PSQA
Palmer Square CLO Senior Debt ETF
7월 28일 3:46 PM ET (한국 7/29 04:46)
$20.57
+0.02 ▲ +0.07%
🌙 7월 28일 5:05 PM ET (한국 7/29 06:05)
$20.57
+0.00 +0.00%
PSQA ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.
Total Expense Ratio
0.21%
Annual operating cost
Net Assets (AUM)
$147M
약 2019억원
Holdings
117 items
Dividend Yield
4.12%
Management Style
Passive
| Category | Bonds - Non Government Asset Backed Securities | Asset Type | Bonds | Return% 1Y | 5.38% | Total Holdings | 117 | Perf Week | 0.12% |
| ETF Type | US Bonds | Active/Passive | Passive | Return% 3Y | - | AUM | $147M | Perf Month | 0.81% |
| Expense | 0.21% | NAV | $20.54 | Return% 5Y | - | 52W High | -1.7% | Perf Quarter | -0.58% |
| Dividend TTM | $0.85 (4.12%) | Div Gr. 3/5Y | - | Return% 10Y | - | 52W Low | 3.34% | Perf Half Y | 0.47% |
| Flows% 1M | 2.82% | Flows% YTD | 103.09% | Return% SI | 5.55% | Volatility(W/M) | 0.24% 0.43% | Perf YTD | 0.96% |
| SMA20 | 0.23% | SMA50 | -0.03% | SMA200 | 0.28% | RSI (14) | 53.32 | Beta | 0.06 |
| IPO | 2024/9/12 | Prev Close | $20.55 | Perf Year | 1.11% | Avg Volume | 0.09M | Price | $20.57 |
Palmer Square CLO Senior Debt ETF (PSQA) Investment Analysis
ETF Overview
Palmer Square CLO Senior Debt ETF · Bonds - Non Government Asset Backed Securities
채권형 — 채권 ETF (만기 미상)
2024년 상장, 2년 운영 중.
Palmer Square CLO Senior Debt ETF는 Palmer Square CLO Senior Debt Index의 가격 및 수익률에 대체로 일치하는 투자 성과를 추구합니다. 지수는 발행 시점 주요 신용평가사 중 최소 하나로부터 AAA 또는 AA 등급을 받았거나 Palmer Square Capital Management가 동등한 등급으로 판단한, 미국에서 거래 가능한 CLO 채무에 대한 룰 기반 관측 가능 가격·총수익 지수입니다. 운용사는 지수 복제 전략을 사용합니다. 비분산형입니다.
📘 PSQA ETF 자세히 알아보기 →U.S.debtdebt-securitiesCLO
- 규모
- $147M 약 2019억원
- 운용사
- -
- 운용 방식
- 패시브 (지수 추종)
- 상장일
- 2024년
Cost Efficiency
Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact
Average expense ratio — 0.21% annually
Mid-range within the Bonds - Non Government Asset Backed Securities category.
Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)
평균권0.21%
My positionMid-range
Low range Average High range
Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount
$100.0M
Annual Expense Ratio
$210K
Save $120K per year vs. category average
Category Median Annual Cost
$330K
Based on expense ratio of 0.33%
10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)
$3.8M
4.0% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees
Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.
Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.
Cheaper alternatives in the same category
PAAA
PGIM AAA CLO ETF
0.19%
-0.02%p annually
ICLO
Invesco AAA CLO Floating Rate Note ETF
0.19%
-0.02%p annually
JAAA
Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF
0.20%
-0.01%p annually
* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.
Long-Term Performance
1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense
Insufficient return data
-12.4%p vs. benchmark (SPY) over 1Y.
ℹ️ The "1Y·3Y·5Y·10Y" periods below represent annualized returns (CAGR) measured backward from today. Example: "3Y +12%" means the investment grew at a compounded 12% per year over the past three years.
If you had invested 1 year(s) ago
$100.0M
Today's value
$105.4M
→
Total gain
+$5.4M
Annualized +5.4%
ℹ️ How to read the return breakdown bar
Each period bar shows the share of this ETF's returns by source.
Price gains Price decline Dividends received
Mostly blue (80%+): Growth-style — price gains drive most returns
Mostly orange (70%+): Income-style — dividends drive most returns (watch out for after-tax drag)
Red + orange: Stagnant or declining price — dividends offset losses (common in covered-call and high-dividend funds)
Mostly orange (70%+): Income-style — dividends drive most returns (watch out for after-tax drag)
Red + orange: Stagnant or declining price — dividends offset losses (common in covered-call and high-dividend funds)
1 Year
2025.07 ~ 2026.07
Annualized +5.38%
평균권Price +1.11% + Dividend +4.27% = Total +5.38%/yr
Trailed the benchmark by 12.4%p annually
My positionMid-range
Low range Average High range
3 Years
2023.07 ~ 2026.07
Listed 2024/9 — under 3 years
5 Years
2021.07 ~ 2026.07
Listed 2024/9 — under 5 years
10Y
2016.07 ~ 2026.07
Listed 2024/9 — under 10 years
2Y Cumulative Total Return Curve
2024-09-12 start, based on a 100M KRW base — read the curve values directly as units of 100M KRW (e.g., 308 → 3.08억 / 308M KRW). Both this ETF and the benchmark are rebased to 100 on the same start date for comparison.
PSQA · Price Only PSQA · Price + Cumulative Dividends PSQA · Dividend Reinvested S&P 500 (SPY)
100
150
ℹ️ Price Only: Excludes dividends and tracks pure stock price only. Covered-call and high-dividend ETFs often show a flat or declining line on this view, which is meaningful from a "principal preservation" standpoint. Price + Cumulative Dividend: Share count stays the same and received dividends are accumulated as cash. Closely matches your actual account total assets. Reinvested: Dividends are immediately used to buy additional shares (adjClose-based, the industry standard for total return). The wider the gap between the three lines, the easier it is to gauge the effectiveness of the dividend strategy.
Annual Return Comparison
ETF returns vs S&P 500 (SPY) by calendar year
PSQA S&P 500 (SPY)
+40%
0%
−40%
2024
2025
2026 YTD
💡 SPY is an equity benchmark, so direct comparison with different asset classes is for reference only.
ℹ️ Returns from January 1 to December 31 of each year. The current year (2026) column is dimmed to indicate YTD (incomplete). If blue is higher than gray, the ETF outperformed the benchmark in that year.
Win rate vs S&P 500 (SPY)
—
Completed years: 2 — 3+ years of data are needed for a win rate to be shown.
2024 ✗
2025 ✗
2026 ✗ YTD
💡 Win rates against SPY are for reference only, since the asset class differs.
ℹ️ Number of winning years versus S&P 500 (SPY) within a completed calendar year (1/1–12/31). The current year (YTD) is reported separately.
Downside Capture
2%
Falls less than the benchmark in drawdowns — strong downside protection
<85% (Defend) 85~110% (Track) >110% (Lag)
💡 Bonds often show negative correlation with equities, limiting how this metric should be interpreted.
ℹ️ Average % drop of this ETF when S&P 500 (SPY) is −1%. Based on daily returns over the past 3 years (only days where the benchmark is negative).
Risk Profile
Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History
Overall Risk Grade
Bond Benchmark
Bond ETFs are naturally less volatile than stocks, so it only makes sense to compare them with other bond ETFs. You should also factor in the inverse relationship between interest rates and bond prices.
🏦 Bond ETFs — Low volatility and low Beta are the norm
Bonds have far lower volatility than stocks, and a lower Beta versus equity benchmarks. An "stable" rating is the natural result; meaningful comparison should be made against bond indices (e.g., AGG/TLT).
Beta (market sensitivity)
평균권0.06
If the market rises +10% +0.6%
If the market falls -10% -0.6%
My positionMid-range
Low range Average High range
ℹ️ A beta of 1.0 moves in line with the market. Above 1 means it moves more than the market; below 1 means less.
Average daily range (last 1 month)
하위 25%±0.43%
S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more
Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)
ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.
Max Drawdown · Past 10 years
-1.6%
2024-09-12 Worst -5% 2026-07-01
ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.
Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)
0.86
Average — Moderate risk-adjusted returns
ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.
Dividend Analysis
Yield · Dividend history · After-tax income calculator
Bond distribution — 4.12% annually
Coupon interest is the primary source.
Bond ETF distributions are mostly coupon income. Distributions may rise when interest rates increase, but this should be considered alongside the resulting price decline.
배당수익률
4.12%
주당 배당
$0.85
연간 기준
5년 성장률
-
지급 주기
분기배당
3월 · 9월 · 12월
연도별 배당 총액 추이
주당 배당금을 연 단위로 합산한 금액입니다. 막대가 우상향이면 매년 배당이 늘어나고 있다는 뜻입니다.
—
2021
—
2022
—
2023
$0.29
2024
$0.91 +213.4%
2025
$X.XX 그 해 총 배당금 +X% 전년 대비 증가 -X% 감소
최근 배당 이력 총 6건
아래로 스크롤하면 과거 배당 이력을 볼 수 있습니다.
배당락일
주당 금액
지급일
당시 수익률
2026-03-25
$0.176
—
5.32%
2025-12-24
$0.235
—
5.87%
2025-09-24
$0.238
—
4.77%
2025-06-24
$0.230
—
3.61%
2025-03-25
$0.209
—
2.48%
2024-12-24
$0.291
—
1.45%
* "배당락일"은 배당받으려면 이 날 이전에 주식을 보유해야 하는 기준일입니다. 지급일·당시 수익률은 일부 종목에서 데이터가 없을 수 있습니다.
💰 내가 $100K 투자한다면
연간 배당금 (세후) $4K
5년 누적 (세후) $18K
* 환율 1 가정, 배당소득세 15% 반영. 5년 누적은 배당 성장률 연 0% 가정.
* Qualified dividend middle-bracket approximation. Actual rate varies by total income.
Overall investment appeal
What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile
Strengths and weaknesses both present Check the fit below to see whether it matches your investing goal.
🎯 목적별 적합도
내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.
낮음
적합
매우 낮음
매우 적합
이런 분에게 어울려요
Investors seeking portfolio stability
✅ 강점
뚜렷한 강점이 드러나지 않아요.
⚠️ 약점·주의사항
- ⚠️Volatility is above average
- 🎯Trails benchmark by -12.4%p annually
Category Peers
Category: Bonds - Non Government Asset Backed Securities
같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 4/6위
카테고리: Bonds - Non Government Asset Backed Securities
ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?
같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 PSQA보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 PSQA보다 불리를 뜻해요.
| 티커 | ETF명 | 보수율 | AUM | 보유종목 | 배당률 | YTD | 1년 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSQA | Palmer Square CLO Senior Debt ETF | 0.21% | $147M | 117 | 4.12% | +0.96% | +1.11% |
| Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF | 0.2% ▲ | $29.2B ▲ | 596 | 4.94% ▲ | - | -0.20% ▼ | |
| PGIM AAA CLO ETF | 0.19% ▲ | $11.2B ▲ | 318 | 4.83% ▲ | - | -0.02% ▼ | |
| Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF | 0.36% ▼ | $4.6B ▲ | 1151 | 4.45% ▲ | - | +0.74% ▼ | |
| iShares AAA CLO Active ETF | 0.2% ▲ | $2.2B ▲ | 411 | 4.89% ▲ | - | +0.11% ▼ | |
| VanEck CLO ETF | 0.36% ▼ | $1.5B ▲ | 183 | 5.26% ▲ | - | -0.08% ▼ |
AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ PSQA보다 유리 · ▼ PSQA보다 불리
Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme
ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy
1 ETFs tracking the same theme as PSQA using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 1)
Not direct derivatives of PSQA, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.
ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?
Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with PSQA, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.
⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding
Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.
Leverage 1 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)
FAQ
What kind of ETF is PSQA?
PSQA is an ETF in the Bonds - Non Government Asset Backed Securities category.
How many holdings does PSQA have?
PSQA holds a total of 117 securities, with an AUM of approximately $147M.
Does PSQA pay dividends (distributions)?
PSQA's distribution yield is approximately 4.12%.
What is the 52-week high and low for PSQA?
PSQA has recorded a 52-week high of $20.92 and a low of $19.90.
면책조항: 본 콘텐츠는 참고 자료이며 투자 권유가 아닙니다. 모든 투자의 책임은 투자자 본인에게 있습니다.