프리마켓
로그인 회원가입
NA
NA
Nano Labs Ltd
7월 27일 4:00 PM ET (한국 7/28 05:00)
$1.87
-0.06 ▼ -3.11%
🌙 7월 28일 4:07 AM ET (한국 7/28 17:07)
$1.85
-0.02 ▼ -1.07%

나노랩스(NA) is a Technology sector company, analyzed across 14 metrics on this page including P/E, EPS, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

시황 · 실적발표 · 매수매도 신호, 가장 먼저 받아보세요 🔔 구독
시가총액
$43M
스몰캡
P/E
2.3
저평가 구간
배당수익률
없음
52주 위치
4%
저점 +18% · 고점 -77%
애널리스트
-
C+
Fundamental health
vs. Semiconductors
수익성
Top 20%
성장
Top 41%
밸류에이션
Top 81%
재무 안정
Top 48%
Index -P/E 2.32EPS (ttm) 0.81Insider Own 60.98%Shs Outstand 23.2MPerf Week 6.25%
Market Cap 0.04BForward P/E -EPS next Y -Insider Trans -0.17%Shs Float 9.1MPerf Month 5.65%
Enterprise Value 0.07BPEG -EPS next Q -Inst Own 26.49%Short Float 12.07%Perf Quarter -15.38%
Income 0.02BP/S 11.51EPS this Y -Inst Trans 140%Short Ratio 7.46Perf Half Y -49.73%
Sales 0.00BP/B 0.4EPS next 5Y -ROA 15.56%Short Interest 1.09MPerf YTD -40.63%
Book/sh 4.65P/C 8.41EPS past 3/5Y 29.79% -ROE 27.44%52W High -76.91% ($8.10)Perf Year -74.24%
Cash/sh 0.22P/FCF -Sales past 3/5Y -70.48% 64.9%ROIC 14.44%52W Low 18.35% ($1.58)Perf 3Y -86.64%
Dividend Est. -EV/EBITDA -EPS Y/Y TTM 140.16%Gross Margin -125.39%Volatility(W/M) 7.25% 8.29%Perf 5Y -
Dividend TTM -EV/Sales 18.8Sales Y/Y TTM -33.13%Oper. Margin -396.49%ATR (14) 0.17Perf 10Y -
Dividend Ex-Date -Quick Ratio 1.99EPS Q/Q -Profit Margin 504.86%RSI (14) 48.55Recom -
Dividend Gr. 3/5Y -Current Ratio 2.09Sales Q/Q -SMA20 1.04% ($1.85)Beta 2.85Target Price -
Payout -Debt/Eq 0.31Earnings 2026/3/30SMA50 -9.1% ($2.06)Rel Volume 0.18Prev Close $1.93
Employees 67LT Debt/Eq 0.23EPS/Sales Surpr. -SMA200 -39.37% ($3.08)Avg Volume(3M) 0.15MPrice $1.87
IPO 2022/7/12Option/Short Yes/YesTrades 602Volume 26,111Change -3.11%
Quarterly earnings trend Quarterly earnings data is not yet available — foreign-listed companies (ADRs) only file annual reports with the U.S., and recently listed companies may not have filed their first quarterly report.

📊 Nano Labs Ltd (NA) Investment Analysis

What kind of company is Nano Labs Ltd?

나노랩스(NA) 초고성장주
Technology · Semiconductors
Small-Cap — Low Volume, High Volatility

A fabless semiconductor design company specializing in high-performance computing (HPC) chips and hardware solutions for artificial intelligence (AI) and metaverse infrastructure. The company is leading the virtual asset mining and AI agent ecosystem through its proprietary 'Cuckoo' series chips and 'iPollo' brand.

Learn more about Nano Labs Ltd →
Market Cap
$0.0B
Approx. KRW 0.1 trillion
⚖️ 0% of Samsung Electronics
Market Cap Rank4988
Employees67people
IPO2022/07/12
Current Price$1.87 ≈ 2,562원
NASD · China

Key Events

⏰ Upcoming events
🔔 Earnings release
The next release date has not been announced yet.
🎯 Ex-dividend date
No scheduled dividends
📜 Recent events
🔔 Earnings release 2026년 3월 30일 (월) · 장 시작 전

Is it profitable?

Financially sound but profitability is low
Losses or thin margins — early-stage growth or weakening competitiveness
Profitability — How efficiently it makes money
Operating Margin
Profit kept from selling products and services (higher is better)
-396.5%
✓ 적자
💡 적자 상태 — 수익을 내지 못하고 있습니다
Net Margin
Share of revenue left after taxes and interest are paid
504.9%
✓ 우수
My positionTop 5%
Low range Average High range
Semiconductors Median 2.5% · Top tier
💡 일반적으로 8% 이상이면 양호, 15% 이상이면 우수
Gross Margin
Profit after subtracting raw-material costs only (signals product competitiveness)
-125.4%
✓ 매우 부진
My positionBottom 5%
Low range Average High range
Semiconductors Median 47.5% · Bottom tier
💡 제조업 30%, IT/소프트웨어 50% 이상이면 우수 (업종별 편차 큼)
ROE
Annual return earned on shareholders' equity (15%+ is strong)
27.4%
✓ 우수
My positionTop 5%
Low range Average High range
Technology 초소형주 Median -35.2% · Top tier
💡 일반적으로 15% 이상이면 우수 (단, 부채 레버리지 효과 주의)
ROA
Annual earnings relative to total company assets
15.6%
✓ 우수
My positionTop 5%
Low range Average High range
Technology 초소형주 Median -21.3% · Top tier
💡 일반적으로 5% 이상이면 양호, 10% 이상이면 우수
ROIC
Return generated per dollar invested in the business
14.4%
✓ 우수
My positionTop 5%
Low range Average High range
Technology 초소형주 Median -26.9% · Top tier
💡 자본비용(보통 8~10%)보다 높으면 가치 창출, 15% 이상이면 우수
Financial health — Debt & liquidity burden
Debt-to-Equity (D/E)
Debt relative to equity (lower is healthier)
0.31
✓ Healthy debt
My positionMid-range
Low range Average High range
Semiconductors Median 0.14
💡 일반적으로 1.0 이하면 건전, 1.5까지는 무난 (금융·유틸·REIT는 구조적으로 높음)
Current Ratio
Liquid assets available to cover liabilities due within a year
2.09
✓ 양호
My positionMid-range
Low range Average High range
Semiconductors Median 3.34
💡 1.5~3.0 적정, 1.0 미만이면 단기 유동성 주의
Quick Ratio
Liquid assets excluding inventory, available for immediate use
1.99
✓ 양호
My positionMid-range
Low range Average High range
Semiconductors Median 2.46
💡 1.0 이상이면 안전, 0.5 미만이면 주의
* Ratings reflect relative position vs. peer-group distribution (same sector & size) plus absolute guards (loss & risk thresholds).

What's the outlook?

Outlook data is insufficient

Analyst estimates and price targets have not been collected.

Did earnings meet expectations?

Insufficient historical earnings data

No analyzable past earnings releases have been collected yet.

Is it growing?

Average Growth
Mid-range within the industry
Healthy, Balanced Growth EPS and revenue are both growing steadily — a sustainable growth profile
📊 How much has it grown? (actual results)
Past 3-Year EPS
Actual average annual EPS growth over the past 3 years
+29.8%
양호
My positionMid-range
Low range Average High range
초고성장주 초소형주 Median 27.5% · Top 48%
Past 5-Year Revenue
How much revenue grew over the past 5 years
+64.9%
양호
My positionMid-range
Low range Average High range
초고성장주 초소형주 Median 47.0% · Top 34%
* Forecast values are analyst consensus estimates. Ratings are determined by relative position vs. peer group of the same growth style and size.

Has the stock risen over the long term?

Underperformed the market by 90%p over the past year
NA -74.2% · S&P 500 +16.0%
Excess return vs. market (price-based, ex-dividends)
1-year basis
vs S&P 500
-90.3%p
Significantly behind the market
vs Technology (XLK)
-107.3%p
Significantly behind the sector average
Rank among peers
1-year return Bottom 23% Based on 13 peers
Current position within 52-week range
Low (-18.4%p) High (-76.9%p)
Current price is 18.4% above the 52-week low and 76.9% below the 52-week high
Recent risk (last 120 trading days)
Max drawdown
-50.5%
Annualized volatility
96.6%

Technical Indicators

Bollinger Bands · MACD · RSI · Stochastics · Ichimoku 5-line · recent 136-day series

Price · Bollinger Bands · Ichimoku Cloud

  • close
  • BB Upper
  • BB Mid
  • BB Lower
  • Tenkan
  • Kijun
  • Cloud (SpanA/B)

Bollinger Bands are upper and lower channels showing the closing price range (20 days · 2σ). Touching the upper band = overheated; touching the lower band = oversold. Ichimoku Cloud shows trend direction and strength through colored areas. Prices above the cloud indicate an uptrend; prices below indicate a downtrend. About Bollinger Bands →

🟢
Current diagnosis · 2026-07-27
Uptrend zone

Current price $1.87 above the midline ($1.85). Normal upward flow. Below the Ichimoku cloud (bearish).

MACD (12 · 26 · 9) Expand ▼

An indicator that uses the difference between the short-term EMA (12) and long-term EMA (26) to identify trend reversals. When MACD rises above the Signal line, it is a buy signal (golden cross); when it falls below, it is a sell signal (death cross). About MACD →

🟡
Current diagnosis · 2026-07-27
Neutral zone — weak trend

MACD -0.038 · Signal -0.057 · Hist 0.019. Weak directional bias.

RSI(14) · Stochastics %K(14) Expand ▼

RSI measures short-term buying and selling pressure on a scale of 0–100. 30 or below = oversold (a rebound may be possible); 70 or above = overbought (a pullback may be possible). Stoch %K similarly measures short-term momentum strength. RSI · Learn more about Stochastics →

🔴
Current diagnosis · 2026-07-27
Bearish zone

RSI 48.8 (below the neutral level of 50). Selling pressure leads, indicating a weak trend. Stoch %K is also 33.3.

※ "Current diagnosis" is an automated interpretation based on standard thresholds and is for reference only. Make your own comprehensive judgment before trading.

Is it attractive at this price?

Cheaper than peers in its industry
Cheap on Vs. Earnings·Vs. Assets, In line with peers on Vs. Sales
💡 How to read this — Compare against peers in the same industry to see what the price is cheap or expensive relative to. Example: cheap vs. earnings = stock price is low relative to what the company earns; expensive vs. assets = stock price is high relative to assets on the balance sheet.
💵 Vs. Earnings Cheap
🏢 Vs. Assets Cheap
🧾 Vs. Sales Mid-range
💵 Vs. Earnings
PER Price-to-Earnings Ratio
How expensive the price is vs. earnings — lower is cheaper
2.32x
✓ Very cheap
My positionTop 5%
Low range Average High range
Semiconductors median 55.28x · Top 1% — relatively cheap within the industry
💡 PER 15 이하 저평가, 25 이상이면 성장성 검증 필요 (적자 기업은 의미 없음)
🏢 Vs. Assets
PBR Price-to-Book Ratio
Price vs. the company's asset value — below 1 trades cheaper than assets
0.40x
✓ Very cheap
My positionTop 5%
Low range Average High range
Semiconductors median 6.04x · Top 1% — relatively cheap within the industry
💡 PBR 1 미만이면 청산가치 이하 (금융·제조업에서 특히 의미, IT는 낮은 비중)
🧾 Vs. Sales
PSR Price-to-Sales Ratio
Market cap vs. revenue — lower is cheaper relative to sales
11.51x
✓ Fair
My positionMid-range
Low range Average High range
Semiconductors median 9.09x · Around the industry average
💡 PSR 2 이하 저평가, 10 초과면 고평가 (고성장 기업일 때만 정당화)
* Valuation is the stock's relative position within the industry peer group (same sector and market-cap range). Even when valuation looks attractive, check the 'Profitability' and 'Growth' sections too.
As of: Recent snapshot · Peer group: Semiconductors

Who owns it?

Ownership flow shows some pressure
Insider modest net selling -0.2% · Institutional net buying +140.0% · Short interest elevated 12.1% · Short interest up +8.4pp over last 90d
📈 Recent trading flow (6 months)
🧑‍💼 Insiders (executives & directors)
-0.2%
Insiders net selling
🏦 Institutions (funds & investors)
+140.0%
Institutions large net buying
💡 Net change over the past 6 months. Shows how much insiders and institutions increased or reduced their holdings, in %.
👥 Holdings composition
🏦 Institutions 26.5%
Moderate institutional participation
Technology 초소형주 Median 7.5%
🧑‍💼 Insiders 61.0%
Founder/management large holders (strong skin-in-the-game)
Technology 초소형주 Median 25.6%
👤 Retail investors (estimated) 12.5%
Everyone excluding institutions and insiders
Institutions Insiders Retail (est.)
📉 Short-selling metrics
Short ratio
12.1%
Somewhat high
Technology 초소형주 Median 3.1%
Past 90 days 📈 +8.4%p increase
Short interest days to cover
7.5 days
Days needed to close short positions using average trading volume
🧮 Share count
Total shares outstanding 23.2M주
Float (tradable shares) 9.1M주
* Insider/institutional flows are based on net changes over the past 6 months. Trend is cumulative over the past 90 days.

ETFs holding NA

ETFs with the highest weightings · 1 total shown
* Based on official quarterly filings. Latest disclosure; actual current weights may differ.

How much does it pay in dividends?

This company does not pay a dividend

It may be a growth-focused firm reinvesting profits into expansion. Consider this growth-stock profile when investing.

Compare Industry Peers

💡 vs. sector average ▲ Favorable / ▼ Unfavorable (Lower PER and PBR are better; higher ROE and dividend yield are better)
Sorted by market cap, largest first
StockMarket CapPERPBRROEDividend YieldChange
NA NA This Stock
$43.4M2.3 0.4 27.44% - -3.1%
AAPL
$4.95T40.8 46.4 141.47% 0.32% +1.2%
NVDA
$4.76T30.1 24.4 114.29% 0.33% -5.0%
MSFT
$2.89T23.2 7.0 34.01% 0.95% +1.9%
TSM
$2.07T28.8 11.2 40.06% 1.03% -1.1%
AVGO
$1.82T63.8 20.8 37.28% 0.68% +0.4%
Sector Avg-31.13.01.77%1.11%-
📊
See the market at a glance with a real-time dashboard Track premarket, regular, and after-hours quotes, screeners, and heatmaps on a single screen

Derivative ETFs for NA

Leveraged, inverse, and covered call ETFs based on the underlying asset

24 derivative ETFs based on NA (Leverage 8 · Inverse 8 · Covered Call 8)
These are based on the same underlying asset but carry a completely different risk and return profile. Please review the warning below first.
ℹ️ What is a Derivative ETF?
These are special ETFs that amplify, reverse, or monetize the price movement of an underlying ETF or security. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs target opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.
⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding
Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.
🧺
Deeper Analysis at the ETF Center ETF overlap, sector exposure, and X-Ray analysis tools

FAQ

What kind of company is 나노랩스(NA)?

나노랩스(NA) belongs to the Technology sector and operates in the Semiconductors industry.

What is the market cap of NA?

The market cap of NA is approximately $43M, ranking 4,988 within its sector.

What is the P/E ratio of NA?

NA has a P/E ratio of approximately 2.3x, which can be used to assess its valuation relative to the Technology sector average.

What is the 52-week high and low for NA?

NA has recorded a 52-week high of $8.10 and a low of $1.58.

시황 · 실적발표 · 매수매도 신호, 가장 먼저 받아보세요 🔔 구독

면책조항: 본 콘텐츠는 참고 자료이며 투자 권유가 아닙니다. 모든 투자의 책임은 투자자 본인에게 있습니다.