MARS
Roundhill Space & Technology ETF
7월 28일 3:59 PM ET (한국 7/29 04:59)
$23.53
-0.31 ▼ -1.30%
🌙 7월 28일 7:42 PM ET (한국 7/29 08:42)
$23.55
+0.02 ▲ +0.08%
MARS ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.
Total Expense Ratio
0.75%
Annual operating cost
Net Assets (AUM)
$52M
약 714억원
Holdings
30 items
Dividend Yield
-
Management Style
Active
| Category | Global or ExUS Equities - Factor & Thematic | Asset Type | Equities (Stocks) | Return% 1Y | - | Total Holdings | 30 | Perf Week | -5.77% |
| ETF Type | Global Equities | Active/Passive | Active | Return% 3Y | - | AUM | $52M | Perf Month | -16.41% |
| Expense | 0.75% | NAV | $23.92 | Return% 5Y | - | 52W High | -48.76% | Perf Quarter | -22.09% |
| Dividend TTM | - | Div Gr. 3/5Y | - | Return% 10Y | - | 52W Low | 0.99% | Perf Half Y | - |
| Flows% 1M | -17.81% | Flows% YTD | - | Return% SI | -9.34% | Volatility(W/M) | 3.9% 4.47% | Perf YTD | -7.65% |
| SMA20 | -12.52% | SMA50 | -27.15% | SMA200 | -23.38% | RSI (14) | 30.66 | Beta | - |
| IPO | 2026/3/5 | Prev Close | $23.84 | Perf Year | - | Avg Volume | 0.17M | Price | $23.53 |
Roundhill Space & Technology ETF (MARS) Investment Analysis
ETF Overview
Roundhill Space & Technology ETF · Global or ExUS Equities - Factor & Thematic
테크 섹터 — 기술 섹터 ETF (소프트웨어·반도체·하드웨어)
Roundhill Space & Technology ETF는 글로벌 우주 경제에 '퓨어플레이' 노출을 제공하도록 설계된 액티브 운용 ETF입니다. 2026년 3월 출시되었으며, 위성통신, 로켓 발사 서비스, 우주 기반 데이터 등 저궤도 및 그 너머의 상업화 확대에서 수혜를 받을 우주 가치사슬 전반의 기업을 대상으로 합니다.
📘 MARS ETF 자세히 알아보기 →Globalequityaerospace-defensecommunication-services
- 규모
- $52M 약 714억원
- 운용사
- Roundhill
- 운용 방식
- 액티브 (운용사 재량)
- 상장일
- 2026년
Cost Efficiency
Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact
Above-average cost — 0.75% annually
Expense ratio is higher than the Global or ExUS Equities - Factor & Thematic median. Compare against similar ETFs.
Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)
하위 25%0.75%
My positionBottom 25%
Low range Average High range
Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount
$100.0M
Annual Expense Ratio
$750K
Pay $200K more per year vs. category average
Category Median Annual Cost
$550K
Based on expense ratio of 0.55%
10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)
$13.4M
13.8% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees
Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.
Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.
Cheaper alternatives in the same category
KLMN
Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF
0.09%
-0.66%p annually
FINA
Fidelity MSCI North American Subset Index ETF
0.09%
-0.66%p annually
VSGX
Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF
0.10%
-0.65%p annually
* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.
Long-Term Performance
1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense
Insufficient return data
Insufficient return data
This ETF is either too recently listed or does not yet have enough disclosed return data. Please refer to ETFs that have been operating for more than one year.
Risk Profile
Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History
Overall Risk Grade
Low Risk
Less volatile than the market average, making it relatively easy to hold over time.
Average daily range (last 1 month)
하위 5%±4.47%
S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more
Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)
ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.
Max Drawdown · Past 10 years
-48.5%
2026-03-05 Worst -31% 2026-07-01
ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.
Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)
-0.23
Poor — Underperforms the risk-free rate
ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.
Overall investment appeal
What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile
Strengths and weaknesses both present Check the fit below to see whether it matches your investing goal.
🎯 목적별 적합도
내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.
낮음
매우 낮음
매우 낮음
낮음
이런 분에게 어울려요
Long-term and recurring investors
✅ 강점
뚜렷한 강점이 드러나지 않아요.
⚠️ 약점·주의사항
- 💸Expense ratio is somewhat high — 0.75% annually
- ⚠️Very high volatility — invest only with capital you can hold for the long term
Portfolio Composition
What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings
128개 종목에 넓게 분산
개별 종목 리스크가 분산되어 있어요.
ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?
ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.
🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기
총 보유종목
128개
상위 10개 비중
52.4%
최대 단일 종목
11.98%
집중도(HHI)
423
낮음 (분산)
⚠️ 소수 종목·섹터에 집중되어 있어, 해당 종목/섹터가 흔들리면 ETF 전체가 크게 영향을 받아요.
🥧 섹터 비중
Technology 30.9%
Consumer Cyclical 14.7%
Communication Services 13.9%
Healthcare 8.7%
Industrials 8.1%
Financial 2.4%
Consumer Defensive 1.0%
Energy 0.7%
Basic Materials 0.5%
Real Estate 0.1%
📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 52.4% 차지
티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)
Category Peers
Category: Global or ExUS Equities - Factor & Thematic
같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 4/6위
카테고리: Global or ExUS Equities - Factor & Thematic
ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?
같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 MARS보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 MARS보다 불리를 뜻해요.
| 티커 | ETF명 | 보수율 | AUM | 보유종목 | 배당률 | YTD | 1년 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARS | Roundhill Space & Technology ETF | 0.75% | $52M | 30 | - | -7.65% | - |
| iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF | 0.55% ▲ | $12.7B ▲ | 56 | 1.49% | - | +29.86% | |
| Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 0.68% ▲ | $9.3B ▲ | 91 | 0.08% | - | +27.40% | |
| iShares Future AI & Tech ETF | 0.47% ▲ | $3.5B ▲ | 66 | 0.07% | - | +46.97% | |
| Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 0.75% | $1.8B ▲ | 48 | 2.15% | - | +52.42% | |
| Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | 0.75% | $1.5B ▲ | 45 | 0.75% | - | +54.79% |
AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ MARS보다 유리 · ▼ MARS보다 불리
Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme
ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy
4 ETFs tracking the same theme as MARS using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 3 · Covered Call 1)
Not direct derivatives of MARS, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.
ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?
Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with MARS, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.
⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding
Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.
Leverage 3 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)
Covered Call & Options 1 ETFs that add a monthly dividend via covered calls on the same theme
FAQ
What kind of ETF is MARS?
MARS is an ETF in the Global or ExUS Equities - Factor & Thematic category, managed by Roundhill.
How many holdings does MARS have?
MARS holds a total of 30 securities, with an AUM of approximately $52M.
What is the 52-week high and low for MARS?
MARS has recorded a 52-week high of $45.92 and a low of $23.30.
면책조항: 본 콘텐츠는 참고 자료이며 투자 권유가 아닙니다. 모든 투자의 책임은 투자자 본인에게 있습니다.