LEND
SEI High Yield Bond & Alternative Credit ETF
7월 28일 1:22 PM ET (한국 7/29 02:22)
$25.04
-0.01 ▼ -0.02%
LEND ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.
Total Expense Ratio
0.65%
Annual operating cost
Net Assets (AUM)
$1.0B
약 1조원
Holdings
1397 items
Dividend Yield
0.98%
Management Style
Active
| Category | Bonds - Broad Market | Asset Type | Bonds | Return% 1Y | - | Total Holdings | 1397 | Perf Week | -0.12% |
| ETF Type | US Bonds | Active/Passive | Active | Return% 3Y | - | AUM | $1.0B | Perf Month | -0.38% |
| Expense | 0.65% | NAV | $24.88 | Return% 5Y | - | 52W High | -0.99% | Perf Quarter | - |
| Dividend TTM | $0.24 (0.98%) | Div Gr. 3/5Y | - | Return% 10Y | - | 52W Low | 0.6% | Perf Half Y | - |
| Flows% 1M | 0.55% | Flows% YTD | -0.38% | Return% SI | 4.67% | Volatility(W/M) | 0.34% 0.34% | Perf YTD | -0.4% |
| SMA20 | -0.04% | SMA50 | -0.22% | SMA200 | -0.22% | RSI (14) | 47.95 | Beta | - |
| IPO | 2026/5/18 | Prev Close | $25.05 | Perf Year | - | Avg Volume | 0.07M | Price | $25.04 |
SEI High Yield Bond & Alternative Credit ETF (LEND) Investment Analysis
ETF Overview
SEI High Yield Bond & Alternative Credit ETF · Bonds - Broad Market
채권형 — 채권 ETF (만기 미상)
U.S.fixed-incomebondsCLO
- 규모
- $1.0B 약 1조원
- 운용사
- -
- 운용 방식
- 액티브 (운용사 재량)
- 상장일
- 2026년
Cost Efficiency
Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact
Above-average cost — 0.65% annually
Expense ratio is higher than the Bonds - Broad Market median. Compare against similar ETFs.
Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)
하위 25%0.65%
My positionBottom 25%
Low range Average High range
Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount
$100.0M
Annual Expense Ratio
$650K
Pay $290K more per year vs. category average
Category Median Annual Cost
$360K
Based on expense ratio of 0.36%
10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)
$11.6M
12.0% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees
Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.
Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.
Cheaper alternatives in the same category
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
0.03%
-0.62%p annually
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
0.03%
-0.62%p annually
BSV
Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF
0.03%
-0.62%p annually
* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.
Long-Term Performance
1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense
Insufficient return data
Insufficient return data
This ETF is either too recently listed or does not yet have enough disclosed return data. Please refer to ETFs that have been operating for more than one year.
Risk Profile
Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History
Overall Risk Grade
Bond Benchmark
Bond ETFs are naturally less volatile than stocks, so it only makes sense to compare them with other bond ETFs. You should also factor in the inverse relationship between interest rates and bond prices.
🏦 Bond ETFs — Low volatility and low Beta are the norm
Bonds have far lower volatility than stocks, and a lower Beta versus equity benchmarks. An "stable" rating is the natural result; meaningful comparison should be made against bond indices (e.g., AGG/TLT).
Average daily range (last 1 month)
하위 25%±0.34%
S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more
Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)
ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.
Max Drawdown · Past 10 years
-66.2%
2019-05-08 Worst -64% 2026-07-01
ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.
Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)
-0.04
Poor — Underperforms the risk-free rate
ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.
Estimated Monthly Maximum Loss (VaR 95%)
-16.4%
Historically, monthly losses exceeding this figure occurred only5%of the time.
ℹ️ A statistical estimate meaning "with 95% probability, monthly losses will not exceed this amount." The remaining 5% corresponds to crisis-level events such as financial crises or pandemics.
Dividend Analysis
Yield · Dividend history · After-tax income calculator
Bond distribution — 0.98% annually
Coupon interest is the primary source.
Bond ETF distributions are mostly coupon income. Distributions may rise when interest rates increase, but this should be considered alongside the resulting price decline.
배당수익률
0.98%
주당 배당
$0.24
연간 기준
5년 성장률
-
지급 주기
—
최근 12개월 기준
💰 내가 $100K 투자한다면
연간 배당금 (세후) $815
5년 누적 (세후) $4K
* 환율 1 가정, 배당소득세 15% 반영. 5년 누적은 배당 성장률 연 0% 가정.
* Qualified dividend middle-bracket approximation. Actual rate varies by total income.
Overall investment appeal
What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile
Strengths and weaknesses both present Check the fit below to see whether it matches your investing goal.
🎯 목적별 적합도
내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.
낮음
보통
매우 낮음
매우 적합
이런 분에게 어울려요
Investors seeking portfolio stability
✅ 강점
뚜렷한 강점이 드러나지 않아요.
⚠️ 약점·주의사항
- 💸Expense ratio is somewhat high — 0.65% annually
- ⚠️Volatility is above average
Portfolio Composition
What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings
채권 포트폴리오
주식과 달리 "섹터 = 만기·신용등급"으로 해석해야 해요.
ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?
ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.
🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기
총 보유종목
7개
상위 10개 비중
56.0%
최대 단일 종목
14.01%
집중도(HHI)
557
보통
⚠️ 소수 종목·섹터에 집중되어 있어, 해당 종목/섹터가 흔들리면 ETF 전체가 크게 영향을 받아요.
Category Peers
Category: Bonds - Broad Market
같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 6/6위
카테고리: Bonds - Broad Market
ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?
같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 LEND보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 LEND보다 불리를 뜻해요.
| 티커 | ETF명 | 보수율 | AUM | 보유종목 | 배당률 | YTD | 1년 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEND | SEI High Yield Bond & Alternative Credit ETF | 0.65% | $1.0B | 1397 | 0.98% | -0.40% | - |
| Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 0.03% ▲ | $160.5B ▲ | 17416 | 4.01% ▲ | - | -0.90% | |
| iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.03% ▲ | $137.5B ▲ | 13300 | 4.03% ▲ | - | -0.77% | |
| Vanguard Total International Bond ETF | 0.07% ▲ | $82.4B ▲ | 6833 | 4.52% ▲ | - | -2.70% | |
| Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF | 0.03% ▲ | $45.3B ▲ | 3201 | 4.02% ▲ | - | -1.15% | |
| iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF | 0.06% ▲ | $43.0B ▲ | 18030 | 4.28% ▲ | - | -0.85% |
AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ LEND보다 유리 · ▼ LEND보다 불리
Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme
ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy
9 ETFs tracking the same theme as LEND using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 2 · Inverse 3 · Covered Call 4)
Not direct derivatives of LEND, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.
ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?
Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with LEND, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.
⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding
Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.
Leverage 2 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)
Inverse 3 ETFs that bet on declines in the same theme
Covered Call & Options 4 ETFs that add a monthly dividend via covered calls on the same theme
FAQ
What kind of ETF is LEND?
LEND is an ETF in the Bonds - Broad Market category.
How many holdings does LEND have?
LEND holds a total of 1,397 securities, with an AUM of approximately $1.0B.
Does LEND pay dividends (distributions)?
LEND's distribution yield is approximately 0.98%.
What is the 52-week high and low for LEND?
LEND has recorded a 52-week high of $25.29 and a low of $24.89.
면책조항: 본 콘텐츠는 참고 자료이며 투자 권유가 아닙니다. 모든 투자의 책임은 투자자 본인에게 있습니다.