NBDS
Neuberger Disrupters ETF
7월 28일 10:53 AM ET (한국 7/28 23:53)
$38.02
-0.79 ▼ -2.03%
🌙 7월 28일 7:34 PM ET (한국 7/29 08:34)
$37.60
-0.42 ▼ -1.11%
NBDS ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.
Total Expense Ratio
0.4%
Annual operating cost
Net Assets (AUM)
$143M
약 1955억원
Holdings
33 items
Dividend Yield
-
Management Style
Active
| Category | Global or ExUS Equities - Factor & Thematic | Asset Type | Equities (Stocks) | Return% 1Y | 13.36% | Total Holdings | 33 | Perf Week | -6.25% |
| ETF Type | Global Equities | Active/Passive | Active | Return% 3Y | 17.67% | AUM | $143M | Perf Month | -5.7% |
| Expense | 0.4% | NAV | $38.79 | Return% 5Y | - | 52W High | -11.16% | Perf Quarter | 5.24% |
| Dividend TTM | - | Div Gr. 3/5Y | - | Return% 10Y | - | 52W Low | 29.24% | Perf Half Y | 6.65% |
| Flows% 1M | 12.88% | Flows% YTD | 503.42% | Return% SI | 11.73% | Volatility(W/M) | 1.17% 1.15% | Perf YTD | 7.24% |
| SMA20 | -6.04% | SMA50 | -5.54% | SMA200 | 5.33% | RSI (14) | 38.25 | Beta | 1.36 |
| IPO | 2022/4/7 | Prev Close | $38.81 | Perf Year | 9.01% | Avg Volume | 0.05M | Price | $38.02 |
Neuberger Disrupters ETF (NBDS) Investment Analysis
ETF Overview
Neuberger Disrupters ETF · Global or ExUS Equities - Factor & Thematic
액티브 운용 — 펀드매니저가 종목을 선별해 초과수익 추구
2022년 상장, 4년 운영 중.
Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF는 자본 성장을 목표로 합니다. 평상시 총자산의 최소 80%를 모든 시가총액의 파괴적 성장 어젠다를 추구하는 미국·해외(신흥국 포함) 기업이 발행한 주식 집중 포트폴리오에 투자합니다. 운용사는 "파괴자"를 기존 시장을 파괴하거나 새로운 시장을 창출하여 새로운 기회를 창출·추구하는 다양한 성장 단계의 기업으로 정의합니다. 비분산형 펀드입니다.
📘 NBDS ETF 자세히 알아보기 →Globalequityinnovationdisruptive
- 규모
- $143M 약 1955억원
- 운용사
- Neuberger Berman
- 운용 방식
- 액티브 (운용사 재량)
- 상장일
- 2022년
Cost Efficiency
Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact
Average expense ratio — 0.4% annually
Mid-range within the Global or ExUS Equities - Factor & Thematic category.
Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)
평균권0.4%
My positionMid-range
Low range Average High range
Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount
$100.0M
Annual Expense Ratio
$400K
Save $150K per year vs. category average
Category Median Annual Cost
$550K
Based on expense ratio of 0.55%
10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)
$7.2M
7.5% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees
Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.
Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.
Cheaper alternatives in the same category
KLMN
Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF
0.09%
-0.31%p annually
FINA
Fidelity MSCI North American Subset Index ETF
0.09%
-0.31%p annually
VSGX
Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF
0.10%
-0.30%p annually
* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.
Long-Term Performance
1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense
Insufficient return data
-4.4%p vs. benchmark (SPY) over 1Y.
ℹ️ The "1Y·3Y·5Y·10Y" periods below represent annualized returns (CAGR) measured backward from today. Example: "3Y +12%" means the investment grew at a compounded 12% per year over the past three years.
If you had invested 3 year(s) ago
$100.0M
Today's value
$162.9M
→
Total gain
+$62.9M
Annualized +17.7%
1 Year
2025.07 ~ 2026.07
Annualized +13.36%
평균권Trailed the benchmark by 4.4%p annually
My positionMid-range
Low range Average High range
3 Years
2023.07 ~ 2026.07
Annualized +17.67% Cumulative +62.9%
평균권Trailed the benchmark by 1.6%p annually
My positionMid-range
Low range Average High range
5 Years
2021.07 ~ 2026.07
Listed 2022/4 — under 5 years
10Y
2016.07 ~ 2026.07
Listed 2022/4 — under 10 years
4Y Cumulative Total Return Curve
2022-04-07 start, based on a 100M KRW base — read the curve values directly as units of 100M KRW (e.g., 308 → 3.08억 / 308M KRW). Both this ETF and the benchmark are rebased to 100 on the same start date for comparison.
NBDS · Price Only NBDS · Price + Cumulative Dividends NBDS · Dividend Reinvested S&P 500 (SPY)
50
100
150
200
ℹ️ Price Only: Excludes dividends and tracks pure stock price only. Covered-call and high-dividend ETFs often show a flat or declining line on this view, which is meaningful from a "principal preservation" standpoint. Price + Cumulative Dividend: Share count stays the same and received dividends are accumulated as cash. Closely matches your actual account total assets. Reinvested: Dividends are immediately used to buy additional shares (adjClose-based, the industry standard for total return). The wider the gap between the three lines, the easier it is to gauge the effectiveness of the dividend strategy.
Annual Return Comparison
ETF returns vs S&P 500 (SPY) by calendar year
NBDS S&P 500 (SPY)
+50%
0%
−50%
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026 YTD
ℹ️ Returns from January 1 to December 31 of each year. The current year (2026) column is dimmed to indicate YTD (incomplete). If blue is higher than gray, the ETF outperformed the benchmark in that year.
Win rate vs S&P 500 (SPY)
2 / 4Y
Roughly even with benchmark (50%)
+ 2026 YTD: Behind (7.0% vs 8.7%)
2022 ✗
2023 ✓
2024 ✗
2025 ✓
2026 ✗ YTD
ℹ️ Number of winning years versus S&P 500 (SPY) within a completed calendar year (1/1–12/31). The current year (YTD) is reported separately.
Downside Capture
168%
Falls more than the benchmark — vulnerable in drawdowns
<85% (Defend) 85~110% (Track) >110% (Lag)
ℹ️ Average % drop of this ETF when S&P 500 (SPY) is −1%. Based on daily returns over the past 3 years (only days where the benchmark is negative).
Risk Profile
Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History
Overall Risk Grade
Low Risk
Less volatile than the market average, making it relatively easy to hold over time.
Beta (market sensitivity)
하위 25%1.36
If the market rises +10% +13.6%
If the market falls -10% -13.6%
My positionBottom 25%
Low range Average High range
ℹ️ A beta of 1.0 moves in line with the market. Above 1 means it moves more than the market; below 1 means less.
Average daily range (last 1 month)
평균권±1.15%
S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more
Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)
ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.
Max Drawdown · Past 10 years
-29.8%
2022-04-07 Worst -26% 2026-07-01
ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.
Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)
0.29
Weak — Low risk-adjusted returns
ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.
Estimated Monthly Maximum Loss (VaR 95%)
-8.1%
Historically, monthly losses exceeding this figure occurred only5%of the time.
ℹ️ A statistical estimate meaning "with 95% probability, monthly losses will not exceed this amount." The remaining 5% corresponds to crisis-level events such as financial crises or pandemics.
Overall investment appeal
What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile
Strengths and weaknesses both present Check the fit below to see whether it matches your investing goal.
🎯 목적별 적합도
내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.
보통
낮음
낮음
낮음
이런 분에게 어울려요
Investors who believe in active strategies
✅ 강점
뚜렷한 강점이 드러나지 않아요.
⚠️ 약점·주의사항
- 🎯Trails benchmark by -4.4%p annually
Portfolio Composition
What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings
33개 종목에 넓게 분산
개별 종목 리스크가 분산되어 있어요.
ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?
ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.
🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기
총 보유종목
33개
상위 10개 비중
47.1%
최대 단일 종목
8.02%
집중도(HHI)
376
낮음 (분산)
🥧 섹터 비중
Technology 51.2%
Financial 7.8%
Consumer Cyclical 7.1%
Industrials 6.0%
Communication Services 5.1%
Healthcare 5.0%
Utilities 3.8%
📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 47.1% 차지
티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)
Category Peers
Category: Global or ExUS Equities - Factor & Thematic
같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 2/6위
카테고리: Global or ExUS Equities - Factor & Thematic
ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?
같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 NBDS보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 NBDS보다 불리를 뜻해요.
| 티커 | ETF명 | 보수율 | AUM | 보유종목 | 배당률 | YTD | 1년 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NBDS | Neuberger Disrupters ETF | 0.4% | $143M | 33 | - | +7.24% | +9.01% |
| AB Disruptors ETF | 0.65% ▼ | $3.0B ▲ | 124 | 0.10% | - | +32.38% ▲ | |
| First Eagle Overseas Equity ETF | 0.5% ▼ | $1.6B ▲ | 77 | 1.35% | - | +28.17% ▲ | |
| Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF | 0.85% ▼ | $1.5B ▲ | 49 | 0.82% | - | +21.34% ▲ | |
| American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF | 0.75% ▼ | $841M ▲ | 46 | 0.86% | - | +41.81% ▲ | |
| ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF | 0.39% ▲ | $424M ▲ | 311 | 3.04% | - | +36.82% ▲ |
AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ NBDS보다 유리 · ▼ NBDS보다 불리
Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme
ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy
3 ETFs tracking the same theme as NBDS using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 1 · Inverse 1 · Covered Call 1)
Not direct derivatives of NBDS, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.
ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?
Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with NBDS, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.
⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding
Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.
Leverage 1 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)
Inverse 1 ETFs that bet on declines in the same theme
Covered Call & Options 1 ETFs that add a monthly dividend via covered calls on the same theme
FAQ
What kind of ETF is NBDS?
NBDS is an ETF in the Global or ExUS Equities - Factor & Thematic category, managed by Neuberger Berman.
How many holdings does NBDS have?
NBDS holds a total of 33 securities, with an AUM of approximately $143M.
What is the 52-week high and low for NBDS?
NBDS has recorded a 52-week high of $42.80 and a low of $29.42.
면책조항: 본 콘텐츠는 참고 자료이며 투자 권유가 아닙니다. 모든 투자의 책임은 투자자 본인에게 있습니다.