KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
7월 28일 1:13 PM ET (한국 7/29 02:13)
$27.00
+0.71 ▲ +2.70%
KWEB ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.
Total Expense Ratio
0.7%
Annual operating cost
Net Assets (AUM)
$5.2B
약 7조원
Holdings
34 items
Dividend Yield
7.76%
Management Style
Passive
| Category | Global or ExUS Equities - Industry Sector | Asset Type | Equities (Stocks) | Return% 1Y | -24.74% | Total Holdings | 34 | Perf Week | -1.6% |
| ETF Type | Global Ex. US Equities | Active/Passive | Passive | Return% 3Y | 1.23% | AUM | $5.2B | Perf Month | 14.26% |
| Expense | 0.7% | NAV | $26.28 | Return% 5Y | -13.84% | 52W High | -37.74% | Perf Quarter | -6.35% |
| Dividend TTM | $2.1 (7.76%) | Div Gr. 3/5Y | - 59.04% | Return% 10Y | -1.2% | 52W Low | 16.23% | Perf Half Y | -24.79% |
| Flows% 1M | -4.01% | Flows% YTD | -13.9% | Return% SI | 1.36% | Volatility(W/M) | 1.4% 1.72% | Perf YTD | -20.7% |
| SMA20 | 3.17% | SMA50 | 2.25% | SMA200 | -16.12% | RSI (14) | 56.11 | Beta | 0.37 |
| IPO | 2013/8/1 | Prev Close | $26.29 | Perf Year | -25.64% | Avg Volume | 25.14M | Price | $27 |
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) Investment Analysis
ETF Overview
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF · Global or ExUS Equities - Industry Sector
신흥국형 — 중국·인도·베트남 등 신흥국 주식
2013년 상장, 13년 운영 중.
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF는 CSI Overseas China Internet 지수의 가격 및 수익률 성과와 대체로 일치하는 투자 성과를 목표로 합니다. 순자산의 최소 80%를 기초 지수 구성 상품 또는 유사한 경제적 특성의 상품에 투자합니다. 지수는 지수 제공자가 판단한 중국 본토 외 상장 기업 중 주 사업이 인터넷·인터넷 관련 섹터인 투자 가능 공개 거래 "중국 기반 기업"의 주식시장 성과를 측정하도록 설계되었습니다. 비분산형 펀드입니다.
📘 KWEB ETF 자세히 알아보기 →Chinaequitytechnologyinternet
- 규모
- $5.2B 약 7조원
- 운용사
- KraneShares
- 운용 방식
- 패시브 (지수 추종)
- 상장일
- 2013년
Cost Efficiency
Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact
Above-average cost — 0.7% annually
Expense ratio is higher than the Global or ExUS Equities - Industry Sector median. Compare against similar ETFs.
Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)
하위 25%0.7%
My positionBottom 25%
Low range Average High range
Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount
$100.0M
Annual Expense Ratio
$700K
Pay $120K more per year vs. category average
Category Median Annual Cost
$580K
Based on expense ratio of 0.58%
10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)
$12.5M
12.9% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees
Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.
Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.
Cheaper alternatives in the same category
HAUZ
Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF
0.10%
-0.60%p annually
VNQI
Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF
0.12%
-0.58%p annually
PBPH
Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF
0.13%
-0.57%p annually
* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.
Long-Term Performance
1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense
Lower-tier returns in its category
Long-term returns trail the category average by a wide margin.-42.5%p vs. benchmark (SPY) over 1Y.
ℹ️ The "1Y·3Y·5Y·10Y" periods below represent annualized returns (CAGR) measured backward from today. Example: "3Y +12%" means the investment grew at a compounded 12% per year over the past three years.
If you had invested 10 year(s) ago
$100.0M
Today's value
$88.6M
→
Total loss
$-11,372,307
Annualized -1.2%
ℹ️ How to read the return breakdown bar
Each period bar shows the share of this ETF's returns by source.
Price gains Price decline Dividends received
Mostly blue (80%+): Growth-style — price gains drive most returns
Mostly orange (70%+): Income-style — dividends drive most returns (watch out for after-tax drag)
Red + orange: Stagnant or declining price — dividends offset losses (common in covered-call and high-dividend funds)
Mostly orange (70%+): Income-style — dividends drive most returns (watch out for after-tax drag)
Red + orange: Stagnant or declining price — dividends offset losses (common in covered-call and high-dividend funds)
1 Year
2025.07 ~ 2026.07
Annualized -24.74%
하위 5%Price -25.64% + Dividend +0.90% = Total -24.74%/yr
Trailed the benchmark by 42.5%p annually
My positionBottom 5%
Low range Average High range
3 Years
2023.07 ~ 2026.07
Annualized +1.23% Cumulative +3.7%
하위 25%Price -2.87% + Dividend +4.10% = Total +1.23%/yr
Trailed the benchmark by 17.8%p annually
My positionBottom 25%
Low range Average High range
5 Years
2021.07 ~ 2026.07
Annualized -13.84% Cumulative -52.5%
하위 5%Price -9.44% + Dividend -4.40% = Total -13.84%/yr
Trailed the benchmark by 26.7%p annually
My positionBottom 5%
Low range Average High range
10Y
2016.07 ~ 2026.07
Annualized -1.20% Cumulative -11.4%
하위 5%Price -1.64% + Dividend +0.44% = Total -1.20%/yr
Trailed the benchmark by 16.1%p annually
My positionBottom 5%
Low range Average High range
10Y Cumulative Total Return Curve
2016-07-28 start, based on a 100M KRW base — read the curve values directly as units of 100M KRW (e.g., 308 → 3.08억 / 308M KRW). Both this ETF and the benchmark are rebased to 100 on the same start date for comparison.
KWEB · Price Only KWEB · Price + Cumulative Dividends KWEB · Dividend Reinvested S&P 500 (SPY)
50
150
250
350
450
ℹ️ Price Only: Excludes dividends and tracks pure stock price only. Covered-call and high-dividend ETFs often show a flat or declining line on this view, which is meaningful from a "principal preservation" standpoint. Price + Cumulative Dividend: Share count stays the same and received dividends are accumulated as cash. Closely matches your actual account total assets. Reinvested: Dividends are immediately used to buy additional shares (adjClose-based, the industry standard for total return). The wider the gap between the three lines, the easier it is to gauge the effectiveness of the dividend strategy.
Annual Return Comparison
ETF returns vs S&P 500 (SPY) by calendar year
KWEB S&P 500 (SPY)
+70%
0%
−70%
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026 YTD
ℹ️ Returns from January 1 to December 31 of each year. The current year (2026) column is dimmed to indicate YTD (incomplete). If blue is higher than gray, the ETF outperformed the benchmark in that year.
Win rate vs S&P 500 (SPY)
4 / 9Y
Roughly even with benchmark (44%)
+ 2026 YTD: Behind (-24.2% vs 8.5%)
2017 ✓
2018 ✗
2019 ✗
2020 ✓
2021 ✗
2022 ✓
2023 ✗
2024 ✗
2025 ✓
2026 ✗ YTD
ℹ️ Number of winning years versus S&P 500 (SPY) within a completed calendar year (1/1–12/31). The current year (YTD) is reported separately.
Downside Capture
111%
Falls more than the benchmark — vulnerable in drawdowns
<85% (Defend) 85~110% (Track) >110% (Lag)
ℹ️ Average % drop of this ETF when S&P 500 (SPY) is −1%. Based on daily returns over the past 3 years (only days where the benchmark is negative).
Risk Profile
Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History
Overall Risk Grade
Moderate Risk
Volatility is around market average. Be prepared for losses of roughly -30% to -40% in major downturns.
Beta (market sensitivity)
상위 25%0.37
If the market rises +10% +3.7%
If the market falls -10% -3.7%
My positionTop 25%
Low range Average High range
ℹ️ A beta of 1.0 moves in line with the market. Above 1 means it moves more than the market; below 1 means less.
Average daily range (last 1 month)
평균권±1.72%
S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more
Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)
ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.
Max Drawdown · Past 10 years
-80.9%
2015-07-31 Worst -79% 2026-07-01
ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.
Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)
-0.09
Poor — Underperforms the risk-free rate
ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.
Estimated Monthly Maximum Loss (VaR 95%)
-15.6%
Historically, monthly losses exceeding this figure occurred only5%of the time.
ℹ️ A statistical estimate meaning "with 95% probability, monthly losses will not exceed this amount." The remaining 5% corresponds to crisis-level events such as financial crises or pandemics.
Dividend Analysis
Yield · Dividend history · After-tax income calculator
Dividend-paying ETF — 7.76% annually
An ETF that provides consistent dividend income.5-year dividend growth rate: +59.0%.
배당수익률
7.76%
주당 배당
$2.10
연간 기준
5년 성장률
59.0%
지급 주기
연배당
12월
연도별 배당 총액 추이
주당 배당금을 연 단위로 합산한 금액입니다. 막대가 우상향이면 매년 배당이 늘어나고 있다는 뜻입니다.
$0.18 -38.8%
2015
$0.41 +132.6%
2016
$0.34 -18.4%
2017
$1.27 +277.2%
2018
$0.04 -96.8%
2019
$0.22 +439.0%
2020
$2.58 +1067.4%
2021
$0.46 -82.1%
2023
$1.02 +122.3%
2024
$2.10 +104.5%
2025
$X.XX 그 해 총 배당금 +X% 전년 대비 증가 -X% 감소
최근 배당 이력 총 14건
아래로 스크롤하면 과거 배당 이력을 볼 수 있습니다.
배당락일
주당 금액
지급일
당시 수익률
2025-12-22
$2.10
—
6.03%
2024-12-17
$1.02
—
4.88%
2023-12-27
$0.042
—
1.78%
2023-12-18
$0.419
—
1.58%
2021-12-29
$2.58
—
8.22%
2020-12-29
$0.221
—
0.30%
2019-12-27
$0.041
—
0.08%
2018-12-26
$1.27
—
3.35%
2017-12-19
$0.338
—
1.29%
2016-12-20
$0.414
—
1.35%
2015-12-28
$0.056
—
0.46%
2015-06-25
$0.122
—
0.97%
2014-06-25
$0.291
—
1.11%
2013-12-26
$0.104
—
0.32%
* "배당락일"은 배당받으려면 이 날 이전에 주식을 보유해야 하는 기준일입니다. 지급일·당시 수익률은 일부 종목에서 데이터가 없을 수 있습니다.
💰 내가 $100K 투자한다면
연간 배당금 (세후) $7K
5년 누적 (세후) $103K
* 환율 1 가정, 배당소득세 15% 반영. 5년 누적은 배당 성장률 연 59.04% 가정.
* Qualified dividend middle-bracket approximation. Actual rate varies by total income.
Overall investment appeal
What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile
Warrants a closer look Several metrics show warning signs. Compare it with similar ETFs before deciding.
🎯 목적별 적합도
내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.
적합
보통
낮음
보통
이런 분에게 어울려요
Emerging-market growth investors
✅ 강점
뚜렷한 강점이 드러나지 않아요.
⚠️ 약점·주의사항
- 💸Expense ratio is somewhat high — 0.7% annually
- 📈Long-term returns are well below peers
- 🎯Trails benchmark by -26.7%p annually
Portfolio Composition
What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings
33개 종목으로 구성
상위 섹터는 Consumer Cyclical (18%)
ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?
ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.
🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기
총 보유종목
33개
상위 10개 비중
62.2%
최대 단일 종목
10.09%
집중도(HHI)
534
보통
⚠️ 소수 종목·섹터에 집중되어 있어, 해당 종목/섹터가 흔들리면 ETF 전체가 크게 영향을 받아요.
🥧 섹터 비중
Consumer Cyclical 18.4%
Communication Services 9.1%
Real Estate 4.3%
Financial 2.7%
📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 62.2% 차지
티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)
#1 - Tencent Holdings Limited 10.09%
#4 - MEITUAN 7.36%
#9 - JD Health International Inc 4.01%
Category Peers
Category: Global or ExUS Equities - Industry Sector
같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 1/6위 · 보수율 4/6위
카테고리: Global or ExUS Equities - Industry Sector
ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?
같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 KWEB보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 KWEB보다 불리를 뜻해요.
| 티커 | ETF명 | 보수율 | AUM | 보유종목 | 배당률 | YTD | 1년 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KWEB | KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | 0.7% | $5.2B | 34 | 7.76% | -20.70% | -25.64% |
| Invesco China Technology ETF | 0.65% ▲ | $3.0B ▼ | 187 | 2.20% ▼ | - | +7.35% ▲ | |
| EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | 0.86% ▼ | $259M ▼ | 58 | 3.76% ▼ | - | -21.07% ▲ | |
| Columbia India Consumer ETF | 0.75% ▼ | $223M ▼ | 32 | - | - | -4.05% ▲ | |
| Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.65% ▲ | $125M ▼ | 60 | 1.61% ▼ | - | -20.40% ▲ | |
| KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF | 0.65% ▲ | $98M ▼ | 53 | 4.12% ▼ | - | -8.70% ▲ |
AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ KWEB보다 유리 · ▼ KWEB보다 불리
Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme
ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy
12 ETFs tracking the same theme as KWEB using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 8 · Inverse 3 · Covered Call 1)
Not direct derivatives of KWEB, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.
ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?
Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with KWEB, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.
⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding
Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.
Leverage 8 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)
YINN
Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X ETF
+5.92%
$656M
CWEB
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2X ETF
+5.52%
$217M
BABX
GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF
+4.93%
$92M
CHAU
Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2X ETF
+2.39%
$90M
XPP
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 2x Shares
+3.85%
$9M
BABU
Direxion Daily BABA Bull 2X ETF
+5.00%
$6M
NIOG
Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF
+6.23%
$4M
XPEG
Leverage Shares 2X Long XPEV Daily ETF
+7.16%
Inverse 3 ETFs that bet on declines in the same theme
Covered Call & Options 1 ETFs that add a monthly dividend via covered calls on the same theme
FAQ
What kind of ETF is KWEB?
KWEB is an ETF in the Global or ExUS Equities - Industry Sector category, managed by KraneShares.
How many holdings does KWEB have?
KWEB holds a total of 34 securities, with an AUM of approximately $5.2B.
Does KWEB pay dividends (distributions)?
KWEB's distribution yield is approximately 7.76%.
What is the 52-week high and low for KWEB?
KWEB has recorded a 52-week high of $43.37 and a low of $23.23.
면책조항: 본 콘텐츠는 참고 자료이며 투자 권유가 아닙니다. 모든 투자의 책임은 투자자 본인에게 있습니다.