RSPA 주가 전망 및 ETF 분석 - 배당·운용보수·보유종목·NAV·RSI·MACD

RSPA

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF

7월 28일 11:18 AM ET (한국 7/29 24:18)

$53.63

+0.15 ▲ +0.28%

RSPA ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

Total Expense Ratio

0.29%

Annual operating cost

Net Assets (AUM)

$1.0B

약 1조원

Holdings

527 items

Dividend Yield

8.96%

Management Style

Active

Category ⓘ	US Equities - Quant Strat	Asset Type ⓘ	Equities (Stocks)	Return% 1Y ⓘ	16.33%	Total Holdings ⓘ	527	Perf Week ⓘ	1.13%
ETF Type ⓘ	US Equity Income	Active/Passive ⓘ	Active	Return% 3Y ⓘ	-	AUM ⓘ	$1.0B	Perf Month ⓘ	0.56%
Expense ⓘ	0.29%	NAV ⓘ	$53.28	Return% 5Y ⓘ	-	52W High ⓘ	-0.87%	Perf Quarter ⓘ	3.69%
Dividend TTM ⓘ	$4.8 (8.96%)	Div Gr. 3/5Y ⓘ	-	Return% 10Y ⓘ	-	52W Low ⓘ	9.79%	Perf Half Y ⓘ	3.23%
Flows% 1M ⓘ	13.31%	Flows% YTD ⓘ	79.1%	Return% SI ⓘ	12.84%	Volatility(W/M) ⓘ	0.79% 0.7%	Perf YTD ⓘ	5.24%
SMA20 ⓘ	0.11%	SMA50 ⓘ	1.07%	SMA200 ⓘ	3.51%	RSI (14) ⓘ	54.49	Beta ⓘ	0.56
IPO ⓘ	2024/7/17	Prev Close ⓘ	$53.48	Perf Year ⓘ	5.9%	Avg Volume ⓘ	0.18M	Price ⓘ	$53.63

📊 Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF · US Equities - Quant Strat

배당 인컴형 — 꾸준한 배당 수익 목적의 배당주 바구니

2024년 상장, 2년 운영 중.

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF는 경상수익과 장기 자본 성장을 통한 총수익을 추구합니다. 이 ETF는 (1) 수수료 차감 전 기준으로 S&P 500 Equal Weight Index 성과를 추종하도록 설계된 미국 주식 포트폴리오 또는 지수 추종 미국 상장 ETF에 투자하고, (2) 지수 또는 지수 추종 ETF에 대한 익스포저를 제공하는 주식연계증권(ELN)을 통해 옵션 기반 인컴 전략을 구현하여 목표를 달성합니다. 비분산형입니다.

📘 RSPA ETF 자세히 알아보기 →

U.S.equityincomeequal-weight

규모: $1.0B 약 1조원
운용사: Invesco
운용 방식: 액티브 (운용사 재량)
상장일: 2024년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Top-tier low cost — 0.29% annually

상위 5% within the US Equities - Quant Strat category. For a ₩100M investment, the annual cost is roughly ₩290,000.

Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)

상위 5%

0.29%

My positionTop 5%

Low range Average High range

Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount

$100.0M

Annual Expense Ratio

$290K

Save $500K per year vs. category average

Category Median Annual Cost

$790K

Based on expense ratio of 0.79%

10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)

$5.3M

5.4% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees

💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Cheaper alternatives in the same category

CBOX

Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF

0.14%

-0.15%p annually

XBOX

Roundhill Ultra Short Duration No Dividend Target ETF

0.14%

-0.15%p annually

SELV

SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Low Volatility Active ETF

0.15%

-0.14%p annually

* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Insufficient return data

-1.5%p vs. benchmark (SPY) over 1Y.

ℹ️ The "1Y·3Y·5Y·10Y" periods below represent annualized returns (CAGR) measured backward from today. Example: "3Y +12%" means the investment grew at a compounded 12% per year over the past three years.

If you had invested 1 year(s) ago

$100.0M

Today's value

$116.3M

→

Total gain

+$16.3M

Annualized +16.3%

ℹ️ How to read the return breakdown bar

Each period bar shows the share of this ETF's returns by source.

Price gains Price decline Dividends received

Mostly blue (80%+): Growth-style — price gains drive most returns
Mostly orange (70%+): Income-style — dividends drive most returns (watch out for after-tax drag)
Red + orange: Stagnant or declining price — dividends offset losses (common in covered-call and high-dividend funds)

1 Year

2025.07 ~ 2026.07

Annualized +16.33%

상위 25%

Price +5.90% + Dividend +10.43% = Total +16.33%/yr

Trailed the benchmark by 1.5%p annually

My positionTop 25%

Low range Average High range

3 Years

2023.07 ~ 2026.07

Listed 2024/7 — under 3 years

5 Years

2021.07 ~ 2026.07

Listed 2024/7 — under 5 years

10Y

2016.07 ~ 2026.07

Listed 2024/7 — under 10 years

2Y Cumulative Total Return Curve

2024-07-17 start, based on a 100M KRW base — read the curve values directly as units of 100M KRW (e.g., 308 → 3.08억 / 308M KRW). Both this ETF and the benchmark are rebased to 100 on the same start date for comparison.

RSPA · Price Only RSPA · Price + Cumulative Dividends RSPA · Dividend Reinvested S&P 500 (SPY)

100

150

ℹ️ Price Only: Excludes dividends and tracks pure stock price only. Covered-call and high-dividend ETFs often show a flat or declining line on this view, which is meaningful from a "principal preservation" standpoint. Price + Cumulative Dividend: Share count stays the same and received dividends are accumulated as cash. Closely matches your actual account total assets. Reinvested: Dividends are immediately used to buy additional shares (adjClose-based, the industry standard for total return). The wider the gap between the three lines, the easier it is to gauge the effectiveness of the dividend strategy.

Annual Return Comparison

ETF returns vs S&P 500 (SPY) by calendar year

RSPA S&P 500 (SPY)

+40%

−40%

+4%

2024

+12%

2025

+9%

2026 YTD

ℹ️ Returns from January 1 to December 31 of each year. The current year (2026) column is dimmed to indicate YTD (incomplete). If blue is higher than gray, the ETF outperformed the benchmark in that year.

Win rate vs S&P 500 (SPY)

—

Completed years: 2 — 3+ years of data are needed for a win rate to be shown.

2024 ✗

2025 ✗

2026 ✓ YTD

ℹ️ Number of winning years versus S&P 500 (SPY) within a completed calendar year (1/1–12/31). The current year (YTD) is reported separately.

Downside Capture

🛡️ 59%

Falls less than the benchmark in drawdowns — strong downside protection

<85% (Defend) 85~110% (Track) >110% (Lag)

ℹ️ Average % drop of this ETF when S&P 500 (SPY) is −1%. Based on daily returns over the past 3 years (only days where the benchmark is negative).

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade

Low Risk

Less volatile than the market average, making it relatively easy to hold over time.

Beta (market sensitivity)

평균권

0.56

If the market rises +10% +5.6%

If the market falls -10% -5.6%

My positionMid-range

Low range Average High range

ℹ️ A beta of 1.0 moves in line with the market. Above 1 means it moves more than the market; below 1 means less.

Average daily range (last 1 month)

하위 25%

±0.70%

S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more

Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)

ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.

Max Drawdown · Past 10 years

-15.4%

Drawdown duration: 4 months

2024-11-29 → 2025-04-08

Recovered in about 3 months

2024-07-17 Worst -8% 2026-07-01

ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.

Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)

0.71

Average — Moderate risk-adjusted returns

ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.

Estimated Monthly Maximum Loss (VaR 95%)

-3.8%

Historically, monthly losses exceeding this figure occurred only5%of the time.

ℹ️ A statistical estimate meaning "with 95% probability, monthly losses will not exceed this amount." The remaining 5% corresponds to crisis-level events such as financial crises or pandemics.

Dividend Analysis

Yield · Dividend history · After-tax income calculator

Dividend-paying ETF — 8.96% annually

An ETF that provides consistent dividend income.

ℹ️ This ETF is designed for dividend income. Distributions mainly come from dividends paid by its holdings, plus a small amount of interest, making them relatively stable.

배당수익률

8.96%

주당 배당

$4.80

연간 기준

5년 성장률

지급 주기

불규칙

1월 · 2월 · 3월 · 4월 · 8월 · 9월 · 10월 · 11월 · 12월

📊 총 이력 2024~2026 (21건)

연도별 배당 총액 추이

주당 배당금을 연 단위로 합산한 금액입니다. 막대가 우상향이면 매년 배당이 늘어나고 있다는 뜻입니다.

—

2021

—

2022

—

2023

$2.03

2024

$4.66 +129.4%

2025

$X.XX 그 해 총 배당금 +X% 전년 대비 증가 -X% 감소

최근 배당 이력 총 21건

아래로 스크롤하면 과거 배당 이력을 볼 수 있습니다.

배당락일

주당 금액

지급일

당시 수익률

2026-04-20

$0.404

—

9.83%

2026-03-23

$0.387

—

10.15%

2026-02-23

$0.411

—

9.67%

2026-01-20

$0.406

—

9.86%

2025-12-22

$0.399

—

9.84%

2025-11-24

$0.393

—

9.30%

2025-10-20

$0.392

—

10.00%

2025-09-22

$0.395

—

10.06%

2025-08-18

$0.387

—

10.19%

2025-07-21

$0.390

—

9.49%

2025-06-23

$0.382

—

8.83%

2025-05-19

$0.385

—

8.04%

2025-04-21

$0.361

—

7.88%

2025-03-24

$0.382

—

6.46%

2025-02-24

$0.396

—

5.56%

2025-01-21

$0.398

—

4.73%

2024-12-23

$0.393

—

4.02%

2024-11-18

$0.436

—

3.14%

2024-10-21

$0.408

—

2.32%

2024-09-23

$0.401

—

1.54%

2024-08-19

$0.393

—

0.78%

* "배당락일"은 배당받으려면 이 날 이전에 주식을 보유해야 하는 기준일입니다. 지급일·당시 수익률은 일부 종목에서 데이터가 없을 수 있습니다.

💰 내가 $100K 투자한다면

연간 배당금 (세후) $8K

5년 누적 (세후) $38K

* 환율 1 가정, 배당소득세 15% 반영. 5년 누적은 배당 성장률 연 0% 가정.

* Qualified dividend middle-bracket approximation. Actual rate varies by total income.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

Strengths and weaknesses both present Check the fit below to see whether it matches your investing goal.

🎯 목적별 적합도

내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.

🌳

장기 보유

수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때

보통

💵

배당 인컴

매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때

매우 적합

⚡

단기 트레이딩

며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매

매우 낮음

🧩

포트폴리오 보조

자산 배분·헤지 용도

보통

👤

이런 분에게 어울려요

Investors who want consistent dividend income

✅ 강점

💸Top 5% lowest expense ratio in US Equities - Quant Strat — 0.29% annually

⚠️ 약점·주의사항

⚠️Volatility is above average

Portfolio Composition

What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings

배당주 중심 포트폴리오

주로 배당을 꾸준히 지급하는 기업들로 구성되어 있어요.

ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?

ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.

🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기

총 보유종목

14개

상위 10개 비중

92.1%

최대 단일 종목

54.67%

집중도(HHI)

3180

높음 (집중)

⚠️ 소수 종목·섹터에 집중되어 있어, 해당 종목/섹터가 흔들리면 ETF 전체가 크게 영향을 받아요.

🥧 섹터 비중

Technology

21.2% -9%p

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%

Communication Services

5.5% -3%p

S&P 500보다 많이 투자 (+3%p 이상) S&P 500보다 적게 투자 (-3%p 이상)

📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 92.1% 차지

티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)

#1 - Invesco Premier U.S. Government Money Portfolio

54.67%

#2 NVDA NVIDIA Corp.

7.44%

#3 MSFT Microsoft Corp.

5.61%

#4 AAPL Apple Inc.

5.09%

#5 AMZN Amazon.com, Inc.

4.36%

#6 TSLA Tesla, Inc.

3.93%

#7 GOOGL Alphabet Inc.

3.18%

#8 AVGO Broadcom Inc.

3.03%

#9 - N/A

2.39%

#10 - N/A

2.39%

Category Peers

Category: US Equities - Quant Strat

같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 1/6위

카테고리: US Equities - Quant Strat

ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?

같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 RSPA보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 RSPA보다 불리를 뜻해요.

티커	ETF명	보수율	AUM	보유종목	배당률	YTD	1년
RSPA	Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF	0.29%	$1.0B	527	8.96%	+5.24%	+5.90%
QQQI	NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF	0.68% ▼	$13.3B ▲	106	14.50% ▲	-	-0.21% ▼
SPYI	NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF	0.68% ▼	$10.8B ▲	509	12.06% ▲	-	+2.43% ▼
ACYN	FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Income ETF	0.75% ▼	$1.3B ▲	7	2.64% ▼	-	-
ISPY	ProShares S&P 500 High Income ETF	0.56% ▼	$1.2B ▲	513	4.71% ▼	-	+8.77% ▲
IWMI	NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF	0.68% ▼	$1.1B ▲	4	13.76% ▲	-	+12.20% ▲

AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ RSPA보다 유리 · ▼ RSPA보다 불리

Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme

ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy

19 ETFs tracking the same theme as RSPA using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 8 · Inverse 3 · Covered Call 8)

Not direct derivatives of RSPA, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.

ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?

Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with RSPA, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.

⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding

Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.

📈 Leverage 8 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)