short Duration Income ETF · Bonds - Broad Market
채권형 — 채권 ETF (만기 미상)
2025년 상장, 1년 운영 중.
Globalfixed-incomebondscorporate-bonds
- 규모
- $385M 약 5278억원
- 운용사
- -
- 운용 방식
- 액티브 (운용사 재량)
- 상장일
- 2025년
Cost Efficiency
Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact
Average expense ratio — 0.42% annually
Mid-range within the Bonds - Broad Market category.
Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)
평균권0.42%
My positionMid-range
Low range Average High range
Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount
$100.0M
Annual Expense Ratio
$420K
Pay $60K more per year vs. category average
Category Median Annual Cost
$360K
Based on expense ratio of 0.36%
10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)
$7.6M
7.8% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees
Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.
Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.
Cheaper alternatives in the same category
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
0.03%
-0.39%p annually
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
0.03%
-0.39%p annually
BSV
Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF
0.03%
-0.39%p annually
* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.
Long-Term Performance
1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense
Insufficient return data
Insufficient return data
This ETF is either too recently listed or does not yet have enough disclosed return data. Please refer to ETFs that have been operating for more than one year.
Risk Profile
Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History
Overall Risk Grade
Bond Benchmark
Bond ETFs are naturally less volatile than stocks, so it only makes sense to compare them with other bond ETFs. You should also factor in the inverse relationship between interest rates and bond prices.
🏦 Bond ETFs — Low volatility and low Beta are the norm
Bonds have far lower volatility than stocks, and a lower Beta versus equity benchmarks. An "stable" rating is the natural result; meaningful comparison should be made against bond indices (e.g., AGG/TLT).
Average daily range (last 1 month)
±0.00%
S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more
Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)
ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.
Max Drawdown · Past 10 years
-0.7%
2025-11-06 Worst -5% 2026-07-01
ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.
Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)
0.66
Average — Moderate risk-adjusted returns
ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.
Dividend Analysis
Yield · Dividend history · After-tax income calculator
Bond distribution — 3.09% annually
Coupon interest is the primary source.
Bond ETF distributions are mostly coupon income. Distributions may rise when interest rates increase, but this should be considered alongside the resulting price decline.
배당수익률
3.09%
주당 배당
$3.12
연간 기준
5년 성장률
-
지급 주기
—
최근 12개월 기준
💰 내가 $100K 투자한다면
연간 배당금 (세후) $3K
5년 누적 (세후) $13K
* 환율 1 가정, 배당소득세 15% 반영. 5년 누적은 배당 성장률 연 0% 가정.
* Qualified dividend middle-bracket approximation. Actual rate varies by total income.
Overall investment appeal
What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile
An average ETF No standout strengths or weaknesses — pretty run-of-the-mill.
🎯 목적별 적합도
내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.
보통
적합
매우 낮음
매우 적합
이런 분에게 어울려요
Investors seeking portfolio stability
✅ 강점
뚜렷한 강점이 드러나지 않아요.
⚠️ 약점·주의사항
특별한 약점이 보이지 않아요.
Portfolio Composition
What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings
채권 포트폴리오
주식과 달리 "섹터 = 만기·신용등급"으로 해석해야 해요.
ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?
ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.
🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기
총 보유종목
195개
상위 10개 비중
19.6%
최대 단일 종목
3.74%
집중도(HHI)
93
낮음 (분산)
🥧 섹터 비중
Financial 18.9%
Energy 5.0%
Utilities 3.2%
Technology 2.5%
Industrials 0.5%
Basic Materials 0.4%
Healthcare 0.1%
📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 19.6% 차지
티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)
#3 - PSEG POWER LLC 2.15%
#4 - EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO SARL 2.13%
#7 - VOLKSWAGEN GROUP AMERICA 1.47%
#10 - TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS NE 1.33%
Category Peers
Category: Bonds - Broad Market
같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 6/6위
카테고리: Bonds - Broad Market
ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?
같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 SLWS보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 SLWS보다 불리를 뜻해요.
| 티커 | ETF명 | 보수율 | AUM | 보유종목 | 배당률 | YTD | 1년 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLWS | Wisdom Short Duration Income ETF | 0.42% | $385M | 200 | 3.09% | -0.26% | - |
| Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 0.03% ▲ | $160.5B ▲ | 17416 | 4.01% ▲ | - | -0.90% | |
| iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.03% ▲ | $137.5B ▲ | 13300 | 4.03% ▲ | - | -0.77% | |
| Vanguard Total International Bond ETF | 0.07% ▲ | $82.4B ▲ | 6833 | 4.52% ▲ | - | -2.70% | |
| Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF | 0.03% ▲ | $45.3B ▲ | 3201 | 4.02% ▲ | - | -1.15% | |
| iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF | 0.06% ▲ | $43.0B ▲ | 18030 | 4.28% ▲ | - | -0.85% |
AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ SLWS보다 유리 · ▼ SLWS보다 불리
Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme
ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy
9 ETFs tracking the same theme as SLWS using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 2 · Inverse 3 · Covered Call 4)
Not direct derivatives of SLWS, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.
ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?
Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with SLWS, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.
⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding
Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.
Leverage 2 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)
Inverse 3 ETFs that bet on declines in the same theme
Covered Call & Options 4 ETFs that add a monthly dividend via covered calls on the same theme
FAQ
What kind of ETF is SLWS?
SLWS is an ETF in the Bonds - Broad Market category.
How many holdings does SLWS have?
SLWS holds a total of 200 securities, with an AUM of approximately $385M.
Does SLWS pay dividends (distributions)?
SLWS's distribution yield is approximately 3.09%.
What is the 52-week high and low for SLWS?
SLWS has recorded a 52-week high of $102.29 and a low of $100.47.
면책조항: 본 콘텐츠는 참고 자료이며 투자 권유가 아닙니다. 모든 투자의 책임은 투자자 본인에게 있습니다.