MRVU 주가 전망 및 ETF 분석 - 배당·운용보수·보유종목·NAV·RSI·MACD

MRVU

Direxion Daily MRVL Bull 2X ETF

7월 28일 4:00 PM ET (한국 7/29 05:00)

$72.77

-13.53 ▼ -15.68%

🌙 7월 28일 4:34 PM ET (한국 7/29 05:34)

$73.14

+0.37 ▲ +0.51%

MRVU ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

Total Expense Ratio

0.97%

Annual operating cost

Net Assets (AUM)

$99M

약 1356억원

Holdings

12 items

Dividend Yield

0.55%

Management Style

Active

Category ⓘ	Equity - Leveraged / Inverse	Asset Type ⓘ	Equities (Stocks)	Return% 1Y ⓘ	-	Total Holdings ⓘ	12	Perf Week ⓘ	-30.57%
ETF Type ⓘ	US Equities	Active/Passive ⓘ	Active	Return% 3Y ⓘ	-	AUM ⓘ	$99M	Perf Month ⓘ	-61%
Expense ⓘ	0.97%	NAV ⓘ	$86.10	Return% 5Y ⓘ	-	52W High ⓘ	-76.43%	Perf Quarter ⓘ	-12.27%
Dividend TTM ⓘ	$0.4 (0.55%)	Div Gr. 3/5Y ⓘ	-	Return% 10Y ⓘ	-	52W Low ⓘ	249.86%	Perf Half Y ⓘ	-
Flows% 1M ⓘ	-20.26%	Flows% YTD ⓘ	-	Return% SI ⓘ	1490.6%	Volatility(W/M) ⓘ	12.84% 14.87%	Perf YTD ⓘ	195.83%
SMA20 ⓘ	-41.04%	SMA50 ⓘ	-54.7%	SMA200 ⓘ	-25.48%	RSI (14) ⓘ	34.82	Beta ⓘ	-
IPO ⓘ	2026/2/11	Prev Close ⓘ	$86.3	Perf Year ⓘ	-	Avg Volume ⓘ	0.35M	Price ⓘ	$72.77

📊 Direxion Daily MRVL Bull 2X ETF (MRVU) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

Direxion Daily MRVL Bull 2X ETF · Equity - Leveraged / Inverse

레버리지형 — 지수의 2~3배 방향으로 추종 (단기 투자용 · 고위험)

Direxion Daily MRVL Bull 2X ETF는 운용 수수료 및 비용 차감 전 기준으로 Marvell Technology, Inc. 보통주 일일 가격 성과의 200%에 해당하는 일일 투자 성과를 목표로 하는 공격적 운용의 단일 종목 레버리지 ETF입니다. 선도 인프라 반도체 솔루션 설계사에 대한 단기 강세 견해를 증폭시키는 전술적 도구로, 파생상품을 활용하며 복리 및 레버리지 효과로 인해 적극적인 일일 모니터링이 필요합니다.

📘 MRVU ETF 자세히 알아보기 →

U.S.single-assetMRVLleverage

규모: $99M 약 1356억원
운용사: Direxion
운용 방식: 액티브 (운용사 재량)
상장일: 2026년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Average expense ratio — 0.97% annually

Mid-range within the Equity - Leveraged / Inverse category.

Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)

평균권

0.97%

My positionMid-range

Low range Average High range

Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount

$100.0M

Annual Expense Ratio

$970K

Same as category average

Category Median Annual Cost

$970K

Based on expense ratio of 0.97%

10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)

$17.1M

17.7% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees

💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Cheaper alternatives in the same category

TOPW

Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF

0.32%

-0.65%p annually

FNGU

MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs

0.35%

-0.62%p annually

SPDN

Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1X ETF

0.48%

-0.49%p annually

* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Insufficient return data

⚡ Leveraged ETF — beware of compounding decay over long holding periods

These ETFs aim to deliver 2–3× the daily return of the underlying index, but during sideways or volatile markets, compounding effects can cause long-term cumulative returns to diverge significantly from 2–3× the index. They are suited for short-term trading and are not appropriate as core holdings for long-term portfolios.

Insufficient return data

This ETF is either too recently listed or does not yet have enough disclosed return data. Please refer to ETFs that have been operating for more than one year.

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade

High Risk

These 2-3x leveraged products are structurally very volatile. Holding them long-term can erode your principal in ways that don't match expectations, so they're better suited for short-term trading.

⚡ Leveraged ETF — High Beta & Volatility Are by Design

A Beta of 2 or higher and volatility 2–3× the underlying index is by design. The "high volatility" reading below is a feature of the product, not a problem. However, long-term holding can lead to compounding decay and results that differ from expectations.

Average daily range (last 1 month)

하위 25%

±14.87%

S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more

Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)

ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.

Max Drawdown · Past 10 years

-75.4%

Drawdown duration: 2 months

2026-06-04 → 2026-07-28

Still recovering

2026-02-12 Worst -35% 2026-07-01

ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.

Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)

6.14

Excellent — Strong risk-adjusted returns

ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.

Dividend Analysis

Yield · Dividend history · After-tax income calculator

Leveraged ETF distribution — 0.55% annually

Its leveraged structure makes it unsuitable for long-term dividend investing.

ℹ️ Leveraged ETFs are not designed for dividend income. Even if they temporarily show a high yield, their structure makes them unsuitable for long-term dividend investing.

배당수익률

0.55%

주당 배당

$0.40

연간 기준

5년 성장률

지급 주기

연배당

3월

💰 내가 $100K 투자한다면

연간 배당금 (세후) $467

5년 누적 (세후) $2K

* 환율 1 가정, 배당소득세 15% 반영. 5년 누적은 배당 성장률 연 0% 가정.

* Qualified dividend middle-bracket approximation. Actual rate varies by total income.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

Designed for short-term trading Not recommended for long-term investing, but suitable for short-term trading and hedging.

⚠️ 2–3x leveraged product; not suitable for long-term holding. Use as a short-term trading tool only.

🎯 목적별 적합도

내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.

🌳

장기 보유

수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때

부적합

💵

배당 인컴

매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때

부적합

⚡

단기 트레이딩

며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매

매우 적합

🧩

포트폴리오 보조

자산 배분·헤지 용도

매우 낮음

👤

이런 분에게 어울려요

Short-term traders only

✅ 강점

뚜렷한 강점이 드러나지 않아요.

⚠️ 약점·주의사항

⚠️Volatility is above average
🎢Leveraged — compounding decay can produce results that differ from expectations over long holds

Portfolio Composition

What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings

파생상품 기반 ETF

실제 보유 종목이 일반 ETF와 다르게 스왑·선물 중심이에요.

ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?

ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.

🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기

총 보유종목

8개

상위 10개 비중

98.4%

최대 단일 종목

36.13%

집중도(HHI)

2251

높음 (집중)

⚠️ 소수 종목·섹터에 집중되어 있어, 해당 종목/섹터가 흔들리면 ETF 전체가 크게 영향을 받아요.

🥧 섹터 비중

Technology

16.4%

Financial

16.2%

📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 97.9% 차지

티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)

#1 - DREYFUS

36.13%

#2 MRVL Marvell Technology Inc

16.43%

GTOP GOLDMAN SACHS LIQ ES FD A

16.19%

#4 - DREYFUS GOVERNMENT CASH MANAGE

14.78%

#5 - GOLDMAN FINANCIAL

13.93%

#6 - N/A

0.90%

#7 - N/A

-0.22%

#8 - N/A

-0.28%

Category Peers

Category: Equity - Leveraged / Inverse

같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 6/6위

카테고리: Equity - Leveraged / Inverse

ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?

같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 MRVU보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 MRVU보다 불리를 뜻해요.

티커	ETF명	보수율	AUM	보유종목	배당률	YTD	1년
MRVU	Direxion Daily MRVL Bull 2X ETF	0.97%	$99M	12	0.55%	+195.83%	-
TQQQ	ProShares UltraPro QQQ 3x Shares	0.82% ▲	$31.8B ▲	130	0.61% ▲	-	+37.13%
SOXL	Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF	0.75% ▲	$18.8B ▲	45	0.01% ▼	-	+307.51%
QLD	ProShares Ultra QQQ 2x Shares	0.95% ▲	$12.5B ▲	128	0.14% ▼	-	+30.19%
SSO	ProShares Ultra S&P500 2x Shares	0.87% ▲	$7.7B ▲	523	0.69% ▲	-	+27.71%
SPXL	Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF	0.84% ▲	$6.5B ▲	516	0.54% ▼	-	+39.37%

AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ MRVU보다 유리 · ▼ MRVU보다 불리

Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme

ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy

24 ETFs tracking the same theme as MRVU using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 8 · Inverse 8 · Covered Call 8)

Not direct derivatives of MRVU, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.

ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?

Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with MRVU, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.

⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding

Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.

📈 Leverage 8 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)