SASS 주가 전망 및 ETF 분석 - 배당·운용보수·보유종목·NAV·RSI·MACD

SASS

M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF

7월 28일 9:30 AM ET (한국 7/28 22:30)

$24.17

-0.04 ▼ -0.14%

🌙 7월 28일 4:04 PM ET (한국 7/29 05:04)

$24.17

+0.00 +0.00%

SASS ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

Total Expense Ratio

0.75%

Annual operating cost

Net Assets (AUM)

$76M

약 1037억원

Holdings

22 items

Dividend Yield

Management Style

Active

Category ⓘ	US Equities - US Style	Asset Type ⓘ	Equities (Stocks)	Return% 1Y ⓘ	-	Total Holdings ⓘ	22	Perf Week ⓘ	-1.33%
ETF Type ⓘ	US Equities	Active/Passive ⓘ	Active	Return% 3Y ⓘ	-	AUM ⓘ	$76M	Perf Month ⓘ	-3.6%
Expense ⓘ	0.75%	NAV ⓘ	$24.21	Return% 5Y ⓘ	-	52W High ⓘ	-4.56%	Perf Quarter ⓘ	-2%
Dividend TTM ⓘ	-	Div Gr. 3/5Y ⓘ	-	Return% 10Y ⓘ	-	52W Low ⓘ	6.48%	Perf Half Y ⓘ	-
Flows% 1M ⓘ	-0.02%	Flows% YTD ⓘ	8.84%	Return% SI ⓘ	-8.85%	Volatility(W/M) ⓘ	- 0.13%	Perf YTD ⓘ	-3.55%
SMA20 ⓘ	-1.8%	SMA50 ⓘ	-1.41%	SMA200 ⓘ	-0.47%	RSI (14) ⓘ	41.12	Beta ⓘ	-
IPO ⓘ	2026/3/4	Prev Close ⓘ	$24.21	Perf Year ⓘ	-	Avg Volume ⓘ	0.00M	Price ⓘ	$24.17

📊 M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF (SASS) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF · US Equities - US Style

가치주형 — 저평가된 가치주 중심 포트폴리오

M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF는 약 15~25개의 대형 및 중형주로 구성된 집중 포트폴리오에 투자하는 액티브 운용 ETF입니다. 철저한 바텀업(Bottom-up) 근본 분석을 통해 시장의 인식이 실제 가치보다 뒤처져 있는 소외주나 오해를 받는 기업들을 발굴하며, 강력한 펀더멘털과 긍정적 변화를 이끄는 촉매제가 있는 비즈니스에 집중합니다.

📘 SASS ETF 자세히 알아보기 →

U.S.equitymid-large-capfundamental

규모: $76M 약 1037억원
운용사: -
운용 방식: 액티브 (운용사 재량)
상장일: 2026년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Above-average cost — 0.75% annually

Expense ratio is higher than the US Equities - US Style median. Compare against similar ETFs.

Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)

하위 25%

0.75%

My positionBottom 25%

Low range Average High range

Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount

$100.0M

Annual Expense Ratio

$750K

Pay $330K more per year vs. category average

Category Median Annual Cost

$420K

Based on expense ratio of 0.42%

10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)

$13.4M

13.8% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees

💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Cheaper alternatives in the same category

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

0.04%

-0.71%p annually

* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Insufficient return data

This ETF is either too recently listed or does not yet have enough disclosed return data. Please refer to ETFs that have been operating for more than one year.

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade

Low Risk

Less volatile than the market average, making it relatively easy to hold over time.

Average daily range (last 1 month)

상위 25%

±0.13%

S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more

Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)

ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.

Max Drawdown · Past 10 years

-9.6%

Drawdown duration: 1 months

2026-03-04 → 2026-03-27

Recovered in about 3 months

2026-03-04 Worst -7% 2026-07-01

ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.

Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)

-0.72

Poor — Underperforms the risk-free rate

ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

Strengths and weaknesses both present Check the fit below to see whether it matches your investing goal.

🎯 목적별 적합도

내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.

🌳

장기 보유

수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때

적합

💵

배당 인컴

매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때

보통

⚡

단기 트레이딩

며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매

매우 낮음

🧩

포트폴리오 보조

자산 배분·헤지 용도

보통

👤

이런 분에게 어울려요

Value investors

✅ 강점

🛡️Below-average volatility

⚠️ 약점·주의사항

💸Expense ratio is somewhat high — 0.75% annually

Category Peers

Category: US Equities - US Style

같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 6/6위

카테고리: US Equities - US Style

ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?

같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 SASS보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 SASS보다 불리를 뜻해요.

티커	ETF명	보수율	AUM	보유종목	배당률	YTD	1년
SASS	M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF	0.75%	$76M	22	-	-3.55%	-
VTV	Vanguard Value ETF	0.03% ▲	$189.1B ▲	325	1.83%	-	+24.06%
IWD	iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF	0.18% ▲	$81.2B ▲	875	1.39%	-	+27.16%
IVE	iShares S&P 500 Value ETF	0.18% ▲	$49.1B ▲	444	1.51%	-	+17.40%
VBR	Vanguard Small Cap Value ETF	0.05% ▲	$37.4B ▲	844	1.74%	-	+22.57%
SPYV	State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF	0.04% ▲	$36.3B ▲	440	1.67%	-	+17.24%

AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ SASS보다 유리 · ▼ SASS보다 불리

Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme

ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy

4 ETFs tracking the same theme as SASS using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 3 · Covered Call 1)

Not direct derivatives of SASS, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.

ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?

Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with SASS, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.

⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding

Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.

📈 Leverage 3 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)