JEDI 주가 전망 및 ETF 분석 - 배당·운용보수·보유종목·NAV·RSI·MACD

JEDI

Defiance Drone and Modern Warfare ETF

7월 28일 4:00 PM ET (한국 7/29 05:00)

$24.04

-0.61 ▼ -2.47%

🌙 7월 28일 4:45 PM ET (한국 7/29 05:45)

$24.04

+0.00 +0.00%

JEDI ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

Total Expense Ratio

0.69%

Annual operating cost

Net Assets (AUM)

$138M

약 1896억원

Holdings

44 items

Dividend Yield

Management Style

Passive

Category ⓘ	Global or ExUS Equities - Industry Sector	Asset Type ⓘ	Equities (Stocks)	Return% 1Y ⓘ	-	Total Holdings ⓘ	44	Perf Week ⓘ	-4.15%
ETF Type ⓘ	Global Equities	Active/Passive ⓘ	Passive	Return% 3Y ⓘ	-	AUM ⓘ	$138M	Perf Month ⓘ	-8.38%
Expense ⓘ	0.69%	NAV ⓘ	$24.60	Return% 5Y ⓘ	-	52W High ⓘ	-44.08%	Perf Quarter ⓘ	-15.5%
Dividend TTM ⓘ	-	Div Gr. 3/5Y ⓘ	-	Return% 10Y ⓘ	-	52W Low ⓘ	9.72%	Perf Half Y ⓘ	-16.21%
Flows% 1M ⓘ	7.49%	Flows% YTD ⓘ	-	Return% SI ⓘ	-2.66%	Volatility(W/M) ⓘ	4.46% 4.82%	Perf YTD ⓘ	-0.95%
SMA20 ⓘ	-6.23%	SMA50 ⓘ	-19.94%	SMA200 ⓘ	-12.05%	RSI (14) ⓘ	39.3	Beta ⓘ	-
IPO ⓘ	2025/9/26	Prev Close ⓘ	$24.65	Perf Year ⓘ	-	Avg Volume ⓘ	0.23M	Price ⓘ	$24.04

📊 Defiance Drone and Modern Warfare ETF (JEDI) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

Defiance Drone and Modern Warfare ETF · Global or ExUS Equities - Industry Sector

일반 ETF — 카테고리 기반 분석만 제공됩니다

2025년 상장, 1년 운영 중.

Defiance Drone and Modern Warfare ETF는 수수료 차감 전 기준으로 BITA Drone & Modern Warfare Select 지수("지수")의 총수익 성과를 추종합니다. 패시브 운용(지수 추종) 방식을 채택합니다. 지수는 선진국 글로벌 거래소에 공개 상장되어 현대전(modern warfare) 산업에서 상당한 매출을 창출하는 기업의 성과를 추종하도록 설계되었습니다. 비분산형 펀드입니다.

📘 JEDI ETF 자세히 알아보기 →

Globalequityaerospace-defensedrones

규모: $138M 약 1896억원
운용사: Defiance
운용 방식: 패시브 (지수 추종)
상장일: 2025년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Average expense ratio — 0.69% annually

Mid-range within the Global or ExUS Equities - Industry Sector category.

Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)

평균권

0.69%

My positionMid-range

Low range Average High range

Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount

$100.0M

Annual Expense Ratio

$690K

Pay $110K more per year vs. category average

Category Median Annual Cost

$580K

Based on expense ratio of 0.58%

10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)

$12.3M

12.7% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees

💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Cheaper alternatives in the same category

HAUZ

Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF

0.10%

-0.59%p annually

VNQI

Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF

0.12%

-0.57%p annually

PBPH

Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF

0.13%

-0.56%p annually

* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Insufficient return data

This ETF is either too recently listed or does not yet have enough disclosed return data. Please refer to ETFs that have been operating for more than one year.

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade

Low Risk

Less volatile than the market average, making it relatively easy to hold over time.

Average daily range (last 1 month)

하위 5%

±4.82%

S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more

Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)

ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.

Max Drawdown · Past 10 years

-45.4%

Drawdown duration: 2 months

2026-05-28 → 2026-07-17

Still recovering

2025-09-26 Worst -32% 2026-07-01

ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.

Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)

-0.16

Poor — Underperforms the risk-free rate

ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

Strengths and weaknesses both present Check the fit below to see whether it matches your investing goal.

🎯 목적별 적합도

내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.

🌳

장기 보유

수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때

낮음

💵

배당 인컴

매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때

매우 낮음

⚡

단기 트레이딩

며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매

매우 낮음

🧩

포트폴리오 보조

자산 배분·헤지 용도

낮음

👤

이런 분에게 어울려요

Long-term and recurring investors

✅ 강점

뚜렷한 강점이 드러나지 않아요.

⚠️ 약점·주의사항

⚠️Very high volatility — invest only with capital you can hold for the long term

Portfolio Composition

What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings

43개 종목에 넓게 분산

개별 종목 리스크가 분산되어 있어요.

ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?

ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.

🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기

총 보유종목

43개

상위 10개 비중

58.7%

최대 단일 종목

9.09%

집중도(HHI)

439

낮음 (분산)

⚠️ 소수 종목·섹터에 집중되어 있어, 해당 종목/섹터가 흔들리면 ETF 전체가 크게 영향을 받아요.

🥧 섹터 비중

Industrials

40.2%

Technology

26.6%

Communication Services

1.4%

📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 58.6% 차지

티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)

RDW Redwire Corp

9.09%

ONDS Ondas Inc

8.24%

UMAC Unusual Machines Inc /US

6.83%

RCAT Red Cat Holdings Inc

6.75%

LUNR Intuitive Machines Inc

5.72%

AI C3.ai Inc

5.03%

ACHR Archer Aviation Inc

4.97%

ASTS AST SpaceMobile Inc

4.47%

AVAV AeroVironment Inc

3.80%

#10 RKLB Rocket Lab Corp

3.75%

Category Peers

Category: Global or ExUS Equities - Industry Sector

같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 5/6위

카테고리: Global or ExUS Equities - Industry Sector

ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?

같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 JEDI보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 JEDI보다 불리를 뜻해요.

티커	ETF명	보수율	AUM	보유종목	배당률	YTD	1년
JEDI	Defiance Drone and Modern Warfare ETF	0.69%	$138M	44	-	-0.95%	-
PPH	VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF	0.36% ▲	$967M ▲	26	1.91%	-	+28.40%
TRFK	Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF	0.49% ▲	$948M ▲	94	0.01%	-	+36.07%
NXTG	First Trust Indxx NextG ETF	0.7% ▼	$539M ▲	107	1.28%	-	+48.33%
ECON	Columbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETF	0.47% ▲	$331M ▲	367	1.48%	-	+33.69%
WQTM	WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund	0.45% ▲	$290M ▲	46	-	-	-

AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ JEDI보다 유리 · ▼ JEDI보다 불리

Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme

ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy

4 ETFs tracking the same theme as JEDI using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 3 · Covered Call 1)

Not direct derivatives of JEDI, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.

ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?

Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with JEDI, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.

⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding

Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.

📈 Leverage 3 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)