애프터마켓
Log in Sign up
SCNM
SCNM
Sterling Capital National Municipal Bond ETF
7월 28일 3:57 PM ET (한국 7/29 04:57)
$24.78
+0.00 +0.00%
🌙 7월 28일 4:10 PM ET (한국 7/29 05:10)
$24.78
+0.00 +0.00%

SCNM ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

시황 · 실적발표 · 매수매도 신호, 가장 먼저 받아보세요 🔔 구독
Total Expense Ratio
0.35%
Annual operating cost
Net Assets (AUM)
$233M
약 3185억원
Holdings
93 items
Dividend Yield
1.79%
Management Style
Active
Category Bonds - MunicipalAsset Type BondsReturn% 1Y -Total Holdings 93Perf Week -0.54%
ETF Type US BondsActive/Passive ActiveReturn% 3Y -AUM $233MPerf Month -1.57%
Expense 0.35%NAV $24.67Return% 5Y -52W High -2.82%Perf Quarter -1.14%
Dividend TTM $0.44 (1.79%)Div Gr. 3/5Y -Return% 10Y -52W Low 0.57%Perf Half Y -1.45%
Flows% 1M 2.19%Flows% YTD 3324.87%Return% SI 0.65%Volatility(W/M) 0.29% 0.23%Perf YTD -1.14%
SMA20 -0.8%SMA50 -0.88%SMA200 -1.15%RSI (14) 31.94Beta -
IPO 2025/12/11Prev Close $24.78Perf Year -Avg Volume 0.04MPrice $24.78

📊 Sterling Capital National Municipal Bond ETF (SCNM) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

Sterling Capital National Municipal Bond ETF · Bonds - Municipal

채권형 — 채권 ETF (만기 미상)
2025년 상장, 1년 운영 중.

Sterling Capital National Municipal Bond ETF는 원금 보존과 함께 연방 소득세가 면제되는 경상 수익 창출을 목표로 하는 액티브 운용 ETF입니다. 정상적인 상황에서 순자산의 최소 80%를 이자가 비과세되는 지방채에 투자하며, 비분산형(Non-diversified)으로 운영됩니다.

📘 SCNM ETF 자세히 알아보기 →
U.S.fixed-incomebondsmunicipal-bonds
규모
$233M 약 3185억원
운용사
Sterling Capital
운용 방식
액티브 (운용사 재량)
상장일
2025년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Average expense ratio — 0.35% annually
Mid-range within the Bonds - Municipal category.
Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)
평균권
0.35%
My positionMid-range
Low range Average High range
Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount
$100.0M
Annual Expense Ratio
$350K
Pay $80K more per year vs. category average
Category Median Annual Cost
$270K
Based on expense ratio of 0.27%
10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)
$6.3M
6.6% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees
💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Cheaper alternatives in the same category

* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Insufficient return data
Insufficient return data

This ETF is either too recently listed or does not yet have enough disclosed return data. Please refer to ETFs that have been operating for more than one year.

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade
Bond Benchmark
Bond ETFs are naturally less volatile than stocks, so it only makes sense to compare them with other bond ETFs. You should also factor in the inverse relationship between interest rates and bond prices.
🏦 Bond ETFs — Low volatility and low Beta are the norm
Bonds have far lower volatility than stocks, and a lower Beta versus equity benchmarks. An "stable" rating is the natural result; meaningful comparison should be made against bond indices (e.g., AGG/TLT).
Average daily range (last 1 month)
평균권
±0.23%
S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more
Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)
ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.
Max Drawdown · Past 10 years
-2.8%
Drawdown duration: 1 months
2026-02-27 → 2026-03-24
Still recovering
2025-12-11 Worst -5% 2026-07-01
ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.
Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)
-0.86
Poor — Underperforms the risk-free rate
ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.

Dividend Analysis

Yield · Dividend history · After-tax income calculator

Bond distribution — 1.79% annually
Coupon interest is the primary source.
ℹ️ Bond ETF distributions are mostly coupon income. Distributions may rise when interest rates increase, but this should be considered alongside the resulting price decline.
배당수익률
1.79%
주당 배당
$0.44
연간 기준
5년 성장률
-
지급 주기
분기배당
2월 · 3월 · 4월 · 12월
📊 총 이력 2025~2026 (4건)
연도별 배당 총액 추이
주당 배당금을 연 단위로 합산한 금액입니다. 막대가 우상향이면 매년 배당이 늘어나고 있다는 뜻입니다.
2021
2022
2023
2024
$0.06
2025
$X.XX 그 해 총 배당금 +X% 전년 대비 증가 -X% 감소
최근 배당 이력 총 4건
아래로 스크롤하면 과거 배당 이력을 볼 수 있습니다.
배당락일
주당 금액
지급일
당시 수익률
2026-04-01
$0.074
0.94%
2026-03-02
$0.066
0.63%
2026-02-02
$0.038
0.38%
2025-12-30
$0.057
0.23%
* "배당락일"은 배당받으려면 이 날 이전에 주식을 보유해야 하는 기준일입니다. 지급일·당시 수익률은 일부 종목에서 데이터가 없을 수 있습니다.
💰 내가 $100K 투자한다면
연간 배당금 (세후) $2K
5년 누적 (세후) $8K
* 환율 1 가정, 배당소득세 15% 반영. 5년 누적은 배당 성장률 연 0% 가정.
* Qualified dividend middle-bracket approximation. Actual rate varies by total income.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

An average ETF No standout strengths or weaknesses — pretty run-of-the-mill.
🎯 목적별 적합도
내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.
🌳
장기 보유
수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때
보통
💵
배당 인컴
매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때
적합
단기 트레이딩
며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매
매우 낮음
🧩
포트폴리오 보조
자산 배분·헤지 용도
매우 적합
👤
이런 분에게 어울려요
Investors seeking portfolio stability
✅ 강점
뚜렷한 강점이 드러나지 않아요.
⚠️ 약점·주의사항
특별한 약점이 보이지 않아요.

Category Peers

Category: Bonds - Municipal

같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 6/6위
카테고리: Bonds - Municipal
ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?
같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시SCNM보다 유리, ▼ 표시SCNM보다 불리를 뜻해요.
티커ETF명보수율AUM보유종목배당률YTD1년
SCNM SCNM
Sterling Capital National Municipal Bond ETF0.35% $233M 931.79% -1.14% -
Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF0.03% $45.2B 105703.41% - +2.49%
iShares National Muni Bond ETF0.05% $45.2B 68863.21% - +2.29%
JPMorgan Municipal ETF0.18% $8.4B 20753.64% - +1.48%
Capital Group Municipal Income ETF0.27% $6.4B 23753.37% - +1.80%
iShares California Muni Bond ETF0.08% $4.6B 17032.98% - +2.59%
AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ SCNM보다 유리 · ▼ SCNM보다 불리
📊
See the market at a glance with a real-time dashboard Track premarket, regular, and after-hours quotes, screeners, and heatmaps on a single screen

Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme

ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy

9 ETFs tracking the same theme as SCNM using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 2 · Inverse 3 · Covered Call 4)
Not direct derivatives of SCNM, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.
ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?
Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with SCNM, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.
⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding
Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.
🧺
Deeper Analysis at the ETF Center ETF overlap, sector exposure, and X-Ray analysis tools

FAQ

What kind of ETF is SCNM?

SCNM is an ETF in the Bonds - Municipal category, managed by Sterling Capital.

How many holdings does SCNM have?

SCNM holds a total of 93 securities, with an AUM of approximately $233M.

Does SCNM pay dividends (distributions)?

SCNM's distribution yield is approximately 1.79%.

What is the 52-week high and low for SCNM?

SCNM has recorded a 52-week high of $25.50 and a low of $24.64.

시황 · 실적발표 · 매수매도 신호, 가장 먼저 받아보세요 🔔 구독

면책조항: 본 콘텐츠는 참고 자료이며 투자 권유가 아닙니다. 모든 투자의 책임은 투자자 본인에게 있습니다.