JA
Janus Henderson AA-A CLO ETF
7월 28일 3:59 PM ET (한국 7/29 04:59)
$50.22
-0.01 ▼ -0.01%
🌙 7월 28일 4:15 PM ET (한국 7/29 05:15)
$50.23
+0.00 +0.00%
JA ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.
Total Expense Ratio
0.29%
Annual operating cost
Net Assets (AUM)
$145M
약 1993억원
Holdings
46 items
Dividend Yield
1.71%
Management Style
Active
| Category | Bonds - Non Government Asset Backed Securities | Asset Type | Bonds | Return% 1Y | - | Total Holdings | 46 | Perf Week | 0.03% |
| ETF Type | US Bonds | Active/Passive | Active | Return% 3Y | - | AUM | $145M | Perf Month | -0.01% |
| Expense | 0.29% | NAV | $50.17 | Return% 5Y | - | 52W High | -0.05% | Perf Quarter | 0.55% |
| Dividend TTM | $0.86 (1.71%) | Div Gr. 3/5Y | - | Return% 10Y | - | 52W Low | 0.75% | Perf Half Y | - |
| Flows% 1M | - | Flows% YTD | 44.9% | Return% SI | 4.84% | Volatility(W/M) | 0.05% 0.06% | Perf YTD | 0.32% |
| SMA20 | 0.15% | SMA50 | 0.12% | SMA200 | 0.21% | RSI (14) | 58.03 | Beta | - |
| IPO | 2026/2/19 | Prev Close | $50.23 | Perf Year | - | Avg Volume | 0.02M | Price | $50.22 |
Janus Henderson AA-A CLO ETF (JA) Investment Analysis
ETF Overview
Janus Henderson AA-A CLO ETF · Bonds - Non Government Asset Backed Securities
채권형 — 채권 ETF (만기 미상)
Janus Henderson AA-A CLO ETF는 매수 시점에 AA 및 A 등급을 받은 고품질 대출채권담보부증권(CLO)에 대한 노출을 제공하는 액티브 운용 펀드입니다. 글로벌 구조화 상품 팀의 철저한 위탁 운용사 실사와 포트폴리오 구성을 통해, 전통적인 채권 시장과의 상관관계를 낮추고 변동성을 억제하면서 일관된 위험 조정 수익과 경상 수익을 제공하는 것을 목표로 합니다.
📘 JA ETF 자세히 알아보기 →U.S.debtdebt-securitiesCLO
- 규모
- $145M 약 1993억원
- 운용사
- Janus Henderson
- 운용 방식
- 액티브 (운용사 재량)
- 상장일
- 2026년
Cost Efficiency
Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact
Average expense ratio — 0.29% annually
Mid-range within the Bonds - Non Government Asset Backed Securities category.
Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)
평균권0.29%
My positionMid-range
Low range Average High range
Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount
$100.0M
Annual Expense Ratio
$290K
Save $40K per year vs. category average
Category Median Annual Cost
$330K
Based on expense ratio of 0.33%
10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)
$5.3M
5.4% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees
Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.
Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.
Cheaper alternatives in the same category
PAAA
PGIM AAA CLO ETF
0.19%
-0.10%p annually
ICLO
Invesco AAA CLO Floating Rate Note ETF
0.19%
-0.10%p annually
JAAA
Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF
0.20%
-0.09%p annually
* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.
Long-Term Performance
1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense
Insufficient return data
Insufficient return data
This ETF is either too recently listed or does not yet have enough disclosed return data. Please refer to ETFs that have been operating for more than one year.
Risk Profile
Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History
Overall Risk Grade
Bond Benchmark
Bond ETFs are naturally less volatile than stocks, so it only makes sense to compare them with other bond ETFs. You should also factor in the inverse relationship between interest rates and bond prices.
🏦 Bond ETFs — Low volatility and low Beta are the norm
Bonds have far lower volatility than stocks, and a lower Beta versus equity benchmarks. An "stable" rating is the natural result; meaningful comparison should be made against bond indices (e.g., AGG/TLT).
Average daily range (last 1 month)
평균권±0.06%
S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more
Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)
ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.
Max Drawdown · Past 10 years
-0.5%
2026-02-19 Worst -5% 2026-07-01
ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.
Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)
-0.08
Poor — Underperforms the risk-free rate
ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.
Dividend Analysis
Yield · Dividend history · After-tax income calculator
Bond distribution — 1.71% annually
Coupon interest is the primary source.
Bond ETF distributions are mostly coupon income. Distributions may rise when interest rates increase, but this should be considered alongside the resulting price decline.
배당수익률
1.71%
주당 배당
$0.86
연간 기준
5년 성장률
-
지급 주기
연배당
3월
💰 내가 $100K 투자한다면
연간 배당금 (세후) $1K
5년 누적 (세후) $7K
* 환율 1 가정, 배당소득세 15% 반영. 5년 누적은 배당 성장률 연 0% 가정.
* Qualified dividend middle-bracket approximation. Actual rate varies by total income.
Overall investment appeal
What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile
An average ETF No standout strengths or weaknesses — pretty run-of-the-mill.
🎯 목적별 적합도
내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.
보통
적합
매우 낮음
매우 적합
이런 분에게 어울려요
Investors seeking portfolio stability
✅ 강점
뚜렷한 강점이 드러나지 않아요.
⚠️ 약점·주의사항
특별한 약점이 보이지 않아요.
Portfolio Composition
What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings
채권 포트폴리오
주식과 달리 "섹터 = 만기·신용등급"으로 해석해야 해요.
ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?
ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.
🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기
총 보유종목
10개
상위 10개 비중
94.1%
최대 단일 종목
55.81%
집중도(HHI)
3772
높음 (집중)
⚠️ 소수 종목·섹터에 집중되어 있어, 해당 종목/섹터가 흔들리면 ETF 전체가 크게 영향을 받아요.
📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 94.1% 차지
티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)
#3 - BANKSAFE TOEWS MONEY MARKET 16.05%
#4 - CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE 0.73%
#5 - CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE 0.57%
#6 - CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE 0.44%
#7 - CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE 0.41%
#8 - OPTION ISSUER 0.06%
#9 - OPTION ISSUER 0.04%
#10 - OPTION ISSUER 0.04%
Category Peers
Category: Bonds - Non Government Asset Backed Securities
같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 4/6위
카테고리: Bonds - Non Government Asset Backed Securities
ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?
같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 JA보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 JA보다 불리를 뜻해요.
| 티커 | ETF명 | 보수율 | AUM | 보유종목 | 배당률 | YTD | 1년 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JA | Janus Henderson AA-A CLO ETF | 0.29% | $145M | 46 | 1.71% | +0.32% | - |
| Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF | 0.2% ▲ | $29.2B ▲ | 596 | 4.94% ▲ | - | -0.20% | |
| PGIM AAA CLO ETF | 0.19% ▲ | $11.2B ▲ | 318 | 4.83% ▲ | - | -0.02% | |
| Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF | 0.36% ▼ | $4.6B ▲ | 1151 | 4.45% ▲ | - | +0.74% | |
| iShares AAA CLO Active ETF | 0.2% ▲ | $2.2B ▲ | 411 | 4.89% ▲ | - | +0.11% | |
| VanEck CLO ETF | 0.36% ▼ | $1.5B ▲ | 183 | 5.26% ▲ | - | -0.08% |
AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ JA보다 유리 · ▼ JA보다 불리
Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme
ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy
1 ETFs tracking the same theme as JA using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 1)
Not direct derivatives of JA, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.
ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?
Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with JA, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.
⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding
Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.
Leverage 1 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)
FAQ
What kind of ETF is JA?
JA is an ETF in the Bonds - Non Government Asset Backed Securities category, managed by Janus Henderson.
How many holdings does JA have?
JA holds a total of 46 securities, with an AUM of approximately $145M.
Does JA pay dividends (distributions)?
JA's distribution yield is approximately 1.71%.
What is the 52-week high and low for JA?
JA has recorded a 52-week high of $50.25 and a low of $49.85.
면책조항: 본 콘텐츠는 참고 자료이며 투자 권유가 아닙니다. 모든 투자의 책임은 투자자 본인에게 있습니다.